
Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds' 'SNL50' appearance could 'undercut any claim for emotional distress': expert
Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds' public appearance at "SNL50" could "undercut any claim for emotional distress damages" in their ongoing legal battle against Justin Baldoni.
Lively sued her "It Ends With Us" co-star for sexual harassment, retaliation and more in December, months after the film premiered. The actress claimed Baldoni's behavior caused emotional distress in a federal lawsuit filed in January.
The couple's appearance on "Saturday Night Live" could hurt and help them, legal experts told Fox News Digital.
"It could potentially affect them in the sense that they are out in public and clearly enjoying themselves, which would undercut any claim for emotional distress damages related to Blake's sexual harassment claim," Camron Dowlatshahi, a partner at MSD Lawyers said. "Typically, people who are severely distressed from sexual harassment are in therapy and trying to avoid publicly discussing and making light of their pending legal matter."
Reynolds seemingly poked fun at his and his wife's legal situation and the surrounding media frenzy as Tina Fey and Amy Poehler took the stage at Sunday's 50th anniversary celebration. The "SNL" alums spotted Reynolds in the crowd and asked, "How's it going?"
Reynolds quickly responded, "Great, why? What have you heard?"
The seeming reference to the lawsuits and "It Ends With Us" drama with Baldoni appeared to catch Lively off guard as she looked at her husband with a confused look on her face.
Fox News Digital reached out to representatives for Lively and Reynolds for comment.
While the couple received some hate online, accusing them of trying to manipulate "the public into buying the 'I'm just a nice, funny guy' act" and saying the "SNL" moment was "cringe," Dowlatshahi explained to Fox News Digital that the move "humanizes" the Hollywood couple.
"It certainly humanizes Reynolds and Lively to have them out, showing their personalities that for years endeared them to fans. This is yet another indication that the couple (and Baldoni, of course) care more about their image and how the public views them, than underlying legal claims."
Doug Eldridge, founder of Achilles PR, told Fox News Digital the "presumption" is that the couple is doing damage control.
"Anytime you have this sort of divisive, public falling out—especially when one or both parties have a devoted following and a high Q-score—you often see a two-pronged, tactical approach… it's really the 'hokey pokey' of manipulating the court of public opinion: make yourself the victim, make someone else the bad guy, and in a near-simultaneous step, double down on how/why the public should like you. It's playing to both sides of the public sentiment and conscience: empathy and relatability," Eldridge said. "That's not to say the couple are following this script, but it's certainly been followed by others and there are some data points to indicate a similar trend line in this case."
Eldridge said Lively and Reynolds likely attended the "SNL" event because it was "a star-studded, who's who of Hollywood dignitaries and celebrated iconic show alums from various decades. It was bound to get wall-to-wall coverage—and presumably positive reviews—so, on the surface, it seemed like a safe calculation."
However, he said Reynolds' one-liner during the show "might prove to be another question all together."
"Their PR team might have been in favor of the move, but their legal team probably had a white-knuckled, four-lettered, response to the decision – much less, the subsequent public response," he said.
In December, Lively detailed allegations of sexual harassment, retaliation, intentional affliction of emotional distress, negligence and more against Baldoni and film producer Jamey Heath in a complaint first filed with the California Civil Rights department and later in federal court.
Baldoni, in his own lawsuit filed in January, insisted that Lively had "falsely" accused him in an attempt to repair her reputation after the fallout of the movie's press tour after the actress took control of the film. Baldoni's legal team claimed Lively had no evidence of a deliberate smear campaign and instead worked to repair her reputation by accusing the actor and others of sexual harassment.
Amid the legal back-and-forth, Lively and Reynolds "need to be visible and likable." The "best thing" the A-list celebrity couple can do is "continue pursuing their careers."
"The legal case will continue until it's eventually resolved, but their brands have already been damaged by all the press surrounding the lawsuit, so they do need to be visible and likable because hiding and avoiding the public is not a good option," entertainment and media law attorney Tre Lovell told Fox News Digital.
"Attending SNL50 was a good idea and they both should make more appearances like that," the founder of The Lovell Firm explained. "The most important thing is to be humble, respond to any questions about the lawsuit in the vein of they respect the process and are letting it play out. In the meantime, they want people to know that their fans have not been forgotten, and the duo looks forward to many more years of moviemaking and entertaining the public."
The legal battle continued last week as Lively and Baldoni showed no signs of settling their respective lawsuits.
Legal teams for both sides told Judge Lewis Liman that "settlement discussions would be premature," according to a joint letter filed in court and obtained by Fox News Digital. The letter also noted that "the parties agree that mediation and the Discovery Protocols… are inappropriate for this case."
The federal judge agreed with the "It Ends With Us" stars and granted the order on Feb. 13.
Lively and Reynolds are also planning to file a motion to dismiss Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit. The deadline for the couple's legal team to file the dismissal motion is March 20.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce spotted at Harry's Bar and Restaurant in Florida, photos show
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce spotted at Harry's Bar and Restaurant in Florida, photos show How long have Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce of Kansas City Chiefs been dating? Relationship was confirmed at 'Saturday Night Live' afterparty in 2023. NFL star Travis Kelce and his global popstar girlfriend Taylor Swift were spotted May 23 while out to dinner at Harry's Bar and Restaurant in West Palm Beach, Florida. Kelce, a tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, is currently renting a multimillion-dollar mansion in Boca Raton for the summer not far from one of the gyms he frequents, Johnny O's Gymnasium. The "Florida!!!" singer has reportedly joined him, and the couple was previously seen at the Royal Palm Yacht and Country Club in Palm Beach County. Fans snapped pictures and videos of the famous power couple as they dined at Harry's and as they left the restaurant. Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce tracker: When and where celebrity sightings occurred in Florida Does Travis Kelce, boyfriend of Taylor Swift, have a house in Florida? No, Travis Kelce does not own a home in Florida. However, he is currently spending the offseason in an estimated $20 million Boca Raton house, according to reports from Athlon Sports and the Daily Mail. According to Boca News Now, Kelce's world-famous Grammy-winning girlfriend Taylor Swift has joined him. The news outlet reported on Saturday, May 17, that it 'ignored rumors a few weeks ago that Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift were seen walking the streets of Royal Palm Yacht and Country Club with a security entourage.' Where were Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift spotted in Florida? Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce were spotted Friday, May 23, dining at Harry's Bar and Restaurant in West Palm Beach, Florida. Kelce is currently staying in nearby Boca Raton for the NFL offseason, where Swift has reportedly joined him. What is Harry's Bar and Restaurant in West Palm Beach, Florida? A Wall Street-area institution, Harry's was founded by pioneering New York restaurateur Harry Poulakakos in 1972. Decades later, Harry's Restaurant Group, now led by son Peter Poulakakos, has opened not one but two restaurants in West Palm Beach, Florida. The swanky Harry's bar and restaurant and sibling Adrienne's Pizzabar account for some 11,000 square feet of indoor and outdoor space at The Square, the restaurants' only presence outside of New York. Harry's made its debut here on June 6, 2023. Harry's is at 384 S. Rosemary Ave., West Palm Beach, 561-834-5010, Are Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift still together? Yes! Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift are still together. The couple has kept a relatively low profile since Kelce's Super Bowl LIX loss, but they are 'still very much together,' sources told Us Weekly in April. How long have Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce been together? Travis Kelce attended Taylor Swift's Eras Tour in July 2023 at the GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City, Missouri, his home stadium during the season. On his joint podcast "New Heights" with brother and former Philadelphia Eagles center Jason Kelce, he revealed he wanted to give Swift a friendship bracelet, a staple practice of her concerts, with his phone number on it. Months later, Swift went on to attend her first Kansas City Chiefs game in September 2023. The relationship was publicly confirmed in October 2023, when Kelce and Swift were seen hand in hand arriving at a "Saturday Night Live" afterparty in New York City, New York. What are other celebrity hotspots in Palm Beach County? Celebrities have popped up at hot spots all over Palm Beach County. Here are a few: NBA legend Michael Jordan parties at Mary Lou's in West Palm Beach Gordon Ramsay at Benny's on The Beach in Lake Worth Beach Guy Fieri at Roccos Tacos in Boca Raton Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in Wellington Wayne Gretzky and Sly Stallone at Pig Beach BBQ in West Palm Beach Contributing: Diamond Walker, Palm Beach Post
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘The White Lotus' star Aimee Lou Wood on the social media drama: ‘It's been scary, overwhelming, and difficult'
The past two months have been quite the roller-coaster for Aimee Lou Wood. She'd barely had a moment to process the fallout from the season finale of The White Lotus, which claimed the life of her fatally doomed character Chelsea, before she got caught up in a swirl about an insensitive Saturday Night Live sketch. And then there was "The Great Unfollowing," the social media obsession about why her White Lotus costar Walton Goggins was no longer tracking her Instagram posts. More from GoldDerby 'Feel good about not conforming': Christina Ricci reflects on her iconic roles, from Wednesday Addams to Misty Quigley 'The show is a true fluke': '100 Foot Wave' executive producer on how they chase big waves across the globe Damian Lewis on returning to 'Wolf Hall': 'Who doesn't want to play Henry VIII?' "I've never experienced anything like this before, so I'm kind of learning along the way," Woods tells Gold Derby. "But the wake of it has been a lot." Here, she reveals how she's learned to deal with the impact of her newfound notoriety, the advice costar Parker Posey gave her, and why she always knew that Chelsea was going to die. Gold Derby: I feel like you've lived two lives — the show life and then the post-show life. Aimee Lou Wood: That is so weird that you say that because I've just been talking about that. It's felt like two chapters of a very complex, amazing, confronting, challenging story. I've had to hold a multitude of truths to just be accepting of everything that's happening. Because it's all of it. You can't put it into a box. You just have to see it as a transformative experience because it is. It's amazing, and it's also been scary, overwhelming, and difficult because you're having to shift into a different way of living that you're kind of expected to know how to do it. But, of course, we don't know how to do it. SEEAimee Lou Wood is rising in the Emmy odds after the 'SNL' teeth joke How are you taking care of yourself? Given the social media swirl of everything that you've been through since the show has ended, are you OK? I am OK. Thank you for asking. That's so nice. God, that made me emotional. I spoke to Parker Posey today, and it was just the best chat because she just does it so right. She just doesn't engage with that. It's like, this is her experience. She is taking from this what Parker needs to take, rather than being at the mercy of other people's opinions. It's about her experience. I think that I'm good. I think that I've learned so much about people and about myself from the craziness of this. And for that, I'm really grateful, actually, and I've had reckonings in my life that I would never have had without this pressure cooker. So I think it's sped up my growing up process quite a lot. Parker was, like, we're entertainers. Our job is to entertain, and then we become not entertaining because of how heavy some of the stuff can be, and actually you have to just be silly actors. We love pretending, and it's when you forget that, or when you lose track of that, that's when it becomes very confusing. You have to reconnect the fact that we're daft and we're silly and we tell stories, that's who we are. And actually, we're not designed for that other part of it. We're not designed for the social media, all of that stuff. That's a different job, that's a completely separate job, and a completely separate thing to the acting. That part is harder because it's not what is our element. I'm not in my element doing that. I'm in my element when I'm on set. I'm finding that moment in Chelsea's story. And I think, "Oh, I've just got to tell the truth here." And that's what I love. But the other stuff, it is a completely different skill. You're only human at the end of the day, and so you have to find that right balance between the two. You do. You really do. It's just taking it all the good and the bad, and then you can do it. Because at one point, it was a bit, like, everyone's coming at me. This is so overwhelming. It's like, actually, everyone's not coming at you, Aimee, they're coming at an idea of you. They're coming at Aimee Lou Wood, who's someone that they don't actually know, and someone that's not you. You're a concept to those people. You're a concept to those people commenting on social media; the people who love you and know you are still the same people. So actually, all of that stuff can't really touch Aimee because they don't know me. It's strangers, it's people who don't know me. Especially with a character like Chelsea, especially with the design of Mike [White]'s show and his casting, he wants people who are really close to their characters, who do share an essence with them. It becomes extremely personal, and then it's like, well, actually, the "you" that they're talking about isn't me. It's Chelsea. That's a really interesting thing to experience. Aimee starts feeling like a disappointment because she's not Chelsea, especially when it's a show that penetrates the zeitgeist this much. You start to feel like you don't belong to yourself. I think that's what Parker was trying to say to me this morning. You can take from this what you need, what you want, to further your journey as a human being and as an actor. It doesn't have to be for anyone else. This is for you, so that then you get a sense of ownership back, rather than feeling like you're being owned by all the people who watch The White Lotus. SEEAimee Lou Wood gets her flowers — literally — from 'SNL' star Sarah Sherman after 'mean and unfunny' sketch; Bowen Yang defends Wood's 'completely valid' reaction I think there's also something about Chelsea inhabiting a world that's full of very unlikable characters, and she is probably the one fundamentally good people that exists in that world. How did you find your way into her? I felt very deeply connected to her from the first read of the audition sides. I'd always wanted to be in White Lotus, and I just didn't know where I would fit. I would watch it, and I think I want to be in this show, and I want to work with Mike, but where the hell do I fit in this world? I don't feel like there's a way in. And then I saw these audition sides from Chelsea, and I was like, "This is the way in if it's going to be anything, it's going to be this." And so from the beginning, I just think I really understood her, and she really resonated with me, and I think Mike really just bolstered that. We didn't have many chats about Chelsea, intellectually, it was all very gut-driven. His thing was more telling me you already know… ...that she was going to die? Yes. I did the scene where it said, "We're going to be together forever, don't you think?" And he says, "That's the plan." And she says, "Is it?" And as soon as I said those words, I knew it was them that died. I knew it was them. And Mike was like, "I think you're picking up on something here." And he told me. So I knew from the second time I ever spoke Chelsea's lines that she was the one who dies, and that Rick was too. And so you kind of have to put it out your mind while you're filming, because she doesn't know she's going to die, even though she does kind of have a connection to death that is quite strange, like she's kind of obsessed with it. She keeps saying bad things happen in threes. Yes, she references it a lot. So that was also helpful because it meant that I could know in the back of my mind because I think Chelsea knows in the back of hers. She knows that she's a person who cannot help but go towards danger. So she's very connected to her death drive, which is what makes her so alive as a person, because she thinks about death a lot, and she's close to it. So it means that she lives very courageously and very moment to moment. But it also is really sad because I felt like she was this person who just couldn't help but walk towards her own doom. And that reminds me of so many like women that I love, who I looked up to so much growing up, these kind of tragic heroines that were there. They were amazing and wonderful and brought so much light to the world, but also had this self-destruct button that they couldn't stop pressing, and it's part of what made them so alive and so interesting as artists, but it also meant that they didn't live. I just always understood that Chelsea was someone who almost knew that she wasn't going to live that long, and so therefore, a relationship like hers and Rick's isn't really that scary to her because she's got that amor fati thing going on, which is, yeah, this is probably destructive, but that doesn't stop her from doing anything because she's already accepted that maybe her life isn't going to be a long one, and it's not going to be a cozy one and a safe one. It's going to be bright and fast. What motivates her? Is it her love for Rick? I think that with Chelsea, a thing that really helped me was her line about "bad things have happened to me too, and you don't see me walking around feeling sorry for myself" that she says to Chloe (Charlotte Le Bon). And after I said that, I thought, Chelsea is running away from something. Chelsea is running away from a pain, just the same as Rick is, but the way that they deal with it is so different. And by pouring herself into Rick, she never has to look at her own stuff. It's all about his pain. She laments that to Chloe, but really she likes it that way because it means that she can just see and give and pour and not ever have to look in. It's all looking out. And that's why she's so confronted by Saxon (Patrick Schwarzenegger) because trying to look at her, and she's like, "Whoa, no. That's not how I work. I do the looking." So I think that what motivates her is love for Rick, but it's also a really deep fear of sitting with herself. She does not want to sit with herself. She really doesn't. She doesn't want to feel the feelings. She's running away. She's gone traveling. She doesn't stop moving. She doesn't stop talking. She's constantly talking; words are her armor. She just chats, chats, chats, chats, chats. And when she's lying on the floor at the end and she can't speak for the first time, Rick actually gets to see her almost more clearly than she's ever let him see her before because she's got nothing funny to say, nothing inquisitive to ask. She's just her, and he can see how much he adores her and loves her. She doesn't really let anyone properly get to know her. It's both adoration and love for Rick and a true belief that he's her soul mate. But it also means she avoids all responsibility because if it's written in the stars, if it's fate, then she doesn't have any responsibility. She doesn't have any choice. So it's done, it's written that whatever goes will go and I don't have any control over it. It's a very clever way to avoid ever growing up, facing your stuff, facing your feelings and taking responsibility because we're soul mates, so there's nothing I can do about it, and that's where her and Rick are so similar because Rick's like, "There's nothing I can do. This is my fate. I have to go and kill this man." No, you don't. You have free will, but both of them believe that their stories are already written and that they can't change it, and that's why they are the perfect storm. SEEPatrick Schwarzenegger on pulling off Saxon's transformation in 'The White Lotus' Season 3 Do you think Saxon was truly changed by his encounter with Chelsea? Do you think she changed him? I think that she did change him. I think she did, and I think that it wasn't even romantic. I think it was someone that he needed to meet on his spiritual journey. That just shocked him. He was in a script, and she just came and ripped up the pages of the script and went, "No, we don't follow that." I'm not doing those lines. It was the shock of this human that woke him up. I think that he thinks it's romantic because he doesn't know any other way to be with women. It has to be that there's some kind of object of desire to him if he's interested. But actually, what I think Saxon realizes over the course of the show is that he's so much more interested in what she has to say and what she has to teach than his own lust. I think they could have had a beautiful friendship. I think what's so sad is that both of them could have had a gorgeous friendship, but they were both blinkered by something that was stopping them from connecting fully to each other. If Saxon was brought up in a different family, he wouldn't be that guy. And if Chelsea had a different life, she wouldn't be that girl. So they kind of miss each other, when actually, by nature, they're probably very similar. They're determined. They both love their mantras. They both love spouting loads of knowledge, and they're both really trying in life. But their just conditioning has been so different that they think they're opposites, but they're actually so deeply similar, and I think they just see that at the end, and then it's too late. What's one thing you took away from the experience? I've learned so much. Probably one of the most profound life moments I ever had was watching Chelsea die, sitting with Charlotte and Patrick and all my friends, all these amazing friends that I've made, and going, "Oh, it's permission to let go of anything in Chelsea that was me, that was holding me back." Because she's so close to who I am, just getting to grow up for both of us, because the thing that Chelsea can't do is grow up. I think that it's made me more ready to be a grown-up. Who do I want to be as a person? Who do I want to be as a human being, and how do I want to live? Because I now have the privilege of getting to be a grown-up, and if I'd made a different step in my life when I was younger, I might have been a Chelsea. So seeing that unfold is really profound. Best of GoldDerby 'The best job I ever had': 'From 'Supernatural' to 'The Boys,' Eric Kripke talks his biggest hits — and miss (ahem, 'Tarzan') 'Cross' star Aldis Hodge on building an aspirational hero — who's not a superhero Jonathan Pryce on the 'great responsibility' of playing a character with dementia in 'Slow Horses' Click here to read the full article.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
R. Kelly Seeks Trump Pardon, Attorney Says Singer Has Been ‘Punished' to Solitary Confinement and ‘Has Spiders Crawling All Over Him'
After R. Kelly filed an emergency motion seeking home confinement for fears for his safety in prison earlier this week, the singer's lawyer is claiming that he is now currently being 'punished' with solitary confinement for taking the action. Attorney Beau Brindley filed the motion on Tuesday claiming that officials solicited an inmate to murder Kelly, who has since been placed in solitary confinement. Brindley says that Kelly has been cut off from communicating with his family, and that he's sleeping in poor conditions without food. More from Variety R. Kelly's Attorneys File for Immediate Release From Custody, Alleging Officials Solicited Inmate to Murder Him 'SNL' Star Michael Che Drinks on Air After Trump Victory, Shouts Out R. Kelly: 'If White People Can Elect Their Felon, I Can Dance to Mine' Lifetime Finds Success With True, Sensitive Stories That Become Watercooler Sensations 'Where he's sleeping now, he has spiders crawling all over him,' Brindley tells Variety. 'This isn't protection — it's punishment for pursuing this. So he remains in solitary, he has not eaten for three days because he's been only offered food that's coming directly from the chow halls that's prepared by the inmates, which he was warned not to eat by one of the officials at the prison who we left anonymous for his own security.' Kelly is currently in a North Carolina facility serving a 30-year sentence for violating the Mann Act and racketeering that involved the sexual exploitation of children. In Tuesday's filing, Brindley alleged that government officials violated attorney-client privilege by intercepting his communications to convict him, and subsequently solicited an inmate to murder him in retaliation for attempting to expose their actions. Brindley says that he was able to speak with Kelly on Thursday morning and intends to file a supplement to his motion that alleges further cruel and unusual punishment in the form of solitary confinement. 'He was very emotional, he's very upset at how he's being treated and the conditions he's having to live with,' he says. 'He's begging me to find a way to help him, because this isn't right. And I'm going to do everything in my power to do it.' That includes seeking a pardon from President Donald Trump, a course of action that Kelly's legal team considered while investigating the government's alleged misconduct over the past year, but has become a priority with the threats on his life. Brindley has spoken with Trump associates as recently as yesterday, with hopes of reaching the President to get his urgent attention. 'I think it's a particular interest to President Trump because, unlike most people who come to this with an air of skepticism, [he] has a personal unique understanding of what it's like to be victimized by prosecution teams and put through that experience through corrupt and criminal hacks,' he says. 'He understands what that's like, and when he knows that it's being escalated to the point of a death threat to hide the corruption that we're trying to put out there, he's perhaps the only person that there is who is going to have the courage to pull the trigger and say I want to stop it now.' Brindley explains that there have been further consequences of filing Tuesday's emergency motion. Mikeal Glenn Stine, a terminally ill inmate who is a leader of the Aryan Brotherhood, gave a sworn declaration in the motion claiming that officials offered him freedom in his final days in exchange for Kelly's murder. Stine says that he was transferred to the North Carolina facility to kill Kelly but had a change of heart at the last minute, instead informing him of what he had been instructed to do. After the filing, Brindley says that he was planning to meet with Stine next week, but that it was canceled this morning. He says that Stine's current whereabouts are unknown. Following the filing, which argued that Kelly remains in danger from other incarcerated members of the Aryan Brotherhood, Judge Martha Pacold set a June 20 hearing to determine the issue of jurisdiction in filing the motion in North Carolina instead of Chicago. Brindley is hopeful that an accelerated briefing schedule will not just address immediate concerns but forge a path to vacating the conviction. 'Ultimately, we're seeing a great deal of interest in what's going to happen next and how this is all going to turn out,' he says, 'because it's been a rollercoaster of facts and occurrences that have brought us to this place.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar