RPSC school lecturer recruitment 2025 notification released for 3,225 posts at rpsc.rajasthan.gov.in
RPSC school lecturer recruitment 2025:
The Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) has officially announced the school lecturer recruitment drive for 2025. A total of 3,225 vacancies for Grade I teachers are to be filled across various government schools under the School Education Department of Rajasthan.
Interested candidates who meet the eligibility criteria can apply online through the official RPSC website.
This recruitment campaign aims to appoint subject-wise lecturers in government schools to enhance the quality of education in the state. The commission has specified that candidates must hold a postgraduate degree in the relevant subject along with a B.Ed. degree from a recognised institution to qualify for the application process.
Application process and eligibility criteria
Candidates planning to apply for the RPSC school lecturer posts must submit their applications online within the stipulated timeframe. The application window opens on August 14, 2025, and closes on September 12, 2025. The application fee varies depending on the candidate's category. General and OBC (CL) applicants must pay Rs 600, while OBC (NCL), EWS, SC, ST, and PwD candidates are required to pay Rs 400.
To be eligible, candidates must be between 21 and 40 years of age as on January 1, 2026. Age relaxations will be applicable as per the Rajasthan government's norms for reserved categories. The recruitment will be conducted through a two-stage selection process consisting of a written examination followed by document verification.
The school lecturer position is classified as a permanent government job with a pay scale at Level 12, which includes a grade pay of Rs4,800.
This opportunity is suitable for postgraduate candidates specialising in various subjects who aspire to work in the state's educational sector.
Direct link to apply online for 3,225 school lecturer vacancies in Rajasthan through RPSC
Selection process and further instructions
The first stage of the recruitment process is a written examination that tests the candidates' knowledge in their specific subjects. Those who clear the written test will be called for document verification to ensure that all eligibility conditions are met.
Candidates must carefully upload all necessary certificates and documents during the online application.
The official notification and detailed guidelines are available on the RPSC website at rpsc.rajasthan.gov.in. Applicants are advised to thoroughly check all details before submitting their forms, and it is recommended to keep a printout of the application for future reference.
This recruitment drive is expected to fill critical teaching positions in Rajasthan's government schools, contributing to the overall educational development in the region.
Read the official notice
here
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Jeju Air jet that crashed in Muan could have kept flying on damaged engine, investigators say
A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. The right engine of the Jeju Air jet experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight,"(AFP/JUNG YEON-JE) The Boeing 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamming into an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight," in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. MORE QUESTIONS So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations, including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had "clear evidence" that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more, resulting in a "cryptic" document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines - made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE and France's Safran - were examined in May and no defects or fault data were found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld but Reuters and South Korean media obtained copies. Boeing and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was "misleading the public" by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive "surge," citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's transport ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week.
The Hindu
15 hours ago
- The Hindu
Jeju Air jet still had a working engine when it crashed, investigation update says
A Jeju Air plane that crashed in December during an emergency landing after a bird strike could have kept flying on the damaged engine that was still working after pilots shut down the other one, according to an update from South Korean investigators. Also Read | Investigation into South Korea's Jeju Air crash hints at pilot error, angering families The Boeing 737-800 instead belly-landed at Muan airport without its landing gear down, overshot the runway and erupted into a fireball after slamming into an embankment, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. Investigators have not yet produced a final report into the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil, but information about the plane's two engines has begun to emerge. According to a July 19 update prepared by investigators and seen by Reuters but not publicly released following complaints from victims' family members, the left engine sustained less damage than the right following a bird strike, but the left engine was shut down 19 seconds after the bird strike. The right engine experienced a "surge" and emitted flames and black smoke, but investigators said it "was confirmed to be generating output sufficient for flight," in the five-page update, which included post-crash photos of both engines. No reason for the crew's actions was given and the probe is expected to last months as investigators reconstruct the plane's technical state and the picture understood by its pilots. Experts say most air accidents are caused by multiple factors and caution against putting too much weight on incomplete evidence. More questions So far, public attention has focused on the possibility that the crew may have shut down the less-damaged engine, rekindling memories of a 1989 Boeing 737-400 crash in Kegworth, England, where pilots shut down a non-damaged engine by mistake. The disaster led to multiple changes in regulations including improvements in crew communication and emergency procedures. Also Read | South Korea Jeju Air jet black boxes stopped recording four minutes before crash A source told Reuters on Monday that the South Korea-led probe had "clear evidence" that pilots had shut off the less-damaged left engine after the bird strike, citing the cockpit voice recorder, computer data and a switch found in the wreckage. But the latest update on the crash also raises the possibility that even the more heavily damaged engine that was still running could have kept the plane aloft for longer. It did not say what level of performance the operating engine still had, nor what extra options that might have given to the plane's emergency-focused crew before the jet doubled back and landed in the opposite direction of the runway from its initial plan with its landing gear up. Both engines contained bird strike damage and both experienced engine vibrations after the strike. The right engine showed significant internal damage, the Korean-language update from South Korea's Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board (ARAIB) said, but it did not describe the damage found in the left engine. The update did not say how the left engine was operating nor the state of systems connected to either engine, said former U.S. National Transportation Safety Board investigator Greg Feith when shown the document translated by Reuters. It contains some new facts but omits far more, resulting in a "cryptic" document, he said. ARAIB, which plans to issue a final report next June, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Safety experts say it is common for early reports to contain sparse facts and limited analysis while investigations continue. A preliminary report released in January said feathers and blood stains from ducks were found in both engines. The engines - made by CFM International, jointly owned by GE and France's Safran - were examined in May and no defects or fault data were found beyond the bird and crash damage, the report said. Families of those who died in the disaster were briefed on the engine findings but asked investigators not to release the July 19 report, saying that it appeared to apportion blame to the pilots without exploring other factors. The report was withheld, but Reuters and South Korean media obtained copies. Boeing and GE referred questions about the crash to ARAIB. Safran did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Jeju Air has previously said it is cooperating with ARAIB and is awaiting publication of the investigation. Under global aviation rules, civil air investigations aim to discover crash causes without assigning blame or liability. The Jeju Air pilots' union said ARAIB was "misleading the public" by suggesting there was no problem with the left engine given that bird remains were found in both. A source who attended the briefing told Reuters that investigators told family members the left engine also experienced a disruptive "surge," citing black box data. The pilot union and representatives of bereaved families have asked that evidence be released to support any findings. Relatives say the investigation also needs to focus on the embankment containing navigation equipment, which safety experts have said likely contributed to the high death toll. Global aviation standards call for any navigation equipment in line with runways to be installed on structures that easily give way in case of impact with an aircraft. South Korea's Transport Ministry has identified seven domestic airports, including Muan, with structures made of concrete or steel, rather than materials that break apart on impact and has said it will improve them. Designs for the new structures are in progress, a ministry official told Reuters last week.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
JPSC Result 2023: Ashish Akshat tops, 342 candidates clear the exam
JPSC 2023 result Out: The final results of the 2023 Combined Civil Service Examination have been released by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC). On the official website at candidates can view the JPSC Civil Service final result. The names, application numbers, categories, and services assigned to the shortlisted candidates have been disclosed by the commission. With the announcement of the JPSC Civil Services Examination 2023 final result, the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) has concluded a long-awaited recruitment cycle in which more than 7,000 applicants vied for 342 coveted government positions. JPSC Recruitment 2023: Timeline of the process • February 2024 – Notification announced for JPSC Civil Services Exam 2023 • 22 April 2024 – Preliminary result out; 7011 candidates qualified • 22–24 June 2024 – Mains exam conducted in Ranchi • 21 May 2025 – Mains result declared; 864 candidates shortlisted for interviews • July 25, 2025 – Final results released. How to check JPSC 2023 Final Result? 1. Visit the official website at 2. Press on the link titled "Final Result - JPSC Civil Services Exam 2023" 3. A PDF with the list of chosen candidates will be showcased 4. Use Ctrl + F to find your name or roll number 5. Download the PDF for later reference. JPSC 2023 Toppers List 342 applicants were deemed successful by the JPSC, precisely equal the number of positions that were advertised. Deputy Collector, DSP, State Tax Officer, and other important administrative positions were among those for which recruitment was conducted. Based on the combined performance in the Mains Exam and Interview phases, the result has been prepared. Ashish Akshat was one of the top-ranked applicants in the state civil services test, followed by: • Ashish Akshat – Rank 1 • Abhay Kumar – Rank 2 • Ravi Ranjan Kumar – Rank 3 • Gautam Gaurav – Rank 4 • Shweta – Rank 5 • Rahul Kumar Vishwakarma – Rank 6 • Robin Kumar – Rank 7 • Sandeep Prakash – Rank 8 • Swati Keshari – Rank 9 • Rajiv Ranjan – Rank 10. JPSC Result 2023: Eligibility To be able to take the test, candidates had to have graduated from a recognised university or institution. On the deadline, they had to be between the ages of 21 and 35. According to the regulations, candidates from the reserved category were granted a relaxation in the upper age restriction. Additionally, candidates were granted a seven-year age relaxation, which increased the number of eligible candidates. JPSC Recruitment 2023: Vacancies (342 posts) • Deputy Collector- 207 • Deputy Superintendent of Police- 35 • State Tax Officer- 56 • Prison Superintendent- 2 • Jharkhand Education Service- 10 • District Magistrate- 1 • Assistant Registrar- 8 • Labour Superintendent- 14 • Probation Officer- 6 • Excise Inspector- 3. JPSC Recruitment 2023: Category-Wise Breakdown • 155 were unreserved • 88 for Scheduled Tribes (ST) • 24 for OBC (Category-2) • 31 for Scheduled Castes (SC) • 15 for OBC (Category-1) • 29 for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). JPSC Recruitment 2023: Exam pattern Preliminary and Mains (written and interview) were the two sections of the test. To be eligible for the Mains exam, candidates needed to receive at least 40% marks. However, qualified applicants from the reserved category are granted a waiver in the qualifying scores. Since the first language exam was merely qualifying in nature, the grades earned in general Hindi and general English were not taken into account when creating the final merit lists or for the interview.
