Latest news with #800
Time of India
8 hours ago
- General
- Time of India
RPSC school lecturer recruitment 2025 notification released for 3,225 posts at rpsc.rajasthan.gov.in
RPSC school lecturer recruitment 2025 notification out for 3,225 posts RPSC school lecturer recruitment 2025: The Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) has officially announced the school lecturer recruitment drive for 2025. A total of 3,225 vacancies for Grade I teachers are to be filled across various government schools under the School Education Department of Rajasthan. Interested candidates who meet the eligibility criteria can apply online through the official RPSC website. This recruitment campaign aims to appoint subject-wise lecturers in government schools to enhance the quality of education in the state. The commission has specified that candidates must hold a postgraduate degree in the relevant subject along with a degree from a recognised institution to qualify for the application process. Application process and eligibility criteria Candidates planning to apply for the RPSC school lecturer posts must submit their applications online within the stipulated timeframe. The application window opens on August 14, 2025, and closes on September 12, 2025. The application fee varies depending on the candidate's category. General and OBC (CL) applicants must pay Rs 600, while OBC (NCL), EWS, SC, ST, and PwD candidates are required to pay Rs 400. To be eligible, candidates must be between 21 and 40 years of age as on January 1, 2026. Age relaxations will be applicable as per the Rajasthan government's norms for reserved categories. The recruitment will be conducted through a two-stage selection process consisting of a written examination followed by document verification. The school lecturer position is classified as a permanent government job with a pay scale at Level 12, which includes a grade pay of Rs4,800. This opportunity is suitable for postgraduate candidates specialising in various subjects who aspire to work in the state's educational sector. Direct link to apply online for 3,225 school lecturer vacancies in Rajasthan through RPSC Selection process and further instructions The first stage of the recruitment process is a written examination that tests the candidates' knowledge in their specific subjects. Those who clear the written test will be called for document verification to ensure that all eligibility conditions are met. Candidates must carefully upload all necessary certificates and documents during the online application. The official notification and detailed guidelines are available on the RPSC website at Applicants are advised to thoroughly check all details before submitting their forms, and it is recommended to keep a printout of the application for future reference. This recruitment drive is expected to fill critical teaching positions in Rajasthan's government schools, contributing to the overall educational development in the region. Read the official notice here TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
The Star
18 hours ago
- The Star
OKU cardholder fined RM1,800 for causing hurt to 11-year-old boy
SEREMBAN: A 36-year-old woman who holds a person with disabilities (OKU) card has been fined RM1,800 after pleading guilty to a charge of causing hurt to an 11-year-old boy. The accused did not contest the charge after it was read to her before Magistrate Saiful Sayoti on Thursday (July 17). The fine was imposed in default three months' jail. She was accused of committing the offence at a grocery store in Mantin at around 12.30pm on Tuesday (July 15). ALSO READ: Cops detain woman for assaulting, threatening 11-year-old boy in Mantin She was charged under Section 323 of the Penal Code with voluntarily causing hurt to the victim by stepping on his face and legs. Offenders can be jailed for up to one year or fined up to RM2,000, or both, upon conviction. Deputy public prosecutor Fidha Misjedi asked the court to impose a punishment commensurate with the offence, as the victim was a young boy. She said pleading guilty did not automatically mean the accused was entitled to a lenient sentence. The accused, who was represented by a lawyer from the Legal Aid Department, pleaded for leniency as she had no source of income, was unmarried, and had mental health issues. Police detained the accused after the victim's mother lodged a report claiming that her son had been beaten and threatened by the suspect. Nilai OCPD Supt Abdul Malik Hasim said the incident was captured by the store's CCTV system. The suspect, he said, was said to have been experiencing hallucinations at the time and suspected the victim of shoplifting, although there was no evidence for that.
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Man charged with raping daughter in Batu Gajah
IPOH: A retired army personnel has been charged with raping and sexually harassing his daughter in Batu Gajah. The 45-year-old claimed trial after being read the charges under Section 376 (3) of the Penal Code and Section 14(a) of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act before Sessions Court Judge J. Jean Sharmila here on Wednesday (July 16). In the first charge, the accused was said to have committed physical sexual harassment on his then 12-year-old daughter in a house in Batu Gajah sometime in mid-December last year at about 2.30pm. In the second charge, the man was accused of raping the victim in the same house some time in mid-December last year at about 11.30pm. In the third charge, the man was said to have committed physical sexual harassment on the victim in the living room of the house in January this year between 2.30pm and 8.30pm. Deputy public prosecutor Qurratu'aini Khalifah said the victim is the accused's third child among six siblings, all of whom were students. Qurratu'aini also told the court that the victim had been pregnant during the incident, but was unsure how long she was due. When pleading for a lower bail, lawyer Muhammad Farhan Ahmad Fadzil stated that the accused relies on his monthly pension of approximately RM1,800. He stated that the accused's wife was not working and that he was taking care of their children. "The accused, who stays in the same house as the victim, will also find another place to stay if allowed bail," he said. Jean Sharmila set bail at RM21,000 with one surety and Aug 18 for mention. She also ordered the accused not to disturb the victim or witnesses and to report to the nearest police station every month.
Mint
3 days ago
- Business
- Mint
Trump's tariff: Gold price surges for fourth week. Is it right time to invest?
Gold prices continued their upward momentum for the fourth straight week amid escalating geopolitical risks and rising trade tensions. On Tuesday, July 15, Gold prices traded higher driven by heightened global trade tensions that boosted demand for safe-haven assets. As of 0635 GMT, spot gold rose 0.5 per cent to $3,359.01 per ounce, while U.S. gold futures edged up 0.3% to $3,368.20. Back home, the yellow metal inched up in early morning trade on Tuesday. MCX Gold futures for August 5 delivery were up by 0.12 per cent at ₹ 97,896 per 10 grams, while MCX Silver futures for September 5 delivery were trading 0.54% lower at ₹ 1,12,330 per kilogram during the same period. Anuj Gupta, Director, Ya Wealth Research & Advisory, says that safe haven demand against uncertainty provide support to the gold prices. The latest surge in prices is being fueled by renewed safe-haven demand, as uncertainty deepens around Trump's aggressive trade tactics and escalating US-Russia tensions. Reports suggest that Trump is preparing to send offensive weapons to Ukraine, which risks intensifying the ongoing conflict with Russia. In addition, the US administration is drafting a sanctions bill that could grant Trump sweeping authority to punish Russia and any nation supporting its war efforts. Proposed tariffs include a massive 500 per cent duty on countries aiding Russia, potentially impacting China, India, and Brazil. According to Sugandha Sachdeva- Founder-SS WealthStreet, price outlook suggests that gold remains well-supported at $3,280 per ounce in the international market, with potential to move higher towards $3,445–$3,450 per ounce in the coming sessions. ' On the domestic front, support lies near Rs.96,000 per 10gm, while prices are expected to head towards Rs.98,800 per 10gm initially. A breakout above this could pave the way for a retest of the Rs.1,00,000 mark. All eyes would now be on the US June consumer and producer price index data as well as the US Fed meeting lined up towards the end of this month, which is likely to provide further cues for the precious metal. Trade-related headlines will also continue to dominate sentiment and influence gold's trajectory,' Sachdeva said. Sachdeva further recommended investors to remain alert to macro developments, as they will be critical in shaping the next leg of gold's move, as volatility rises.
The Star
7 days ago
- Business
- The Star
Fashion dupes are everywhere – but are they crossing the legal line?
Fashion "dupes', or less expensive versions of high-end clothing and other accessories, are just about everywhere these days. They're also drawing some businesses into legal battles. In the latest example, Lululemon slapped a lawsuit against Costco on Friday (June 27), accusing the wholesale club operator of selling lower-priced duplicates of some of its popular athleisure apparel. Across the retail industry, it's far from a new phenomenon. But social media is pushing the culture of online dupe shopping to new heights as influencers direct their followers to where they can buy the knockoffs. Want a taste of Hermes' US$1,000 (approximately RM4,215) fuzzy slippers? Target has a version for US$15 (RM63). Looking for a US$2,800 (RM11,800) Bottega Veneta hobo bag? There's a version for US$99 (RM417) on online clothing and accessories upstart Quince, which has become a go-to for fashionistas. It's not even the first time Lululemon has encountered what it says are knockoffs of its clothing, which often carry steep price tags of over US$100 (RM421) each for leggings and sporty zip-ups. Without specifying additional sellers beyond Costco in Friday's (June 27) complaint, Lululemon noted that a handful companies have "replicated or copied' its apparel to sell cheaper offerings – including those popularised online through hashtags like "LululemonDupes' on TikTok and other social media platforms. For years, companies have rolled out a range of cheaper option for consumers to buy instead of pricey name-brands or designer labels – often through retailers' house or generic brands. Read more: Turmoil or not, luxury fashion can't afford to ignore the Middle East region Unlike more direct copies of the product with an unauthorised trademark or logo of a patented brand, "pure' dupes that just resemble certain features are generally legitimate. They can even spark awareness of the original items. But the rising frenzy for dupes, particularly in the fashion space, signals that many shoppers want a taste of luxury, but no longer want to pay for (or care about) getting the real thing. Late last year, for example, discount chain Walmart created a buzz when it started selling a leather bag online that resembled Hermes' coveted Birkin bag. The US$78 (RM329) item – sold by Kamugo, which doesn't appear to have its own website – was a fraction of the price of the original, which goes from US$9,000 (RM37,930) to hundreds of thousands of dollars on resale and auction sites. Influencers labelled the leather bag a "wirkin'. Other suppliers including BestSPR, YMTQ and Judy were listed on Walmart's site selling similar totes. While popular among shoppers, these kind of look-alikes can frustrate the targeted companies. Following the viral fame of the "wirkin', Hermes executive chairman Axel Dumas shared his annoyance, for example. "Making a copy like this is quite detestable,' Dumas said in a corporate earnings call in February. Still, he acknowledged that it was "quite touching' to see so many consumers want a bag with the Birkin style – and that "difference in quality' was still evident, noting that nobody bought the dupe thinking it was from Hermes. Alexandra Roberts, a professor of law and media at Northeastern University, said that "the term 'dupe' itself doesn't tell us much about legality", noting the word has also been used to describe more traditional counterfeits. But overall, dupes can move into shaky legal territory, including copyright and trademark infringement, particularly if a dupe marketer makes false claims about the duplicate or the original. "With fashion, in particular, we're going to get into some thorny questions," Roberts said. That includes what intellectual property rights exist and how enforceable they are, she explained, and whether there is actual infringement or if a product is just "positioning itself as a less expensive alternative'. Often such disputes boil down trademark questions around consumer confusion or patented product designs. Several businesses have already put this to the test, but not always successfully. In December, for example, Benefit lost a lawsuit in California over Elf's US$6 (RM25) Lash 'N Roll mascara, which is similar to Benefit's US$29 (RM122) Roller Lash mascara. The judge's decision was "a resounding win for us', Elf CEO Tarang Amin previously said. "The basic reality is we always put our E.l.f. twist on it,' he said. "It's an E.l.f. product that's a much better value.' In its lawsuit, Lululemon argued that Costco had "unlawfully traded' on Lululemon's reputation and that it was suing as part of wider intellectual property enforcement "directed to retailers who have chosen to copy rather than compete.' Lululemon accuses Costco of making duplicates of several products, including its popular Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants. Lululemon says one of the duplicates that Costco sells is the Hi-Tec Men's Scuba Full Zip, with the lawsuit showing a screenshot image of Costco's website showing the item priced at US$19.97 (RM84). Roberts said she was "a little skeptical' of some of Lululemon's claims, noting that the design patents in particular could be hard to challenge. And she pointed to Lululemon's asserting common law trade dress over a "triangle kind of shape in the crotch region' of the ABC pants. "My first reaction as a trademark expert is that looks pretty functional,' she said, and functional matter is not protected under trademark law. "I was just cracking up because that particular claim seemed really far-fetched to me. Those pants look really basic." Still, Roberts noted that Lululemon had some plausible claims. Read more: Why is Jonathan Anderson's first Dior show at Paris Fashion Week so significant? Lululemon alleges that Costco is known to use manufacturers of popular branded products for its private label Kirkland brand, although the companies involved don't clearly reveal that information to customers. Due to this, Lululemon claims some shoppers may believe that Kirkland-branded products are made by the authentic supplier of the "original' products. Roberts said this could rule in Lululemon's favour as something that "weighs toward consumer confusion'. Still, she noted that most of the products Lululemon mentioned in its complaint weren't sold under the Kirkland brand, which could undermine the argument. A message was left Tuesday (July 1) seeking comment from Costco on the lawsuit. Lululemon found itself in a similar dispute with Peloton in 2021, when it sued the exercise bike company over alleged "copycat products' in its then-new clothing lines. Two years later, the companies announced a five-year partnership that included Lululemon becoming the primary athletic apparel partner to Peloton. – AP
