
Why Hiring Executives First Is Killing Your Scale-Up
Jim Collins' insight from "Good to Great" remains foundational: Getting the right people on the bus is fundamental to business success. But Theo Saville, CEO of CloudNC (providing AI solutions for Computer Aided Manufacturing) adds nuance from his company's nine-year journey: "You can have an army of geniuses. But if you don't have good product-market fit, you won't make any money. It's actually the most important thing in business. However, once you achieve product-market fit, the right people become your scaling superpower.'
After solving deep technical problems to create a product which matched market demand, CloudNC has been doubling revenue every quarter, largely through a contrarian US expansion strategy that hired proven performers first rather than executives. Saville's core insight challenges conventional wisdom: The traditional approach of hiring executives first to build new teams or functions is "a terrible idea" - instead, "hire the people that produce the actual frontline value first."
Saville's point of view is contrarian but has some logic - front-line first hiring creates healthier organizational dynamics that prepare the engine of growth more effectively than traditional hierarchical approaches.
Why Front-Line First Beats Executive First When Scaling or Entering New Markets
Once you have product-market fit, speed of execution becomes critical. Yet most companies fall into the traditional executive-first trap. As Saville explains: "One month to pick the search firm, three to six months for the search... then maybe 12 months later, you have the frontline workers actually doing the work. And what if you got that hire wrong? You spent 50 grand on a search firm, huge salary, big exit package. It is a terrible idea."
The organizational readiness cost extends beyond time and money. During this hierarchy-building process, the invisible dynamics that drive growth remain unprepared. Companies are essentially building management structures before they have the operational foundation to require them.
CloudNC took a different approach by creating new functions and geographies with proven front line workers who could start generating value and strengthen organizational dynamics. According to Saville when hiring their sales team: "Almost every single one of our sales people made it. They nearly all paid for themselves within 30 days compared to the industry standard of 12 months.'
This approach wasn't just about individual performance. Front-line performers who fit culturally strengthen the organization's growth engine, while poor fits are naturally rejected. As Saville notes, "the company, almost like an immune system, tends to reject them." This creates a self-reinforcing cycle that builds organizational strength from the ground up.
The A Method: A 4-Step System for Finding Proven Performers
CloudNC's approach stems from applying "The A Method for Hiring" framework from Geoff Smart and Randy Street's book "Who." This systematic approach has four key steps:
Step 1 - SCORECARD: "I write deliverables that only a top 10% candidate could achieve - then find somebody who can deliver on that" explains Saville. The key is defining specific, measurable outcomes for any function, not just creating job descriptions.
Step 2 - SOURCE: Identify proven performers. Saville's approach: "We're going to find people who work at companies that sell to our target buyers directly... and offer them an easier product to sell with bigger commission potential."
Step 3 - SELECT: Again Saville's approach: Focus on proven track records over potential. "I want to see that they have achieved it more than once in their career. Because if I'm hiring... people who've done it three times before, chances are they're going to be able to do it a fourth time as well."
Step 4 - SELL: Apply the Five F's framework to close top performers.
The Five F's: What Top Performers Really Want
The A Method's "Five F's" framework identifies what proven performers care about when switching jobs:
Fit: Matching their goals with company vision - letting them be "A players" where they can excel
Family: Making the transition work for their personal situation and loved ones
Freedom: Saville notes "A players don't like being micromanaged. They look for positions where they'll be given space to excel"
Fortune: Competitive compensation that reflects their proven value
Fun: Engaging, challenging work environment with meaningful outcomes
This framework was prescient. Written in 2008, these Five F's to attract 'A Players' have become increasingly aligned with what today's workforce prioritizes as found in surveys such as the Deloitte Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey.
Using Smart and Street's methodology, CloudNC addresses these priorities through what Saville lists as 'premium pay, autonomy, clear challenging outcomes, and an entrepreneurial culture for people used to working in an environment without much bureaucracy." This approach creates what Saville describes as the scaling advantage: "You can keep recycling that money into more hires and grow grow grow."
The Future of Strategic Hiring
The invisible advantage of front-line first hiring extends beyond revenue acceleration - it prepares the organizational engine for sustainable growth by building the right internal dynamics from the start. However, Saville's approach is expensive as you are paying for proven talent. Whilst more difficult, 'hire attitude, train skills' can be an alternative approach - more risky but lower upfront cost.
Whichever approach is taken, it is necessary to identify core value-creating roles, define specific outcomes and ensure new hires strengthen rather than weaken the organization's growth engine. In an era where scaling speed often determines market success, the companies that master front-line first hiring may find a scaling edge when growing or entering new markets.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stocks Pressured by Weakness in Netflix and Health Insurers
The S&P 500 Index ($SPX) (SPY) today down -0.08%, the Dow Jones Industrials Index ($DOWI) (DIA) is down -0.44%, and the Nasdaq 100 Index ($IUXX) (QQQ) is down -0.15%. September E-mini S&P futures (ESU25) are down -0.14%, and September E-mini Nasdaq futures (NQU25) are down -0.17%. Stocks today gave up an early advance and turned lower as a -5% decline in Netflix weighed on technology stocks after the company forecasted below-consensus full-year operating margins. Also, the weakness in health insurance providers is weighing on the broader market today after Humana lost a lawsuit to reverse cuts to its Medicare bonus payments and after Elevance Health was downgraded. More News from Barchart Insider Trading Alert: Here's Who Bought Nvidia and AMD Stock Before the U.S. Chip Deal with China Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 23 Robinhood Keeps Hitting New Highs. How Should You Play HOOD Stock Here? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. Stock indexes initially moved higher, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 posting new record highs. Bullish factors included the stronger-than-expected housing starts report and generally upbeat earnings reports. Also, the University of Michigan's US July consumer sentiment index rose more than expected to a 5-month high. Falling bond yields are supportive of stocks following dovish comments from Fed Governor Christopher Waller on Thursday evening, who stated that he supports a Fed interest rate cut at the July 29-30 FOMC meeting. Also, an easing of inflation expectations in today's University of Michigan's July inflation expectations report was bullish for T-notes and stocks. The 10-year T-note yield is down -3 bp to 4.42%. US June housing starts rose +4.6% m/m to 1.321 million, stronger than expectations of 1.300 million. Also, June building permits, a proxy for future construction, unexpectedly rose +0.2% m/m to 1.397 million versus expectations of a -0.5% m/m decline to 1.387 million. The University of Michigan's July US consumer sentiment index rose +1.1 to a 5-month high of 61.8, stronger than expectations of 61.5. The University of Michigan's US July 1-year inflation expectations indicator fell to a 5-month low of +4.4%, better than expectations of no change at +5.0%. Also, the July 5-10 year inflation expectations indicator eased to a 5-month low of +3.6%, weaker than expectations of +3.9%. Thursday evening, Fed Governor Christopher Waller said, 'With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate. I believe it makes sense to cut the FOMC's policy rate by 25 basis points two weeks from now.' Recent trade news has put some downward pressure on stocks. President Trump said late Wednesday that he intends to send a tariff letter to more than 150 countries notifying them their tariff rates could be 10% or 15%, effective August 1, and that the group was 'not big countries who don't do that much business with the US.' Also, President Trump last weekend announced that the US will impose 30% tariffs on US imports from the European Union and Mexico, effective August 1. Mr. Trump said last Thursday that a 35% tariff on some Canadian products would take effect on August 1, up from the current 25%. Last week, Mr. Trump imposed a 50% tariff on copper imports, which will include semi-finished goods, and stated that drug companies could face tariffs as high as 200% on imports if they don't relocate production to the US within the next year. Federal funds futures prices are discounting the chances for a -25 bp rate cut at 5% at the July 29-30 FOMC meeting and 58% at the following meeting on September 16-17. Earnings season began in earnest this week as big bank earnings results came in stronger than expected. Early results now show S&P 500 earnings are on track to rise +3.2% for the second quarter, better than the pre-season expectations of +2.8% y/y, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. Also, only six of the eleven S&P 500 sectors are projected to post an increase in earnings, the fewest since Q1 of 2023, according to Yardeni Research. Overseas stock markets today are mixed. The Euro Stoxx 50 is down -0.42%. China's Shanghai Composite closed up +0.50%. Japan's Nikkei Stock 225 fell from a 2.5-week high and closed down -0.21%. Interest Rates September 10-year T-notes (ZNU25) today are up +9 ticks. The 10-year T-note yield is down -2.0 bp to 4.432%. T-notes are climbing today on dovish comments from Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who said he backs a Fed rate cut at the July 29-30 FOMC meeting. Also, falling inflation expectations in today's University of Michigan report were bullish for T-notes. On the bearish side, today's US housing starts report was stronger than expected. Also, today's increase in the University of Michigan US July consumer sentiment to a 5-month high was negative for T-notes. European government bond yields today are moving higher. The 10-year German bund yield is up +2.1 bp to 2.696%. The 10-year UK gilt yield climbed to a 1.5-month high of 4.680% and is up +2.1 bp to 4.676%. Eurozone May construction output fell -1.7% m/m, the biggest decline in nearly 2.5-years. The German June PPI fell -1.3% y/y, right on expectations and the steepest pace of decline in 9 months. Swaps are discounting the chances at 1% for a -25 bp rate cut by the ECB at the July 24 policy meeting. US Stock Movers Weakness in managed health care stocks is weighing on the broader market today. Elevance Health (ELV) is down more than -5% to lead losers in the S&P 500 after Leerink Partners downgraded the stock to market perform from outperform. Also, Humana (HUM) is down more than -2% after it lost a lawsuit seeking to reverse cuts to its Medicare bonus payments. In addition, Molina Healthcare (MOH) is down more than -4%, and Centene (CNC) and CVS Health Corp (CVS) are down more than -1%. Netflix (NFLX) is down more than -5% to lead losers in the Nasdaq 100 after forecasting a full-year operating margin of 29.5%, below the consensus of 29.7%. American Express (AXP) is down more than -3% to lead losers in the Dow Jones Industrials after reporting Q2 total expenses of $12.90 billion, above the consensus of $12.73 billion. 3M Co (MMM) is down more than -3% after cutting its full-year organic sales estimate to +2% from a previous forecast of +2% to +3%. Sarepta Therapeutics (SRPT) is down more than -18% after it said another patient died from acute liver failure after receiving one of its experimental gene therapies for a muscle disease. Autoliv (ALV) is down more than -4% after reporting Q2 adjusted operating margin of 9.30%, below the consensus of 9.35%. Builders FirstSource (BLDR) is down more than -2% after Zelman & Associates downgraded the stock to underperform. Talen Energy (TLN) is up more than +22% after acquiring gas-fired power plants in Pennsylvania and Ohio for $3.5 billion. Invesco Ltd (IVZ) is up more than +11% to lead gainers in the S&P 500 after it filed a proxy statement with the SEC seeking to convert the Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 into an open-ended fund from a unit investment trust. Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) is up more than +6% after reporting Q2 total net interest income of $860 million, well above the consensus of $794.7 million. Regions Financial (RF) is up more than +4% after reporting Q2 net interest income of $1.27 billion, better than the consensus of $1.24 billion, and raising its full-year net interest income growth estimate to +3% to +5% from a previous estimate of +1% to +4%. Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is up more than +3% after Jefferies upgraded the stock to buy from hold with a price target of $145. Norfolk Southern (NSC) is up more than +3% on reports that Union Pacific is said to be exploring an acquisition of the company. Charles Schwab (SCHW) is up more than +2% after reporting Q2 net revenue of $5.85 billion, stronger than the consensus of $5.72 billion. Earnings Reports (7/18/2025) 3M Co (MMM), Ally Financial Inc (ALLY), American Express Co (AXP), Charles Schwab Corp/The (SCHW), Comerica Inc (CMA), Euronet Worldwide Inc (EEFT), Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH (HBAN), MarketAxess Holdings Inc (MKTX), Regions Financial Corp (RF), Schlumberger NV (SLB), Southern Copper Corp (SCCO), Truist Financial Corp (TFC). On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Verge
29 minutes ago
- The Verge
Microsoft suddenly kills its movies and TV store on Xbox and Windows
Microsoft has suddenly shut its movies and TV store on Xbox consoles and Windows PCs. As of today you can no longer purchase new movies or TV shows from the Microsoft Store on Xbox or Windows, but you will still be able to access previously purchased content on devices. 'Downloads will continue to be available on Windows and in HD max resolution,' says Microsoft, but you'll have to continue using the Movies & TV app on Windows or Xbox to play the content you own rather than access it from another service — unless your purchased movies are part of Movies Anywhere in the US. Microsoft is not offering a refund for purchases, either. The closure of Microsoft's movies and TV store has been nervously anticipated by Xbox and Windows users ever since Microsoft shut down its Groove Music service in 2017. Microsoft originally launched a movies and TV storefront with the Zune Video Marketplace in 2006, before it was replaced by Xbox Video in 2012. That then morphed into the Movies & TV app and store in 2015, and now a decade later it's going away. Microsoft is now leaving it up to Amazon, Netflix, Apple TV, and the many other streaming video services to cater for movies and TV content on Windows and Xbox. Microsoft will continue to provide support for any issues playing back previously purchased content, and owners will be hoping the company keeps its servers online for many years to come.


The Verge
29 minutes ago
- The Verge
24,000 e-bike batteries recalled because the US can't get its shit together
The US federal government's consumer watchdog has issued a recall for 'about 24,000' batteries sold with cheap VIVI e-bikes at retailers like Walmart, Amazon, and AliExpress for prices between $365 and $950. At least 14 incidents of overheating batteries have been reported, with three reported fires. No injuries have been reported, but owners are urged to stop using the e-bikes immediately because the lithium-ion batteries pose a 'risk of serious injury or death.' The VIVI e-bikes and batteries in question — models listed here — were likely not certified to UL safety standards. That's not stated in the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recall notice, but it's a near universal truth for budget brands selling e-bikes at rock-bottom prices. Certification costs money and is entirely voluntary outside of New York City. VIVI also seems to have started appending a 'UL' to the end of its UL certified model names. Owners affected by the recall can contact VIVI to receive a free replacement charger and battery, though it's unclear if the new battery will be UL certified. The recalled batteries were sold with e-bikes between December 2020 and November 2023. Certification costs money and is entirely voluntary The recall deals yet another blow to the reputation of electric bikes in the US, where a preponderance of e-bike incidents occur despite its minuscule share of the global market. In the EU, e-bikes are viewed as safe, reliable, healthy, and space-saving alternatives to automobiles and public transportation thanks largely to strict regulations. The VIVI recall is unlikely to be the last while federal lawmakers in the US continue to ignore e-bike safety. VIVI's e-bikes are made in China, like 86.3 percent of the US bike market. Prior to May 2nd, 2025, Chinese imports were eligible for the de minimis exception, whereby goods costing less than $800 entered the country duty free. The impact of this on the price of gadgets from Temu and clothing from Shein has been well documented, but that seemingly inconsequential exception also impacted e-bike safety. First, it allowed those big lithium-ion batteries attached to cheap e-bike motors to be imported with minimal government inspection, as Consumer Reports warned back in 2022. It also incentivized e-bike makers to cut corners in order to beat that $800 cap. UL testing and certification has a one-time cost of between $30,000 to $100,000 per model, allowing companies like VIVI to undercut brands like Rad Power that willingly pay for the marketing that comes with a UL seal of approval. There are two main safety standards that apply to e-bikes in the US: UL 2849, which applies to e-bikes, and UL 2271 for e-bike batteries. Both certifications are recommended by the CPSC but remain voluntary everywhere but New York City which made them mandatory in 2023. As of September 30th, 2024, there were three deaths and 84 injuries from e-bike fires, down from 14 deaths and 114 injuries for the same period a year earlier. Tough e-bike safety laws like the one coming into effect for all of California on January 1st could convince more e-bike makers to seek UL certification. But only a federal mandate can guarantee a uniform approach and solve the battery safety issue once and for all. In the meantime, we can expect more e-bike battery-related injuries to persons and property in the US. And since President Trump is openly hostile to regulation and any form of transportation that doesn't require exploding dinosaur juice, there's little hope we'll see a federal e-bike safety standard during his reign. So, the best you can do for now is look for that 'UL Certified' sticker. If you're buying a new e-bike in the US, you should demand it. And if you already own a cheap Chinese import without it, well... maybe park it outside.