California, the world's fourth largest economy, to charge road tax as people go electric, citizens furious
California, the fourth largest economy in the world, is planning to introduce a new road charge that would charge drivers per mile driven, a plan that has drawn criticism from California residents and politicians throughout the state, as per a report.
California Eyes Per-Mile Road Tax
The new proposal comes as California is expected to have a $5 billion shortfall in gas tax revenue over the next decade, according to a CBS8 News report. This is because electric and hybrid cars are quickly taking over from gasoline-powered vehicles, as per the report. The state's main source of revenue to fund about 80% of the roadwork, like highway maintenance, is funded via a 59-cent per gallon gas tax, which is the highest in the country, and is slipping away, as per the CBS8 News report.
ALSO READ:
FDA issues new heart risk warnings for Pfizer, Moderna COVID vaccines - should you be worried?
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Unwind in elegant bedrooms with private decks at Sunteck City
Sunteck City
Learn More
Undo
What Is the State Testing?
With the aim of addressing the funding gap, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has recently tried a pilot program to understand this potential new fee system, which could replace the current gas tax, as reported by CBS8 News.
During the trial program, many approaches were tested, like a flat fee of 2.8 cents per mile and an individualised fee based on a vehicle's fuel economy, as reported by CBS8 News. Even different methods of reporting mileage to the state were also considered, such as odometer readings and special plug-in devices to measure miles travelled, according to the report.
Live Events
ALSO READ:
Meet Trapit Bansal, Meta's new AI superintelligence team hire - Is Meta poaching top talent from OpenAI?
Why the Road Charge Now?
Chair of UCLA's Department of Urban Planning, Michael Manville, explained that, "The purchasing power of the fuel tax, which is the main way we finance transportation infrastructure has been steadily declining," as quoted in the report. Manville also pointed out that, "We have a lot more electric cars, we have a lot more hybrid cars, and just the typical new car gets better gas mileage," quoted CBS8 News.
Californians Push Back
However, the latest proposal faced disapproval from many Californians, like a San Diegan, Gail Hofilena expressed her opposition, by saying, "Not for it. I'm a hard 'no' on everything. I got to save my money where I can," as quoted in the report.
While, assembly member Carl DeMaio, who previously had led the opposition to a local mileage fee, criticised the state-wide proposal, saying, "A mileage tax in California is a money grab, let's just be very clear," as quoted by the CBS8 News report.
ALSO READ:
After Canada, now US: College graduates face the toughest job market in decades – what's gone wrong?
DeMaio estimated that the average Californian might have to pay $900 to $1200 per year under this new system and argued that it would disproportionately affect working and lower-income families with longer commutes, as reported by the CBS8 News report.
He explained that, "A lot of working families, poorer, families, have a longer commute, so they will actually pay a higher mileage tax," adding, "It's very regressive. It's unfair," as quoted in the report.
DeMaio also voiced out his scepticism regarding the state's claim that the road charge would replace the existing gas tax, as he said, "That's nonsense," adding, "These people would never give up a tax. They're just going to add an additional one," as quoted in the report.
What's Next?
However, it will be decided by the State Legislature whether the road charge would replace the fuel tax, reported CBS8 News.
According to the report, Caltrans is expected to release the results of its recent pilot program later this year, which will likely inform the ongoing debate over this controversial proposal.
FAQs
How much tax could I be charged under this plan?
Estimates suggest anywhere from $900 to $1,200 per year, depending on how much a person drives, as reported by CBS8 News.
Why is California proposing a road charge now?
Because the gas tax is no longer bringing in enough money, mainly due to more electric and fuel-efficient cars on the road, as per the CBS8 News report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
The AI frenzy is escalating. Again.
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Silicon Valley's artificial intelligence frenzy has found a new and a half years after OpenAI set off the artificial intelligence race with the release of the chatbot ChatGPT, tech companies are accelerating their AI spending, pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into their frantic effort to create systems that can mimic or even exceed the abilities of the human tech industry's giants are building data centres that can cost more than $100 billion and will consume more electricity than 1 million American homes. Salaries for AI experts are jumping as Meta offers signing bonuses to AI researchers that top $100 venture capitalists are dialling up their spending. US investment in AI companies rose to $65 billion in the first quarter, up 33% from the previous quarter and up 550% from the quarter before ChatGPT came out in 2022, according to data from PitchBook, which tracks the industry."Everyone is deeply afraid of being left behind," said Chris V. Nicholson, an investor with the venture capital firm Page One Ventures who focuses on AI astonishing spending, critics argue, comes with a huge risk. AI is arguably more expensive than anything the tech industry has tried to build, and there is no guarantee it will live up to its potential. But the bigger risk, many executives believe, is not spending enough to keep pace with rivals."The thinking from the big CEOs is that they can't afford to be wrong by doing too little, but they can afford to be wrong by doing too much," said Jordan Jacobs, a partner with the venture capital firm Radical biggest spending is for the data centres. Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Google have told investors that they expect to spend a combined $320 billion on infrastructure costs this year. Much of that will go toward building new data centres—more than twice what they spent two years OpenAI and its partners build a roughly $60 billion data centre complex for AI in Texas and another in the Middle East, Meta is erecting a facility in Louisiana that will be twice as large. Amazon is going even bigger with a new campus in Indiana. Amazon's partner, the AI startup Anthropic, says it could eventually use all 30 of the data centres on this 1,200-acre campus to train a single AI experts question whether companies like Anthropic will continue to improve their AI systems at the rapid rate they have maintained over the last few years. But Amazon says that even if the progress stops, it will use those 30 data centres to deliver AI systems to companies are spending so much on data centres, they see no problem with dropping several billions more to buy a startup or millions on a world-class AI researcher. In 2013, Google shocked Silicon Valley when it paid $44 million for just three researchers. Today, that seems like table just invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI, a startup that helps collect and organise the enormous amounts of digital data needed to train AI systems. In return, Meta landed Scale AI's young chief executive, Alexandr Wang, who is considered an up-and-coming deal maker in the AI was not the first big technology company to make such an unusual deal. Google, Microsoft and Amazon have also been investing hundreds of millions—or even billions—in startups just for the right to hire their employees and use their technology. In essence, they bought everything but the startups."Companies are acquiring other companies not necessarily for their products or their services or their revenues but just for their talent," said Dimitri Zabelin, an emerging-technology analyst at Scale AI investment was part of an effort by Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's chief executive, to start an AI research lab dedicated to the creation of superintelligence, a hypothetical technology that would be more powerful than the has been offering compensation packages worth as much as $100 million a person. He and his company made more than 45 offers to researchers at OpenAI alone, according to a person familiar with these approaches.(The New York Times has sued OpenAI and its partner, Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to AI systems. The two companies have denied the suit's claims.)One Silicon Valley giant, Apple, has been more cautious about chatbots. But as the AI race escalates, Apple is also scrambling for talent. The company has had internal discussions about buying the AI startup Perplexity, according to a person familiar with those conversations. Perplexity is valued at $14 billion."Apple seems to be sitting on its hands. But I am sure they will surprise us before too long," said Matt Murphy, a partner at the venture firm Menlo Apple spokesperson did not respond to a request for as venture firms double down on their deal making, there is less appetite for investing in general AI systems designed to do everything, because that work is dominated by established companies like OpenAI and Google. Instead, they are starting to focus on AI that does specific tasks, like Ribbon, a company that does AI for job interviews, and Eleos Health, which creates AI to record and summarise doctor companies acknowledge that they may be overestimating AI's potential. But even if the technology falls short, many executives and investors believe the investments they're making now will be worth it."Christopher Columbus thought he was headed to the Orient, and he ended up in the Caribbean," said Nicholson of Page One Ventures. "He did not get to where he thought he was going, but he still got to a place that was highly valuable."
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Supreme Court Key Rulings: All details about birthright citizenship, Obamacare task force, LGBTQ school books
On Friday, the US Supreme Court issued four major decisions. These rulings involved the Trump administration's birthright citizenship proposal, preventive health care coverage, rural internet funding and religious objections to LGBTQ-themed books in schools. Each ruling came through a 6-3 vote, mostly along ideological lines. Birthright Citizenship The Court allowed the Trump administration to take steps toward ending automatic birthright citizenship. In a 6-3 ruling, it limited the use of nationwide injunctions. Judges may now issue injunctions only for parties involved in the lawsuit. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that courts should not exceed their authority, even if they find executive actions unlawful. She added that lower courts must quickly decide how wide any injunction should be. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo This ruling does not decide the legality of the policy itself. The Trump order redefines birthright citizenship, making it available only to children of US citizens or legal residents. The 14th Amendment currently guarantees citizenship to almost anyone born in the country, except children of diplomats. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, called the ruling a threat to the rule of law. She urged plaintiffs to file class action suits, which the ruling still permits. Live Events The executive order remains blocked in New Hampshire due to a separate case. Still, the decision allows the proposal to move ahead in other states. Also Read: NYC Mayor Race: Will US deport Zohran Mamdani? See who wants to revoke his US citizenship and does law permit it Obamacare Task Force In another 6-3 ruling, the Court upheld the authority of a government task force under the Affordable Care Act. The task force recommends preventive services that insurers must cover at no cost. The challenge came from Christian-owned businesses. They argued that the task force held unchecked power because its members were not Senate-confirmed. The Court disagreed. About 150 million Americans currently receive free preventive services under this arrangement. These include screenings and medications related to cancer, HIV, and cholesterol. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented. They questioned the structure and influence of the task force. Internet Subsidy Program The Court upheld the Universal Service Fund (USF), which supports phone and internet access in rural areas, schools and hospitals. The decision rejected a challenge from Consumers' Research, which claimed Congress gave too much authority to the FCC and a private company. The fund, started in 1996, distributes about $8 billion a year. It supports low-income users and underserved communities. Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the majority. She said the funding structure does not violate the Constitution. Justices Gorsuch, Thomas and Alito dissented. The decision keeps the USF intact. Both the Biden and Trump administrations defended the program. Also Read: Reacher Season 4 Casting Update: Christopher Rodriguez-Marquette joins cast. See which role will he play LGBTQ Books in Schools The Court sided with parents who objected to their children reading LGBTQ-themed books in Maryland elementary schools. The 6-3 ruling found that the school board's refusal to offer opt-outs violated religious rights. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that denying opt-outs placed a burden on parents' right to exercise their religion. The books include stories involving same-sex marriage and transgender identity. The case arose after a school board revised its English curriculum in 2022 to reflect diverse families. Initially, opt-outs were offered but later withdrawn. The plaintiffs included Muslim, Catholic and Orthodox Christian families. A federal judge and appeals court had sided with the school board, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision. FAQs What did the Supreme Court decide about birthright citizenship? The Court allowed the Trump administration to proceed by limiting court injunctions, without ruling on whether the plan itself is constitutional. How did the Court rule on preventive health coverage? The Court upheld a task force's authority under the ACA to mandate no-cost preventive services, benefiting over 150 million Americans.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Post election, Trichy corpn begins work to form street vending panel
Trichy: Following the election of six representatives of street vendors to the street vending committee, Trichy corporation has now launched the work to form the committee by nominating and appointing remaining members. The local body is identifying three representatives from non-governmental organisations (NGO) and residents welfare associations (RWA) to form the 15-member committee. As per Tamil Nadu Street Vendors (protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending) Scheme 2015, a committee must be formed with Trichy corporation commissioner as the chairman. The committee will earmark permitted and prohibited zones to streamline the business of street vendors on arterial roads. "We will complete nominations in a week; three members from NGOs and RWAs will be nominated while remaining six members will be officials from govt departments. Administrative work is underway," a senior corporation official said. Since representatives from NGOs and RWAs have a major say in classifying and finalising the permitted and prohibited zones on roads for business, activists said that apolitical members with valid credentials should be appointed to the committee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Presently, the local body gets no revenue from the street vendors. A minimum of 250 to maximum of 3,000 per annum can be collected by the committee as user fee. "Apolitical members should be appointed as they would not compromise on the safety of commuters for political and personal gains. The vending committee election was completed after a long struggle, now, we expect solutions," H Ghouse Baig, a consumer rights activist said. There are 6,182 street vendors in five zones. "We expect the committee to be formed within 30 days after the election. We have sought an office to deal with the administrative work, " S Selvi, an elected representative of street vendors, said. Roles of the vending committee: 1) Earmarking permitted place for street vendors (vending zone) 2) Identifying crucial roads where street vendors will be prohibited (no-vending zone) 3) Providing facilities such as restrooms for street vendors and collecting user fees. Approximate annual revenue to the civic body: Rs30 lakh to Rs35 lakh per year Members in vending committee: Total- 15 1) Medical officer - 1 2) Police personnel- 2 3) Corporation officer- 1 4) Representatives of street vendors (elected)- 6 5) A representative of traders association- 1 6) Members from NGO, community-based organisation- 2 7) Members from residents welfare association- 1 8) Chairman (city corporation commissioner)- 1
