logo
Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

The Star3 days ago
The Conversation | Published 2 days ago
Khalid Siddig
Since April 2023, Sudan has been engulfed in a devastating war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces. What began as a struggle for power has turned into a national catastrophe. More than 14 million people have been displaced. Health and education systems have collapsed and food insecurity threatens over half the population of about 50 million.
The war has disrupted key sectors, triggering severe economic contractions, and worsening poverty and unemployment levels.
Sudan's finance minister reported in November 2023 that the war had resulted in economic losses exceeding US$26 billion – or more than half the value of the country's economy a year earlier. The industrial sector, which includes manufacturing and oil refining, has lost over 50% of its value. Employment has fallen by 4.6 million jobs over the period of the conflict. More than 7 million more people have been pushed into poverty. The agrifood system alone has shrunk by 33.6%. These estimates exclude informal economy losses.
My research applies economy-wide models to understand how conflict affects national development. In a recent study, my colleagues and I used this approach to answer the question: what will happen to Sudan's economy and poverty levels if the war continues through 2025?
To assess the economic impact of the conflict, we used a Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model. This is a tool that captures how shocks affect different sectors and other agents of the economy, such as firms, government and households.
Based on our modelling, the answer is devastating: the conflict could shrink the size of Sudan's economy by over 40% from 2022 levels, plunging millions more into poverty.
We modelled two scenarios to capture the potential trajectories of Sudan's economy.
The extreme scenario assumes a sharp initial collapse, with a 29.5% contraction in the size of the economy in 2023 and 12.2% in 2024, followed by a 7% decline in 2025, reflecting some stabilisation over time.
The moderate scenario, based on World Bank projections, applies a 20.1% contraction in 2023 and a 15.1% drop in 2024, also followed by a 7% reduction in 2025, indicating a slower but more prolonged deterioration.
We estimated the annual figures and report only the aggregate impacts through 2025 for clarity.
We found that if the conflict endures, the value of Sudan's economy will contract by up to 42% from US$56.3 billion in 2022 (pre-conflict) to US$32.4 billion by the end of 2025. The backbone of livelihoods – agriculture – will be crippled. And the social fabric of the country will continue to fray.
Our Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model used data from various national and international sources to show the impact of conflict on the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare.
We connected this to government and World Bank data to reflect Sudan's current conditions.
This allowed us to simulate how conflict-driven disruptions affect the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare.
Under the extreme scenario, we found: Gross domestic product collapse : Gross domestic product (GDP) measures the total value of all goods and services produced in a country within a year. It's a key indicator of economic health. We found that the value of Sudan's economy could contract by up to 42%. This means the country would be producing less than 60% of what it did before the conflict. This would affect incomes, jobs, government revenues and public services. The industrial sector – heavily concentrated in Khartoum – would be hardest hit, with output shrinking by over 50%. The value of services like education, health, transport and trade would fall by 40%, and agriculture by more than 35%.
Job losses : nearly 4.6 million jobs – about half of all employment – could disappear. Urban areas and non-farm sectors would be worst affected, with over 700,000 farming jobs at risk.
Incomes plummet : household incomes would decline across all groups – rich and poor, rural and urban – by up to 42%. Rural and less-educated households suffer the most.
Poverty spikes : up to 7.5 million more people could fall into poverty, adding to the 61.1% poverty level in 2022. In rural areas, the poverty rate could jump by 32.5 percentage points from the already high rural poverty rate pre-conflict (67.6% of the rural population). Women, especially in rural communities, are hit particularly hard. Urban poverty, which was at 48.8% pre-conflict, increases by 11.6 percentage points.
The agrifood system – which includes farming, food processing, trade and food services – would lose a third of its value under the extreme scenario.
Sudan was already in a fragile state before the war. It was reeling from decades of underinvestment, international sanctions and institutional breakdown.
The war has reversed hard-won gains in poverty reduction. It is also dismantling key productive sectors – from agriculture to manufacturing – which will be essential for recovery once the conflict ends. Every month of continued fighting adds to the damage and raises the cost of rebuilding.
Our projections already show major economic collapse, yet they don't include the full extent of the damage. This includes losses in the informal economy or the strain on household coping strategies. The real situation could be even worse than what the data suggests.
First and foremost, peace is essential. Without an end to the fighting, recovery will be impossible.
Second, even as conflict continues, urgent action is needed to stabilise livelihoods. This means: supporting agriculture in areas that remain relatively safe. Food production must be sustained to prevent famine.
restoring critical services where possible – particularly transport, trade and retail – to keep local economies functioning
protecting the most vulnerable, such as women in rural areas and the elderly, through expanded social protection and targeted cash assistance.
Third, prepare for recovery. The international community – donors, development banks and NGOs – must begin laying the groundwork for post-conflict reconstruction now. This includes investment in public infrastructure, rebuilding institutions and re-integrating displaced populations.
Sudan's war is more than a political crisis. It is an economic catastrophe unfolding in real time. One that is deepening poverty, destroying livelihoods and erasing years of progress.
Our research provides hard numbers to describe what Sudanese families are already experiencing every day.
The country's economy is bleeding. Without a shift in the trajectory of the conflict, recovery could take decades – if it happens at all. | The Conversation Khalid Siddig is Senior Research Fellow and Program Leader for the Sudan Strategy Support Program, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peace offering? Donald Trump's Nobel obsession
Peace offering? Donald Trump's Nobel obsession

eNCA

time8 hours ago

  • eNCA

Peace offering? Donald Trump's Nobel obsession

WASHINGTON - A craving for international prestige, a decade-long Obama rivalry and perhaps a dash of provocation: a mercurial melange of factors is at play in Donald Trump's obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize. "It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on July 31, prompting reactions of disbelief and sarcasm from the Republican leader's opponents. Since his January 20 return to power, the US president "has brokered, on average, one peace deal or ceasefire per month," Leavitt said, citing as examples his mediations between India and Pakistan; Cambodia and Thailand; Egypt and Ethiopia; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Serbia and Kosovo; and others. His leading spokeswoman also mentioned Iran, where Trump ordered US strikes against the Islamic republic's nuclear facilities, as evidence of decisions Leavitt claims have contributed to world peace. She made no mention of the conflict in Ukraine, which Trump pledged multiple times to end on "day one" of his term, or the war in Gaza, which rumbles on and for which the US supplies Israel with weapons. Pakistan, Israel For some foreign leaders, mentioning the prestigious award has become a sign of diplomatic goodwill toward an American president who envisions himself as a peacemaker. Pakistan nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, as did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. During an early July meeting at the White House, a journalist asked the presidents of Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon whether Trump deserved the award. Basking in the flattering responses from the African leaders, a smiling Trump said: "We could do this all day long." Tens of thousands of people can offer a nomination to the Nobel committee, including lawmakers, ministers, certain university professors, former laureates and members of the committee themselves. Nominations are due by January 31, with the announcement coming in October -- this year on the 10th of the month. Law professor Anat Alon-Beck, who is an Israeli-American, submitted Trump's name to the committee's five members, who were appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. The assistant professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law told AFP she did so because of the "extraordinary leadership" and "strategic brilliance" he has shown, in her opinion, in advancing peace and securing the release of hostages held in the Gaza Strip. 'Never' getting the Nobel For some, the prospect of handing the prize to someone who has upended the international order is untenable. "Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show," US history and politics researcher Emma Shortis wrote on news site The Conversation. "Of course Trump does not deserve it." The American president disagrees. "I deserve it, but they will never give it to me," Trump told reporters in February as he hosted Netanyahu at the White House, lamenting not ticking the Nobel box in his life. "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be," Trump griped on his Truth Social platform in June. "But the people know, and that's all that matters to me!" Trump is well-known as someone who is particularly fond of accolades and prizes, Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP, "so he would welcome this major international recognition." And since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, "he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009," Martin added. The prize awarded to the Democratic former president, barely nine months after he took office, sparked heated debate -- and continues to do so. "If I were named Obama I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds," Trump bellyached in October 2024, during the final stretch of the presidential campaign. 338 candidates Three other US presidents have also been so honored: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter. The prize was also awarded to Henry Kissinger in 1973 for his efforts to help end the war in Vietnam. The choice of the one-time US secretary of state was heavily criticized. The full list of Nobel Peace Prize nominees is confidential -- except for individual announcements by sponsors -- but their number is made public. In 2025, there are 338 nominees. Some betting sites have Trump in second place to win, behind Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. By Aurélia End

FW de Klerk Foundation urges South Africa to diversify trade amid US tariffs
FW de Klerk Foundation urges South Africa to diversify trade amid US tariffs

The Star

time10 hours ago

  • The Star

FW de Klerk Foundation urges South Africa to diversify trade amid US tariffs

Bongani Hans | Published 17 hours ago Apartheid's last president, FW De Klerk's foundation has added its voice in calling for South Africa to stop being overly reliant on America and look elsewhere for trade deals amid concerns over President Donald Trump's 30% tariffs on exports. In what could be seen as the country's population bending together against the economic squeezing tariffs, the foundation echoed DA leader John Steenhuisen in calling for the country to spread its wings wider, looking for alternative markets across the world. Steenhuisen, in his capacity as Agriculture minister, said recently that the country is strengthening its trade alliances with the likes of Chile, Peru, and New Zealand 'to jointly lobby for fair and stable trade treatment of fresh produce' through the Southern Hemisphere Association of Fresh Fruit Exporters. He also said the state had finalised new phytosanitary protocols for the export of avocados to China, table grapes to Vietnam and the Philippines, and maize to India. FW de Klerk Foundation's Ismail Joosub called for the strengthening of trading ties ' with our BRICS partners and Africa'. The foundation was concerned about the South African Reserve Bank warning that the tariffs could cost the country around 100,000 jobs, 'hitting our agriculture and automotive sectors the hardest.' South Africa is a member of BRICS, which the US sees as a threat to its global economic and political dominance. 'China's vast market, for instance, can buy more of our minerals, wine, and fruits. 'India, Brazil, and others present growing export destinations if we proactively pursue them,' Joosub said in a statement. He issued the statement on Friday, the same day Trump implemented the tariffs, which he said would be effective on August 7. According to, Charles A. Ray, a chairperson of the US-based Foreign Policy Research Institute's African Program and former US ambassador to Cambodia and Zimbabwe, US was unhappy with South Africa's proximity to China and Russia and its membership with BRICS. He said it ' has since become an alternate political forum to the US-led West, seeking to shift the global order more to the advantage of China and to move away from the US dollar's domination of the global economy'. According to one of Trump's Executive Orders, South Africa was undermining the US's foreign policy and posed threats to the US and its allies' security and interests. ' Our government is already working with industry to find alternative markets for our goods and support affected sectors with contingency plans. 'We should build on this by ramping up trade promotion in Asia, the Middle East and across Africa. 'In short, if one door closes, we must be ready to open many others,' said Joosub. He said another step to protect and grow the economy was to invest in youth, skilling young people by taking advantage of an initiative that China has established through its Luban Workshops, which are vocational training centres in nearly 20 countries. 'South Africa should welcome such initiatives and even expand them here at home, [as] at last year's BRICS summit in Johannesburg, a BRICS Skills Challenge showcased how collaboration in fields like robotics, data science and aerospace can help our youth develop critical skills. 'Millions of talented South African youth remain on the margins, [so] we need to harness their potential through education, training and entrepreneurship support,' he said. Joosub also called for the country to look at technical exchange programs, scholarships, and joint research with programmes with China, India and others to help the country cultivate much-needed skills in engineering, artisans and the innovation sectors. 'By equipping young South Africans with world-class skills, we not only reduce unemployment but also make our economy more competitive globally. 'Our Constitution's preamble enjoins us to ' free the potential of each person , ' and there is no greater potential waiting to be freed than that of our youth,' he said. The foundation was concerned that unemployment was already at 32,9% and youth unemployment exceeded 46%. 'We cannot afford further blows. It's a stark reminder that nearly half of young South Africans struggle to find work,' he said. He said the US was punishing South Africa for its domestic policies, including affirmative action and Black Economic Empowerment, and the country's diplomatic stance on the Russia-Ukraine war and a genocide case against Israel , which he said the US views as creating barriers or running counter to its interests. 'We should be candid: while the American approach is blunt, it has exposed fault lines in our own house. 'This tariff standoff is, in part, a reaction to our policy choices - and it compels us to reflect on whether those choices are achieving their intended goals,' said Joosub. President Cyril Ramaphosa believes his administration will still be able to find a way out of the 30% tariffs before August 7. [email protected]

Ukrainian drone strikes kill 3 in Russia
Ukrainian drone strikes kill 3 in Russia

Eyewitness News

timea day ago

  • Eyewitness News

Ukrainian drone strikes kill 3 in Russia

MOSCOW - Ukrainian drone strikes killed three people and wounded two others overnight in western Russia, regional governors said on Saturday. One woman was killed and two other people were wounded in an attack on an enterprise in Penza, the region's governor, Oleg Melnichenko, wrote on Telegram. An elderly man was killed inside a house that caught fire due to falling drone debris in the Samara region, governor Vyacheslav Fedorishchev posted on Telegram. In the Rostov region, a guard at an industrial facility was killed after a drone attack and a fire in one of the site's buildings, acting Rostov governor Yuri Sliusar said. "The military repelled a massive air attack during the night," destroying drones over seven districts, Sliusar posted on Telegram. Russia's defence ministry said its air defence systems had destroyed 112 Ukrainian drones over Russian territory -- 34 over the Rostov region -- in a nearly nine-hour period, from Friday night to Saturday morning. In Ukraine's central-eastern Dnipropetrovsk region, overnight Russian drone attacks left three people wounded, governor Sergiy Lysak wrote on Telegram. Several buildings, homes and cars were damaged, he said. Russian forces have claimed advances in Dnipropetrovsk, recently announcing the capture of two villages there, part of Moscow's accelerated capture of territory in July, according to AFP's analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW). Kyiv denies any Russian presence in the Dnipropetrovsk area. Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire in the more than three-year conflict, said Friday that he wanted peace but that his demands for ending Moscow's military offensive were "unchanged". Those demands include that Ukraine abandon territory and end ambitions to join NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, said only Putin could end the war and renewed his call for a meeting between the two leaders. "The United States has proposed this. Ukraine has supported it. What is needed is Russia's readiness," he wrote on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store