logo
Parents urged not to give their children smartphones

Parents urged not to give their children smartphones

Telecoms expert Juliet Moran is warning parents that smartphones are wiring permanent addiction pathways in children's brains and can be just as harmful as giving them cigarettes or alcohol.
Dumbphones, also known as 'feature phones', have no internet access, no social media apps, and no endless scrolling.
They're seeing a comeback too, with the total global market projected to bring in £8.5 billion in revenue this year. Yet despite the risks, Ofcom figures show 97% of children own a smartphone by the age of 12, and nearly a quarter of children as young as five to seven already have one.
Juliet, who is director of TelephoneSystems.Cloud, says: 'Smartphones are designed to be addictive and they give children access to the entire world. We don't let children smoke or drink for good reason, yet we give them smartphones which have severe consequences and can be just as addictive.
'There's no need for children so young to own a smartphone. Endless scrolling feeds content addiction by triggering dopamine hits and with children's brains still developing, excessive smartphone use can wire addictive behaviours into young minds permanently.'
Juliet is also warning that parental controls may not be as reliable as many hope. With smartphone companies profiting from increased screen time , there's little incentive for them to make these controls as strict or effective as they truly need to be.
'Controls can help but they're not strict enough," she says. "These phone companies want us to be glued to our phones because it benefits them. The best thing you can do for your child is not give them a smartphone until they are at least 13.
'Children need to be outside and dumbphones give them the freedom to do this while allowing parents to stay in touch with them through calls and text messages. This keeps them away from harmful group chats and social media.'
Juliet plans to get her own daughter a dumbphone for her next birthday so she can keep in touch when she's out with her friends, but stay free from the dangers of smartphones.
'I want her to be able to play outside and do physical activities rather than be stuck in her room scrolling through content all night,' she says.
Recommended reading:
Over 90% of schools in England have banned mobile phones, with academic research suggesting they not only affect pupils' educational attainment, but contribute to problems such as bullying.
Dumbphones help tackle these issues by removing access to messaging apps and features like Emojis, which have been used for covert bullying - a problem highlighted in this year's Netflix show Adolescence.
Campaign groups like Smartphone Free Childhood - now with over 150,000 members - also advise that a child's first phone should only allow calls and texts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Free VPN alert issued to all UK homes as strict new rules confirmed - don't ignore it
Free VPN alert issued to all UK homes as strict new rules confirmed - don't ignore it

Daily Mirror

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Free VPN alert issued to all UK homes as strict new rules confirmed - don't ignore it

The way millions of UK homes access the web has just changed. New rules are now in place that are aimed at stopping people under the age of 18 from accessing adult content, with blocks popping up until proof of ID is confirmed. ‌ The latest update has been implemented by UK regulator Ofcom due to concerns about the rise in youngsters visiting X-rated sites. ‌ Explaining more, Ofcom said: "This is a significant change to how adults in the UK access pornography, and is a key step in helping to protect children from harmful content when they're online." ‌ The new update now means anyone clicking on certain web pages will need to enter credit card or personal details before access is granted. It's clearly important to stop children from seeing inappropriate content but some experts have warned that the new verification system could put people at risk of cyber attacks, with scammers almost certainly looking for easy ways to cash in on the new system. "There are still details of the act that are missing that could even pose significant privacy and security risks by collecting data such as ID uploads and financial information," Jake Moore, Global Cybersecurity Advisor, ESET, explained. ‌ With this in mind, many have now decided to install a VPN (Virtual Private Network) in a bid to get around the new ban. A VPN will hide your IP address and make the web think you accessing websites from another country. One VPN provider says it has seen a huge spike in UK downloads, and these applications are currently top of the charts on official app stores. Although this may seem like a quick fix, downloading free VPNs does come with a risk. ‌ The internet is full of websites that promise VPNs without any payment but these are often too good be true. "One of the primary concerns with free VPNs online is that they may not have robust security features," the EC-Council University explained. "Many free VPN providers lack the resources to develop and maintain strong security protocols, leaving their users vulnerable to cyber threats such as malware, hacking, and phishing. ‌ "Free VPNs need to generate revenue, and they often do this by logging and selling users' data to third-party advertisers. These VPN providers may log your browsing history, online activity, and personal information and then sell it to advertisers, compromising your online privacy." If you are considering installing a VPN then make sure you do your research first and don't install anything unless you know the product is totally safe. Free VPNs might sound tempting, but are fraught with risks, so you will almost certainly need to pay to get a secure experience. "We understand the temptation of having a secure online connection for free," explained the team at Mozilla. "It's important that you know, however, that the risks of free VPNs may make you think twice about that free price tag. When VPNs are offered to users for free, that means that providers have to gain revenue in another way."

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

The Independent

time17 hours ago

  • The Independent

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says
UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says

LONDON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Britain's online safety law risks suppressing free speech due to its heavy-handed enforcement, social media site X said on Friday, adding that significant changes were needed. The Online Safety Act, which is being rolled out this year, sets tough new requirements on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X, as well as sites hosting pornography, to protect children and remove illegal content. But it has attracted criticism from politicians, free-speech campaigners and content creators, who have complained that the rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and more than 468,000 people have signed an online petition calling for the act to be repealed. The government said on Monday it had no plans to do so and it was working with regulator Ofcom to implement the act as quickly as possible. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators". Elon Musk's X, which has implemented age verification, said the law's laudable intentions were at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'," it said in a statement. "It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made." X said the timetable for meeting mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight, and despite being in compliance, platforms still faced threats of enforcement and fines, encouraging over-censorship. It said a balanced approach was the only way to protect liberty, encourage innovation and safeguard children. "It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK," it said. A UK government spokesperson said it is "demonstrably false" that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. "As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression," the spokesperson said. Ofcom said on Thursday it had launched investigations into the compliance of four companies, which collectively run 34 pornography sites.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store