Leaked emails reveal jaw-dropping campaign to get an Aussie CEO FIRED - after he levelled an explosive claim about the Australia-China Relations Institute on social media
Robert Potter, an Australian who runs his own multinational cybersecurity firm, has repeatedly drawn attention to the fact that the Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI) receives funding from two Chinese state-owned companies.
ACRI, based at the University of Technology, Sydney, is partially-funded by the China Construction Bank and John Holland, both state-owned Chinese enterprises.
The institute seeks to study the relationship between China and Australia and was established following a $1.8million donation from Chinese billionaire Xiangmo Huang in 2013.
In 2019, Mr Huang had his visa torn up and was banned from re-entering Australia after ASIO accused him of being 'amenable to conducting acts of foreign interference', which he denied.
Mr Potter claims he wrote to ACRI's director, Professor James Laurenceson, to outline his concerns about ACRI's ongoing funding arrangements and its alleged lack of disclosure in media reports.
However, Mr Potter claims his email fell on deaf ears, so he has voiced his concerns publicly on X on several occasions over the past few years.
Last month, for example, Mr Potter highlighted ACRI's funding arrangements when sharing an opinion piece Prof Laurenceson wrote about how Australia's strengthening economic relationship with China could deliver more security.
'James never disclosed that he's (allegedly) literally payed by China (sic),' Mr Potter alleged.
'His institution is funded by donations from two state owned firm(s). The founding donation for his center came from a guy expelled for foreign influence.'
While ACRI receives funding from two Chinese-state owned businesses, Mr Laurenceson himself is paid by UTS. He does not receive any external funding and it is not suggested otherwise.
ACRI's website also states: 'Industry partners do not provide strategic direction nor do they shape or influence UTS:ACRI's academic activities. UTS:ACRI has a fully independent, academically rigorous and transparent research agenda.'
In response to these repeated public statements, Mr Laurenceson wrote to the Australia National University (ANU), where Mr Potter holds an honorary appointment as a visiting fellow at the Centre for European Studies, to complain about his behaviour.
When he failed to receive a response, Mr Laurenceson sent a follow-up email expressing his frustration that the matter had not been dealt with and that Mr Potter was still employed by the institution.
'I was surprised not to receive a response given Mr Potter's behaviour and had hoped for this to be resolved at a centre level,' he wrote.
'If this is not possible, however, I will pursue other avenues.'
After being fobbed off by ANU, Mr Laurenceson sent another email on July 23 - a day after Mr Potter's latest public comments - to reiterate his complaint.
'Mr Potter appears to remain affiliated with your centre,' Mr Laurenceson wrote.
'He also continues to direct abuse at me, claiming that I am 'literally paid by China'.'
'In the absence of any communication and resolution, I can only assume that his behaviour is deemed tolerable.'
The Daily Mail approached Mr Laurenceson for comment.
A spokesperson for UTS insisted that ACRI has 'stringent guidelines to preserve the independence of its research and commentary'.
'Like most institutes, it is funded by a range of sources which have no influence or impact on its work; these are publicly disclosed and include both Australian and Chinese industry partners,' the spokesperson added.
'A number of sustained, unfounded and personal allegations have been made by one individual about Professor Laurenceson over a prolonged period of time.
'As these have been made from a staff member at ANU using his university credentials, Professor Laurenceson has brought these to the attention of ANU to take whatever action they deem appropriate.
'UTS:ACRI director Professor James Laurenceson is a widely regarded, well respected academic. He is paid by the university and is not the recipient of external funding by any external organisations.'
The Daily Mail does not suggest Prof Laurenceson has been engaged in any acts of foreign influence whatsoever, only that he has faced calls to be more transparent about ACRI's funding arrangements in media articles he has written.
Mr Potter argues that Prof Laurenceson should disclose ACRI's funding arrangements when he writes articles for publications such as the Australian Financial Review, The Australian or when he appears on ABC programs.
Prof Laurenceson, a lifelong academic who has held posts at universities in China and Japan, has written hundreds of articles and academic papers about Australia's relationship with China over the last 15 years.
Titles include: 'Don't be scared, China's plan is good for Australia'; 'Australia's great, untapped resource … Chinese investment'; 'Why all the worry about China?'; 'Why we shouldn't be so worried about China buying the farm' and 'By standing up to China, Australia may end up standing alone'.
Mr Potter, who co-founded cybersecurity firm Internet 2.0 and the Cyber Activities Group, has spent the past few years training Ukrainian soldiers in how to ward off potential cyber attacks from Russian hackers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Anthony Albanese says Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘in denial' about crisis in Gaza
Benjamin Netanyahu is 'in denial' over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Anthony Albanese claimed after a phone call with the Israeli leader, saying frustration with Israel's military campaign in the besieged territory was part of Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state. The prime minister's escalating public criticism of Israel comes as the French president, Emmanuel Macron, overnight welcomed Australia's commitment to recognise Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly in September. 'I spoke with prime minister Netanyahu. He, again, reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well – which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people,' Albanese told ABC TV. Albanese yesterday said Australia's pledge to recognise a Palestinian state was 'predicated' on conditions agreed to by the Palestinian Authority, which included no role for terror group Hamas in a future government. The prime minister said the international community could block Hamas from standing in future elections in Palestine, but refused to say whether Australia would revoke its plans to recognise if such conditions were not met. 'You can [stop Hamas from standing in elections] if you have the Arab states in the Middle East all speaking as one, as well as the Palestinian Authority, as well as the international community. Yes, you can,' he told Nine. In a press conference, Albanese went on to say that violence in the region, including Israel's planned military occupation of Gaza City, 'just cannot continue into the future without an end point.' 'The international community is coming up with an end point, which is, how do we resolve this? How do we get a permanent security position?' he said. Macron, who declared in July that France would recognise Palestinian statehood at the General Assembly, said Australia was 'joining the momentum' of a global push toward resolving the crisis in Gaza. 'This reflects our commitment to the two-State solution and to the need to collectively rebuild a political pathway, without which there can be no peace and security for all,' he wrote. There are a raft of unanswered questions including how the Palestinian state will be formed, how it would be demilitarised, and where Australia would establish an embassy. Albanese and foreign minister Penny Wong shrugged off repeated questions in media interviews on Monday and Tuesday about how Australia would respond if the Palestinian Authority's commitments were not met, or if they would reverse their recognition pledge. 'What we will also do is work with the international community to hold the Palestinian Authority to its commitments,' Wong told the ABC's 7.30 program on Monday night. The Coalition opposition is critical of the Labor government's decision, claiming it rewards Hamas, and that the government has failed to answer outstanding questions. The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, said on Tuesday the government hasn't clarified its position on how those conditions will be met. '[Albanese] actually refuses to say what will happen if the conditions that he sets out for recognition are not met,' she told 2GB radio. 'Those conditions are unlikely in many views to be met. One of them is that there can't be a role for the terrorists in any future Palestinian state, but Hamas is there, they're on the ground, they're in control.' Former Liberal prime minister, Scott Morrison, claimed Jewish-Australians would feel a 'sense of betrayal' at the government's shift. 'It will prove a hollow gesture, like for all those who have taken this step before it. None should take any comfort in it. Meanwhile the suffering will regrettably continue in Gaza and the hostages will remain in captivity,' Morrison wrote on his website. Israel's government has been deeply critical of Anthony Albanese's decision, and also said Labor is rewarding Hamas. In a statement on X, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sharren Haskel, said the move was about domestic politics, not peace. '50 of our hostages remain in Hamas's dungeons of torture, being starved to death - being forced to dig their own graves, yet the Australian government has decided now is the right time to reward the monsters of October 7 with recognition of a Palestinian state,' she wrote. 'This decision by Australia won't change anything in Israel or Gaza, but let's be quite clear, this is all about domestic politics, not peace.'
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lucky $100million Powerball winner STILL hasn't claimed their prize two months on - as theories swirl around the identity of the mystery ticket holder
The mystery winner of a $100million Powerball jackpot has yet to claim their life-changing prize two months after the draw. The winning ticket for Powerball draw 1517 was purchased at Bondi Junction Newsagency and Internet Cafe, in Sydney 's eastern suburbs. Despite public appeals, no one has come forward to claim the third-largest lottery prize in Australian history since the draw was called on June 12. Part-time cashier Grace Martino told Daily Mail the winner may have been a tourist or backpacker, as the regular players have all been asking about the result. 'People come through all the time. It could be somebody who passed by; it could be someone who's a backpacker; it could be a tourist,' she said. Ms Martino does not even know when the customer bought the winning ticket. Instead, lottery officials are trying to match the time of the ticket's purchase with CCTV footage from inside the store. 'We have no idea, they never disclose that. I guess that's a big secret,' Ms Martino said. The store has sold winning tickets in the past, including to a lucky customer who won $1million. Ms Martino advised anybody who plays regularly to register their tickets so they can still claim their winnings in case they lose proof of their purchase. When asked if she had ever claimed a lottery prize, Ms Martino said not quite. 'Oh, no, I'm still here,' she said. The $100million prize is the third-biggest in Australia's history. In 2019, a nurse in Sydney took home the second-biggest prize after claiming $107million. A man in Adelaide took home the largest lottery prize in 2024, winning $150million in a Powerball jackpot. The odds of winning the Powerball jackpot are 134million to one, according to official estimates. Lottery winners in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory have six years from the draw date to claim their lottery prize. In Queensland, players have seven years. There is no time limit for winners in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. However, they face administrative fees if they delay collecting their prize for more than 12 months. On average, successful ticket holders claim their prize ten days after winning. The Lott's investigation team is working to find the winner. Information about the person, however, cannot be released unless they consent. Other details, including the time and date of the ticket's purchase, cannot be released as they are key pieces of information used to verify the winning ticket holder. '(There are) established guidelines for the responsible management of unclaimed prize money, which include initiatives such as community donations, bonus draws, and player promotions,' a Lott spokesman said. 'That said, our hope is that the full amount is claimed and enjoyed by its rightful owner well before then.' The Lott advises punters to register their tickets in case they misplace or damage them. Somebody who has lost the ticket entirely can send the Lott a declaration including the time and place of their purchase. But the Lott is not obligated to pay out to the holder of a missing and unregistered ticket. The company will only do so if they find 'clear and irrefutable' evidence the claimant purchased the ticket. If a punter discovers an unregistered winning ticket, nothing technically stops them from claiming the win. A spokesman advised tickets should be treated with the same care as cash. If the winner was a backpacker or tourist, as is possible in a bustling suburb like Bondi Junction, foreign nationals can still claim the prize. However, their win could be subject to different taxation rules depending on their home country. They would also either have to claim their ticket while still in the country, or return to make the claim.
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why Chinese social media is melting down over absurdly wealthy heiress Lanlan Yang who smashed her Rolls-Royce into Kyle Sandilands' chauffeur: Read the ridiculous claims
Rumours about the identity, fortune and bank balance of a wealthy heiress who crashed her Rolls-Royce into a Mercedes in Sydney 's eastern suburbs have spread like wildfire on Chinese social media. LanLan Yang, 23, was allegedly behind the wheel of her $1.5million Rolls-Royce Cullinan in the early hours of July 27 when she smashed into a van driven by George Plassaras, radio king Kyle Sandilands ' chauffeur. Plassaras was left in hospital with life-threatening injuries. Sandilands was not in the car at the time. Yang was charged by NSW Police with causing bodily harm by misconduct and refusing or failing to submit a breath test. Yang's extraordinary apparent wealth has sparked widespread interest in Australia - particularly after the Daily Mail revealed she owned two Rolls-Royces and lived in a luxury apartment in Sydney's eastern suburbs. And in recent days, the speculation has taken off in China, where she has become the subject of wild, inaccurate and very viral claims posted on Chinese platforms Douyin and Weibo, plus mainstream Chinese media reports. A series of widely-viewed Chinese social media posts falsely claimed that Yang paid up an $80million AUD bond to get bail from Waverley Local Court in Sydney's eastern suburbs. They also claimed, without naming a source or providing any corroboration, that authorities found she had $270 billion sitting in a local bank account when she was arrested. The first claim about the bond is demonstrably false - a court spokesperson told the Daily Mail there was 'no monetary condition stipulated by police' as part of her bail agreement. The bank balance claim is impossible to confirm. Fevered Chinese social media speculation also claimed she uses the English name 'Wendy' and that she is a former University of NSW student whose fortune stems from the iron ore trade. Some users even claim her minder - seen when the Daily Mail confronted Yang outside Rose Bay Police Station last month - has the rank of lieutenant colonel with the Beijing police special duty unit. This could not be confirmed and is likely false. Yang ignored questions about the charges she faces, her ability to afford two Rolls-Royces, and Plassaras's significant injuries when our reporter crossed paths with her on July 30. She kept her head down and climbed into a chauffeur-driven minivan, a stark contrast to the two luxury vehicles she is known to own. The crash left Plassaras with a broken spine, ribs, hips and femurs, a ruptured spleen and diaphragm, and a torn-open abdomen. Sandilands described his chauffeur Mr Plassaras as the 'greatest employee ever'. 'What did [he] say when he was taken away in the ambulance? He asked for his mobile phone so he could do what?' he said. 'This is a guy at 4.30 in the morning after he has been cut out of his vehicle, he's been trapped in his van for an hour, this poor bloke. Driver to the rich and famous George Plassaras was left in hospital with life-threatening injuries by the crash (above) Sandilands was not in the car at the time 'And he asks the ambo: 'Get my phone so I can make sure Kyle's all right for the week.' Neighbours at Yang's elite rental block, which caters to 'discerning clientele,' describe her as polite but rarely seen. They say she occupies the building's prized penthouse and decorates her car with ultra-exclusive Labubu toys. She also owns a second unregistered white Rolls-Royce Ghost Convertible worth up to $800,000, which sits unused in her Vaucluse penthouse garage. The building's car lift can only take 3,000kg, forcing her to park her heavier Cullinan SUV in the street. CCTV footage of the crash appears to show Yang's SUV veering into oncoming traffic before the head-on impact. Yang is on conditional bail ahead of her August 15 appearance at Downing Centre Local Court. Her bail conditions ban her from driving, require her to remain in her penthouse between 8pm and 6am, and to report to police three times a week.
