Democrats Assail Bessent on ‘Privatizing' Social Security Remark
'In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security,' Bessent said of the tax-advantaged investment accounts created by President Donald Trump's signature domestic policy initiative, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was signed into law on July 4.
'Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out,' Bessent said at a Breitbart News event Wednesday in Washington. 'To the extent that if all of a sudden these accounts grow, and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement, then that's a game-changer.'
The accounts can help young people feel like they are part of the system rather than being disillusioned with it, he added.
'Why are we on the verge of Caracas on the Hudson in New York?' Bessent said, referring to the campaign of Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for mayor of New York. 'Why is this guy getting traction? Because people, young people, are disillusioned with the system.'
Hours later, Bessent sought to clarify his remarks. 'Trump Baby Accounts are an additive benefit for future generations, which will supplement the sanctity of Social Security's guaranteed payments,' the secretary said in a post on X. 'This is not an either-or question: our Administration is committed to protecting Social Security and to making sure seniors have more money.'
Earlier: Social Security Warns of 23% Benefit Cut by 2034 Without a Fix
Democrats seized on Bessent's comments at the Breitbart event, calling them a scheme to cut benefits.
Bessent 'just said the quiet part out loud,' said Tim Hogan, an adviser for the Democratic National Committee. 'Trump is now coming after American seniors with a 'backdoor' scam to take away the benefits they earned. Democrats won't stand by as Trump screws over working families in order to give more handouts to billionaires.'
Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, warned that 'Republicans would follow up privatization with brutal cuts that would drive vulnerable people into destitution.'
A Treasury spokesperson said Bessent's remarks had been taken out of context and that the accounts are meant to 'work in conjunction with Social Security to broaden and increase the savings and wealth of Americans.'
'Social Security is a critical safety net for Americans and always will be,' the spokesperson said.
The savings program allows parents to contribute as much as $5,000 a year to an investment account for newborns that can be drawn upon when the child turns 18. The Treasury Department will contribute $1,000 to each account for children born between January of this year through 2028.
'When you do this, you make everyone a shareholder,' Bessent said. 'People who are part of the system do not want to bring down the system.'
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
25 minutes ago
- India.com
Why is India's Tejas MK2 much better than F-35 from US? Indigenous fighter jet can...
Why is India's Tejas MK2 much better than F-35 from US? Indigenous fighter jet can... After the way Trump has dropped the bomb of 25% tariff on India , it is also being feared that the US President is angry about not being able to sell his goods? This development comes at a time when there is a lot of discussion going on about the deal of the fifth generation US stealth fighter jet F-35. In such a situation, it is important to understand that in what sense is the Tejas Mk2 that India is making in its country any less than its expensive fighter jet? What is the difference between F-35, Tejas Mk2? US company Lockheed Martin makes mainly three versions of F-35 fighter aircraft. The price of the lowest version of these is more than $82.5 million. The price of F-35B, which was stuck in Kerala for 39 days, is $109 million. On the other hand, the estimated cost of Tejas MK2, which Indian company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is working on, is going to be only around $50 to $60 million. Speed and strength: The American fighter jet F-35 uses a 43,000lb thrust engine. Its speed is Mach 1.6. That is, 1,960 kilometers per hour. Whereas, the GE F414 engine being used in Tejas Mk2 produces a thrust of 98 kilonewtons. That means its speed will be Mach 1.8, that is, it can tear through the winds at a speed of 2,205 kilometers per hour. F-35 is equipped with integrated AESA radar, 360 degree camera and advanced data fusion equipment, which gives the pilot information about the real time location of enemies. At the same time, our Tejas Mk2 is also being equipped with the best AESA radar, infrared search and track equipment is being installed in it and the cockpit is being designed in such a smart way that many targets can be tracked simultaneously. Weapon and payload capacity: The F-35 can carry up to 8,160 kg of weapons on a mission. Tejas Mk2, despite being a 4.5 generation fighter, is capable of carrying 6,500 kg of weapons. The Indian fighter is also capable of flying simultaneously carrying indigenous, western and Russian weapons, bombs and missiles. Firepower and flight capability: The combat range of the F-35 is about 1,500 km, while it can fly up to 2,200 km in a single round without refueling (ferry range). The combat range of Tejas Mk2 is about 3,000 km (with drops or additional tanks); and due to the ability to refuel in the air and larger fuel tanks, it is able to fly for longer missions. Meaning, here too the difference between the two is clear. How much difference does stealth technology make? The F-35 is a fifth-generation stealth fighter jet. This technology enables it to remain hidden from enemy radars, infrared sensors and other detection systems. All this is due to its special design and the special material used in it, which enables it to deceive the radar. While radar-evading elements have been installed in Tejas Mk2, its improved and new canard wings make it 75% more advanced than its previous version.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
Indian refiners still buying oil from Russia, report claims amid Trump's 'halt' remark
Indian refiners reportedly keep buying Russian crude oil for economic reasons, despite US President Trump's claim that India stopped. Earlier, the ministry of external affairs had defended India's longstanding partnership with Russia read more Advertisement Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin. File image/ Reuters Indian refiners have not stopped buying crude oil from Russia, news agency ANI has reported, citing sources in the government. 'Their supply decisions are guided by price, grade of crude, inventories, logistics and other economic factors,' the agency quoted the source as saying. The sources also highlighted Russia's crucial place in the global oil market, being the world's second-largest exporter of crude. Fears of Russian oil being pushed out of the market and the consequent dislocation of traditional trade flows drove dated Brent crude prices to soar to US$137 per barrel in March 2022. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In this challenging environment, India, as the world's third-largest energy consumer with 85 per cent crude oil import dependence, strategically adapted its sourcing to secure affordable energy while fully adhering to international norms,' said the sources. Earlier, US President Donald Trump on Friday (August 1) said he heard that India is no longer purchasing oil from Russia. While speaking to the reporters, Trump went on to describe the alleged halting of oil purchases as a 'good step'. 'I understand India no longer is going to be buying oil from Russia,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House for his weekend trip to his Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey. 'That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not, but that's a good step. We'll see what happens,' he said. Trump's statement came after news agency Reuters reported, citing sources, that Indian state-owned refineries suspended Russian oil purchases last week amid threats of tariffs from US and narrowing price discounts. Meanwhile, the Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal on Friday responded to the criticisms hurled by the Trump administration and defended India's longstanding partnership with Russia. 'India and Russia share a steady and time-tested partnership,' he said. Jaiswal also reaffirmed the strength of the India-US relationship, noting it is based on 'shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties,' and expressed confidence that bilateral relations would continue to move forward despite current tensions.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explained: The reason why India wouldn't budge and Trump slapped 25% tariff
Explained: The reason why India wouldn't budge and Trump slapped 25% tariff TOI Explains Reuters Aug 2, 2025, 12:19 IST IST The US wants India to open its market to American products including dairy, corn and soybeans, but India has refused in order to protect its farmers. Here's why US President Donald Trump on Thursday (July 31) slapped a 25% tariff on Indian goods after prolonged talks that got bogged down over access to India's labour-intensive agricultural sector, which New Delhi has pledged to protect.
