logo
Liberal party hardliners are on the back foot – but while Tony Abbott is around, the right will fight

Liberal party hardliners are on the back foot – but while Tony Abbott is around, the right will fight

The Guardian18-07-2025
Four days on from the Liberal party's worst federal election defeat in its 80-year history, Tony Abbott sought to explain the wreckage. Peter Dutton, Abbott argued, put the Coalition in the 'box seat' to beat Labor with his opposition to the Indigenous voice to parliament, nuclear power ambitions, refusal to stand in front of the Aboriginal flag and warnings about 'indoctrination' in schools. That was at the end of 2024. Then something changed.
'This year, really from January on, we failed to pick fights,' the former Liberal prime minister told a podcast by the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), the rightwing thinktank of which he is a distinguished fellow.
'And when we did pick fights on, for argument's sake, trying to get public servants back into the office, as soon as we came under a bit of pressure, we pulled back. We kind of lost our mojo a bit; we lost direction a bit.'
The explanation from Abbott – who was close to Dutton – reflected a popular counter-narrative pushed by hardline conservatives in the election postmortem. The Coalition didn't lose, and lose badly, because Dutton had dragged it too far to the right, as most commentators concluded.
It lost, Abbott was suggesting, because Dutton pulled back.
As Sussan Ley tries to reposition the Liberals to the political centre in response to Dutton's catastrophic defeat, the new leader will face resistance from conservatives, inside and outside the party, who are adamant it must remain on the right.
This latest chapter in the party's enduring internal conflict is expected to flare during debates over whether to dump the target of net zero emissions by 2050, adopt gender quotas and embrace or shun culture wars.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
Conversations with Liberal MPs and insiders suggest that more than six years after losing his seat in federal parliament, Abbott remains arguably the most powerful conservative in Australian politics. One senior Liberal source said Abbott was as influential as he has been since he was dumped as prime minister in 2015.
The 67-year-old is entrenched in the ecosystem of rightwing media, thinktanks and lobby groups that shape conservative thinking. He sits on the board in charge of Fox News (Donald Trump's favoured cable news channel), appears regularly on Sky News, often with his former chief-of-staff Peta Credlin, and has ties to the IPA and the rightwing campaign group Advance.
Overseas, Abbott advises the rightwing political forum Alliance for Responsible Citizenship and is a senior visiting fellow at the Danube Institute, a Hungary-based thinktank supportive of the country's far-right prime minister, Viktor Orbán.
In a revealing insight into his worldview, Abbott used a recent speech to the Hungarian Conservative Political Action Conference to urge western countries to have the 'cultural self-confidence' to resist the 'the politics of climate and identity' and the 'false doctrine of multiculturalism'.
One Liberal source suggested Abbott's endgame was to transform the Liberals – the supposed 'broad church' accomodating moderates and conservatives – into a rightwing party.
'He [Abbott] wants to be the major power behind the throne. He's not driven by money; he's driven by power,' a Liberal source said.
Abbott helped orchestrate Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's post-election defection from the Nationals to the Liberals to run as Angus Taylor's deputy, two sources familiar with the covert plot confirmed. He actively campaigned for fellow anti-voice campaigner Warren Mundine in his preselection tilt for Bradfield. He publicly put pressure on Ley to extend the Dutton-backed intervention into the troubled NSW Liberal division.
The three cases are evidence of Abbott as an active player internally. But they are instructive for another reason: in each, he failed to achieve his ultimate outcome.
The Taylor-Price leadership team never materialised while Mundine lost preselection in Bradfield to Gisele Kapterian. The NSW intervention was ultimately extended but in a vastly different form after Ley secured support for an all-NSW administrative committee to run the branch, effectively sacking the two controversial Victorian figures installed under Dutton with Abbott's support.
An 11th-hour push from right faction powerbrokers to secure Abbott a seat on the new committee failed.
Some Liberals view the sequence of setbacks, each at the hands of Ley and her allies, as signs of the waning influence of Abbott and the conservatives over the party.
Others aren't so sure.
Under Dutton, the conservatives ruled the Liberal party in Canberra. After the teal independents all but wiped out the Liberal moderates in 2022 and Scott Morrison's exit diminished the centre-right group that had expanded around him, Dutton and the right faction assumed both numerical and ideological control of the federal party.
Dutton's dramatic downfall at the 3 May federal election set in train a realignment of the internal power dynamics. With more than 20 members, the right is still clearly the largest faction in the 52-member federal Liberal party room.
Yet it was unable to install Taylor as Dutton's successor after surviving moderates, centre-right and unaligned MPs combined to make Ley the federal party's first female leader.
Taylor and senior rightwingers Michaelia Cash, James Paterson and Andrew Hastie have retained senior roles, but other conservatives were dumped or demoted, including Sarah Henderson, Claire Chandler, Tony Pasin and Price, who abandoned plans to run for deputy leader after Taylor lost the ballot.
The right was surprised and concerned at how far Ley went in rewarding backers and punishing internal rivals in her shadow ministry, particularly given she won the leadership by just 29 votes to 25.
'She overextended in the reshuffle and that could come back to haunt her,' one Liberal insider says.
For now, senior conservatives are supporting Ley after a tumultuous first two months in the role, which included navigating the brief split with the Nationals while grieving over her mother's death.
Taylor, now the shadow defence minister, has not been agitating behind the scenes and has been dissuading others from doing so, sources say.
The open hostilities in the run-up to the leadership vote, which included the distribution of a scorecard mocking Ley's closeness to centre-right numbers man Alex Hawke, her past support for Palestine and her alleged faith in 'numerology', have stopped.
There is a widely held view among Liberal MPs that Ley's fledging leadership is not under threat and undermining her serves no one's interest.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Conservatives are wary, though, of the new leader's early, deliberate steps to distance herself from Dutton, such as opening her speech to the National Press Club with an acknowledgment of country to traditional owners.
'[Sussan] is a completely different leader to Dutton and that is a good thing,' a senior Liberal source says.
'She does need to be careful in navigating her way. Her acknowledgment to country at the Press Club and standing in front of three flags during her press conference did not go down well with the base.
'The Liberal party is the main centre-right party in Australia and we cannot forget that. If we do, we will lose our base.'
The right secured a small win ahead of parliament's return, with the faction's pick, Slade Brockman, defeating the Ley-backed candidate, Andrew McLachlan, in an internal ballot for the role of deputy Senate president.
Liberal MPs acknowledge conflict is inevitable and even necessary after internal contest was sacrificed for discipline under Dutton, a trade-off many MPs blame for the threadbare agenda it offered on 3 May.
But some fights are expected to extend well beyond the bounds of robust debate, descending instead into open political warfare.
'Everyone will behave themselves in the short term, but whenever something comes up, people will seek to use that to litigate their personal grievances,' one MP said.
'Things like net zero, for example, will really ramp up.'
Climate change is ground zero for the Liberal party's internecine conflicts. The latest battle – whether to abandon a commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 – shapes as a defining contest for Ley's leadership and the future of the Liberal-National Coalition.
The hard-won but fragile consensus that allowed Morrison to sign up the Coalition to the emissions target in 2021 has fractured, exposing deep divisions over what has become a totemic issue for the political right.
Ley immediately put net zero up for debate after agreeing to review the opposition's entire policy agenda.
The shadow energy minister, Dan Tehan, is leading an internal policy working group that will report to Ley and the Nationals leader, David Littleproud. The Nationals will conduct a separate review, to be jointly led by parliament's loudest net zero critic, Matt Canavan.
Liberal MPs are not optimistic a consensus position can be achieved as they brace for a divisive and damaging brawl.
'I'm a bit worried about it,' one says. 'The issue was settled at enormous cost [under Morrison]. No person in their right mind should open it up again.'
One option discussed among some Liberal MPs would involve abandoning 2030 and 2035 targets – a position that would be incompatible with the Paris agreement – but retaining the 2050 ambition.
Even that compromise would struggle to placate a growing number of sceptical colleagues, who believe net zero proponents have failed to explain the case for climate targets to rightwing voters.
'The mods say we need net zero to win,' one such MP says. 'That is the most facile, self-serving reason – it's exactly why people hate politicians.'
Pressure to dump net zero is also coming from the party's state branches and grassroots members.
Alex Antic's SA Liberal division, Price's NT Country Liberal party and the NSW Nationals division have all passed motions since the federal election rejecting net zero.
The branch members, who are responsible for selecting election candidates, tend to skew older and more conservative than the average Liberal supporter.
They tend to get their news and opinions from Sky News, Liberals say, making the conservative figures who appear on the channel's evening programs hugely influential over the 'base'.
Figures such as Tony Abbott.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia
Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

Economists doubt Trump outlook that US will sell 'so much' beef to Australia

WASHINGTON/CANBERRA/CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said that the United States would sell "so much" beef to Australia after Canberra relaxed import restrictions on Thursday, but economists and traders said that high prices and tight supplies make major American exports unlikely. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for U.S. beef. The move will not significantly increase U.S. shipments, though, because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower, analysts said. U.S. companies export small quantities of beef to Australian buyers. They import much more in the form of lean beef used to make hamburgers, particularly as U.S. production has declined due to tight cattle supplies. U.S. beef prices set records this year and the number of beef cattle fell to the lowest level since 1961 after ranchers slashed their herds due to drought that burned up pasturelands used for grazing. A ban on cattle imports from Mexico because of New World screwworm, a devastating livestock pest, and steep tariffs on Brazilian beef that are set to take effect on Aug. 1 could further tighten supplies, and require additional imports of Australian beef. "We can't get enough beef in the U.S. right now, so we're bringing it in from Australia and Brazil," said Dan Norcini, an independent U.S. livestock trader. "We're not going to be selling anything significant to anyone." Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tons of U.S. product moving the other way. "They have more cattle than people," said David Anderson, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M University. "That's why they export so much." U.S. and Australian beef also taste different. Many Australians like the grass-fed beef raised there, not marbled beef from U.S.-raised cattle that are generally fed with grain, said Jerry Klassen, chief analyst for Resilient Capital in Winnipeg. He predicted the United States will not export substantial amounts of beef to Australia in the next five years. "We just aren't in a position to export much beef to anyone, and the reality is Australia doesn't really have much need for U.S. beef," said Karl Setzer, partner at Consus Ag. The barriers that remain to exporting significant volumes of U.S. beef to Australia appeared to be lost on Trump this week. "We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE." Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States – a characterisation many economists dispute. "For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on U.S. beef," U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a "major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for U.S. farmers and ranchers." Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of U.S. biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted U.S. beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the U.S. but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. The U.S. sources some of its feeder cattle from the two neighboring countries. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said U.S. cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. "We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump," shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia faces a 10% across-the-board U.S. tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: "I'm not too sure." "We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement," he said. "We think that they should do that anyway."

Australia's parliament opens with tradition and pageantry – plus a sideshow of protest and reactionary zeal
Australia's parliament opens with tradition and pageantry – plus a sideshow of protest and reactionary zeal

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Australia's parliament opens with tradition and pageantry – plus a sideshow of protest and reactionary zeal

Just as the governor general, Sam Mostyn, was preparing to address the ceremonial opening of federal parliament this week, word got around the press gallery that One Nation was preparing to mount a stunt. Along with veterans Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts, One Nation's two new senators, Warwick Stacey from New South Wales and Tyron Whitten from Western Australia, had quietly let it be known they would turn their back on the Indigenous acknowledgment of country. Tuesday's opening was dominated by tradition and pageantry, including a welcome to country event in the Great Hall and a smoking ceremony on the forecourt earlier in the afternoon. Usually sparsely occupied, the Senate press gallery was packed with reporters but, initially at least, One Nation's statement failed to eventuate. During the speech – a laundry list of the government's policy commitments for the upcoming term, read by the king's representative in Canberra – Greens deputy leader, Mehreen Faruqi, held up a sign protesting against the starvation and suffering caused by Israel's denial of aid for Palestinians in Gaza. That move saw Faruqi sanctioned by the Senate a day later. Labor and the Coalition voted to bar her from taking part in any overseas parliamentary delegations for the next three years, and the Senate president, Sue Lines, called her 'utterly disrespectful' to Mostyn. The debate was at times bitter. Later, as the normal business of parliament got under way at about 5pm, the One Nation foursome turned their backs as Lines made the routine acknowledgment of Canberra's traditional custodians, the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people, and Indigenous elders around the country. The statement took barely 10 seconds, before Hanson, Roberts, Stacey and Whitten were forced into an awkward pivot to avoid snubbing the Lord's Prayer. Sign up: AU Breaking News email For decades, Hanson has weaponised the politics of grievance, including punching down on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. She was on Sky on Tuesday evening to say she was fed up with the practice of acknowledging Indigenous communities, erroneously calling the brief statement a welcome to country, before claiming the longstanding practice somehow 'disenfranchised' her. In reality, the stunt wasn't for the press gallery or other members, but rather it was orchestrated to be quickly packaged up for One Nation's social media followers. Ironically, Hanson then criticised Victorian independent senator Lidia Thorpe for making protests that disrupt parliamentary traditions in Canberra, before claiming it was Labor that was driving division in the community. Sky host Chris Kenny pointed out that some people consider the acknowledgment overdone elsewhere but it was surely appropriate at the start of a sitting of the country's parliament. He suggested participation by Hanson's crew would be the polite approach. The firebrand senator was unmoved. Not to be outdone, Coalition MPs did their best to overshadow Sussan Ley's first question time as opposition leader in the lower house, with Nationals backbenchers Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack making a splash on their new partnership to officially oppose net zero some time this year. Joyce has a private member's bill on the issue, and despite reviews being under way in both the Liberal and Nationals party rooms, he and McCormack came out to call plans to wind back damaging carbon emissions 'insane'. Farmers, they claimed, are fed up with infrastructure for renewable energy taking up prime agricultural land – the MPs failed to acknowledge that drought, floods and less predictable rain patterns caused by climate change are making life for farmers worse. Some Coalition figures consider net zero one of the most politically complex issues facing the Liberals and Nationals in decades, with both parties facing a likely impossible task of trying to reconcile disparate policies in time for the next election. One Nationals figure compared the two former leaders to old bulls bored after being put out to pasture. The rightwing MPs determined to keep fighting the climate wars look out of touch, long after voters have made up their minds on the subject. It shouldn't be lost on anyone that both Joyce and McCormack have previously argued for net zero and Labor's ascendancy could render the Coalition's policy position pretty meaningless for at least three – possibly six – years to come. By Friday, the Liberal Senate leader, Michaelia Cash, was arguing against acknowledgment of country and the Aboriginal flag being displayed at official events. Cash endorsed motions to be debated at the weekend's WA Liberal state council, also set to include a push to abandon net zero endorsed by frontbencher Andrew Hastie. For her part, Ley, who says she wants the Coalition to better reflect the modern Australia it seeks to represent, was gracious in acknowledging symbolic and practical recognition of Indigenous Australians this week. She called for the ceremonial welcome by Indigenous leaders to 'set the tone' for MPs as they seek practical action to improve lives and expand opportunity for Indigenous people around the country. Liberal figures were downcast about the atmospherics of renewed culture war fights on the flag, Indigenous recognition and net zero, asking why MPs would waste valuable political capital to speak outside their portfolios. One called the antics 'a sideshow' and suggested more discipline was necessary to bring the fight to Labor. It might be only a few months on from the 3 May election, but Hanson and the outspoken members of the Coalition have failed to appreciate that Anthony Albanese won the centre by focusing on the issues that voters see as critical to making their lives better. Ley's predecessor, Peter Dutton, lost in part because voters were turned off by his attacks on Indigenous recognition and Trump-style division and obstruction. Even many who find statements of acknowledgment overdone at public events or in meetings at work don't want parliament turned into a sideshow of reactionary zeal. Both the Coalition and Labor's election reviews will show Dutton's campaign aggression and intolerance unsettled voters, including those who might otherwise have been open to voting for the Coalition. Mostyn said it best in her speech to the Senate. While acknowledging the challenges of the past and urging renewed action to close the Indigenous disadvantage gap, she called for all Australians to 'approach the path forward together with determination, humility and optimism'. It might be a long three years.

Australian army officer stripped of security clearance over Israel loyalty leaves defence force
Australian army officer stripped of security clearance over Israel loyalty leaves defence force

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Australian army officer stripped of security clearance over Israel loyalty leaves defence force

An officer in the Australian army, stripped of his security clearance because Asio believed he was more loyal to Israel, has left the Australian defence force. In February, Guardian Australia revealed the man had his clearance revoked after the administrative review tribunal (ART) upheld Asio's assessment that he was not of 'appropriate character and trustworthiness to hold any security clearance'. At the time of the ART decision, the man was in the inactive reserve pending administrative action but Guardian Australia understands he has now left the ADF. The man, anonymised in the ruling as HWMW, had told Asio interviewers he did not view Israel as a foreign government and that he would share classified information with the Israel Defense Forces if asked. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Asio said the officer, who is Jewish and had served 19 years in the Australian military, withheld information from Australian officials about training courses he undertook in Israel – where he is not a citizen – in 2016 and 2019, which included self-defence, security and firearms training. The training was for a Sydney community security group (CSG) – an organisation that provides security and intelligence services to the Jewish community – in which he volunteered between 2014 and 2023. The officer had said in cross-examination that withholding the information was not a lie but not a 'complete disclosure'. HWMW told interviewers the CSG training he did could be considered a 'natural recruiting pool' for the Mossad, which would probably be aware of the courses. The Greens senator and defence spokesperson, David Shoebridge, questioned defence officials in Senate estimates in February on whether there had been any review undertaken of ADF members who may have undertaken similar training by CSG 'that makes them incredibly susceptible to recruitment by a foreign government'. In a response tabled in the Senate this week, defence stated all security clearance holders have their suitability to hold the clearance reviewed on a regular basis, and an assessment of external loyalties is a key part of this process. 'Security clearance holders are required to report foreign contacts, in addition to a range of other issues that may impact their suitability to hold a clearance,' the department stated. Shoebridge said on Friday the department had failed to answer his question on whether a review of CSG groups had been undertaken. 'This should have been a simple exercise, having discovered an ADF member undertook secret training associated with a foreign government, then the exit should have been rapid,' he said. '[In defence] overarching loyalty to the US and its allies is seen as normal and entirely consistent with Australia's national interest. 'It is not, and this shows again the lack of genuine independence in so much of our defence and foreign policy.' The Asio director general, Mike Burgess, told Senate estimates in February that the case raised 'potential concerns' but said: 'I want to be clear here on the public record – there is nothing wrong with the community security groups'. He said, however, that it was important for people to be transparent about their involvement with the groups in overseas training. '[CSGs] perform a decent function, an important function, especially in times like this, [the] training they might provide to help provide security to members of the Jewish community is fine,' Burgess said. 'Of course, there is an element of that that in some cases it may be the case that that training done overseas in Israel might present an opportunity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store