
Liberal party hardliners are on the back foot – but while Tony Abbott is around, the right will fight
'This year, really from January on, we failed to pick fights,' the former Liberal prime minister told a podcast by the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), the rightwing thinktank of which he is a distinguished fellow.
'And when we did pick fights on, for argument's sake, trying to get public servants back into the office, as soon as we came under a bit of pressure, we pulled back. We kind of lost our mojo a bit; we lost direction a bit.'
The explanation from Abbott – who was close to Dutton – reflected a popular counter-narrative pushed by hardline conservatives in the election postmortem. The Coalition didn't lose, and lose badly, because Dutton had dragged it too far to the right, as most commentators concluded.
It lost, Abbott was suggesting, because Dutton pulled back.
As Sussan Ley tries to reposition the Liberals to the political centre in response to Dutton's catastrophic defeat, the new leader will face resistance from conservatives, inside and outside the party, who are adamant it must remain on the right.
This latest chapter in the party's enduring internal conflict is expected to flare during debates over whether to dump the target of net zero emissions by 2050, adopt gender quotas and embrace or shun culture wars.
Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads
Conversations with Liberal MPs and insiders suggest that more than six years after losing his seat in federal parliament, Abbott remains arguably the most powerful conservative in Australian politics. One senior Liberal source said Abbott was as influential as he has been since he was dumped as prime minister in 2015.
The 67-year-old is entrenched in the ecosystem of rightwing media, thinktanks and lobby groups that shape conservative thinking. He sits on the board in charge of Fox News (Donald Trump's favoured cable news channel), appears regularly on Sky News, often with his former chief-of-staff Peta Credlin, and has ties to the IPA and the rightwing campaign group Advance.
Overseas, Abbott advises the rightwing political forum Alliance for Responsible Citizenship and is a senior visiting fellow at the Danube Institute, a Hungary-based thinktank supportive of the country's far-right prime minister, Viktor Orbán.
In a revealing insight into his worldview, Abbott used a recent speech to the Hungarian Conservative Political Action Conference to urge western countries to have the 'cultural self-confidence' to resist the 'the politics of climate and identity' and the 'false doctrine of multiculturalism'.
One Liberal source suggested Abbott's endgame was to transform the Liberals – the supposed 'broad church' accomodating moderates and conservatives – into a rightwing party.
'He [Abbott] wants to be the major power behind the throne. He's not driven by money; he's driven by power,' a Liberal source said.
Abbott helped orchestrate Jacinta Nampijinpa Price's post-election defection from the Nationals to the Liberals to run as Angus Taylor's deputy, two sources familiar with the covert plot confirmed. He actively campaigned for fellow anti-voice campaigner Warren Mundine in his preselection tilt for Bradfield. He publicly put pressure on Ley to extend the Dutton-backed intervention into the troubled NSW Liberal division.
The three cases are evidence of Abbott as an active player internally. But they are instructive for another reason: in each, he failed to achieve his ultimate outcome.
The Taylor-Price leadership team never materialised while Mundine lost preselection in Bradfield to Gisele Kapterian. The NSW intervention was ultimately extended but in a vastly different form after Ley secured support for an all-NSW administrative committee to run the branch, effectively sacking the two controversial Victorian figures installed under Dutton with Abbott's support.
An 11th-hour push from right faction powerbrokers to secure Abbott a seat on the new committee failed.
Some Liberals view the sequence of setbacks, each at the hands of Ley and her allies, as signs of the waning influence of Abbott and the conservatives over the party.
Others aren't so sure.
Under Dutton, the conservatives ruled the Liberal party in Canberra. After the teal independents all but wiped out the Liberal moderates in 2022 and Scott Morrison's exit diminished the centre-right group that had expanded around him, Dutton and the right faction assumed both numerical and ideological control of the federal party.
Dutton's dramatic downfall at the 3 May federal election set in train a realignment of the internal power dynamics. With more than 20 members, the right is still clearly the largest faction in the 52-member federal Liberal party room.
Yet it was unable to install Taylor as Dutton's successor after surviving moderates, centre-right and unaligned MPs combined to make Ley the federal party's first female leader.
Taylor and senior rightwingers Michaelia Cash, James Paterson and Andrew Hastie have retained senior roles, but other conservatives were dumped or demoted, including Sarah Henderson, Claire Chandler, Tony Pasin and Price, who abandoned plans to run for deputy leader after Taylor lost the ballot.
The right was surprised and concerned at how far Ley went in rewarding backers and punishing internal rivals in her shadow ministry, particularly given she won the leadership by just 29 votes to 25.
'She overextended in the reshuffle and that could come back to haunt her,' one Liberal insider says.
For now, senior conservatives are supporting Ley after a tumultuous first two months in the role, which included navigating the brief split with the Nationals while grieving over her mother's death.
Taylor, now the shadow defence minister, has not been agitating behind the scenes and has been dissuading others from doing so, sources say.
The open hostilities in the run-up to the leadership vote, which included the distribution of a scorecard mocking Ley's closeness to centre-right numbers man Alex Hawke, her past support for Palestine and her alleged faith in 'numerology', have stopped.
There is a widely held view among Liberal MPs that Ley's fledging leadership is not under threat and undermining her serves no one's interest.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Conservatives are wary, though, of the new leader's early, deliberate steps to distance herself from Dutton, such as opening her speech to the National Press Club with an acknowledgment of country to traditional owners.
'[Sussan] is a completely different leader to Dutton and that is a good thing,' a senior Liberal source says.
'She does need to be careful in navigating her way. Her acknowledgment to country at the Press Club and standing in front of three flags during her press conference did not go down well with the base.
'The Liberal party is the main centre-right party in Australia and we cannot forget that. If we do, we will lose our base.'
The right secured a small win ahead of parliament's return, with the faction's pick, Slade Brockman, defeating the Ley-backed candidate, Andrew McLachlan, in an internal ballot for the role of deputy Senate president.
Liberal MPs acknowledge conflict is inevitable and even necessary after internal contest was sacrificed for discipline under Dutton, a trade-off many MPs blame for the threadbare agenda it offered on 3 May.
But some fights are expected to extend well beyond the bounds of robust debate, descending instead into open political warfare.
'Everyone will behave themselves in the short term, but whenever something comes up, people will seek to use that to litigate their personal grievances,' one MP said.
'Things like net zero, for example, will really ramp up.'
Climate change is ground zero for the Liberal party's internecine conflicts. The latest battle – whether to abandon a commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 – shapes as a defining contest for Ley's leadership and the future of the Liberal-National Coalition.
The hard-won but fragile consensus that allowed Morrison to sign up the Coalition to the emissions target in 2021 has fractured, exposing deep divisions over what has become a totemic issue for the political right.
Ley immediately put net zero up for debate after agreeing to review the opposition's entire policy agenda.
The shadow energy minister, Dan Tehan, is leading an internal policy working group that will report to Ley and the Nationals leader, David Littleproud. The Nationals will conduct a separate review, to be jointly led by parliament's loudest net zero critic, Matt Canavan.
Liberal MPs are not optimistic a consensus position can be achieved as they brace for a divisive and damaging brawl.
'I'm a bit worried about it,' one says. 'The issue was settled at enormous cost [under Morrison]. No person in their right mind should open it up again.'
One option discussed among some Liberal MPs would involve abandoning 2030 and 2035 targets – a position that would be incompatible with the Paris agreement – but retaining the 2050 ambition.
Even that compromise would struggle to placate a growing number of sceptical colleagues, who believe net zero proponents have failed to explain the case for climate targets to rightwing voters.
'The mods say we need net zero to win,' one such MP says. 'That is the most facile, self-serving reason – it's exactly why people hate politicians.'
Pressure to dump net zero is also coming from the party's state branches and grassroots members.
Alex Antic's SA Liberal division, Price's NT Country Liberal party and the NSW Nationals division have all passed motions since the federal election rejecting net zero.
The branch members, who are responsible for selecting election candidates, tend to skew older and more conservative than the average Liberal supporter.
They tend to get their news and opinions from Sky News, Liberals say, making the conservative figures who appear on the channel's evening programs hugely influential over the 'base'.
Figures such as Tony Abbott.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labor MPs urge government to prioritise reform of ‘failed' job-ready university graduates scheme
Labor MPs are increasing pressure on the government to speed up reform of the controversial Morrison-era job-ready graduates (JRG) scheme that has 'failed' students. The Albanese government has flagged its intention to reform the scheme, but MPs have told Guardian Australia it should be a priority early in Labor's second term. Louise Miller-Frost, a South Australian Labor MP, said the JRG scheme, which has been widely condemned for hiking the cost of humanities and social science degrees, has angered voters. 'It is something that gets raised quite often, particularly when I'm talking to students about the 20% off Hecs which is very popular and people love it, but this is the next step,' she said. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'It is a priority to make sure that we have the best possible access for university … I do see it as an intergenerational equity [issue].' The matter has also been raised with Victorian MP Carina Garland, who studied humanities and has worked as an academic. She said the reforms needed to be done as soon as possible. 'I would hate to see the scheme becoming too entrenched,' Garland said. 'It's really clear from my community that they want the government to act on the current job-ready graduates scheme, and it should happen sooner rather than later. 'The [universities] accord was pretty clear in its assessment and the minister has said we will move progressively to implement the recommendations. I've advocated for change [directly] to the minister's office and will continue to do so.' The scheme, introduced in 2021, changed the fee structure for university courses to increase costs for subjects including arts and law, and lowered course fees for degrees in Stem areas. The scheme also introduced a rule to remove Hecs debt eligibility for students who failed more than 50% of their units. Labor commissioned the universities accord to outline a reform path across the entire sector, which made several key findings on the JRG scheme. In July 2023, the accord released its interim report, which found the fee structure needed to be 'redesigned before it causes long-term damage to Australian higher education by increasing the cost of gaining a qualification', and recommended the 50% pass rule should be scrapped. Labor immediately abolished the 50% pass rule, and later established the Australian Tertiary Education Commission (Atec) to make recommendations on changing the fee structure under the scheme. The education minister, Jason Clare, has provided no timeline on when Atec, which has been in place since 1 July, will make its recommendations. Clare said the accord had 'made a number of recommendations and called out the previous government's job-ready graduates program as a failure'. 'We've bitten off a big chunk of its recommendations already – 31 of 47 in full or in part. This includes changes to make the repayment system for Hecs fairer, which we passed through parliament last week,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'There's more work to do and we'll take it one step at a time.' Labor MP Sally Sitou railed against the 'failed' rules in parliament last week. Sitou told Guardian Australia the previous Morrison government 'actively undermined and underfunded the university sector' and said reform was 'complex' and would take time. '[The Coalition government] introduced the job-ready graduate scheme which the universities accord said [has] failed, and it made recommendations about how to address this,' she said, adding that Atec would 'help to steer reform across the sector, including advice on the setting of course fees'. Sitou said Labor had made significant progress on reform, and wants a rethink of the rules. The parliament's youngest-ever senator, Labor's 21-year-old Charlotte Walker, said 'stigma' around arts degrees, exacerbated by the JRG program, must end. 'There's a stigma around, 'Oh, why would you want to do that? You're not actually going to be able to get a job'. I do genuinely think that sort of stigma turns students away from studying things,' Walker said. 'I really hope we can start moving past that.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Hundreds of jobseeker payments cancelled illegally by government IT system, watchdog finds
The legality of the system designed to penalise jobseekers has been thrown into doubt after the commonwealth ombudsman found a government department's automatic system unlawfully cancelled payments. The ombudsman has found 964 jobseekers had their payments unlawfully cancelled between April 2022 and July 2024 by the automated IT system that underpins the targeted compliance framework (TCF) system. TCF is designed to make sure jobseekers meet requirements such as attending meetings with an employment provider and applying for jobs to continue to receive their payments. Payment cancellations have been paused since January after the government found a further 1,326 people had financial penalties 'applied incorrectly' due to an IT issue. On top of this, 45 people had their payments illegally cancelled because the system continued to operate in error. On Wednesday, the ombudsman found the payments had been cancelled unlawfully and recommended the government continue to pause cancellations until the it could review the legality of the entire TCF system. The ombudsman, Iain Anderson, said he investigated cancellations where public servants working at the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations had failed to consider individual circumstances before cancelling a payment as laid down by law. 'They were just automating the cancellation without considering the individual circumstances of the jobseeker and whether it was appropriate to cancel the payment or not,' he told Guardian Australia. 'The target compliance framework itself has been very problematic in that regard.' Anderson said that in 2022 DEWR was also meant to put in a 'digital protection framework' to ensure jobseekers were treated fairly, but the department had failed to do so. Anderson said the secretary of DEWR, Natalie Jones, needed to be 'completely confident' the system was working properly before the cancellations resume. 'The targeted compliance framework has had a number of different problems, and so the secretary of DEWR needs to do much more than simply look at the unlawful cancellation issue. 'They need to be really certain that the entire target compliance framework is going to comply with the law and be fair.' He said there were also concerns as to whether the suspension of payments, which happens in tens of thousands of cases each month, was legal. 'We have some concerns as to whether the suspension process is happening fairly and reasonably,' he said. On top of this, Guardian Australia understands a Deloitte report into the IT system that underpins the TCF has found that it is not functioning within the proper legal frameworks. The Deloitte report – which has yet to be published – recommends overhauling the TCF's IT system to ensure that the suspension or cancellation of payments is done legally. The Greens have called for the government to abolish the TCF and release the report. 'It is clear that the TCF is an expensive hangover from a conservative government which has been heartlessly prolonged by this Labor government for far too long,' senator Penny Allman-Payne said. The DEWR is also conducting a legal review to examine the way decisions are being made under the legislation. The Ombudsman will continue to investigate the TCF with another report due out later in the year.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Should big tech be allowed to mine Australians' text and data to train AI? The Productivity Commission is considering it
The Productivity Commission is examining whether technology firms should be exempted from copyright rules that stop companies from mining text and data to train artificial intelligence models. The PC, in its interim report into 'harnessing data and the digital economy', used copyright as a case study for how Australia's existing regulatory framework could be adapted to manage the risks of artificial intelligence. A key recommendation from the interim report was that the federal government should conduct a sweeping review of regulations to plug potential gaps that could be exploited by 'bad actors' using AI. Scott Farquhar, the co-founder of software company Atlassian, last week called for an 'urgent' overhaul of Australia's copyright rules, arguing they were out of step with other comparable countries. Farquhar said creating exemptions for text and data mining to train large language models 'could unlock billions of dollars of foreign investment into Australia'. That suggestion has been rejected by the Copyright Agency, a not-for-profit organisation that collects and distributes royalties to thousands of copyright holders. The agency has argued instead for the government to create a new compensation scheme for creators of content used by tech companies to train their AI models. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Stephen King, one of two commissioners leading the PC's inquiry into harnessing the opportunities of the digital economy, said: 'Copyright is a great example of where Australia needs to sit back and ask: 'Are our laws fit for purpose with AI?'' 'The obvious harm is that an AI company may use copyright materials without providing appropriate compensation. On the other side, we want the development of AI-specific tools that use that copyrighted material,' King said. 'It may be possible to say, can we approach AI the same way we have approached copyright in other ways, through copyright collections. Music is played everywhere, so we have set up collecting societies that are authorised under our competition laws, and they act on behalf of singers, songwriters and creators.' King said the PC was asking for feedback on other options, before a final recommendation by the end of the year. 'We have a fair dealing exemption that doesn't include text and data mining, maybe that should be an exemption – as long as AI companies are gaining legal copies and they have paid for it.' In its third of five thematic reports, the commission said artificial intelligence could resuscitate Australia's moribund productivity. PC modelling showed that even the most conservative estimate was that AI would deliver a $116bn boost to the economy over the next decade. King said that this translated into a $4,300 kicker to the average Australian's real wage in 10 years' time, and that the actual benefits could be much larger. The commission advised against creating an overarching AI-specific piece of legislation, and warned that clumsy or excessive regulation risked stifling the technology's potentially transformative benefits. That message is likely to be well received by the government, with Andrew Leigh, the assistant minister for productivity, backing this approach. But King said the commission was not arguing for a minimalist approach to AI regulation. 'It's not light-touch at all. What we are saying is that AI is going to make it easier, cheaper and faster for bad actors to engage in harmful conduct. But most of that harmful conduct is already illegal,' he said. 'Let's work out where the harms are and see whether they are covered by existing law. And if they are, let's make sure the regulators have the resources and powers to stop the bad actors.' The PC's interim report also backed changing privacy rules to incorporate an outcomes-based approach, rather than a 'box-ticking' exercise where businesses 'comply with the letter of the law but not the spirit of it'. The commission said the government 'should support new pathways to allow individuals and businesses to access and share data that relates to them'.