EU and China hold trade talks with expectations low
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa will meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang to mark 50 years of relations between Brussels and Beijing.
Originally planned as a two-day event, the summit was scaled back amid economic uncertainty, wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and the looming threat of renewed US tariffs.
EU officials were expected to raise concerns over China's support for Russia amid its ongoing, full-scale invasion of Ukraine, persistent cyberattacks and espionage, trade imbalances, Beijing's near-monopoly in rare earth minerals and human rights issues in Xjinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong.
The EU is also navigating a balancing act with Washington as it braces for a possible trade war with the US.
'Europe is being very careful not to antagonise President Trump even further by looking maybe too close to China, so all of that doesn't make this summit easier,' said Fabian Zuleeg, chief economist of the European Policy Centre. 'It will be very hard to achieve something concrete.'
There is also little likelihood of a major breakthrough amid China's hardening stance on the EU, despite a few olive branches. This includes the suspension of sanctions on European lawmakers who criticised Beijing's human rights abuses in Xjinjiang, a region in north-western China home to the Uyghurs.
'China has come away emboldened from its trade confrontation with Trump. That has reduced its appetite for making concessions to the EU,' Zuleeg said. 'Now that Trump has backed down, China sees less of a need to wood Europe.'
China is the EU's second-largest trading partner after the US, with around 30% of global trade flowing between them. While both sides hope to use their economic ties to help stabilise the global economy, fundamental divisions remain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
10 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Initial tariff impacts painful for auto, textile and chemical industries
Beyond Donald Trump's sound and fury, there is the reality on the ground. Six months after the White House first announced new tariffs (the 10% levy on China, which came into force on February 4), the first tangible effects of the trade war launched by the United States have now become apparent. This year, the US protectionist machine has already collected $108 billion (€92.1 billion) from these tariffs, double the 2024 total. While the global macroeconomic effects have remained moderate so far, sector-specific impacts have become increasingly clear as companies publish their second-quarter results. The automotive industry, an archetypically globalized sector, has been the first to falter: General Motors reported $1.1 billion in losses linked to tariffs in just the first half of the year, Stellantis (which encompasses Peugeot, Citroën, Chrysler, Fiat and others) reported €300 million, and Volkswagen €1.3 billion. "If the current tariffs [25%], the burden would increase to several billion" for the whole year, said Oliver Blume, CEO of Volkswagen. The chemical industry has faced a similarly alarming situation: Five European companies have issued profit warnings, all stressing that US demand has decreased. The same is true for textiles: Puma has issued a profit warning, with its share price dropping more than 15% on Friday, July 25, while Nike announced that the tariffs had cost it $1 billion.
Euronews
12 minutes ago
- Euronews
Trump and Starmer to discuss Ukraine and Gaza in Scotland
US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer are set to meet on Monday, one day after a new US-EU trade deal was announced. The two will meet at a golf property owned by the US president's family in southwestern Scotland. They will then travel to Aberdeen, where there is another Trump golf course and a third is set to open soon. Discussions between the two heads of state are expected to cover US tariffs, Russia's all-out war in Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, among other topics. According to Starmer's office, they will address diplomatic steps necessary to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table within the next 50 days. London is also reportedly hoping for deeper US involvement in Gaza ceasefire talks. Protesters have planned a demonstration near Trump's existing course after previously taking to the streets on Saturday to decry the American president's visit. The discussions follow a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry course on Sunday. The two announce a new trade framework – though many major details remain pending. The new trade agreement between the US and EU will see a blanket tariff of 15% on most EU goods imported to the US and is set to kick in on Friday. It means that the EU will avoid 30% tariffs previously threatened by Trump. At a previous G7 summit in Canada, Starmer and Trump signed a trade agreement lifting US tariffs on British aerospace exports and reducing duties on auto-related goods from 25% to 10% while increasing the amount of US beef it pledged to import. The US ran a $11.4 billion trade surplus with the UK last year, meaning it exported more than it imported. US Census Bureau figures this year indicate that the surplus could grow. Trump is set to return to the UK in September for an unprecedented second state visit. Trump will be hosted then by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle.
LeMonde
41 minutes ago
- LeMonde
EU-US trade deal: A bittersweet compromise for the EU
The palpable relief among European officials following the announcement of the trade agreement reached on Sunday, July 27, by Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen spoke volumes about the ordeal the US president had imposed on the European Union (EU). Fearing a 30% tariff on goods exported to the United States starting August 1, Europe was satisfied to escape with a 15% rate. Finalized in Turnberry, Scotland, at one of the luxury golf resorts owned by the billionaire, the agreement at this stage remains silent on the specific list of exemptions that the Commission negotiated for the most sensitive sectors. Trump highlighted the EU's commitment to purchase $750 billion worth of energy and make an additional $600 billion in investments in the US. The outcome of the talks, with its ambiguities, leaves a bitter aftertaste. Given the size of its market (450 million consumers) and its status as the US's second-largest supplier of goods, Europe seemed at first to have stronger leverage than Japan in seeking a rate lower than 15%. The changing benchmarks set by negotiators illustrated their setbacks. At the end of June, the EU aimed for less than 10%. By mid-July, the bloc thought it was on the verge of securing 10%, the rate negotiated by the United Kingdom, the US's third-largest trading partner. The uneven compromise advocated by the Commission underscored how difficult it was for the 27 member states to assert themselves against a former ally who not only seeks to impose its own rules on the rest of the world, but is pursuing a political agenda to weaken the EU. Urged by France to take a tougher stance in the final stretch, with the adoption of a package of retaliatory measures worth €93 billion that would have taken effect on August 7 if trade talks failed, the president of the European Commission was, not without reason, focused on maintaining European unity in the face of the temptation for each country to go its own way. Deeply involved in transatlantic trade, Germany – and even more so Italy – were not ready for confrontation. The need to secure US support in Ukraine and America's contribution to European defense also weighed heavily in the decision. Presented as the lesser evil, the 15% tariff followed previous increases imposed by Trump on steel and aluminum (50%), as well as on automobiles and auto parts (25%). These measures are bound to affect the competitiveness of the companies involved and drive prices higher. In exchange, von der Leyen and the business world are clinging to the hope of stabilizing the economic environment. In reality, they have no such guarantee. Unpredictable and abrupt, Trump has broken with all the rules of international trade. Three days after the summit between China and the EU – which ended in a dialogue of the deaf and highlighted Brussels' inability to obtain even a minimal rebalancing of trade – the handshake between Trump and von der Leyen epitomized the current balance of power: In the emerging new world order taking shape, contrary to the values it defends, Europe is not breaking ranks, but its current purely defensive approach offers no protection against future power plays.
