BASIN BITES: Straight out of the wood oven
Greggor's Pizza, originally known as The Pizza Stone, first started in the Pecos/Fort Stockton area while owner Greg Cook was working for his corporate job. However, when that moved to Odessa, he moved the business here. His wife Angela would homeschool the kids, but once they got older and began attending public school, she brought her prior food service experience to the table.
'We talked about the whole time opening our own little business for years,' says Angela. 'I've always dreamed about opening my own little place with him and and of course, with his experience with cooking and over the fire and whatnot. I think that's what correlates the wood-fired pizza and the wood-fired things that we do. That's what kind of impressed us about this.'
You can find Greggor's Pizza on Facebook, where they post their location for the week.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Axing public notices will threaten local democracy, Cleverly tells Rayner
Rachel Reeves' proposal to axe rules that require businesses to share their licence bids in newspapers would threaten the future of local democracy, Sir James Cleverly has told the Government. In a letter to Angela Rayner, the shadow local government secretary said suggestions that statutory notices could be scrapped raised 'concerning questions' about the future of local journalism. He told the PA news agency Government changes had been proposed 'without any consideration' of the effect on local press and could have the 'perverse effect of making it harder for many pubs and clubs to operate.' Last month, the Chancellor said she would look at dropping the requirement for venues such as pubs and restaurants to advertise licensing applications in local newspapers, in a bid to cut red tape for the hospitality sector. Sir James demanded the Government share its assessments of how the move would affect the press amid industry fears that it could interfere with the public's right to know and lead to revenue losses for local journalism. He said that while there was scope to reform the statutory notice regime, 'rather than embracing innovation, it would appear that the Government intends to axe support entirely'. Sir James told PA: 'Labour don't have a clue about the pub and hospitality industry. 'Labour are tying them in red tape and higher taxes. Their proposed changes to licensing rules could have the perverse effect of making it harder for many pubs and clubs to operate. 'Labour's proposed changes to notification on licensing changes has been made without any consideration on the effect on local newspapers, or how to best ensure that the public know about matters which affect their lives. 'Local democracy needs an independent free press, so empowered local representatives are held to account, and local residents have their voice listened to.' In his letter to Ms Rayner, who is Deputy Prime Minister and also Local Government Secretary, Sir James said: 'If local newspapers close down this will be to the detriment of local democracy. 'The devolution of responsibility and finance to local government needs stronger local accountability and transparency to go hand in hand with new powers, and an independent free press is essential to this.' Ministers last month announced a new licensing framework would aim to fast-track permissions for al fresco dining in dedicated areas and make it easier to open new venues. Speaking to the Mail on Sunday, Ms Reeves said she would also look at removing the 'outdated rule that means (a business) needs to advertise in locally printed press when applying for a licence'. The remarks prompted a backlash from industry figures, with the News Media Association warning the proposals would amount to a 'betrayal of local communities and the public's right to know'. 'Changing this would, at a stroke, disenfranchise local communities and deprive local journalism of a vital revenue stream,' News Media Association chief executive Owen Meredith said. 'Local pubs, like local papers, are at the heart of their communities and the Government should rightly support them. 'This proposal does nothing to help either. 'It is not a cut to bureaucratic red tape, as framed, but a damaging assault on democratic engagement.' The Government has been contacted for comment.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
The Enemy Within: How AI Uncovers Corporate Espionage In Real Time
Raghu Para is a tech exec with over 15 years of progressive experience in software, artificial intelligence and machine learning. Picture this: At a Silicon Valley tech firm, the office Keurigs kept mysteriously dying. IT wrote it off as hard water until their AI security system cross-referenced maintenance logs with HR records and discovered the outages always occurred precisely 27 minutes after Greg from Facilities received negative feedback in his quarterly review. Turns out Greg had been remotely triggering maintenance alerts as petty revenge, proving even coffee machines aren't safe from workplace drama. When confronted, Greg claimed it was "just a weird coincidence," right before the system flagged his LinkedIn activity, showing he'd connected with three competitors that morning. This isn't some Black Mirror episode. It's the new reality of corporate security, where the line between employee and insider threat is thinner than the patience of a sysadmin during a server migration. Forget Russian hackers—today's most dangerous threats wear employee badges and know where the good snacks are. According to the 2024 Verizon DBIR, the "human element"—including errors and misuse—is involved in 68% of data breaches. Enough time for a disgruntled worker to do the digital equivalent of keying the company Ferrari while maintaining perfect deniability. AI-powered sabotage detection is like giving every cubicle a lie detector—with a psychology degree and zero chill. These systems don't just block hackers; they analyze digital sweat. From too-perfect mouse jiggles to passive-aggressive Slack emoji storms, they flag patterns even the drama club would call extra. What if a bank caught a quant tweaking risk models? His 'random' seeds matched his employee ID, edits always came at 4:45 p.m. on Fridays, and he Googled 'how to adjust financial models without getting caught' on his work laptop. The AI would likely flag it as fraud. Traditional rule-based security is like hunting for plastic explosives with a metal detector while wearing oven mitts. Sure, it catches the massive downloads and sketchy links but misses the nuanced sabotage. Think subtle algorithm tweaks that nudge forecasts or slow-drip data theft: 10MB a day that quietly turns into a hemorrhage. In hyper-connected workplaces, it's not the firehose that will get you—it's this steady leak. One national bank discovered its employees using mouse movements to fake activity. They'd perfected the "minimum viable productivity" approach until the company's activity tracking software was in play. Even better now, AI can start to notice their "work" followed mathematically perfect sine wave patterns no human could maintain (unless they'd developed robot-level precision). The system can also catch agents deliberately sabotaging knowledge base articles to generate more calls, like changing "restart your computer" instructions to something weird. Modern detection systems combine three scary-smart technologies that would make even the NSA blush. 1. Behavioral biometrics monitor typing patterns, login timing and mouse movement to flag anomalies—like a daytime analyst suddenly typing erratically at 3 a.m. while digging through sensitive files. 2. NLP-based tone analysis tracks emotional shifts in communication. One system using sentiment features on email data achieved 91% accuracy in detecting insider threats using a Random Forest model. 3. Graph AI maps digital relationships to catch suspicious behavior, such as sudden encrypted chats or odd emoji signals before trades. Financial institutions increasingly employ graph-based behavioral analytics to identify potential insider collusion. By mapping communication and trading interactions into a network, anomalous relationship patterns can surface as early warning signs. The benefits are obvious: Prevention beats damage control, and AI can monitor employees without needing coffee breaks or developing personal biases (though some systems can be caught flagging too many Daves in IT departments). Many banks now use AI audit trails as courtroom evidence, turning HR investigations into episodes of Law & Order: SVU, where the smoking gun is a suspiciously timed VPN connection instead of a bloody glove. But there's a dark side to our new digital hall monitors: Imagine working under constant surveillance where your keystrokes are analyzed more closely than a polygraph test and your Slack tone is graded like a high school essay. A company could flag an employee for "suspicious activity" because he job-searched on LinkedIn during lunch (the horror!), while another company's AI nearly caused a mutiny when it started questioning why the marketing team spent so much time on "unproductive" sites like Pinterest and Instagram (clearly built by engineers who've never heard of visual content creation). Under the hood, these systems use self-supervised learning—essentially teaching themselves what shady behavior looks like by studying millions of data points until they can spot anomalies with the accuracy of a mother knowing exactly which child took the last cookie. They establish baselines (your normal work patterns), then use isolation forests (statistical outlier detectors that sound like rejected Hunger Games locations) to spot anomalies. Advanced systems are now exploring reinforcement learning approaches to detect sophisticated 'false flag' tactics—cases where attackers deliberately mimic legitimate activity to evade detection, a phenomenon detailed in MIT's attribution research on cyberattacks. We're now in an arms race where employees use ChatGPT to generate activity logs while companies deploy "honeypot" trap files with names like "LAYOFF_LIST_FINAL_FINAL_REALLY.xlsx" that trigger alerts when opened. Behavioral biometric systems are now so advanced that they may one day build profiles even for devices—from typing pressure on keyboards to interaction patterns—to detect abnormal activity and potential misuse. The future might involve thermal sensors detecting stress during sensitive tasks or analyzing keyboard acoustics to verify identities. The ethical tightrope is real. Yes, AI can prevent sabotage, but at what cost to workplace trust? The solution lies in transparency explaining how monitoring works (without tech jargon), allowing appeals (because even AIs make mistakes), and auditing the algorithms themselves (preferably before they develop opinions about who deserves promotions). After all, the best defense against betrayal isn't just smarter tech but creating a culture where going rogue doesn't pay better than just doing your job. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to explain why I just Googled, "How to write about corporate espionage without looking suspicious" three times in a row. For research. Obviously. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Oregon Government Ethics Commission opens third investigation in 2025 for state lawmaker
The Oregon Government Ethics Commission on Aug. 8 launched an investigation into whether state Rep. Greg Smith, R-Heppner, violated state law regarding the reporting of income sources, marking the third probe into potential violations by Smith in recent months. The commission voted unanimously to open an investigation into whether Smith violated state laws when he failed to disclose income from the Morrow Development Corporation in his 2024 and 2025 Statements of Economic Interest. Smith did not appear or speak during the meeting and did not immediately respond to a request for comment. He has been a representative of Oregon's House District 57 since 2001. The district includes Umatilla, Morrow, Gilliam, Sherman, Wheeler, Wasco, Jefferson, Marion and Clackamas counties. State Rep. Greg Smith failed to disclose client, preliminary review says Public officials must list in their annual disclosure statements the name, principal address and a brief description of any source of income that accounts for 10% or more of their household's total annual income. As of 2024, they are also required to list additional information about sources of income for listed businesses. They are required to list clients who contribute 10% or more of the business's gross annual income and have a legislative or administrative interest in the public body that the public official serves. A complaint alleged that Smith's income from the Morrow Development Corporation meets the criteria and should have been reported. According to the preliminary review report, Smith confirmed MDC does contribute more than 10% of income for Gregory Smith & Company, LLC, which is focused on business development. The report added that because the Morrow Development Corporation is registered to do and does business in Oregon, it appears to have a legislative or administrative interest in the Legislature. The investigator said Smith contended, however, that he had called OGEC for advice this year regarding whether he needed to report the income from MDC. The investigator said the call included "a couple" of different topics related to the SEI filing and that she could not recall if Smith inquired specifically about MDC. "Still, due to the failure to disclose Morrow Development Corporation on both his 2024 and 2025 SCI, there is a substantial objective basis to believe that Representative Smith failed to report a client that constitutes 10% or more of his business's income and has a legislative or administrative interest," investigator Casey Fenstermaker said. Both filings have been amended to include MDC as of Aug. 8. OGEC opened investigations into state Rep. Greg Smith earlier in 2025 The Aug. 8 vote is not the first time the ethics commission has taken action related to Smith in 2025. On June 13, the commission opened an investigation into Smith's role as executive director of the Columbia Development Authority. Commissioners are investigating whether Smith improperly used his position when he received a pay raise from $129,000 to $195,000 and failed to disclose an apparent conflict of interest in the process. The pay raise was later reversed, according to reporting from the Malheur Enterprise. Smith also received a letter of education in lieu of a financial penalty in March for another investigation the commission had opened on Jan. 24. The commission investigated Smith's failure to list Harney County as a source of income for his business, even though Harney County contributed more than 10% of the business' gross annual income and has a legislative or administrative interest in his decisions or votes as a representative. The actions described constitute one violation of state ethics law, the commission's final order said. In addition to the ethics cases, Smith is also a defendant in a $6.9 million lawsuit filed in July by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield against a group of Morrow County officials. The lawsuit alleges eight officials, including Smith, abused their positions as board members of a nonprofit named Inland Development Corp. when it sold a for-profit subsidiary, Windwave Communications, to themselves. The lawsuit claims Windwave was valued at $9.5 million but was purchased for $2.6 million. "These were people in power who knew that Windwave was about to explode in value—and instead of protecting the public's interest, they cashed in," said Rayfield in a July 15 press release. Dianne Lugo covers the Oregon Legislature and equity issues. Reach her at dlugo@ or on X @DianneLugo. This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Oregon Government Ethics Commission investigating Rep. Greg Smith Solve the daily Crossword
