Construction red tape freeze to speed up housing push on roundtable agenda
Talks in the Cabinet room on Wednesday morning focused on red tape and housing, with the topic expected to turn to environmental approvals after the brief morning tea break.
Housing Minister Clare O'Neil joined the discussion, which canvassed the possibility of freezing the construction code.
The mammoth list of rules builders have to comply with is due for an update next year anyway, but there has been chatter that further changes other than those dealing with urgent defects or safety issues could be put on ice.
The Government has a target to build 1.2 million homes in the five years to mid-2029, but Treasury and the housing sector say that won't be met at the current rate of construction, in part because of the amount of red tape.
A leaked Treasury briefing paper ahead of the roundtable suggested freezing the code could be a consensus outcome.
One source in the room said there was generally good support for reforming the code, but another said nothing had been settled.
Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry head Andrew McKellar said the talks on Wednesday morning were 'where the rubber really hits the road' on boosting productivity.
'It's about, how do you get a process underway to reform that (construction) code, to make it simpler?' he said.
'I think there's a recognition that it's incredibly complex, that it overreaches at the moment and makes the process unwieldy.'
The Coalition took a policy to the election to freeze the construction code for a decade, but the proposal expected to come out of the roundtable isn't expected to be as long or as blunt as that.
'Where the National Construction Code is unhelpful, of course it should be paused,' Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said on Wednesday.
'This Government must do much more than just pause the national construction code in order to get housing supply back on track in this country.'
Earlier, Treasurer Jim Chalmers declared that better living standards for Australians are the 'holy grail' for everyone attending the economic roundtable.
He told attendees he was pleased with the constructive engagement around the Cabinet table on day one, having counted about 100 contributions from those present, and urged them to build on the momentum.
'We need to keep front of mind what all of this is about – it is about creating more opportunities for more people in every part of our country, lifting living standards by making our economy more productive,' he said.
'That is the holy grail for us, and that's the focus of today. But not just today, all of the work that happens after here as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Tax reform on the table as summit eyes negative gearing
An overhaul of how Australians could be taxed will be put in the spotlight as a productivity roundtable draws to a close. The third and final day of the federal government's economic reform summit in Canberra will focus on tax reform and budget sustainability on Thursday. The government went into the federal election in May promising not to make changes to negative gearing and the capital gains benefit, but forum attendees are still expected to make the case for the reforms. Unions are set to argue for a full suite of tax measures including limiting negative gearing to one investment property, with existing laws allowed to stay in place for the next five years. A minimum tax rate of 25 per cent for people earning more than $1 million per year has been pitched by union attendees. Capital gains and negative gearing reform needed to be considered by the government to take to voters, tax expert Dale Boccabella said. "Aspects of the tax system is just unfair and the big one is the capital gains tax discount," the associate professor of tax law at the University of New South Wales told AAP. "If you look at who gets the benefits, it goes to the top end, they don't need a 50 per cent tax break." Assoc Prof Boccabella said sustainability of the tax system needed to be front and centre during the final day of the roundtable. "Sustainability and fairness go hand in hand, and underlying that, of course, is generational unfairness," he said. "The government should not be criticised for acting on (negative gearing), it should be done in a sustainable way." The third day of the summit will include a presentation on budget sustainability by Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. A pitch on a better tax system will be delivered by Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally. Discussions on how to make government services and spending more efficient will be another topic for debate. The roundtable had produced consensus for areas of economic reform, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said. "We've already got a big agenda to ease the burden on businesses, cut red tape and build more homes but we're keen to do more where we can," he said.
Canberra Times
an hour ago
- Canberra Times
Public spat marks lowest point in Israel-Australia ties
"(Australians) look at increased settler violence in the West Bank, they look at the decision Israel has made in March to restrict the access of aid, food and water people in Gaza needed, and they think that something needs to change," he said.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Public spat marks lowest point in Israel-Australia ties
Australia's ties with Israel are strained like never before but the nation's global standing could be boosted after Benjamin Netanyahu's latest lashing. The Israeli prime minister labelled Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese a "weak politician" in a social media post and claimed he abandoned the nation's Jewish community. The Australian leader shrugged off the comments while his lieutenants fired back, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke declaring "strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry". The fracas followed the federal government denying a visa to a far-right Israeli politician set to undertake a speaking tour of Australia at the invitation of a fringe Jewish group. Israel retaliated by cancelling the visas of three Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority and ordering embassy staff to apply extra scrutiny to Australian applications to enter Israel. The tit-for-tat marked an all-time low in diplomatic relations but the impact remains to be seen, Australian National University politics and international relations senior lecturer Charles Miller said. "Australia's championing of the rules-based global order looks hypocritical ... to the extent it is combined with close relations with Israel," he told AAP. "By distancing itself from Israel, Australia gains credibility in many parts of the world, especially the Islamic world." Israel has been accused of committing war crimes in its military action in Gaza, with the International Criminal Court issuing an arrest warrant for Mr Netanyahu. The warrant, which includes allegations of using starvation as a method of warfare and directing attacks against civilians, are not findings of guilt and Israel has denied the claims. Australia could feel ramifications of the diplomatic low through a lack of intelligence communication with Israel, along with flow-on effects to its relationship with America, Dr Miller said. But the latter factor should not be exaggerated because it ought not be assumed America "will always remain as pro-Israel" as it currently is. "Even if it does, the US maintains a good relationship with Australia because it is in its own interests to do so," Dr Miller said. Mr Albanese continued to ramp up his rhetoric surrounding Israel's Gaza offensive, stating "too many innocent lives have been lost" and insisting the international community agreed. "(Australians) look at increased settler violence in the West Bank, they look at the decision Israel has made in March to restrict the access of aid, food and water people in Gaza needed, and they think that something needs to change," he said. Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion wrote to both leaders to warn the deterioration in diplomatic relations brought pain and anguish, suggesting both men should have opted for silence. "The Australian Jewish community will not be left to deal with the fallout of a spat between two leaders who are playing to their respective domestic audiences," he said.
