logo
Tax reform on the table as summit eyes negative gearing

Tax reform on the table as summit eyes negative gearing

West Australian13 hours ago
An overhaul of how Australians could be taxed will be put in the spotlight as a productivity roundtable draws to a close.
The third and final day of the federal government's economic reform summit in Canberra will focus on tax reform and budget sustainability on Thursday.
The government went into the federal election in May promising not to make changes to negative gearing and the capital gains benefit, but forum attendees are still expected to make the case for the reforms.
Unions are set to argue for a full suite of tax measures including limiting negative gearing to one investment property, with existing laws allowed to stay in place for the next five years.
A minimum tax rate of 25 per cent for people earning more than $1 million per year has been pitched by union attendees.
Capital gains and negative gearing reform needed to be considered by the government to take to voters, tax expert Dale Boccabella said.
"Aspects of the tax system is just unfair and the big one is the capital gains tax discount," the associate professor of tax law at the University of New South Wales told AAP.
"If you look at who gets the benefits, it goes to the top end, they don't need a 50 per cent tax break."
Assoc Prof Boccabella said sustainability of the tax system needed to be front and centre during the final day of the roundtable.
"Sustainability and fairness go hand in hand, and underlying that, of course, is generational unfairness," he said.
"The government should not be criticised for acting on (negative gearing), it should be done in a sustainable way."
The third day of the summit will include a presentation on budget sustainability by Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson.
A pitch on a better tax system will be delivered by Grattan Institute chief executive Aruna Sathanapally.
Discussions on how to make government services and spending more efficient will be another topic for debate.
The roundtable had produced consensus for areas of economic reform, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.
"We've already got a big agenda to ease the burden on businesses, cut red tape and build more homes but we're keen to do more where we can," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable
Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable

Sydney Morning Herald

time37 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable

It's difficult to put a price tag on Treasurer Jim Chalmers' roundtable, but the three-day affair has pulled some of the nation's top-paid executives and public servants away from their regular jobs. While the government did not pay anyone to attend the roundtable, an analysis of a dozen publicly disclosed salaries suggests that companies – and in some cases, taxpayers – are footing a significant bill for their appearance. We only know the salaries of 13 of the more than 40 high-powered Australians who surrendered their phones and diaries to sit at the oval cabinet room tale, but collectively, their time over the three days was worth more than $145,000. Bran Black, CEO of the Business Council of Australia insists it was time well spent. 'I think the positive thing about the conversation we've just had is that there are some points of agreement right around the room,' he said in an interview on ABC's 730 Report on Wednesday, saying it was the best way to thrash out consensus. But others are wondering if the time spent talking about productivity was used productively. 'Despite some positive calls for change, reports coming out of the roundtable have been vague and largely aspirational,' Ted Forrest, the CEO of property development association Urban Taskforce Australia, said in a statement released on the final day. Chalmers, who is on a base salary of nearly $450,000, said ahead of the roundtable that the invite list would be 'pretty small, pretty tight and targeted.'

Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable
Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable

The Age

time37 minutes ago

  • The Age

Up to $60k a day each: the cost of inviting execs to sit at Chalmers' roundtable

It's difficult to put a price tag on Treasurer Jim Chalmers' roundtable, but the three-day affair has pulled some of the nation's top-paid executives and public servants away from their regular jobs. While the government did not pay anyone to attend the roundtable, an analysis of a dozen publicly disclosed salaries suggests that companies – and in some cases, taxpayers – are footing a significant bill for their appearance. We only know the salaries of 13 of the more than 40 high-powered Australians who surrendered their phones and diaries to sit at the oval cabinet room tale, but collectively, their time over the three days was worth more than $145,000. Bran Black, CEO of the Business Council of Australia insists it was time well spent. 'I think the positive thing about the conversation we've just had is that there are some points of agreement right around the room,' he said in an interview on ABC's 730 Report on Wednesday, saying it was the best way to thrash out consensus. But others are wondering if the time spent talking about productivity was used productively. 'Despite some positive calls for change, reports coming out of the roundtable have been vague and largely aspirational,' Ted Forrest, the CEO of property development association Urban Taskforce Australia, said in a statement released on the final day. Chalmers, who is on a base salary of nearly $450,000, said ahead of the roundtable that the invite list would be 'pretty small, pretty tight and targeted.'

'Having to import people': The Aussie job locals don't want to do despite bumper wages and extraordinary employee benefits
'Having to import people': The Aussie job locals don't want to do despite bumper wages and extraordinary employee benefits

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

'Having to import people': The Aussie job locals don't want to do despite bumper wages and extraordinary employee benefits

Drakes Supermarkets are struggling to fill vacancies despite offering workers a raft of benefits. Drakes operates 66 stores in South Australia and Queensland with more than 6,000 Australians employed. However, director John Paul Drake is struggling to fill vacancies despite offering an onsite gym, free lunch and canteen at their distribution centre. This has led the company to open the door for international workers. Speaking to Chris Kenny on Sky News, Mr Drake said it's an 'extraordinary situation' that his distribution centre in Adelaide's northern suburbs is looking to fill 20 vacancies in an area where the unemployment rate is five times higher than the national rate of 4.2 per cent. 'Chris, it's hard to comprehend. The unemployment rate in the northern suburbs is actually 21 per cent,' Mr Drake said. 'So, when you're talking about a number like that, it is quite big. 'I'll admit, it might not be the sexiest job in the world, but the guys and girls we have down there, they're picking up to 10 tonne a day, but they're working pretty much Monday to Friday 9 to 3, $38 an hour and we are having to import people from Vanuatu to fill up the rest of the jobs and we need more people there even now.' Mr Drake claims that post-Covid, some Australians figure they are better off not working long shifts and rather receive more money from Centrelink. 'They've got the job and then when we get them started with an 8 or 12 hour shift they turn around and sit and go, well hang on, I can actually get paid more by not actually working here,' he said. The director of Drakes said there could be something "fundamentally wrong" with Australia's unemployment system for people to turn down jobs and cash in on benefits. 'And then you sit and go okay well fundamentally we might have a system problem when the employee they won't take the job because they're getting more Centrelink benefits than they are actually working so there's some other things there we need to look at.' 'And when people sit there and go, oh, well you're not employing Australians. Well, that's just that's not true. We're employing as many Australians as we can. 'Is there something fundamentally wrong with the current system which is making it very difficult? 'I mean, do I need to provide limo service to pick them up to bring them to work? You know, do I need to have dinners prepared for them for when they leave? I mean how far can you go?' Mr Drake said his Vanuatuan workers from the PALM scheme are being paid the same as Australians with 20 currently employed in the business. 'I can tell you, so we've had nine month visas, and we get a new load every nine months and the current team go back. And I could tell you out of our top eight performers, they come in with the top six. That's a huge number,' he said. 'They're such hardworking individuals that bought a worth ethic second to none.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store