logo
US Trojan horse alarms pushing China's robots to Europe

US Trojan horse alarms pushing China's robots to Europe

AllAfrica06-06-2025
Chinese robot makers are expanding their presence in Europe amid the growing risk of having their products banned by Washington if the US-China technology war escalates.
Distributors of Unitree Robotics and several others backed by Chinese technology giants such as Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent (a tech trio known as BAT), said at a recent event in London that Chinese firms are actively seeking European customers and partners.
Aska Liu, founder and chief executive at EnduX, a United Kingdom-based distributor for Chinese robot makers, told Asia Times that many Chinese robotic firms are still collaborating with their US counterparts despite rising Sino-China political tensions. Aska Liu, founder and chief executive at EnduX, says Europe and China should collaborate in robotic technologies. Photo: Asia Times/Jeff Pao
For example, she said that Physical Intelligence (Pi), a California-based AI firm founded in 2024, used AgiBot's hardware to develop their robotic brains.
She said Chinese and US firms, which are good at hardware and brains, respectively, should collaborate and utilize each other's strengths.
However, she noted that some Chinese players are now seeking to diversify their markets.
'We have seen a shift in focus of some Chinese players to Europe,' she said. 'They are saying: The US has so much instability and uncertainty. We don't want to put all eggs in one basket.'
She suggested Europe could benefit from the changing political situation between the US and China, as Chinese robot makers want to build stronger relationships with the bloc.
Liu said Europe is the best place in the world for Chinese firms to deploy robotic technologies because: Europe has labor shortage challenges;
Europe has intense industrial and agricultural scenes for the deployment of robots;
Europe is a global leader in regulations and a good gatekeeper for ethics, safety and standards;
China has a complete electronic supply chain for companies to finish proof-of-concept (POC) and mass-produce their robots.
She said Chinese robot makers should target markets related to research and education, inspection and patrolling, hospitality and services, material handling and so-called 'teleoperation', which allows workers in low-wage countries to control robots remotely and work in shops and factories in high-cost countries.
At the same time, Chinese robots are under assault in America. On May 9, the US Congress' Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) said its members signed a bipartisan letter warning of a growing national security threat posed by Unitree's 'dual-use' robots.
The committee called for an investigation into Unitree's connection to the People's Liberation Army (PLA) and whether the company's products contain built-in backdoors that transmit data back to China. It said China might use the robots' remote-access features to spy, gather intelligence or cause Trojan horse-like disruption inside the US.
'The fact that PLA-connected robots are operating in US prisons and even within Army operations should be a wake-up call,' said committee chairman John Moolenaar. 'These machines are not just tools—they are potential surveillance devices backed by the CCP.'
In November 2022, the Federal Communications Commission banned the import of communications equipment made by China's Huawei Technologies and ZTE because they were 'deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to national security.' In early 2024, the Biden administration warned of potential national security risks associated with Chinese electric vehicle imports.
Autodiscovery, a UK-based distributor for China's Unitree and AgileX, said on its website that it can disable all networking features if a customer wishes to use the robot in a secure environment.
According to official footage, Unitree G1 and US robot maker Boston Dynamics' Atlas can move swiftly, but the latter can perform more complex tasks, such as precisely moving objects. Aron Kisdi, managing director at Autodiscovery, says Chinese robot makers aim to enhance their robots' ability to move objects. Photo: Asia Times/Jeff Pao
'In the recent demonstrations from Boston Dynamics, we have seen much more capability from the robot. It can pick up heavy objects and move them around in a facility. That is certainly a skill many of our clients are looking for,' said Aron Kisdi, managing director at Autodiscovery.
'The ability to do simple tasks like moving strange-shaped or heavy objects from one location to another in the factory is useful for our clients,' he said.
'Unitree platforms don't have the software capability out of the box, and we need to implement this specifically for the client whenever we find a new deployment. Boston Dynamics is ahead of this.'
Kisdi said his company not only sells Chinese robots but also helps Chinese manufacturers understand the needs of European customers, enabling them to improve their research and development (R&D).
'We are increasingly talking to end users who don't have a robotics lab but want a functional robot in their facility doing useful things,' he said. 'By the end of 2026 or the beginning of 2027, we will have Unitree-based platforms with improved software that can go straight to clients.'
Atlas is not yet available for sale. Its production cost is estimated to be between US$500,000 and $1 million. Unitree's G1 robot, which made global headlines in the world's first robotic kickboxing match in Hangzhou last month, is priced at only $16,000.
'I wouldn't categorize Chinese and US robots as low-end or high-end, but they are in different parts of the value chain,' Liu said.
'China is leading the hardware, manufacturing and design. We see all sorts of robots manufactured and designed in China, which are second to none. You won't be able to find this level of variety, quality, value for money or cost anywhere.'
'In a humanoid robot, 40 to 60% of its parts can be sourced from the supply chain of electric vehicles. China is very well developed in electric vehicles, and it's having an advantage,' she added.
Founded by Liu in March 2023, EnduX sells robots for LimX Dynamics (backed by Alibaba Group and NIO Capital), AgiBot (backed by Tencent, BYD and Baidu), Deep Robotics and Kepler Exploration Robotics. LimX's TRON1 Photo: Asia Times/Jeff Pao
Although Chinese robot makers enjoy a cost advantage in global markets, they face rising domestic competition.
At the Humanoids Summit, held in London on May 29-30, Unitree displayed an H1 robot without turning it on, while Kingston University used a Unitree G1 robot to demonstrate some simple movements.
EnduX demonstrated LimX's TRON1, a biped robot that can maintain balance on rough terrains.
Booster Robotics, a Beijing-based company established in 2023, stole the show with its T1 robot playing football and performing with a human dancer.
The T1 humanoid robot stands 1.2 meters and weighs 30 kilograms, compared with Unitree G1's 1.3 meters and 35 kilograms. A Booster T1 robot performs with a human dancer. Photo: Asia Times/Jeff Pao
'Unitree is a great company and has made great products and market noise,' Chaoyi Li, head of globalization at Booster Robotics, told Asia Times during a question-and-answer session. 'As a startup, we have to differentiate our products. We want to make something robust to ensure our products don't break that much.'
Li said Booster also invested in software development, with many of its team members having worked in companies like Microsoft. He said his company would build better hands for its robots to do sophisticated tasks.
Read: China stages first-ever humanoid robot kickboxing match
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China-India relations thaw but no major reset yet
China-India relations thaw but no major reset yet

AllAfrica

time13 minutes ago

  • AllAfrica

China-India relations thaw but no major reset yet

After more than three years, China's top diplomat and Politburo member Wang Yi visited New Delhi this week for the 24th round of India-China Special Representative talks. The last round took place in December 2019, but the Galwan Valley clashes in June 2020 brought the dialogue to a halt. Talks resumed only in December 2023 in Beijing, following a Narendra Modi–Xi Jinping meeting in Kazan, Russia, in October that year. This visit contrasted starkly with Wang's trip to India in April 2022. Then, India gave him a lukewarm reception, largely because he had come directly from Islamabad and made contentious remarks on Kashmir at the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. There was even speculation at the time about whether he would proceed to New Delhi at all. Now, the tone has shifted, reflecting a cautious and potentially ground-breaking recalibration in India–China relations amid Trump's tariff tantrum toward India. The Kazan meeting between Modi and Xi appears to have created space for tentative re-engagement and a recalibration of ties. Moves were afoot even before Trump's tariff tantrum toward India. In June, India's defense minister and national security advisor visited China, followed by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's trip to Beijing in July. That bilateral momentum will build when China hosts and Modi attends the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin this month. Significantly, it will mark the first time Modi has traveled to China since 2018. Still, calling this a full China-India 'reset' might overstate the reality while deep-seated mistrust lingers. What's unfolding is better seen as a cautious inclination toward cooperation in sectors where both nations see mutual benefit — and strategic necessity — in easing tensions amid a turbulent global landscape shaped by Trump's tariff-induced trade frictions and rising geopolitical uncertainty. Wang's inability to meet Modi in March 2022 symbolized the frost between the two sides at the time. But much has changed since. China has recently eased curbs on exports of fertilizers, rare earth minerals, magnets and tunnel-boring machines — all vital inputs for India's manufacturing and infrastructure sectors. India, in turn, has relaxed visa policies for Chinese nationals, reopened limited border trade and begun engaging with select Chinese firms to secure supply chain components needed for its domestic production goals. New Delhi's push for 'Make in India' manufacturing self-reliance depends, in part, on access to Chinese industrial inputs. Beijing, meanwhile, may see an opportunity to leverage tensions in India's ties with the US, aiming to tilt New Delhi away from Washington and reinvigorate the Russia–India–China strategic triangle. This pragmatism reflects mutual recognition of tactical and strategic leverage points. Indian establishment voices in policymaking circles have increasingly urged joint ventures with Chinese firms that hold dominant global positions in manufacturing and supply chains. To be sure, the bilateral thaw is delicate and tentative. Symbolic gestures — resuming direct flights, reopening the Kailash–Mansarovar pilgrimage and loosening investment restrictions — suggest movement toward normalized ties. Yet key irritants persist, including lack of data-sharing on Himalayan rivers, the unresolved issue of the Dalai Lama's reincarnation and, perhaps most crucially, China's strategic axis with Pakistan. While both sides speak of stabilizing borders and how the Xi-Modi meeting last year in Kazan created a 'new environment' for diplomacy, their disputed 3,488-kilometer border means the peace is still fragile and tentative. For India, Modi's Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) vision is a key driver. Unlike past Soviet-style licensed production, India today seeks technology transfers to build its manufacturing base. But Chinese companies, like others, will tightly control how much technology crosses borders — and under what conditions. Some joint initiatives are emerging, but asymmetry in economic and technological power remains. India, for its part, wants to diversify its technology and investment sources without becoming overly dependent on either China or the US. And while Beijing may seek to prevent India from drifting too far into US-led geopolitical and supply chain initiatives, their diplomatic-economic-strategic balancing act remains delicate. India continues to see China's close relationship with Pakistan as a limiting factor in bilateral ties. China supplies more than 80% of Pakistan's defense imports and offered intelligence support, including live inputs, during recent India–Pakistan clashes. Wang's scheduled trip to Islamabad after New Delhi — to co-chair the sixth Pakistan–China Strategic Dialogue and review the status of the Belt and Road Initiative-driven China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)— underscored this reality. New Delhi also recognizes that Beijing may quietly welcome the recent and significant strain in US–India relations. Despite foundational defense agreements and the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET), Washington remains hesitant to share advanced technologies with India. The Trump administration's renewed protectionist measures, not least his 50% punitive tariff on India over its purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, have made top-tier US tech-sharing even less likely. Wang put the dispute in a broader global context, warning that the world faces 'a once-in-a-century transformation at an accelerating pace,' and must resist 'bullying' tactics — a not-so-veiled critique of Washington that aimed to pull India more deeply into the expanding BRICS bloc of middle powers. Jaishankar echoed a shared call for 'reformed multilateralism,' positioning India and China as powers aligned on global governance, even as their bilateral irritants remain unresolved. Wang's meeting with Modi also laid the diplomatic groundwork for the Indian leader's upcoming China visit, marking perhaps the most consequential upshot of the Chinese envoy's visit. Symbolism — resumed flights, pilgrimage access and border calm — may help restore public perceptions of China-India normalcy. Substantive issues — minerals, joint ventures and tech transfer — will likely evolve more cautiously. Still, this week's diplomacy showed that, despite rivalry, both nations are exploring ways to coexist and cooperate in the fractured global order driven by Trump-era tariffs and 'America First' nationalism. It's for now a modest ambition, but in today's world, modesty itself is an achievement.

Hong Kong centre takes legal action against firm suspected of water procurement fraud
Hong Kong centre takes legal action against firm suspected of water procurement fraud

South China Morning Post

time13 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Hong Kong centre takes legal action against firm suspected of water procurement fraud

A testing centre, where a Hong Kong lawmaker serves as a director, has taken legal action against a company suspected of procurement fraud over false claims that the body had issued safety certificates for 1.88 million bottles of water supplied to government offices. The Hong Kong Standards and Testing Centre clarified on Wednesday that it had not provided any services to Xin Ding Xin Trade, the water supplier suspected of defrauding the government in the HK$52.9 million (US$6.8 million) contract. 'The centre is following up on this incident with the relevant government departments and has taken legal action to pursue legal liabilities,' it said. Jeffrey Lam Kin-fung, a centre director and member of the Executive Council, the city's top decision-making body, previously denied any involvement with tests conducted on 'XinLe' bottled water provided by Xin Ding Xin. The water procurement controversy came to light on Saturday last week when the Government Logistics Department announced it had 'partially terminated' a contract with the company to supply bottled water to civil servant offices on Hong Kong Island and some outlying islands for three years. Xin Ding Xin Trade's director Lui Tsz-chung, and his wife and shareholder Chan Pik-lam were arrested. Lui was charged with one count of fraud on Monday, while Chan was bailed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store