What does the UK-EU deal mean for holidays and jobs? Your questions answered
Your questions have touched on a range of issues, including jobs, food and travel.
Our experts have been digging into the detail to figure out what the deal means for you and your family.
Anna Maria, a dental student studying in Bulgaria, asked about mutual recognition of professional qualifications, which was a Labour Party manifesto pledge. Our political reporter Becky Morton has looked into the details of the deal.
In its manifesto last year, Labour said it would seek to "secure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications, external to help open up markets for UK service exporters".
That would mean professionals such as doctors, lawyers and accountants who qualified in one country could practice in another with minimal extra bureaucracy - a system already in place across the EU.
Monday's deal promises to set up "dedicated dialogues" on the recognition of professional qualifications, but a full agreement could take much longer to negotiate.
Such an agreement would make it easier for British companies to move staff between the UK and EU and undertake short-term work in Europe.
However, there may be less incentive for the EU to agree a deal, given the current situation makes it harder for UK firms to compete for business in Europe.
Malcolm in Bristol wanted more clarity on what the agreement will mean for passport queues for UK citizens visiting the EU. Our transport correspondent Simon Browning explains.
While some EU ports and airports already allow UK citizens to use modern e-gates, many do not and queues have become familiar to holidaymakers.
The new agreement provides more clarity on e-gates and sets out that in the future, UK citizens will be able to use them - but the EU Commission says that will not come into force in time for this summer.
However, the UK government has indicated it is hopeful there could be changes in time for the summer, so the timeline still appears to be up for debate.
The EU says there will be no change before a new EU border security scheme comes into force in October, which will see biometric data including fingerprints collected from passengers coming from non-EU countries such as the UK.
It will mean manned desks where people will have to queue in order to enter some EU countries could still be a feature of travel beyond this year, even if e-gate usage becomes more widely available.
In short, that will mean long queues at some destinations could continue during this holiday season and perhaps beyond.
Any decision about UK citizens using e-gates will not be a blanket one across the bloc. Instead, it will be up to individual countries to decide how they manage queues at their borders.
We have received a lot of questions about pet passports. Our political correspondent Jack Fenwick has looked into when the scheme will be up and running.
In short, we just do not know yet whether there will be any change in time for this summer.
The agreement between the UK and EU commits to introducing a new passport system which would make it easier for people to travel with their pets and end the need to acquire repeat vet certificates.
Many British holidaymakers will be keen for these rules to be introduced in time for their trip this year.
However, so-called pet passports come under a part of the deal known as the sanitary and phytosanitary agreement - and while the UK and EU have agreed to work together in this area, the full scope of it has not been fully fleshed out yet.
Chris in Bristol asked whether UK farmers would have to accept EU regulations on food standards. Our business correspondent Simon Jack has assessed the impact.
The new agreement removes the need for time consuming and costly veterinary checks and forms - but in return, the UK will have to align with EU food standards.
As those regulations change, the UK will have to change too.
The government insists it will have a say in how those rules develop and it may be able to negotiate exceptions - but they will not have a vote.
The National Farmers Union has broadly welcomed the new deal because it provides easier and quicker access to a big market for perishable products, in which the speed that goods can be moved is important.
Andy in Eastbourne asked whether this deal would allow for the free and unrestricted movement of musicians and bands on tour in Europe. Our political reporter Becky Morton answered.
Since Brexit, British musicians have faced extra costs and red tape when touring Europe.
The industry has been urging the government to find a solution and Labour's general election manifesto pledged to "help our touring artists" as part of negotiations with the EU.
But the deal agreed on Monday only recognises the "value" of touring artists and promises to continue efforts "to support travel and cultural exchange".
The UK says it will explore "how best to improve arrangements for touring across the European continent".
Tom Kiehl, chief executive of UK Music, which represents the industry, welcomed this as "an important first step" but said the sector was seeking "more concrete commitments".
Brian in Nottingham asked about any knock-on effect the agreement may have on the UK's ability to negotiate trade deals with other nations. Political correspondent Jack Fenwick looked into it for him.
If the UK was to re-join the customs union or single market, there would be knock-on effects for other trade agreements, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership - but this relatively limited agreement does not go nearly that far.
However, the UK will now effectively be a rule-taker when it comes to EU standards on food and farming exports - but the government is fairly comfortable with that for two reasons.
Firstly, ministers do not want to lower food standards anyway, which we saw during recent trade negotiations with the US.
Secondly, the level of trade the UK has with the EU massively outstrips other agreements signed in recent years.
This UK-EU deal is expected to eventually boost the economy by around £9bn a year, largely from food, farming and energy trading. Compare that with the much broader agreement signed with India this year, which will bring economic benefits of around £5bn a year.
Neil Heard asked whether people who owned properties in the EU before Brexit would be able to spend more time there? Political analyst Peter Barnes checked it out.
There was nothing in the new agreement that would change the rules in this respect.
If a UK citizen travels to the Schengen area, which covers most of the EU and some other European countries, you do not need a visa but you can only stay for 90 days in any 180 day period.
The rule applies even if the 90 days is made up of multiple trips, and also if you stay in more than one Schengen area country. It is the total number of days that counts.
Ireland and Cyprus are not in the Schengen area and UK citizens have the right to live and work in Ireland - but for people with holiday homes in France and other EU countries, the rules are not changing.
The Schengen agreement abolished many of Europe's internal borders, allowing freedom of movement between the countries which are signed up to it.
A reader in Scotland asked about the impact on the local fishing industry. Scotland editor James Cook spelled out what it means for the whole of the UK.
To understand what has gone on, we need to go back to when the UK was a member of the EU. Back then, fishing quotas were governed by the EU's Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) under which EU boats could catch fish in UK waters and vice versa.
This was very unpopular with many UK fishermen who complained, accurately, that under the CFP they caught far fewer fish in EU waters than EU fishermen caught in UK waters.
After Brexit, the UK and the EU agreed that EU vessels could still fish in UK waters until 30 June 2026, but that 25% of the EU's quota in UK waters (by value of fish landings) would gradually be transferred to the UK.
From 1 July 2026, EU-UK deals for fishing access were going to be negotiated annually.
But this new deal maintains the current position in terms of EU access to UK waters for 12 years, a move criticised by the Scottish Fishermen's Federation as a "total capitulation" by the UK government.
Downing Street stressed that the EU quota in UK waters has not increased, and says the deal provides certainty - as well as streamlining the process for selling UK fish and shellfish in the EU.
Five unanswered questions in UK-EU deal
The new UK-EU deal at a glance
Who are the winners and losers from the UK-EU agreement?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US trade deal will only benefit Jaguar Land Rover, warns Aston Martin
Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump risks favouring Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) and 'squeezing out' smaller carmakers, the boss of Aston Martin has claimed. Adrian Hallmark said changes to the UK-US agreement were urgently needed 'so we don't get squashed and so that it doesn't become a JLR tariff agreement'. The chief executive's comments, reported by Bloomberg, concern the trade deal's arrangements for British cars shipped to America under a new quota system that came into effect this month. Under the deal, tariffs on British cars have fallen from 27.5pc to 10pc. But this is only for the first 100,000 cars per year, or 25,000 cars per quarter. It has also recently been confirmed that this quota will be allocated on a 'first come, first served' basis, triggering fears that carmakers will be forced to race against each other to get vehicles out of factories and on to ships first – or face higher taxes than their competitors. JLR shipped more than 120,000 cars to North America in 2024, according to published sales figures. Aston shipped about 2,000. High stakes On Wednesday, Mr Hallmark called on the Government to impose limits for different categories within the quota. For example, he said some of the quota should be reserved for the type of high-end supercars that Aston and competitors produce. The marque also competes with the likes of JLR, Lotus, Rolls-Royce and Bentley in the lucrative luxury SUV market with its DBX model. The stakes for these brands are high because once the quota is taken up, they must go back to paying the 27.5pc tariffs Mr Trump previously imposed in April. Such levies have proved expensive for companies exporting from the EU, which is scrambling to get a deal with Mr Trump over the line to reduce the rate to 15pc. Vauxhall owner Stellantis has said it expected to pay €1.5bn (£1.3bn) in tariffs this year. Separately on Wednesday, Mercedes-Benz and Porsche said tariffs would cost them €362m and €400m respectively for the first half of 2025 alone. Earlier this month, Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society for Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said there was a 'general feeling' among carmakers 'that the tariff quota we have is sufficient to meet the demand for this year' but the industry wanted it to grow year on year. However, at the moment there is no indication that the quota will be increased. Mr Hawes added: 'They're reasonable quotas, given our export volumes. Obviously we would like to see that increase … but at least it gives you a basis to start from. 'Different brands will have different strategies, wherever they are on the product cycle for next year, and we know there are some new products coming next year.' He admitted there was a possibility that carmakers might seek to beat each other to the quota and that there was probably 'some paranoia' about that in the industry. But he claimed such a scenario was 'unlikely, because if you try and put one over on your competitors, you're going to damage that same supply chain, because it's shared among so many of these manufacturers'. Sir Keir visited the Midlands headquarters of JLR in May when he announced his 'landmark' trade deal with Mr Trump and vowed to protect jobs. However, just weeks later the carmaker said it would cut 500 jobs in what was described as 'a personal embarrassment' for the Prime Minister. A government spokesman said: 'We are working with industry to ensure the quota works effectively and fairly, and will ensure the UK remains a top destination for investment in automotive manufacturing through our Plan for Change.' JLR was approached for comment on Wednesday. Mr Hallmark's remarks came as Aston confirmed a 25pc drop in sales during the first half of 2025, blaming both US tariffs that were announced in April and lower deliveries of 'specials' – the ultra-expensive and highly profitable one-off models it produces. The company sold 1,922 in the first six months of this year, down from 1,998 in 2024. But revenues fell 25pc to £454m and profit margins shrank from 39pc to 28pc, reflecting the less profitable sales mix. Half-year losses fell from about £217m to £141m. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
European automotive giant Stellantis faces €1.5 billion hit from US tariffs this year
The second-biggest carmaker in Europe has forecast that US tariffs could cost it €1.5 billion this year as the EU has failed to avert auto levies imposed by the Trump administration. The producers of luxury Maserati cars as well as mid-range and affordable favourites such as Lancia, Peugeot and Fiat, said on Tuesday that net profits plummeted from €5.6bn in the same period last year. This was as it burned €3.3 billion in cash for the cancellation of a hydrogen fuel cell project. Changes in the fine regime for US carbon emission regulations and write-downs on platform investments also hit profits. US President Donald Trump's tariffs cost the company €300 million in the first six months of the year, Stellantis said. Losses like these could crank up political and labour pressure as the carmaker faces a heightened risk of plant shutdowns, delayed model launches and fights with unions as management scrambles to manage the cash gap. Carmakers are the main drivers of European industry. The sector pumps out roughly 7% of EU GDP according to the European Commission, supports around 14 million jobs across its supply chains and delivers one of the bloc's biggest export surpluses each year. Automakers also pour more than €70bn annually into engineering and technological innovation. A dip in their fortunes can therefore ripple into technology, steel, chemicals, logistics and the continent's drive for innovation. Stellantis said it expected net revenues to increase over the next six months compared with the first half, when they dropped 13% to €74.3bn. The carmaker also said cash flow would improve. Incoming CEO Antonio Filosa, who was confirmed in the role last month, said the new executive team would "continue to make the tough decisions needed to re-establish profitable growth and significantly improve results". 'My first weeks as CEO have reconfirmed my strong conviction that we will fix what's wrong with Stellantis,'' Filosa said in a statement. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stellantis warns of $1.7 billion earnings hit from tariffs
Stellantis on Tuesday said that President Trump's tariffs will cost the auto manufacturer 1.5 billion euros, or about $1.7 billion, in 2025. The parent company of brands like Chrysler, Fiat, Jeep and Peugeot announced the projected earnings hit as Mr. Trump clinches deals with U.S. trade partners that include steep tariffs on U.S. imports. Stellantis expects most of the earnings decline to materialize in the second half of 2025. "Stellantis updates its estimate of 2025 net tariff impact to approximately €1.5 billion, of which €0.3 billion was incurred in H1 2025. The Company remains highly engaged with relevant policymakers, while continuing long-term scenario planning," the company said in a statement Tuesday as it reported financial results for the first half of 2025. The automaker acknowledged that Mr. Trump's 25% tariffs on imports of autos and auto parts to the U.S. are hurting its business, particularly in North America. Stellantis builds its Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep brand vehicles in factories in Canada and Mexico, meaning they're subject to the new levies. While Mr. Trump's deal with the EU, calling for 15% tariffs across the board will make BMW and Mercedes-Benz vehicles more expensive for U.S. consumers, according to analysts. Stellantis is largely unaffected by the EU agreement. "Stellantis isn't much affected by the EU/US tariff news — the question for STLA is if the Detroit-3 will want to renegotiate the [U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)] tariff after the EU and Japan got a better deal," UBS analysts said in a research note. Other automobile manufacturers, including General Motors, have been bracing for impact from tariffs. GM CEO Mary Barra said the company took a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs in the second quarter, and that the company is taking steps to reduce its tariff exposure by investing in U.S. assembly plants. European automaker Volkswagen also said last week that tariffs cost the company $1.5 billion in the first half of 2025. John Oliver: The 60 Minutes Interview Finding the plane used for Argentina's dictatorship-era "death flights" | 60 Minutes Immigration agent told 18-year-old U.S. citizen "you got no rights here" during arrest Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data