logo
Odisha's BJP govt moves to keep bureaucrats at arm's length in bid to change perception of ‘overpowering' influence

Odisha's BJP govt moves to keep bureaucrats at arm's length in bid to change perception of ‘overpowering' influence

Indian Express21-05-2025
In what sources described as an effort to counter the perception that bureaucrats wield undue power in ministries, the BJP government in Odisha has issued a circular barring secretaries of departments from being present at Cabinet meetings.
During the previous government under Naveen Patnaik, the BJP had repeatedly alleged that the government was being run by bureaucrats. They had particularly targeted V K Pandian, who served as private secretary to then-CM Patnaik for over a decade, accusing him of wielding enormous power over ministers and MLAs in the BJD regime. The supposed influence wielded by the Tamil Nadu-born Pandian was a major election issue for the BJP in the 2024 polls.
A BJP leader said, 'There was an impression on the ground that bureaucrats continue to wield their influence, overpowering ministers the way it happened during the BJD regime. The BJP government is going to complete one year in office next month, and such a perception is not good for it.'
According to sources, the government issued such a circular to also negate growing public perception about the role of ministers.
'There were instances in the past when ministers expressed their ignorance about subjects of their own departments. This is because… the secretaries used to prepare the Cabinet memorandums and also participated in the discussion. The presence of ministers was a mere formality. The move is to change that perception,' a senior bureaucrat said.
According to the circular issued by the state parliamentary affairs department on May 9, during Cabinet meetings, only the Chief Minister, Cabinet ministers, ministers of state in charge of the department whose agenda is up for discussion, and the secretary to the Cabinet (Chief Secretary) are to sit inside the Cabinet room.
'Hence, secretaries of departments whose agenda are placed for discussions, may sit in a separate room specially designated for officers and may enter the Cabinet room as and when required by the Cabinet to assist the Cabinet with any issue,' the circular read.
The circular also said that secretaries will not take part in discussions during the Cabinet meeting, except when asked for their opinion. 'When a case is brought before the Cabinet, the presiding authority will call upon the minister-in-charge or the minister of state-in-charge to speak on the issue placed for approval of the Cabinet. Other ministers will speak subsequently,' it said.
The circular also lays down strict timelines for submission of Cabinet memorandums and related documents. It asked the secretaries to submit the Cabinet memorandums to the parliamentary affairs department at least three working days before a Cabinet meeting, unless the timeline is relaxed by the Chief Minister.
Ministers will be informed about the agenda to be taken up for discussion two days before the Cabinet meeting.
Speaking to reporters in Bhubaneswar, Revenue Minister Suresh Pujari said, 'Nothing has been newly introduced or amended. The system that needs to be followed in a parliamentary democracy has now been restored. The move will ensure qualitative discussion, and the ministers will present their cases in a more effective manner.'
Pujari said the system has been spoiled in the past 24 years — the period of time that the BJD was in power in the state. He said the role of the political leadership in a democracy had been neglected in the past, and is now been upheld.
'In a democracy, the role of everyone — ministers, MLAs and secretaries — has been defined clearly. It has now been restored,' he said.
The BJD, however, called the move a gimmick. Senior BJD MLA Kalikesh Singh Deo said the efficiency of the government should be seen on the ground. 'It would be my request to the government to stop the marketing gimmick and to contemplate on the development of Odisha and the welfare of its people,' said Singh Deo.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five judges, two agencies and a 17-year wait — the long road to verdict in Malegaon blast case
Five judges, two agencies and a 17-year wait — the long road to verdict in Malegaon blast case

Economic Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Five judges, two agencies and a 17-year wait — the long road to verdict in Malegaon blast case

The trial in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, which stretched over nearly 17 years, witnessed not only a change in investigating agencies but also five different judges presiding over various stages of the proceedings. A special court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, noting there was "no reliable and cogent evidence" against them. The investigation was initially conducted by the state Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), which had pinned the blame on right-wing extremists who were members of 'Abhinav Bharat' probe was later handed over to the NIA, which gave a clean chit to Thakur. However, the court conducted the trial against her, citing prima facie the initial remand of the accused to the filing of charge sheets, framing of charges, commencement of trial, and finally the verdict, the case passed through the hands of five judges between 2008 and 2025. Both the victims of the blast and the accused cited this frequent change of judges as a significant factor in derailing the trial and contributing to the prolonged Kulkarni, one of the accused who was eventually acquitted, told PTI that this was among the longest-running trials. He blamed both the prosecution and defence for failing to expedite the proceedings. Kulkarni had even filed a petition in the High Court seeking that the trial be Shaheed Nadeem, who represented several victims, acknowledged that the repeated transfer of judges had indeed hampered the trial. He pointed out that the voluminous case records meant each new judge had to start afresh, further delaying the first judge to preside over the case was Special Judge Y.D. Shinde. He handled the initial remand of the accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit, and others. In a significant ruling, Judge Shinde set aside the invocation of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), observing that none of the accused were part of an organised crime syndicate. He noted that the legal prerequisite for invoking MCOCA-that an accused must have more than one charge sheet filed against them-was not met. However, the Bombay High Court later reinstated the application of MCOCA following an appeal by the state Shinde, special judge S.D. Tekale presided over the case from 2015 to 2018 until his transfer during annual judicial was Judge Tekale who rejected the National Investigation Agency's (NIA) move to grant a clean chit to Pragya Thakur, asserting that there was prima facie evidence warranting her Tekale, special judge V.S. Padalkar took over and, in October 2018, formally framed charges against Thakur, Purohit, and five others. The trial officially began under his tenure with the examination of the first P.R. Sitre succeeded Padalkar after his retirement in 2020. However, the COVID-19 pandemic brought the trial to a temporary standstill. Despite the challenges, Judge Sitre managed to examine 100 witnesses during his tenure of just over a 2022, when Sitre was slated for transfer, victims of the blast wrote to the then Bombay High Court Chief Justice Dipankar Datta, urging that the transfer be stayed to avoid further Sitre's transfer, special judge A.K. Lahoti took over the trial in June 2022. Till April 2025, Judge Lahoti continued the April, when he was slated for transfer to Nashik, the victims again wrote to the then HC Chief Justice seeking a stay on the transfer as the trial was nearing completion. Responding to their plea, Judge Lahoti's tenure as special NIA judge was extended until the end of August 2025, allowing him to complete the trial.

'This Was A False Case': Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani On Malegaon Verdict
'This Was A False Case': Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani On Malegaon Verdict

News18

time21 minutes ago

  • News18

'This Was A False Case': Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani On Malegaon Verdict

A Mumbai court acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon blasts case, including ex-BJP MP Pragya Singh. Mahesh Jethmalani called it a "false case" and "politically driven." A special court in Mumbai has acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon blasts case. Reacting to the verdict, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, who had previously represented Sadhvi Pragya, said 'this was a false case." Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur was acquitted of the charges against her, along with six others, by an NIA court. Jethmalani further said the issue was 'politicised" and was 'only to further statement by a leading politician that Hindu terrosism was more dangerous than LET Terrorism." 'I feel sorry for the victims who suffered as the case was politically driven." After 17 years since the bomb blast was carried out in the Muslim-dominated area of Mumbai's Malegaon during the month of Ramadan in 2008. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and Retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay were among the seven accused named by NIA in the case. After a long-shelved legal battle, all 7 accused are acquitted today. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the charge of Malegaon attack from Maharashtra Anti-terrorism squad in 2011. As per the court's verdict pronounced today, the prosecution failed to present any concrete evidence linking the seven accused to the 2008 Malegaon blasts. The single-judge bench led by AK Lahoti stated that the use of UAPA in this case was also defective. The court observed no religion teaches violence, the court said. Terrorism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception. Special judge A K Lahoti, presiding over National Investigation Agency (NIA) cases, while reading out the judgment said there was no 'reliable and cogent evidence" against the accused that proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. What Happened In 2008? An explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008 killing six persons and injuring 101 others. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

500 waterlogging points identified
500 waterlogging points identified

New Indian Express

time23 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

500 waterlogging points identified

NEW DELHI: Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said her government has identified over 500 waterlogging hotspots across the capital and appointed nodal officers, with the support of the Delhi Police, to tackle the issue. She said drainage systems have improved and waterlogging, which earlier lingered for hours, is now being resolved much faster. Speaking at an event at the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on Tuesday, Gupta said, 'There are over 500 waterlogging points in Delhi. A detailed list is being prepared. Delhi Police is also assisting. Nodal officers have been appointed to address the issues.' Taking a jibe, she also thanked the opposition for circulating videos of waterlogged areas, saying it helped her government identify and fix vulnerable spots. 'Earlier, the previous government only made videos during rain. I'm glad they are doing it again. At least it is helping us identify and fix the issues,' she said. However, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) took sharp aim at the BJP-led Delhi government. AAP Delhi State President Saurabh Bharadwaj held Chief Minister Rekha Gupta directly responsible for the flooding after a moderate spell of rain, pointing to poor drainage preparedness despite the crores reportedly spent on desilting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store