logo
Nintendo Switch 2 Prices? The ESA Warns Trump's Tariffs Will Reach Far Beyond That

Nintendo Switch 2 Prices? The ESA Warns Trump's Tariffs Will Reach Far Beyond That

Forbes05-04-2025

Switch 2
There is a bit of blindness going on when it comes to the effect of Donald Trump's recent mass tariffs in the video game industry. Much of the focus has been on how it may affect the Nintendo Switch 2, which was just priced at a rather high $450 this past week, with the idea the hardware may go higher than that as a result of tariffs hitting Japan and manufacturing partners like Vietnam and Cambodia.
Now, America's Entertainment Software Association (ESA) is commenting on the tariffs, and warning everyone that this is more far-reaching than a single, upcoming console. In an interview with IGN's Rebekah Valentine, the ESA's spokesperson, Aubrey Quinn, had this to say about the situation:
How, specifically? It's a chain reaction. Tariffs will lower consumer spending due to high prices on essentials, which likely will reduce purchases of 'luxury' items in the gaming sphere, where prices will also be up in that sector, most likely. Then, profits go down, industry layoffs may happen (which are obviously already happening), and that means less development in the industry. Quinn says that could even affect next generation consoles outside of the Switch 2, even if they're years away. If those are suddenly much more expensive to develop and build, that may change the core of some of these systems.
TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump holds a chart as he delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs ... More during an event in the Rose Garden (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
The ESA says it's talking to the government with other consumer groups, but at this point, it's a little hard to see what impact that may have given that almost every industry is being touched in some way by these tariffs, so they're sort of just another voice yelling in the crowd. They recommend gamers reach out to their own representatives to complain about the situation.
It is too early to know exactly what will happen in the industry, specifically, outside of 'bad things.' Prices have not been raised, companies have not announced significant strategic changes, but obviously it has not even been a week since these tariffs were announced, and the dust is far from settling. There was some pre-emptive action taken on the assumption tariffs would be implemented, but that created situations like Nintendo moving hardware production out of China to Vietnam and Cambodia where now both of those countries have been slapped with some of the highest tariffs of them all. It's a mess, though of course it reaches far beyond the Nintendo Switch 2.
Read the full IGN interview here.
Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.
Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP hawks clash with MAGA isolationists as Trump contemplates next steps in Iran
GOP hawks clash with MAGA isolationists as Trump contemplates next steps in Iran

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

GOP hawks clash with MAGA isolationists as Trump contemplates next steps in Iran

(CNN) — As President Donald Trump prepared to leave the G7 summit a day early amid an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, he dialed up his go-to national security confidant Sen. Lindsey Graham — who's also one of the GOP's most vocal war hawks. In that phone call, Graham said he personally urged Trump to go 'all in' to end any hope Iran had of attaining a nuclear weapon, using the considerable might of the US military if necessary. After months of talks with Iran ahead of Israel's strikes last week, Graham now warned Trump: The window for diplomacy has passed. 'I said, 'Mr. President, this is a historic moment. Four presidents have promised that they won't get a nuclear weapon on your watch. You can fulfill that promise,' Graham said, recalling his conversation with Trump. The call reflects how Trump, who has embraced a more isolationist approach than many of his GOP predecessors, is navigating competing forces within his own party as he contemplates whether to order the US military to strike Iranian nuclear sites. On one side: traditional Republicans like Graham who are eager to see the US flex its military muscle. On the other, key MAGA allies like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has forcefully argued this week that anyone 'slobbering' for the US to intervene in Iran is not in line with Trump's politics. Greene told CNN she has traded texts with the president recently, though she would not divulge their conversation. 'We have all been very vocal for days now urging, 'Let's be America first. Let's stay out,'' Greene told CNN on Tuesday of the pressure campaign, which she said has included more isolationist Republicans like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Matt Gaetz. The lobbying has played out publicly and privately, with Republicans taking aim at one another as they have jockeyed for Trump's attention. In public appearances since his phone call with Trump, Graham has pushed a specific plan for Trump to use the US military to attack a secretive Iranian nuclear site, which is so deep underground that the only way to destroy it would be using a massive bomb that only America possesses. That kind of move would also require a US bomber to enter Iranian airspace — a major escalation of the American role in the conflict. Two US officials told CNN Tuesday Trump was increasingly receptive to that approach, and less interested in pursuing a diplomatic solution. 'The president, he's his own man. Everyone who knows Donald Trump knows he makes up his own mind. But I think it's important to discuss. We have to let him know what we think,' Greene told CNN, adding that she's been getting a flood of calls to her office supporting her position. 'Many Americans just do not want to be involved. That's why I spoke up and have been vocal about it.' As the president huddled in the Situation Room with his top advisers to weigh his options on Tuesday, a small group of House and Senate lawmakers — including at least one Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie — have been privately mobilizing one possible way to check Trump's power in Congress. In the last 24 hours, two lawmakers have introduced War Powers Resolutions that would formally limit Trump's power to deploy the military without Congress' specific consent. Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine is leading the push in the Senate, with Massie taking lead on the House measure. Such an effort could face tall odds in the GOP-controlled chambers of Congress, particularly if a vote comes before more Trump action in the Middle East. But both measures in the House and Senate are expected to be 'privileged,' which means leaders will be forced to bring it to the floor. That could be a major headache for both parties, with Democratic progressives and GOP ultraconservatives known to veer from their own party orthodoxy on war powers matters. Debate on the Senate measure is expected to come to a head in the coming days, with a vote as soon as next Wednesday, Kaine told CNN. It could have robust Democratic support. 'I believe Congress and the Senate, Senate Democrats, if necessary, will not hesitate to exercise our authority,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on whether he would support the measure. In the House, the timeline for a vote is less clear. Massie formally introduced the measure on Tuesday but privately has not yet indicated when he might force it to the floor, as lawmakers of both parties closely watch Trump's next steps, according to multiple people familiar with the discussions. In the House, GOP leaders have moved to prevent contentious measures from coming to the floor before — but it's not clear the votes would be there to do that this time, according to one person familiar with the discussions. Lawmakers' calculus could also be upended by what Trump does in the coming days, sources in both parties told CNN. That includes whether Trump escalates the conflict by using U.S. military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities like the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, the deep underground facility that is seen as key to Iran's desires to constructing a unclear weapon. 'If that happens, then it's a game changing calculation,' one congressional source told CNN. Greene and Massie are not the only Hill Republicans vocally opposed to Trump increasing US involvement in the conflict. Sen. Josh Hawley, another critic of intervening in foreign wars, spoke to Trump about this topic, including others, in a recent call. He said Trump 'wisely' did not talk about offensive action with Iran in their conversation. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky noted that Trump has in the past held back, and said he hoped he would do so again. 'I think the lingering chance for diplomacy comes from restraint. The President has shown restraint in the past,' Paul said. 'The president's instincts are good, and I'm hoping the President will not get involved with the war. I think, if the United States actively bombs Tehran, the possibility of negotiation goes out the window.' Trump has sparred with both Massie and Paul over his domestic agenda, and multiple Republicans told CNN it appears that the White House is listening more to war hawks like Graham than his isolationist allies. Some of those Republicans pointed to Trump's dig at conservative commentator Tucker Carlson earlier this week, after Carlson accused the president of being 'complicit in an act of war' in Israel's strikes on Iran. Carlson also called on the US to decouple itself from Israel altogether — not providing any funding or weapons to assist its long-time ally. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen,' the president told reporters in response. Hill Republicans took notice of the flap. Sen. Mitch McConnell, the veteran Kentucky Republican and leading defense hawk, singled out both Carlson and Bannon to CNN on Monday. 'I think what's happening here is some of the isolationist movement led by Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon are distressed that we may be helping the Israelis defeat the Iranians — it's the same kind of complaint they had about helping Ukraine,' McConnell said in rare public remarks to reporters since leaving his leadership post. 'I would say it's been kind of a bad week for the isolationists.' Asked if he thinks the GOP's isolationist wing has too much sway with President Donald Trump, McConnell said: 'I think that remains to be seen. The president still has the opportunity do the right thing. I think he will. … I think we ought to help the Israelis win and help the Ukrainians win. It's in our interest to do that.'

Indexes end lower as Israel-Iran fighting raises investor anxiety
Indexes end lower as Israel-Iran fighting raises investor anxiety

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Indexes end lower as Israel-Iran fighting raises investor anxiety

STORY: U.S. stocks closed lower on Tuesday, with the Dow dropping seven-tenths of a percent, the S&P 500 losing more than eight-tenths and the Nasdaq shedding nine-tenths of a percent. The Israel-Iran conflict raged on for a fifth day, with the U.S. military moving fighter jets to the Middle East and President Donald Trump calling for Iran's "unconditional surrender." Besides the conflict, investors are closely watching for any new information on Trump's tariffs, his tax-cut bill and U.S. interest rates. The Federal Reserve is expected to leave rates unchanged at the conclusion of its two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, despite ongoing pressure from Trump to lower them. Robert Conzo is CEO of The Wealth Alliance. 'I think [Fed Chairman] Jerome Powell wants to be independent from Trump. He wants to show I'm not going to be strong-armed by the government. I'm going to hold this until we're ready to drop it down. I'm not really sure why the Fed doesn't do a signalling cut of 25 basis points just to show that they're willing to do it. The rest of the world is cutting. We're in great shape. I'm not sure why he doesn't do that, but he's not. And there's no indication that in this particular round he's going to [cut rates].' Stocks on the move included solar companies which fell after Senate Republicans late Monday unveiled proposed changes to Trump's tax-cut bill, including a phase-out of solar, wind and energy tax credits by 2028. Enphase Energy tumbled 24% and Sunrun plunged 40%. Also, Eli Lilly shares dipped 2% after the company agreed to acquire Verve Therapeutics for up to $1.3 billion. Shares of Verve surged more than 80%. And shares of JetBlue fell almost 8% after its CEO told employees the airline will wind down underperforming routes and reassess the size and scope of its leadership team. The carrier also said it was unlikely it would break even this year, according to an internal memo seen by Reuters. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump is giving TikTok another ban extension
Trump is giving TikTok another ban extension

The Verge

time31 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Trump is giving TikTok another ban extension

For the third time, President Donald Trump will extend the deadline for TikTok to spin out from its Chinese parent company or face a US ban. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in a statement Tuesday that Trump will sign an executive order this week extending the deadline another 90 days, landing the new deadline in mid-September. The Trump administration will spend the next 90 days 'working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' Leavitt said. The extension, first signed on January 20th, theoretically offers legal cover for TikTok's US service providers who are subject to the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act from the hundreds of billions in penalties they could face for keeping the app online and in US app stores. But that legal cover was already shaky given that Trump's extensions are not codified into the law, which was passed overwhelmingly by a bipartisan vote in Congress, and upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court. As The Verge previously reported, ByteDance and an Oracle-led coalition had nearly hammered out a deal in April, but Trump's tariffs abruptly blew up the tentative agreement. While trade tensions between the US and China have simmered down, there's been no recent news about resurrecting that deal or another one. Even when a sale seemed likely, it was unclear whether China would allow ByteDance to sell the valuable algorithm that powers TikTok's video recommendations. 'The whole thing is a sham if the algorithm doesn't move from out of Beijing's hands' Several lawmakers, including those who've criticized a divest-or-ban law for TikTok and ByteDance, have warned that Trump's repeated extensions are untenable and illegal. After Trump's last extension in April, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Mark Warner (D-VA) told The Verge the move was 'against the law' and said 'the whole thing is a sham if the algorithm doesn't move from out of Beijing's hands.' Even before the second extension, Sens. Ed Markey (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Cory Booker (D-NJ), who oppose a ban of TikTok, wrote Trump that it would be 'unacceptable and unworkable for your Administration to continue ignoring the requirements in the law.' They warned, 'any further extensions of the TikTok deadline will require Oracle, Apple, Google, and other companies to continue risking ruinous legal liability, a difficult decision to justify in perpetuity.' That's because TikTok service providers in the US can be fined for facilitating access to the app after the ban deadline, and Trump's extensions fall outside of the mechanisms allowed for in the law. So far, however, these companies appear to be relying on assurances from the administration that they won't be sued for keeping TikTok online, although it reportedly took a letter from the US attorney general herself to assuage Apple and Google's concerns. A court could evaluate whether Trump's actions are legal, but only if somebody sues to stop the extension — and so far, nobody has. Earlier this month, though, a Google shareholder filed a lawsuit against the company for allegedly failing to share internal records about its decision to flout the law under the Justice Department's assurances. The same shareholder had already filed suit against the DOJ for allegedly failing to share information about its decision not to enforce the law against Apple and Google. While members of Trump's party generally haven't gone so far as to call his extensions illegal, a dozen House Republicans said in a statement in April that 'any resolution must ensure that U.S. law is followed, and that the Chinese Communist Party does not have access to American user data or the ability to manipulate the content consumed by Americans.' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told reporters that month that Trump 'ought to enforce the statute and ban TikTok. This middle way, I don't think is viable.' But it's not clear what would prevent Trump from approving indefinite extensions or a deal that doesn't meet the letter of the law. As Hawley acknowledged while speaking to reporters in April, 'Congress, we don't have an enforcement arm of our own.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store