Did Trump really strike Gulf deals worth $2tn?
1 day ago
Share
Save
Sameer Hashmi
Business reporter
Reporting fromJeddah
Getty Images Donald Trump waves with one hand as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stands behind himGetty Images
Trump started the four-day visit in Saudi Arabia where deals worth $600bn were announced
Flying home from his Gulf trip last week, President Donald Trump told reporters 'that was a great four days, historic four days'.
Visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), he added in this trademark swagger that 'the jobs and money coming into our countries, there has never been anything like it'.
Trump claimed that he was able to secure deals totalling more than $2tn (£1.5tn) for the US, but do the numbers add up?
The trip itself was an extravaganza, with the three Gulf states pulling out all the stops.
Escorts of fighter jets, extravagant welcoming ceremonies, a thundering 21-gun salute, a fleet of Tesla Cybertrucks, royal camels, Arabian horses, and sword dancers were all part of the pageantry.
The UAE also awarded Mr Trump the country's highest civilian honour, the Order of Zayed.
The visit's optics were striking; the region's richest petrostates flaunted their opulence, revealing just how much of that fortune they were ready to deploy to strengthen ties with the US while advancing their own economic goals.
Ros Atkins on… Trump's deals in the Gulf
Trump heads to Saudi Arabia eyeing more investment in US
What did Trump's speech in Saudi Arabia reveal?
Before embarking on the trip, President Trump, who touts himself as a 'dealmaker in chief' was clear that the main objective of the trip was to land investments worth billions of dollars. On the face of it, he succeeded.
In Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reiterated a pledge to invest $600bn in US-Saudi partnerships. There were a plethora of deals announced as part of this, encompassing arms, artificial intelligence (AI), healthcare, infrastructure projects and science collaborations, and various security ties and initiatives.
The $142bn defence deal grabbed a lot of the attention as it was described by the White House as the largest arms deal ever.
However, there remains some doubt as to whether those investment figures are realistic.
During his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, Trump had announced that Saudi Arabia had agreed to $450bn in deals with the US.
But actual trade and investment flows amounted to less than $300bn between 2017 to 2020, according to data compiled by the Arab Gulf States Institute.
The report was authored by Tim Callen, the former International Monetary Fund (IMF) mission chief to Saudi Arabia, and now a visiting fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute.
'The proof with all of these [new] deals will be in the pudding,' says Mr Callen.
The BBC contacted the White House for comment.
Getty Images Trump walking through a guard of honour with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman upon landing in RiyadhGetty Images
President Trump was given a welcome fit for royalty
In Qatar, Trump announced an 'economic exchange' worth at least $1.2tn. However, in the fact sheet released by the White House deals worth only $243.5bn between the two countries were mentioned.
One of the Qatari agreements that was confirmed was Qatar Airways purchasing up to 210 passenger jets for $96bn from the beleaguered American aircraft manufacturer Boeing.
The White House said the deal would support 154,000 jobs in the US each year of their production, totalling one million jobs over the deal's lifecycle.
Meanwhile, the UAE inked an agreement to construct the world's largest AI campus outside the US, reportedly granting it access to 500,000 cutting edge microchips from US giant Nvidia, starting next year.
This project sits within the UAE's broader pledge to invest $1.4tn in the US over the next decade.
As well as the challenge of delivering what is promised, another potential obstacle to these figures being realised are oil prices.
Oil prices tumbled to a four-year low in April amid growing concerns that Trump's tariffs could dampen global economic growth. The decline was further fuelled by the group of oil producing nations, Opec+, announcing plans to increase output.
For Saudi Arabia, the fall in global oil prices since the start of the year has further strained its finances, increasing pressure to either raise debt or cut spending to sustain its development goals.
Last month, the IMF cut the forecast for the world's largest oil exporter's GDP growth in 2025 to 3% from its previous estimate of 3.3%.
'It's going to be very hard for Saudi to come up with that sort of money [the $600bn announced] in the current oil price environment,' Mr Callen adds.
Other analysts note that a lot of the agreements signed during the trip were non-binding memorandums of understanding, which are less formal than contracts, and do not always translate into actual transactions. And some of the deals included in the agreement were announced earlier.
Saudi oil firm Aramco, for instance, announced 34 agreements with US companies valued at up to $90bn. However, most were non-binding memorandums of understanding without specified monetary commitments.
And its agreement to purchase 1.2 million tonnes of liquified natural gas annually for 20 years from US firm NextDecade was also included in the list of new deals, despite it first being announced months ago.
Getty Images A Qatar Airways Boeing aircraftGetty Images
One of the deals announced on the trip was Qatar Airways buying 210 new aircraft from Boeing
Yet the massive investments mark a continuation of the shift in the US-Gulf relationship away from oil-for-security to stronger economic partnerships rooted in bilateral investments.
Bader Al Saif, an assistant professor at Kuwait University and an associate fellow at think tank Chatham House, says that the deals indicate that US and the Gulf states are 'planning the future together and that was a significant change for the relationship'.
He adds that the AI deals with the UAE and Saudi Arabia were central to this as 'they clearly demonstrate that they are trying to see how to build the new global order and the new way of doing things together'.
This emphasis on AI underscores the growing strategic importance of the technology to US diplomacy. Trump was accompanied on the trip by Sam Altman, the boss of OpenAI, Nvidia's Jensen Huang, and Elon Musk, who owns Grok AI.
And on the eve of the visit, the White House scrapped tough Biden-era restrictions on exports of the advanced US semiconductors required to best run AI systems. The rules had divided the world into tiers, with some countries enjoying broad access to its high-end chips, and others being denied them altogether.
About 120 countries, including the Gulf nations, were grouped in the middle, facing strict caps on the number of semiconductors they could import. This had frustrated countries such as Saudi Arabia, who have ambitions to become high-tech economies as they transition away from oil.
Both Saudi and the UAE are racing to build large-scale AI data centres, while Abu Dhabi, the UAE's capital, aims to become a global AI hub.
The UAE has made visible efforts to reassure Washington – deepening partnerships with US tech firms, curbing ties with Chinese companies, and aligning more closely with American national security interests.
Mr Al-Saif says that the UAE is 'betting on the Americans when it comes to AI'. 'We have seen that the technological turn in the 90s came from the US anyway.'
Getty Images Trump walking with the Emir of Qatar Tamim bin Hamad al Thani Getty Images
After Saudi Arabia Trump travelled to Qatar where $1.2tn of deals were announced
Both camps are hailing the visit as a triumph. For the Gulf, and especially Saudi Arabia, it resets a partnership that frayed under Biden, and underscores their ambition to act as heavyweight players on the world stage.
For Trump, touting 'trillions' in new investment offers a timely boost – his tariff hikes have dented global trade and pushed US output into its first quarterly dip in three years.
These Gulf deals will be sold as proof that his economic playbook is working.
At the end of the trip, Mr Trump worried that whoever succeeds him in the White House would claim credit for the deals once they come to completion.
'I'll be sitting home, who the hell knows where I'll be, and I'll say, 'I did that,'' he said.
'Somebody's going to be taking the credit for this. You remember, press,' he said, pointing to himself, 'this guy did it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump, send your deportees to Europe not Africa
On August 5, Rwanda announced it had agreed to accept 250 migrants under the Trump administration's expanding third-country deportation programme. Speaking from Kigali, government spokesperson Yolande Makolo said Rwanda would retain the right to decide which deportees to admit for 'resettlement'. Those accepted, she added, would receive training, healthcare, and housing to help them 'rebuild their lives'. The programme forms part of President Donald Trump's controversial pledge to carry out 'the largest deportation operation in American history.'It also marks the third deportation agreement of its kind on the African continent. On July 16, the US sent five convicted criminals from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Cuba, and Yemen to Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. Described as 'barbaric and violent' and rejected by their countries of origin, they are confined to isolated units at the Matsapha Correctional Complex, near the capital Mbabane, pending eventual repatriation. Eleven days earlier, on July 5, eight men convicted of murder, sexual assault, and robbery were deported to South Sudan. Reports differ on whether any deportee was South Sudanese. The deportations have already provoked widespread outrage – from civil society groups in Eswatini, to lawyers in South Sudan, who denounce them as illegal. South Africa's government has even lodged a formal protest with Eswatini. Nigeria, meanwhile, has rebuffed US pressure to accept 300 Venezuelans, with Foreign Minister Yusuf Tuggar saying the country already has 'enough problems' and 'over 230 million people' to care for. These deals are unfair. The US is strong-arming others at the expense of vulnerable people. Trump's established brutality is horrifying. His family separations in 2019 left children terrified and alone, all in the name of policy. The US is now sending people to Rwanda, Eswatini, and South Sudan – countries already struggling to care for their own citizens. This truth exposes Trump's Victorian view of Africa: a desolate, irredeemable continent unworthy of respect or equal partnership. His vision echoes a Western tradition, crystallised in Conrad's Heart of Darkness, where Africa is portrayed as 'dark' and 'primeval' – a land deemed oppressive and violent, its people cast as incapable of understanding, feeling, or compassion. That is not who we are. Yes, Africa has challenges. Nonetheless, we do not turn the marginalised into pawns, nor do we disguise exile as policy. Our humanity is unshakable and beyond reproach. Today, Uganda hosts about 1.7 million refugees, making it Africa's largest refugee-hosting country. This figure exceeds the combined refugee populations under UNHCR's mandate in the UK, France, and Belgium today. Europe must assume a far greater share of responsibility for asylum seekers and refugees. These third-country deportation deals are not credible policy. They are colonialism reborn. No self-respecting African leader should ever agree to participate in an organised atrocity – not when Africa still bleeds from the wounds inflicted by the West: Sudan's civil war, civic unrest in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, environmental devastation in Nigeria's Delta, and the continuing reach of French monetary imperialism through the CFA. 'Uncle Sam' now plans to send both convicted criminals and desperate asylum seekers to Africa's shores, instead of the warships of old. Both groups deserve support at home in the US, with extensive rehabilitation for offenders and safe sanctuary for the vulnerable. If not, Europe can be the only alternative. Let the architects of empire face the heat. Let the wealthy, politically obnoxious allies of Washington carry the burden for once. Rwanda, Eswatini, and South Sudan are among the poorest nations in the world, with per capita incomes just a tiny fraction of their former colonial rulers in Europe. Expecting them to carry the burden of America's deportees is not only unjust – it is absurd. A May 2025 study, Unequal Exchange and North-South Relations, undertaken by Gaston Nievas and Thomas Piketty, analysed foreign wealth accumulation over more than two centuries. It shows that by 1914, European powers held net foreign assets approaching 140 percent of GDP, underscoring how colonial transfers, artificially low commodity prices, forced labour, and exploitation fuelled Europe's enrichment. From Juba to Kigali, colonial plunder still drives global inequality. A return to the systemic brutalities unleashed after the disastrous Berlin Conference of 1885, when European powers carved up Africa, cannot be accepted. No matter what officials in Rwanda, South Sudan, or Eswatini claim in public, sending America's cast-offs to Africa is colonial exploitation repackaged for today. This is not a new strategy. Beginning in the 19th century, many European colonies were reduced to offshore extraction centres and dumping grounds. France banished convicts and political exiles to territories such as present-day Gabon and Djibouti. Spain used Bioko Island in Equatorial Guinea as a penal settlement for deportees from Cuba. The US has revived that same imperial entitlement, delivering a fresh blow to both Africa and the Americas. Most irregular migrants in the US come from Venezuela, Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Haiti – nations scarred by centuries of European colonialism and US imperial interference. These countries embody the ongoing impact of colonial legacies and geopolitical meddling that propel migration. Yet the West, and Europe above all, denies and disowns the consequences of its crimes, past and present. European nations have certainly prospered through centuries of colonial exploitation. The UK, France, Belgium, and the Netherlands, for instance, boast robust welfare systems, public health networks, and prison rehabilitation programmes – magnificent structures built on centuries of colonial extraction. They have both the means and the institutions to absorb deportees. They also have the record. These same powers have eagerly joined the US in targeting and destabilising sovereign nations across Africa, as well as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya – in wars widely condemned as violations of international law. Every intervention has unleashed fresh waves of refugees and asylum seekers, hapless men, women, and children fleeing the very chaos Western armies engineered: powerless people whom the West openly ignores or despises. Africa, by contrast, plays by the rules and adheres to the UN Charter. We honour sovereignty, respect international law, and strive for peace, even while shackled by colonial debt designed to keep us dependent. Europe breaks the rules, Africa abides by them – yet Africa is asked to shoulder the burden. The hypocrisy is staggering. We will not bankroll, legitimise, or inherit the crimes of empire. After all, we barely control our own destinies. The IMF and World Bank dictate our economies. The UN Security Council enforces old hierarchies. The G7 protects the West's interests over us, Africans left impoverished and starving. Structural oppression allows the West to keep interfering in the lives of people across Africa and the Americas. But we will not be complicit. We will not be silent. Western policies and interventions drive poverty, displacement, and instability in the Global South. If the US insists on offloading its deportees, let it send them to those who built and still profit from this system of oppression. The West must reckon with its spoils. Leave Africa out of it. Send Trump's deportees to Europe. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Security guarantees for Ukraine are 'not going to be sufficient'
Samuel Ramani talks about potential outcomes for Ukraine Quotable Samuel Ramani, an associate fellow at Royal United Services Institute talks about potential outcomes for Ukraine following the meeting between Trump, Zelenskyy and EU leaders. Video Duration 01 minutes 10 seconds 01:10 Video Duration 01 minutes 07 seconds 01:07 Video Duration 01 minutes 19 seconds 01:19 Video Duration 01 minutes 30 seconds 01:30 Video Duration 01 minutes 24 seconds 01:24 Video Duration 01 minutes 19 seconds 01:19 Video Duration 01 minutes 33 seconds 01:33
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
White House confirms US troops won't be deployed to defend Ukraine
White House confirms US troops won't be deployed to defend Ukraine NewsFeed The White House has reiterated President Donald Trump's remarks that US troops will not be deployed to Ukraine as part of any security guarantees under a peace deal with Russia. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the US may instead provide coordination and air support. Video Duration 00 minutes 57 seconds 00:57 Video Duration 01 minutes 01 seconds 01:01 Video Duration 01 minutes 35 seconds 01:35 Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46 Video Duration 02 minutes 13 seconds 02:13 Video Duration 01 minutes 37 seconds 01:37 Video Duration 03 minutes 05 seconds 03:05
