Oil And Gold Jump As Israel Targets Iranian Energy
Brent crude rose as much as 5.5% to $77.50 – its Thursday night high – in early Asian trading after Israel and Iran continued attacks on one another's territories over the weekend. The price then promptly ease back as shorts who stand to suffer massive losses in case of a squeeze, doubled down by shorting even more in hopes the crises somehow de-escalates.
That's a problem because unlike late last week, over the weekend Israel started attacking Iran's energy infrastructure, and on Saturday launched an attack on the giant South Pars gas field in the Persian Gulf, forcing the shut down of a production platform, after air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites and military leadership last week.Asian equity-index futures pointed to declines in Hong Kong and Sydney, while contracts for US equities initially edged lower before stubborn retail dip buyers promptly emerged again. The dollar saw modest gains against major peers in early trading, while gold rose toward a record on Monday as the conflict drove investors toward haven assets.
Last week's biggest market reaction to the conflict was oil, with crude prices surging more than 13% on Friday before paring some of those gains. The biggest concern for the market centers on the Strait of Hormuz and prices could soar further if Iran attempts to block the route. On Saturday, JPMorgan raised its odds of a Hormuz closure to 17%.
'Markets should be prepared for a prolonged period of uncertainty,' said Wolf von Rotberg, an equity strategist at Bank J. Safra Sarasin, quoted by Bloomberg. 'Hedging against potential oil supply-chain disruptions via exposure to the energy market and adding to gold, which may see an acceleration of its structural uptrend, are the best ways to protect a portfolio against a further escalation in the Middle East.'
Some investors ended last week choosing to wait to gauge how long the tensions would last, mindful of similar standoffs between the two nations that eventually de-escalated. Still, the extension of the conflict and intensity of the current hostilities is likely to cast a shadow over risk assets on Monday. Already, the MSCI World Index of developed-market equities fell the most since April on Friday following Israel's initial air strikes on Iran.
'This is a significant escalation, to the point where these nations are at war,' said Michael O'Rourke, chief market strategist at JonesTrading. 'The ramifications will be larger and last longer,' with weakness in equity markets likely, especially after recent gains, he said.
While the drop in US stock futures was modest, most Middle East stock indexes suffered bigger losses on Sunday. Egypt's main gauge was the worst performer, seeing the biggest losses in more than a year on concern that a halt in Israeli gas production will cause fuel shortages. In Saudi Arabia, the Tadawul gauge's declines were limited by Aramco, which gained on higher oil prices. Israel's benchmark ended higher as military supplier Elbit Systems Ltd. rallied.
Still, judging by the recent dip-buying euphoria, one can see why some are confident that this too will blow over quickly.
'Unless oil stays elevated and drives inflation higher, this is more likely a pause than a panic as other narratives are driving the market,' said Dave Mazza, chief executive officer, Roundhill Investments. 'It may present a buying opportunity, but with markets having rallied sharply off recent lows, gains from here will be harder to come by.'
Traders are weighing the fresh geopolitical risks at a time when they are also grappling with destabilized global trade relationships, the prospect of new tariffs from Donald Trump, economic cross-currents, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and rising political tensions in the US amid protests.
Also read: Israel Attack Targets Refinery At Iran's Giant South Pars Gas Field
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
a day ago
- Daily Tribune
Fifth Minor Criminal Court Acquits Asian Employee of Embezzlement Charges
TDT | Manama The Fifth Minor Criminal Court has acquitted a woman in her forties, an Asian employee, of charges of embezzling funds from a company managing a chain of restaurants. The defendant was represented by lawyer Reem Al-Mahari, who argued that the case was maliciously filed by the company, which accused the employee of misappropriating company funds. Al-Mahari explained that her client worked in an administrative role, which included receiving checks to cover routine expenses such as workers' and employees' payments, transfers to the Labour Market Regulatory Authority, social insurance contributions, and petty cash. She submitted evidence showing that the funds in question had indeed been transferred to the relevant authorities. She also presented a labor court judgment indicating an unresolved dispute in which the company had withheld the employee's labor rights. The Public Prosecution had charged the defendant with embezzling BD 1,420 between 2023 and 2024, in Muharraq Governorate, alleging she misappropriated cash belonging to the company that was under her custody by virtue of her job. The accusation was based on an accounting report submitted by the complainant, in addition to his statements. However, the court ruled that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the charges. It noted that the case documents lacked reliable proof linking the defendant to the alleged crime, and that the accounting report did not conclusively establish embezzlement. The expert's findings only confirmed that the defendant had issued seven checks totaling BD 1,420, without proving any wrongdoing. The court further observed that the existence of labor disputes between the defendant and the complainant company added weight to the possibility of malicious intent behind the case. Based on Article 255 of the Criminal Procedure Law No. 46 of 2002, the court concluded that the charges were unsubstantiated and ruled to acquit the defendant.
Daily Tribune
07-08-2025
- Daily Tribune
Businessman on Trial for Faking Brother's Death in $500,000 Insurance Scam
TDT | Manama A businessman appeared before the High Criminal Court accused of orchestrating a fake death scheme involving his brother to fraudulently claim a $500,000 life insurance payout. The man, who was reported dead, was later discovered to be alive and living abroad. The case revolves around a 44-year-old investor who had taken out a life insurance policy in April 2023, listing his wife as the beneficiary. Just four months later, the insurance company received a death notice from a broker, claiming the policyholder had died in an Asian country. A claim was submitted, and a civil court initially ruled in favour of the wife. However, when the insurance company requested supporting documents, inconsistencies began to emerge, eventually uncovering the alleged fraud.
Daily Tribune
05-08-2025
- Daily Tribune
Appeals Court clears Bahraini employee in vehicle seizure case
A six-month prison sentence handed to a Bahraini employee for obstructing enforcement procedures has been overturned by the Second High Appeals Court, which acquitted him and instead imposed a BD500 fine on the company owner involved in the case. The pair had been accused of deliberately preventing the seizure of a company-owned vehicle that was meant to be sold at auction, according to the employee's lawyer, Reem Al Mahari. Prosecutors alleged that the two men concealed one of the company's cars from enforcement officers tasked with executing court rulings against the firm in 2024. The Lower Criminal Court had found them guilty and sentenced each to six months in prison, setting bail at BD100 to suspend the punishment. Both defendants challenged the decision. Evidence In its ruling, the appeals court said the evidence presented against the employee gave rise to doubt. The judges stated that after examining the case file and hearing the arguments, they were not satisfied that the man had taken any steps to hide the vehicle or help someone else to do so. The incident began when a private bailiff moved to carry out seizure orders against a company owned by the Asian co-defendant. Two cars were handed over at the company premises, while the location of a third was shared separately. Vehicles The bailiff managed to secure the two vehicles on site, but the third was missing. The court found no clear link between the Bahraini employee and the missing vehicle. It ruled there was no proof he had concealed it or acted in collusion with the owner. That gap in the prosecution's case led the court to clear him of all charges. Rule The judges referred to the long-standing rule that doubt must be weighed in favour of the accused. They added that the risk of convicting someone without firm grounds would do more harm than letting someone go free. The earlier verdict was overturned, and the employee was acquitted. The company owner, however, remains liable for a BD500 fine.
