CCTV Script 21/07/2025
"The whole election is about inflation. People are hopping mad about the size of the inflation at the moment, rice is up 100.2% year on year. Japan has just had its biggest wage hike since 1991 and the whole of that has been washed away by the rise in inflation."
In response to the rising prices, the ruling coalition led by Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and the opposition parties have proposed opposing plans. The opposition parties advocate for reducing the consumption tax to alleviate the pressure of rising living costs, while the ruling coalition favors issuing one-time cash subsidies, arguing that this approach is easier to implement quickly. They also emphasize that consumption tax revenue is a crucial source of funding for Japan's social welfare system. It must be acknowledged that this issue is indeed tricky.
There is a generational divide among the Japanese public regarding whether to lower the consumption tax. Recent polls by Nikkei and Tokyo Broadcasting System show that younger Japanese are more inclined to support tax cuts, while older generations prefer maintaining the status quo to safeguard social welfare.
The current unfavorable election prospects for Japan's ruling party could also impact U.S.-Japan trade negotiations. Prime Minister Ishiba is facing widespread skepticism both within and outside his party, raising doubts about whether he can fulfill the commitments on the trade talks with the U.S. Analysts point out that under the current circumstances, Japan is unlikely to secure a favorable position in trade talks with the United States.
For example, U.S. President Trump has been pushing for Japan to further increase its imports of American rice. However, analysis indicates that Japan currently allows a maximum of 770,000 tons of duty-free rice imports annually, nearly half of which already come from the U.S. Therefore, under the existing framework, Japan has limited room to increase the imports further. Any additional concessions would require broad consensus and support within the ruling party.
"LDP is now losing the elections. It's not so popular. So which means, at this moment, he's not in a position to make a bold vision to open the country for agriculture products. That's a concern."
In addition, experts caution that automobiles are the key battleground in U.S.-Japan trade talks. It's important to note that cars and auto parts account for as much as 80% of Japan's trade surplus with the U.S. If the U.S. imposes tariffs on Japan's automotive industry, it could severely impact Japan's car exports, thereby affecting Japan's overall exports and the domestic economy.
Analysts also point out that, regardless of whether Prime Minister Ishiba remains in office, Japan may face dual challenges in both politics and the economy in the future.
'…if Ishiba survives, you have a crisis Because you have a leader who really has lost the confidence of the public and lost the confidence of much of much of his own party, and isn't able to get anything through the diet. But even if you get a new leader, and you get maybe an expanded coalition, you're still not looking at, you know, it's going to be a weak coalition...and they're going to be dealing with a real, you know, potentially serious economic blow."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
GOP Sen. Tom Cotton questions new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan over alleged ties to Chinese military
A top Republican senator demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan reveal if he has any ties to China's Communist Party and military – citing national security concerns. In a letter sent Wednesday to Intel Chairman Frank Leary, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote that he is concerned 'about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on US national security,' according to a copy of the letter obtained by The Post. Tan replaced ousted Intel chief Pat Gelsinger in March — a year after the struggling company was awarded a whopping $8 billion in Biden-era CHIPs Act funding. Advertisement 3 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan speaking on stage in Taiwan in May. REUTERS Cotton's missive came after a report earlier this year claimed Tan invested at least $200 million across hundreds of Chinese firms between March 2012 and December 2024. Some of these advanced manufacturing and semiconductor firms have been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and military, Reuters reported in April. Advertisement In his letter, Cotton questioned whether the board had required Tan to divest from these stakes before assuming the CEO role. The senator asked whether Tan had disclosed his remaining investments to the US government, since Intel has a responsibility as a major recipient of federal funding. He also demanded to know whether the board was aware of subpoenas targeting Cadence Design – which Tan ran from 2008 to 2021 – before it hired him. 'Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the US defense ecosystem,' an Intel spokesperson told The Post. Advertisement Intel added that it will address the matter with Cotton, who asked for responses by Aug. 15. 3 Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's chairman with concerns about Lip-Bu Tan's reported ties to China. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Cotton wrote in the letter. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations.' Advertisement In 2024, Intel was awarded $8.5 billion in CHIPs funding under the Secure Enclave program, a national security initiative to make secure microchips for defense and intelligence applications. Later that year, the government slashed that figure by more than $600 million to about $7.85 billion. Intel still ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. 3 Intel ranks as one of the top companies receiving the most federal funding. Getty Images A source familiar with the matter told Reuters in April that Tan had divested from his positions in Chinese firms. The outlet reported at the time that Chinese databases still listed many of his investments as current. While it is not illegal for US citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, there is a US Treasury list of banned Chinese firms. Reuters reported earlier this year that Tan was not invested directly in any company on that list. Meanwhile, Cadence Design last week agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to settle charges that it sold its chips to a Chinese military university, according to a Reuters report. Advertisement The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, according to the report. Those sales took place under Tan's leadership at Cadence. After stepping down as CEO in 2021, Tan stayed on at Cadence as executive chairman through May 2023.
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Debanking' is an obscene abuse of government power
'Debanking' seems like something out of paranoid dystopian fiction, but this horrific abuse of government power is already all too real. We're almost glad the Biden crew deployed it against then-former-President Donald Trump in 2021: That not only ensures he's aware of this outrage; it points to how even the powerful are vulnerable. It's as simple as it is scary: Government regulators give a quiet nod to financial institutions that certain people or industries are to be 'unpersoned,' and pretty soon they get the same treatment as North Korean tyrants, terrorists or drug kingpins: locked out of the financial system, which means social death. The victim gets turned away at other banks, all with no way to appeal what's blandly painted as a 'business decision.' Just try life without any ready way to cash checks or pay bills, not even a debit card — nor, if you run a business, a line of credit to pay suppliers and meet payroll. The abuse apparently began under President Barack Obama, deployed against disfavored businesses such as gun manufacturers on the laughable ground that they posed a 'reputational risk'; it expanded under President Joe Biden to hit crypto and tech startups, as well as individuals whose opinions or political activity got labeled 'dangerous.' Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen calls it a 'privatized sanctions regime'; American victims apparently number in the thousands. In the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Trump was first personally dropped by Chase, then refused service by Bank of America. And First Lady Melania Trump reports that she and her son Barron were dropped by their bank. The good news is that Donald Trump is signing executive orders to crack down on the abuse and will surely sign legislation to prevent it. Banks have a duty to watch out for criminal abuse of their services, but forcing them to secretly enforce political insiders' ideological agenda is frighteningly totalitarian.
Buzz Feed
11 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
4 Ways Trump's Policies Harm Americans, Per Buttigieg
Former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg is being applauded online for his recent, simple breakdown on all the ways Donald Trump's chosen cabinet is negatively impacting Americans' lives. While sitting down for NPR's Morning Edition, Pete insisted that Democrats need to change their approach if they want to reach voters. "We do have to look at what we're doing that makes it hard to hear what we have to say," he told host Steve Inskeep. "Too often we talk in terms that are academic. When we're talking about deeply important things, like freedom and democracy, we still have to have a way of talking about it that relates to how everyday life is different." As an example, Pete shared ways our "everyday life is different and worse" under Trump's presidency, because, as he said, "When you have an autocrat in power, he can get away with appointing incompetent people over very important things in our lives." To start, he said, "Right now we have the secretary of defense — in charge of defending the American people — who was accidentally texting military strike information to journalists." "We have the person in charge of American public health, who is a quack who doesn't believe in medicine, and now measles is on the rise in America," he continued. "We have a secretary of education — in charge of your kid's educational well-being — who has spoken about the importance of 'A1,' which means she does not understand that the acronym is AI, which means she does not understand the most important development affecting education in our lifetimes." Pete continued, "We have a secretary of homeland security who sat on funding and did not allow it to go to Texas during the floods for at least two days for no good reason." "So these things do affect you," Pete concluded. "Not for academic reasons, but because of what happens when you have a loss of accountability. Those are the kinds of things I think we need to talk about before anybody can hear us." A clip of Pete's simple yet effective explanation was shared to X, formerly known as Twitter, where it garnered over 1.7 million views and over 1,000 comments. By and large, people are calling Pete's breakdown "brilliant." One person said, "This breakdown of the incompetence of the administration is simple yet brilliant. And the reality of how they're affecting peoples' REAL lives is heartbreaking and infuriating." "Last thirty seconds should be mandatory listening," another agreed. "The loss of accountability over trumps horrible yes men stooge picks for cabinet undeniably makes your life worse as an American. It isn't up for debate." Others called Pete "the best communicator in US politics"... ...and insisted, "This is who We The People employ!!!" Talks like this have made Pete a favorite amongst voters looking to the future of the Democratic Party. And even some abroad. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
