Prabowo and Trump have struck tariff deal – but at what cost to Indonesia?
US President Donald Trump broke the news on his Truth Social platform, saying that he had struck a trade pact with Indonesia following negotiations with Prabowo to avoid steeper tariffs.
'They are going to pay 19 per cent and we are going to pay nothing... We will have full access into Indonesia, and we have a couple of those deals that are going to be announced,' he later told reporters.
No details have been given about the deal, which comes after deals Trump has made with Vietnam and the UK. The US President had threatened Indonesia with a 32 per cent tariff rate starting on Aug 1 in a letter last week.
Prabowo on July 16 said his conversation with Trump heralded 'a new era of mutual benefit' between both sides.
As part of the deal, Indonesia has committed to purchasing US$15 billion in US energy, US$4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing jets, many of them 777s.
The sheer scale of Indonesia's purchase commitments, and the lack of clarity on how they will be financed and integrated with national strategies, has raised eyebrows, with experts warning that the deal could set a precedent for other trade partners to demand similar 'full access' terms.
Associate Professor Yohanes Sulaiman of Jenderal Achmad Yani University in West Java highlighted the plan to buy the Boeing jets, noting that national carrier Garuda Indonesia is still struggling financially and unlikely to be in a position to take on large-scale purchases.
In the first quarter of 2025 alone, the state-owned carrier recorded a net loss of US$75.9 million, surpassing its already-large net loss for the entire 2024 fiscal year.
When asked about the planes on July 16, President Prabowo said that Indonesia needs to grow the national carrier's presence and, to do so, new aircraft are needed.
There are also doubts about the energy component. While Indonesia does import liquefied petroleum gas and other fuels, analysts say a US$15 billion commitment would run counter to the government's ambitions to reduce fossil fuel dependency and boost renewables.
The scale of the energy imports is not aligned with Indonesia's energy transition goals, and this could introduce fiscal strain and policy contradictions down the line, noted Dr Siwage Dharma Negara, a senior fellow at the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.
'The arrangement doesn't necessarily reflect a balanced, win-win outcome,' he said, warning that Indonesia has to keep in mind the longer-term costs.
'It remains unclear whether the economic benefits fully justify the scale of concessions offered by Jakarta.'
Indonesia's goods trade with the US reached nearly US$40 billion in 2024, with a roughly US$18 billion surplus, and key exports including electronics, footwear, car tyres, palm oil and frozen shrimp.
Indonesia's central bank on July 16 delivered its fourth interest rate cut since last September, trimming its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to 5.25 per cent in a bid to support the economy amid weakening global trade and sluggish domestic demand.
Sluggish household spending had already weakened growth in the first quarter, while the outlook for subsequent quarters has been clouded by the impact of US tariffs on global trade.
Some observers found the direct negotiation between the two leaders notable.
This growing personal rapport was most visibly demonstrated in November 2024, when Prabowo posted a video of his congratulatory call to Trump after the US presidential election, in which he offered to fly over in person, and referenced his American military training.
Bank Permata economist Josua Pardede said Trump singling out Prabowo and calling him 'highly respected' was more than symbolic, chalking it up as a win for the Indonesian leader and his foreign policy approach.
'Such direct acknowledgment from a global leader underscores President Prabowo's capability to manage complex international relations and signals strength and credibility to both domestic and international stakeholders,' he said.
The agreement signals that Prabowo is willing to make bold economic moves to safeguard Indonesia's interests, said Dr Siwage.
'Trump's public acknowledgment of a direct deal with Prabowo suggests that Indonesia took an active role in shaping the outcome,' he said, adding that this highlights how both leaders prefer a personal, transactional style of diplomacy.
Other experts, however, cautioned that the deal may carry ripple effects across Indonesia's wider network of economic relationships.
Muhammad Habib Abiyan Dzakwan from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies warned that the nature of the arrangement, involving significant import concessions, could prompt demands from other economic partners.
'What I am concerned the most is the extent of this unusual arrangement would then affect Indonesia's relations with Asean neighbours and free trade agreement partners. More partners will likely demand the same concession from Indonesia,' he said.
In particular, countries like China, the archipelago's largest trading partner and one of its top investors, may view Jakarta's increasing economic overtures to the US with suspicion, he added.
He cautioned that the government must ensure it has sufficient budget and fiscal space not only to meet these obligations, but also to prepare for future uncertainties that may arise.
While the figures in the deal appear large, Bank Permata's Josua said the commitments are likely to be staggered over time, and may align with Indonesia's long-term infrastructure and aviation ambitions.
But whether they benefit Indonesia in the long run will depend on how they create jobs and drive productivity, and how Indonesia integrates these commitments with domestic policy objectives.
'Careful negotiation and execution will be critical to ensuring that benefits are maximised and commensurate with the substantial financial outlays involved,' Josua said. - The Straits Times/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
ECB holds fire amid Trump's tariff threat
FRANKFURT: The European Central Bank is likely to stare down the economic danger posed by US President Donald Trump's tariffs by opting to leave a potential cut in borrowing costs for another day. In their final decision before a seven-week summer break, policymakers on Thursday will probably keep the interest rate unchanged at 2%, pushing off a response to Trump's threatened tariffs of 30% until they materialise and their impact can be better assessed. With many officials likely to use the interlude for a long holiday, the temptation to restate that inflation is at target and to postpone worrying about the economic outlook until new quarterly forecasts are compiled for the Sept 10 to 11 meeting may seem appropriate. What policymakers do know, however, is that trouble is lurking. Aside from concerns about tariffs, the euro has strengthened, damping the outlook for prices and threatening to further squeeze exporters. Meanwhile, another political crisis in France may be brewing over its bloated public finances. Given that backdrop, the ECB Governing Council could acknowledge among themselves that the chance of another rate cut in September is growing, even if they stick with their well-worn 'meeting-by-meeting' approach to decision-making. In that vein, president Christine Lagarde, in her opening statement to reporters this Thursday, is likely to restate that risks to growth are 'tilted to the downside', Morgan Stanley economists wrote in a preview titled 'Ready for the Beach.' Bloomberg Economics senior euro-area economist David Powell said, 'We expect the Governing Council's language after the July 24 meeting to be similar to the wording in June, leaving open the possibility of additional cuts without committing to them.' Economic reports in the coming week will inform their deliberations. They include the ECB's own bank lending survey, due tomorrow; consumer confidence on Wednesday; and purchasing manager indexes from across the region and other major economies, set for release on Thursday, hours before the outcome of the ECB deliberations. Other key indicators, such as Germany's closely watched income from operations business confidence and Italian economic sentiment, will follow on Friday. Elsewhere, inflation numbers from Japan to Brazil and testimony by the UK central bank chief are among the things in store for investors. The US economic data calendar is relatively light and highlighted by a pair of housing market reports. On Wednesday, June data from the National Association of Realtors are projected to show a third month of scant change in sales of previously owned homes. Contract closings have been hovering near an annualised rate of four million, just above last year's level, which was the weakest since 2010. Meanwhile, economists expect a government report on Thursday to show new-home sales recovered a bit in June after posting the biggest monthly decline since 2022. The pace of contract signings on new houses has largely trended sideways for the better part of two years. The housing market has struggled to gain traction as elevated mortgage interest rates and affordability constraints keep many potential buyers sidelined. Other reports include Friday's release of June durable goods orders, preceded by S&P Global's July manufacturing and services surveys on Thursday. Fed policymakers are in a blackout period ahead of their July 29 to 30 meeting, although chair Jerome Powell tomorrow gives welcoming remarks at a conference focused on capital frameworks for large banks. Further north, the Bank of Canada's business and consumer surveys for the second quarter will offer fresh insight into inflation expectations and investment plans. Retail data for May and a flash estimate for June are likely to show slumping sales as consumers pull back after a tariff-driven rush to buy cars earlier in the year. Two fiscal monitors from the federal government may contain more details about retaliatory tariff revenues collected to date. Asia's data docket offers a broad cross-section of economic signals, from trade in South Korea to inflation indicators in Japan, Singapore and New Zealand. The figures will help clarify how the region's economies are responding to trade-related uncertainties. South Korea opens the week today with 20-day trade data, an early indicator for July exports. Next follows consumer confidence on Wednesday and retail sales during the week, offering a read on household conditions after the Bank of Korea held rates steady this month. Also on today, China will release loan prime rates, which are expected to be kept steady for a second month in July, taking a cue from the People's Bank of China. Australia takes the spotlight tomorrowwith minutes from the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) July policy meeting, at which it shocked investors by keeping rates on hold at 3.85%. The minutes may offer a clearer sense of how close policymakers are to resuming their easing cycle. RBA governor Michele Bullock gives a speech on Thursday. Tomorrow, Taiwan is set to publish export orders for June, along with employment data. India's July purchasing managers' index (PMI), due Thursday, will indicate the resilience of both manufacturing and services activity. Japan closes out the week on Friday with a full slate of data, including Tokyo consumer price index, department store sales and factory activity. The inflation reading will offer an early steer on national price trends, while the other releases will help assess how well domestic demand and production are holding up. New Zealand reports second-quarter inflation today, while Singapore publishes its price gauges on Wednesday and industrial production data on Friday. Thailand has car sales and customs trade balance figures during the week. The United Kingdom will release public finance data tomorrow at a time when its economic woes and fiscal position are very much in focus. With unemployment at a four-year high and growth faltering, PMI numbers on Thursday and retail sales on Friday may also draw attention. Britain's exposure to market stress may be a topic when Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey and colleagues testify on financial stability to lawmakers tomorrow. — Bloomberg
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump and Xi may meet before or during October APEC summit in South Korea
SEOUL: U.S. President Donald Trump may visit China before attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in October or meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the event in South Korea, according to a report by the South China Morning Post. The two leaders could discuss ongoing trade disputes, as both nations attempt to negotiate an end to escalating tariffs that have disrupted global supply chains. Trump has pushed for higher tariffs on imports, including a 55% rate on Chinese goods, arguing it will boost domestic manufacturing. Critics, however, warn this could raise prices for American consumers. A deadline of August 12 has been set for the U.S. and China to reach a long-term trade agreement. A Trump spokesperson did not comment on the reported meeting plans. The most recent high-level talks between the two countries occurred on July 11, when U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi held discussions in Malaysia. Rubio confirmed that Trump had received an invitation to visit China, stating both leaders 'want it to happen.' Meanwhile, China's Commerce Minister Wang Wentao emphasized the need to stabilize trade relations, suggesting recent talks in Europe indicated a tariff war was unnecessary. - Reuters
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trump's aid cut halts global water works
NAIROBI: The Trump administration's decision to slash nearly all US foreign aid has left dozens of water and sanitation projects half-finished across the globe, creating new hazards for some of the people they were designed to benefit, Reuters finds. Reuters has identified 21 unfinished projects in 16 countries after speaking to 17 sources familiar with the infrastructure plans. Most of these projects have not previously been reported. With hundreds of millions of dollars in funding cancelled since January, workers have put down their shovels and left holes half dug and building supplies unguarded, according to interviews with United States and local officials and internal documents seen by Reuters. As a result, millions of people who were promised clean drinking water and reliable sanitation facilities by the United States have been left to fend for themselves. Water towers intended to serve schools and health clinics in Mali have been abandoned, according to two US officials. In Nepal, construction was halted on more than 100 drinking water systems, leaving plumbing supplies and 6,500 bags of cement in local communities. The Himalayan nation will use its own funds to finish the job, according to the country's water minister, Pradeep Yadav. In Lebanon, a project to provide cheap solar power to water utilities was scrapped, costing some 70 people their jobs and halting plans to improve regional services. The utilities are now relying on diesel and other sources to power their services, said Suzy Hoayek, an adviser to Lebanon's energy ministry. In Kenya, residents of Taita Taveta County say they are now more vulnerable to flooding than they had been before, as half-finished irrigation canals could collapse and sweep away crops. Community leaders say it will cost US$2,000 to lower the risk – twice the average annual income in the area. 'I have no protection from the flooding that the canal will now cause; the floods will definitely get worse,' said farmer Mary Kibachia, 74. Trump's dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) has left life-saving food and medical aid rotting in warehouses and thrown humanitarian efforts around the world into turmoil. The cuts may cause an additional 14 million deaths by 2030, according to research published in The Lancet medical journal. The Trump administration and its supporters argue that the United States should spend its money to benefit Americans at home rather than sending it abroad and say it had strayed from its original mission by funding projects like lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer rights in Serbia. With an annual budget of US$450mil, the US water projects accounted for a small fraction of the US$61bil in foreign aid distributed by the United States last year. Before Trump's re-election in November, the water projects had not been controversial in Washington. A 2014 law that doubled funding passed both chambers of Congress unanimously. Advocates say the United States has, over the years, improved the lives of tens of millions of people by building pumps, irrigation canals, toilets and other water and sanitation projects. That means children are less likely to die of water-borne diseases like diarrhoea, girls are more likely to stay in school, and young men are less likely to be recruited by extremist groups, said John Oldfield, a consultant and lobbyist for water infrastructure projects. 'Do we want girls carrying water on their heads for their families? 'Or do you want them carrying school books?' he said. The US State Department, which has taken over foreign aid from USAID, did not respond to a request for comment about the impact of halting the water projects. The agency has restored some funding for life-saving projects, but Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said American assistance will be more limited going forward. At least one water project has been restarted. Funding for a US$6bil desalination plant in Jordan was restored after a diplomatic push by King Abdullah. But funding has not resumed for projects in other countries, including Ethiopia, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, say people familiar with those programmes who spoke on condition of anonymity. That means women in those areas will have to walk for hours to collect unsafe water, children will face increased disease risk and health facilities will be shuttered, said Tjada D'Oyen McKenna, chief executive officer of Mercy Corps, a non-profit that worked with USAID on water projects in Congo, Nigeria and Afghanistan that were intended to benefit 1.7 million people. 'This isn't just the loss of aid – it's the unravelling of progress, stability, and human dignity,' she said. In eastern Congo, where fighting between Congolese forces and M23 rebels has claimed thousands of lives, defunct USAID water kiosks now serve as play areas for children. Evelyne Mbaswa, 38, told Reuters her 16-year-old son went to fetch water in June and never came home – a familiar reality for families in the violence-wracked region. 'When we send young girls, they are raped; young boys are kidnapped. 'All this is because of the lack of water,' the mother of nine said. — Reuters
