Dutch Tech Giant ASML Sees Profits Rise But Warns On 2026
The firm, which makes cutting-edge machines for the manufacture of semiconductors, said net profits came in at 2.3 billion euros, compared with 1.6 billion euros in the second quarter of last year.
However, it warned that the growth outlook for next year was somewhat less rosy than before.
"Looking at 2026, we see that our AI customers' fundamentals remain strong," said Chief Executive Officer Christophe Fouquet in a statement.
"At the same time, we continue to see increasing uncertainty driven by macro-economic and geopolitical developments," he cautioned.
"Therefore, while we still prepare for growth in 2026, we cannot confirm it at this stage."
When Fouquet presented first-quarter results in April, he also warned of "increased uncertainty" due to tariffs with the situation likely to "remain dynamic for a while."
However, he had reiterated his belief at that stage that 2025 and 2026 would be "growth years."
The firm said its net sales in the second quarter of 2025 came in at 7.7 billion euros, at the upper end of its forecasts of between 7.2 and 7.7 billion euros.
Net bookings, the figures most closely watched in the markets as a predictor of future performance, were 5.6 billion euros, compared to 3.9 billion euros in the first quarter.
Fouquet said he expected sales in the third quarter to come in between 7.4 billion and 7.9 billion euros.
ASML is a key cog in the global economy, as the semiconductors its machines help to make can power everything from smartphones to missiles.
Longer term, ASML believes the rapidly expanding AI market will push sales up to between 44 and 60 billion euros by 2030.
"I think long term, the semiconductor market remains very strong," said Fouquet.
"And I think a lot of people say that AI is really a great opportunity. We have seen again the fundamentals around AI to be very, very strong."
The semiconductor industry has been buffeted by geopolitical headwinds in recent years.
Washington has sought to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, concerned that they could be used to advance Beijing's military systems and otherwise undermine American dominance in AI.
In May, Trump's administration rescinded some export controls on semiconductors.
But Washington also unveiled fresh guidelines warning firms that using Chinese-made high-tech AI semiconductors, specifically tech giant Huawei's Ascend chips, would put them at risk of violating US export controls.
Beijing described the warnings as "typical unilateral bullying and protectionism."
On Tuesday, US tech giant Nvidia announced it would resume sales of its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China, after Washington pledged to remove licensing curbs that had halted exports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Are Trump's tariffs the new sanctions? – DW – 07/21/2025
Donald Trump is betting that tariffs rather than sanctions will fix economic and geopolitical imbalances. But does the threat of rising US inflation and retaliation make sanctions a safer choice? US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports primarily used to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on another country to punish and its government. Sanctions typically put restrictions on trade or his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s, and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion in the first half of the year, compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Previous US administrations have preferred sanctions over tariffs as a punitive tool to bring rogue countries into line. Since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has imposed more than 2,500 sanctions on Russia, targeting individuals, entities, shipping and aircraft. The US has also imposed sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. "These economies are not crucial trading partners for the US," the Atlantic Council's Busch said, adding that Trump's tariffs on the "top US trading partners" were "more of an economic threat domestically." Trump has recently expressed more openness to deploying sanctions. Referring to a bill proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham for additional penalties on Moscow if it fails to negotiate a peace deal in good faith with Kyiv, Trump said he was "very strongly" considering fresh sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If passed, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 will target key Russian officials and oligarchs, financial institutions and the energy sector, aiming to curb Russia's ability to export oil and gas. The bill, which has bipartisan support, also proposes secondary sanctions on third countries and foreign companies, which Trump has termed "secondary tariffs" of up to 500% on countries importing Russian energy. Trump's similar "secondary tariffs" of 25% on buyers of Venezuelan oil, which took effect in March, were also designed to pressure energy importers to align with US foreign policy, a role typically reserved for sanctions. Secondary sanctions usually include blacklisting individuals and entities, asset freezes and banking restrictions. The threat of US criminal charges and travel bans is also often used. "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape."
Local Germany
5 hours ago
- Local Germany
Can you be sacked in Germany for a workplace romance?
The subject of relationships between colleagues is once again in the headlines after a married American startup CEO was caught on the 'kiss cam' at a Coldplay concert cuddling the company's head of HR. He has since resigned. All countries have different rules on this tricky issue, so could an inter office hook-up - even an adulterous one - get you fired in Germany? Companies in Germany tend to take a more relaxed view of personal relationships in the workplace, especially compared to places where office romances are frowned upon, such as at companies in the United States. This is due in no small part to German law, which puts heavy emphasis on preserving human dignity and peoples' privacy. For their part, most workers in Germany are not afraid of dating around the office. A 2012 survey found that more than half of German workers have had an office romance , and nine out of ten reportedly said they thought sleeping with colleagues was okay. However the majority of people surveyed thought kissing at work was completely unacceptable. There are other limits to what's accepted, and German companies can enforce certain rules around personal relationships at the workplace. READ ALSO: 'Liebeskummer' - How to talk about dating like a German Article 2.1 of Germany's Basic Law ( Grundgesetz ) protects every person's right to "the free development of his or her personality", and this broad protection also extends to the workplace. Generally speaking, German law therefore prevents employers from having a say over who you have a relationship with - so long as the nature of the relationship doesn't disrupt your work for the company. This was upheld in a 2005 ruling by the Düsseldorf Higher Labour Court against the American retail group Walmart. The company, which was operating in Germany at the time, had attempted to ban romantic relationships among its employees. According to media reports , workers had received a notice which said they were not to date or enter into romantic relationships, and additionally prohibited "lustful looks, ambiguous jokes and sexually interpretable communication of any kind". The Düsseldorf Higher Labour Court ultimately ruled that the blanket ban on romantic relationships between employees was a violation of human dignity, it added that the company must make efforts to protect workers from sexual harassment but that the limits for such provisions would need to be agreed with its works council. What are your rights around workplace relationships? In Germany, a person's right to a free choice of partners extends to the workplace, where workers cannot be prohibited from dating or falling in love, even with people they meet in a professional context. Advertisement Also, there is no obligation for employees to report their relationship to the boss or to a works council. Put simply, if your love life is not affecting your work, then it's no-one's business but yours. This is generally true even if the relationship is between an employee and their superior. However employers may transfer an employee or engage in restructuring to avoid conflicts of interest. How much can companies regulate romance? While companies cannot legally enforce a blanket ban on love, or inter office relations, they can take steps to ensure that their business is not negatively affected by personal relationships. This could include prohibiting intimate acts at the office or during working hours, or making sure that company property - including work phones or computers - are not used for personal chats. If you are in a senior position and engage in office romance, you should be conscious of the risk of favouritism and may be expected to take steps to avoid any potential conflict of interest. According to an article by Jura law firm, which focuses on employment law in North Rhine Westphalia, companies could therefore require employees to disclose relationships that cross certain levels of hierarchy. Advertisement At German media giant Axel Springer SE, for instance, executives are required to disclose relationships with their subordinates. This policy was introduced following a 2021 scandal in which the editor-in-chief of the Bild daily newspaper was dismissed after multiple allegations surfaced that he had affairs with, and exploited, young colleagues. READ ALSO: How to know if you're getting a good severance package in Germany Employees cannot be dismissed solely for having initiated a workplace relationship. But if a relationship, or its disclosure in the workplace, leads to disruptions then an employer can take certain sanctions such as giving warnings, or even dismissing workers in extreme cases. Dismissals are usually only justified when a worker has engaged in conduct that violates the terms of their employment contract, and usually requires a warning first.
DW
5 hours ago
- DW
China begins construction on world's largest dam in Tibet – DW – 07/21/2025
China is building the world's largest hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, which starts in the Himalayas. However, India and Bangladesh have both expressed concerns over the dam's potential impact. China's Premier Li Qiang announced that construction has begun on what will be the world's largest hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, at the eastern rim of the Tibetan Plateau. The announcement was made at the ceremony on Saturday, as reported by the Chinese media. However, the planned dam has sparked concerns from India, Bangladesh and NGOs. The Yarlung Tsangpo river, which is 2,900 kilometres long, starts in the Himalayas and winds through what is said to be the world's deepest land-based canyon. At one section, the river drops 2000 meters (6561 feet) in elevation within 50 kilometers (31 miles). China has cited expanding renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions, and economic goals in the Tibet region as reasons behind the estimated $170 billion (€147.4 billion) project. "The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet," state media reported. The dam will reportedly consist of five cascade hydropower stations with capacity to produce 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity each year — equivalent to the amount consumed by the UK last year. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As the Yarlung Tsangpo flows south, it becomes the Brahmaputra river in India and Bangladesh. Millions rely on the river as a water source and for agriculture. Both countries have expressed concerns over the dam's impact on millions of people living downstream. NGOs have also warned of risks of irreversible damage to the ecologically sensitive plateau. In January, India's Foreign Ministry raised concerns with China, saying it will "monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests." The ministry stressed that China has been "urged to ensure that the interests of the downstream states of the Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas." A 2020 report from the Lowry Institute, an Australian think tank, reported that "control over these rivers gives China a stranglehold on the Indian economy." Chinese authorities have not said how many people would be displaced by construction of the Yarlung project. In December, China's Foreign Ministry said that the project would not have any "negative impact" downstream, adding that Beijing "will also maintain communication with countries at the lower reaches" of the river. This is not the first time geopolitical issues have been raised by rivers which cross international borders. The Yarlung Tsangpo dam is expected to be operational in the 2030s. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
