Hiscox profits fall after £128m claims hit from LA wildfires
The wildfires, which raged in California during the first half of January, have been estimated by some to be the costliest natural disaster in US history.
Aki Hussain, group chief executive at Hiscox, branded it the 'largest wildfire insurance event in history', estimating earlier this year the loss to the sector could be as high as 40 billion dollars (£30.1 billion).
More than 16,200 structures were destroyed as flames ripped through Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadena and Altadena areas of Los Angeles.
Estimates of the total economic loss from the firestorm have been estimated to surpass 250 billion dollars (£188 billion).
The wildfire claims saw half-year profits at Hiscox fall 2% to 276.6 million dollars (£208 million) in the six months to June 30.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax operating profits were 9% lower at 262 million dollars (£197 million).
Hiscox said despite the profit drop, it would increase its share buybacks by 100 million dollars (£75.2 million) and hike its interim dividend payout by 9.1%.
Mr Hussain said: 'Our balance sheet remains strong and we are achieving sustained and strong capital formation which underpins our increased return of capital to shareholders, through step-ups in ordinary dividends and buybacks, over the last two years.'
Shares jumped 8% after the half-year results.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starbucks sets ambitious new goal to combat customers' biggest gripe
Starbucks is making a bold promise to tackle customers' biggest gripe — no coffee will take longer than four minutes. America's biggest coffee chain has lost millions of customers in the past year, some fed up with high prices or shoddy stores. But, by Starbucks' own admission, most had grown weary of waiting 20 minutes for a drink. CEO Brian Niccol, poached from Chipotle in the fall, is rolling out a new 'Green Apron Service' to tackle this and other customers moans. Baristas have a target that no custom drink should take more than four minutes. The key to cutting wait times is Starbucks' biggest hiring spree in history — which adds as many as 85,000 workers across its 17,000 US locations. When Niccol's announced the recruitment blitz at a huge Starbucks convention in Las Vegas in June, the 14,000 stores managers roared their approval. Five years ago, Starbucks stores averaged 23 employees. Cost-cutting has since trimmed that number down to 18 to 19 — four to five fewer workers per location. 'It's centered on putting enough partners on the roster in the stores and then deployed correctly so they can provide that customer connection, that experience, that frankly Starbucks really was founded on,' Niccol said. Restoring pre-Covid staffing levels would mean hiring between 68,000 and 85,000 people across all US stores. Even focusing solely on the 11,000 company-owned locations, the increase would still be a massive 44,000 to 55,000 hires. The new hires are also expected to support Starbucks' efforts to bring back a more personal touch — including a new policy asking baristas to handwrite notes on customers' cups. The former Chipotle boss has embarked on a series of plans to return Starbucks to its original 'third place between home and work' concept. Coffee drinkers have turned away from the chain in recent years, put off by high beverage prices, long wait times and impersonal experiences. Niccol has set about axing complicated drinks from Starbucks menus, asking staff to put messages on customer's coffee cups and scaling back promotions. The plan will help address the major customer pet peeve of long wait times before getting their hands on a coffee. It will also likely be popular with front of house employees who have complained of chronic issues with understaffing, which compounds the backlogs. Another change is Starbucks' decision to axe mobile and pickup-only stores. All 80-90 locations will either shutter or be converted to traditional coffeehouses by next year. Other changes include removing complicated drinks and new uniform rules — the latter resulting in baristas threatening to quit. The changes were not enough to improve Starbucks' sales, which declined for its sixth straight quarter. Both its global and North American sales dipped by two percent — higher than price drops anticipated by Wall Street.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump's ‘visa integrity fee' could cause a decline in tourism
Donald Trump signed a new $250 ' visa integrity fee' into law, which will take effect in October and applies to non-immigrant visa holders from certain countries. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) initially estimated the fee would generate over $27 billion for the US economy over a decade. However, a Tourism Economics analysis suggests the fee could cost the United States $11 billion over three years by deterring international visitors. This potential decline in tourism could lead to reduced visitor spending and job losses, particularly impacting visitors from significant markets like India and Brazil. The fee is being introduced despite the US already facing a decline in international tourism and ahead of major events such as the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Summer Olympics.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump's controversial $250 visa fee could cost the US economy $11 billion as tourists stay away, research finds
Research suggests President Donald Trump 's new $250 'visa integrity fee' could cost the United States $11 billion — a much larger figure than the Congressional Budget Office previously estimated, according to a report. The fee, packed in Trump's so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that he signed into law last month, applies to all visitors traveling to the U.S. on a non-immigrant visa. The fee doesn't apply to countries on the Visa Waiver Program, which includes most Western European nations and some Asian countries. By 2034, the 'visa integrity fee' would bring in more than $27 billion, the Congressional Budget Office estimated. Said differently, the office is predicting the U.S. will rake in $2.7 billion from 11 million foreign travelers paying the fee each year. While the language of the law makes the fee sound like a win for the U.S. economy, it may actually become a major loss, as the cost could deter visitors. That loss could be as high as roughly $3.6 billion per year, or $11 billion in three years, according to a Tourism Economics analysis seen by Forbes. A decline in travelers could lead to a dip in visitor spending and job losses in the tourism industry. In 2022, the travel and tourism industry contributed $2.3 trillion to the U.S. economy, according to the International Trade Administration. The CBO appeared not to have taken these potential drops into account. 'By longstanding tradition, the Congressional Budget Office does not incorporate macroeconomic feedback effects into its traditional cost estimates,' a CBO spokesperson told Forbes. 'We didn't specifically do a dynamic analysis of this provision.' The Independent has reached out to the CBO for more information. The fee, which will take effect in October, was introduced before the U.S. is set to host events which tend to draw large crowds from around the world, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics. Even before Trump's mega-bill was passed international tourism was down. The U.S. was the only country of the 184 economies analyzed by the World Travel & Tourism Council forecast to see international visitor spending decline in 2025, a May report found. At this rate, the U.S. is on track to lose $12.5 billion in international visitor spending this year, according to the report. 'This is a wake-up call for the U.S. government,' the organization's CEO Julia Simpson warned in a statement. 'The world's biggest Travel & Tourism economy is heading in the wrong direction, not because of a lack of demand, but because of a failure to act. While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is putting up the 'closed' sign.' Outside of Canada and Mexico, the United Kingdom, India, Brazil, Japan, and Germany comprised the top five countries with citizens that visited the U.S. this year as of May 2025, according to the International Trade Administration. Of these nations, the fee would only apply to citizens of Brazil and India, which could pack a punch to the U.S. economy. In 2022, for example, Indian tourists visiting the U.S. generated around $13 billion, according to the International Trade Administration. 'Congress made the mistake of assuming that this worldwide visa integrity fee would not have a big impact on visitors from countries like India or Brazil,' Erik Hansen, senior vice president of government relations at the U.S. Travel Association, told Forbes. 'This is the exact type of armchair public policymaking that is going to get us into a big mess.'
