logo
Two vacant erven sold for a combined R170m in Clifton

Two vacant erven sold for a combined R170m in Clifton

The Herald24-05-2025
Two vacant erven in one of the country's most exclusive addresses have sold for a combined R170m in Cape Town.
The plots, a combined space of 2,700m2, are in Nettleton Road, Clifton.
While the erven have planning permission for nine apartments, the multinational entity which purchased them plans to build one 'expansive trophy property to crown Nettleton Road', said Annette Hepburn of Pam Golding Properties, who secured the sale.
'This is one of a few remaining vacant sites in this highly sought-after address, where properties rarely become available and when they do, opulent, completed residences can be acquired for upwards of R150m,' said Hepburn.
'Nettleton Road is the most exclusive of all streets in the country, with a limited number of residential properties, large luxurious, iconic homes which offer all the elements desired by high-net-worth individuals — an unparalleled lifestyle, exclusivity, privacy and rarity, and above all, the spectacular views.'
The street is home to captains of industry and luxurious designer homes. The combined sale price of the erven included VAT.
TimesLIVE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zuma: Some MK party members are lucky I have not fired them
Zuma: Some MK party members are lucky I have not fired them

Mail & Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Zuma: Some MK party members are lucky I have not fired them

MK party leader Jacob Zuma (Delwyn Verasamy/M&G) uMkhonto weSizwe ( Zuma has removed more than 10 national MK leaders since the party's inception on 16 December 2023. 'They say I am firing people all the time. We didn't come here to play. If you want to play, we are not playing; that is why we are not going to go to a conference that has white money,' he told a media briefing after the party announced new leaders. 'We are only going to meet as a party to discuss how we are taking the party forward. If you can't listen, we'll remove you. You are lucky because [the national leadership] warned me. [Otherwise] I would have fired a lot of people by now. The leaders have said I should wait a bit, and they will fix it.' On Friday the party announced Bongani Mncwango as its new secretary general, replacing Nomsa Dlamini becomes the new deputy secretary general, replacing Nombuso Mkhize, while Alec Mguni was named the new national organiser, replacing Joe Ndhela who will now be the policy coordinator. MK national chairperson Shivambu has since been involved in what he calls a national consultative process to launch his political party, called Mayibuye iAfrica. On Friday, Mayibuye iAfrika announced Mkhize as its new head of presidency. Asked whether the MK party was aware that Mkhize had joined Shivambu, Nhleko said she was free to join whoever she wanted. In a briefing two months ago, after his axing, Shivambu told journalists that R7 million had been stolen from the MK party, but did not say by whom. At Friday's briefing, MK treasurer general Mpiyakhe Limba countered that Shivambu should have admitted that he had left the party with a R28 million debt. Limba added that the party had appointed a consulting company of qualified chartered accountants and auditors for an independent overview of its finances. 'The purpose of auditing is for continuous improvement so that we have a proper system in place,' Limba said. 'We do have findings which are more focused on our bookkeeping, rather than to say there's any form of corruption.'

A city in decline in need of a comeback plan
A city in decline in need of a comeback plan

The Herald

timea day ago

  • The Herald

A city in decline in need of a comeback plan

The deindustrialisation happening in large parts of Nelson Mandela Bay is cause for concern and needs to be urgently addressed by our city's leadership. You only need to drive through the once booming industrial areas such as Deal Party and parts of North End, Korsten and Struandale to see abandoned buildings, empty car parks and distressing 'To Let' or 'For Sale/Auction' signs in what can only be described as scenes from a ghost town. The real concern is that these deindustrialised areas may increase, and may begin to include large sections of the metro such as Kariega, which was recently dealt a blow with the closure of Goodyear. Besides the loss of 900 jobs, you also fear for the onset of deindustrialisation in this part of Nelson Mandela Bay and what this could mean for ordinary ratepayers, the community and residents in general. What are they doing in council? The question arises what the city's leadership is doing about the economy of Nelson Mandela Bay. Are these trends being considered and addressed in our IDP and by the affected directorates? Should a strategy to counter deindustrialisation not be a priority? When last were issues of economic concerns raised in council agendas? What are political parties doing in council to address deindustrialisation and to attract investment and growth? The drivers of deindustrialisation should be investigated — whether these are as a result of globalisation and uncertain trade relations or automation and technological changes. Adapting to these changes and providing a conducive business environment should be a priority. While we may not be able to change the bigger global factors, we can address policy gaps, red tape, improved logistics, investment incentives and overall stronger governance to attract business confidence in the Bay. Coega is proof that we've still got it With tentative interest by investors to take up the gap left by Goodyear in the tyre manufacturing sector, it is encouraging that the need to build tyres, as just one example of the manufacturing capacity and potential of the region, still exists in the metro. Local manufacturing is still viable and inexpensive compared to our overseas counterparts. The Coega Special Economic Zone (SEZ) has 67 tenants, who have created 11,000 jobs. Entities such as the Coega Development Corporate (CDC) operate as islands within the economic climate in SA. In an article titled 'Leveraging special economic zones for growth', Prof William Gumede suggests that SEZs should align with the country's National Development Plan to play a critical role in growing the economy, in partnership with business. However, SEZs in general 'operate largely as enclaves', according to Gumede, and while they do achieve investment and industrialisation, they find themselves in a vacuum that is disconnected from the local and national economy. Similarly in the local government bulletin for the Dullah Omar Institute, in an article titled 'The role of special economic zones in the promotion of local economic development', the writer argues that local governments are failing to maximise the potential of SEZs due to a lack of adequate information on how to incorporate them into economic strategies. The recommendation is that 'there must be municipal representation on SEZ boards to incorporate municipal planning with SEZ activities for community benefit'. As a country, and more specifically as a metro, can we afford further youth disenfranchisement, unemployment, brain drain and urban decay? Nelson Mandela Bay stands at the crossroads. The signs of deindustrialisation are visible, red flags that we have perhaps become used to seeing. Deindustrialisation is not just about empty buildings, it is about lost livelihoods, lost hope and a metro at risk. A committed, collaborative leadership with a shared vision for renewal is needed to come up with a turnaround plan to rebuild a resilient, inclusive local economy. Dr Luvuyo Bono qualified with a doctorate in labour law (LLD) at Nelson Mandela University in 2023, where he also holds the title of adjunct professor of law. He was admitted as an advocate of the High Court in 2000 and has contributed to key labour law legislation in SA. He is the current chair of the Coega Development Corporation and writes in his personal capacity The Herald

South Africa proposes ban on polluting plastic microbeads
South Africa proposes ban on polluting plastic microbeads

Mail & Guardian

timea day ago

  • Mail & Guardian

South Africa proposes ban on polluting plastic microbeads

South Africa is taking a bold step in the fight against plastic pollution with the announcement of a total ban on plastic microbeads South Africa is taking a bold step in the fight against Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister Dion George on Thursday released draft regulations to prohibit the manufacture, import, export, distribution and sale of microbeads and products containing them. The move, published under the National Environmental Management Act, marks what the department calls 'a significant stride' in combating marine pollution and protecting public health. Microbeads are tiny plastic particles commonly used in cosmetics, toiletries, pesticides and personal care products. Though barely visible, their environmental impact is immense. Once washed down drains, they enter water systems, accumulate in food chains and damage marine and freshwater ecosystems. The department said the move 'underscores a fierce commitment to environmental preservation and public health'. In 2018, the then-department of environmental affairs set up a task team to look at imposing a total ban on microbeads after a The study, The department said that once enacted, the proposed regulations would impose a blanket prohibition on microbeads, with provisions for monitoring and evaluation, and strict penalties for non-compliance Strong enforcement provisions are proposed: penalties of up to R10 million in fines or 20 years' imprisonment for repeated violations. A 24-month transitional period will allow businesses to phase out existing stock, with mandatory notification and phase-out plans to be submitted to the department. The draft regulations emphasise the country's commitment to safeguarding marine ecosystems, According to George, the rules mark a pivotal moment in 'our ongoing efforts to protect South Africa's precious natural heritage from the scourge of plastic pollution'. 'Plastic microbeads may be small but their impact on our oceans and wildlife is immense. By banning them, we are not only preserving biodiversity but also ensuring a healthier future for generations to come,' he said. A coalition of civil society organisations, that is involved in advocating for a strong global plastics treaty, has commended the 'bold signal' from the department to South Africa is taking a step towards addressing one of the key drivers of the global plastics crisis, the organisations said. 'By recognising the environmental and health harms of microplastics, like microbeads, the government is demonstrating how to translate global concern into national action. It also provides a clear example of how to tackle both supply and demand pressures that continue to fuel the plastic pollution crisis.' The timing of this ban is significant, coming just as the negotiations on the global plastics treaty are underway in Geneva, Switzerland. The organisations pointed out that plastic microbeads are just one of many sources of microplastics that enter our waterways, oceans and even our bodies. 'Therefore, this is the kind of leadership needed in the global plastics treaty process.' They are urging South Africa to champion legally binding global bans and phase-outs of the most harmful plastics and chemicals of concern. This includes supporting an initial list of product and chemical groups that have been proved to cause significant harm to human health and ecosystems and ensuring the list is strengthened over time. 'Plastic microbeads are part of the initial list proposed by a South Africa should not only support such global measures, the country should lead, they said. 'We already have key policy tools in place nationally, including bans on certain plastic items and mandatory extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes. These measures show that ambitious action is possible and effective.' Now is the time to raise the bar internationally, they added. 'South Africa must stand with the ambitious group of countries pushing for a strong, legally binding treaty that prioritises reduction in plastic production to end plastic pollution for people and the natural environment.' Outlawing microbeads, from WWF's perspective, is a low-hanging fruit, said That South Africa is willing to ban microbeads in the country means it should also support banning them elsewhere in the world, through supporting the global list to ban and phase out microbeads and other products such as single-use plastics, 'that already we know there are alternatives for', Sadan said. 'We already know the harmful impact that we see every single day in our streets [from single-use plastic], in the rivers, on the beaches — and that is not unique to South Africa,' she added. South Africa is open to discussing global measures to phase-out plastic products and chemicals of concern 'but they've been The country should support these global measures and an initial list of products and chemicals as the science is already very clear on their harms. 'This is one of the key measures that we want to see in the treaty. Microbeads are just one part of the bigger picture. We also need to address the chemicals of concern found in plastic materials. 'But we also need to ensure that there is an enabling environment for circular products so we are also urging South Africa to support global product design criteria that will enable a circular economy. These ambitious measures need to be backed by finance,' she said, adding that this is another element that 'we see as an effective mechanism under the treaty'. 'Finally, our package of what we see as an effective treaty is also to ensure that there's a functional conference of the parties that is ensuring any decisions going further, such as extending and expanding that initial list to more products and more chemicals as the science evolves.' South Africa has been hesitant on certain measures. 'They feel that this would harm our GDP, given that the plastics sector does account for 2% of GDP. However, as civil society and WWF, we are encouraging South Africa to be open to this. We think that we already know that, globally, we are producing way too much plastic. We are also designing products in such a way that it's meant for single use and we need to address that,' Sadan said. Whatever plastic is placed on the market needs to be accounted for and this can be done through EPR schemes, which South Africa is already implementing. The country, too, should also support that EPR should be mandated nationally in the global plastics treaty. 'South Africa is participating and is putting forth these good signals in terms of national measures that they are willing to take but South Africa should also be putting strong signals for these ambitious global rules.' This is to 'protect its citizens and protect nature from whatever it is importing.' As much as the country is an exporter of plastic and plastic goods, it too, imports these products. 'We need to ensure that we're part of this harmonised global system and we're supporting global rules that will benefit our people and our nature.' The public is invited to submit written comments on the draft regulations within 30 days from the date of publication in the Government Gazette .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store