logo
Trump's sanctions have failed to deter Russia. Now the West faces a dilemma

Trump's sanctions have failed to deter Russia. Now the West faces a dilemma

The Print5 days ago
The question is: will Trump's threats be enough to affect any change in Russia's behaviour? Or will such threats be counter-productive, embolden Putin's hand, and give him more ammunition to project a Russia reclaiming its lost status of parity with the US and standing up to the combined might of the Western alliance?
Russia's newly updated nuclear doctrine apparently allows Moscow to use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear weapon state that is supported by a nuclear one, unsettling deterrence dynamics in Europe. Though Trump's about–turn on the Russia-Ukraine war might bring some sigh of relief in Kyiv, Moscow's counter-threats echo a Biden-era tit-for-tat escalation when Washington's no-holds-barred support for Ukraine's war efforts was met with Moscow's nuclear threats.
Last week, Russia once again pulled the nuclear weapon threat out of its sleeves, two days after US President Donald Trump — following his meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte — threatened to impose 100 per cent secondary tariffs on Moscow if it doesn't reach a deal with Kyiv in 50 days. Trump also confirmed that 'top-of-the-line' weapons, including the Patriot missile defence system and batteries, would be sent to Ukraine in an operation coordinated by NATO members.
Sanctions' toothless bite
Sanctions are meant to bite, and not just bark. They are coercive economic tools that the US and its Western allies have often used as a default policy to punish adversaries. However, do they really affect consequential changes in a country's behaviour as expected? In the case of Russia, sanctions have won tactical gains, but have failed to achieve the desired strategic goals.
US–led Western sanctions have hit Russia since 2014, when the latter annexed Crimea from Ukraine after the Maidan Square event. Though Russia has seen rising inflation, labour shortage, and devaluation of its currency, the sanctions have had too little impact to make Moscow kowtow. On the contrary, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation has kept the key rate at 21.5 per cent per annum, indicating that inflation and economic growth are relatively stable under the current circumstances. The Russian stock exchange market has also continued to grow despite Trump's warnings. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has forecasted Russia's growth rate in 2025 at 1.5 per cent while the Russian Economic Development Ministry has kept it at 2.5 per cent.
This month, the US Senate tabled additional sanctions on Russia, calling them a 'sledgehammer'. Sanctions on Russia will also impact countries that trade with Russia in oil, gas, uranium, and other products. Such secondary sanctions on third countries are reportedly proposed to touch 500 per cent. Some US lawmakers are even hinting at the US, together with its European allies, accessing frozen Russian assets, including the $5 billion located in the US, to dent Russia's warfighting resources and utilise the money in Ukraine's reconstruction. This would be an unprecedented move as no US president has ever taken the central bank assets of a foreign country that the US is not at war with.
However, secondary sanctions have not been too successful either, with Russia, through its 'shadow fleet', exporting energy to the other countries, including China, Turkey, UAE, Belarus, and Armenia. Moreover, partner countries of the US such as Turkey, UAE, and Armenia have not participated in sanctions, creating an enforcement gap, helping Russia maintain access to sanctioned goods and continue its economic activities.
A report, published by the Kyiv School of Economics, estimated that the shadow fleet transports about 70 per cent of Russia's seaborne exports, and in the first nine months of 2024, earned Russia an extra $8bn in oil sales. In fact, a report by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) shows how Russia has been evading sanctions by opening new overseas branches and subsidiaries of Russian financial institutions. Wars do not come cheap, and the fact that Russia has been able to sustain the war with Ukraine and foot the comprehensive military bill amidst the onslaught of the Western sanctions, speaks volumes about the latter's relative failure. Moreover, sanctions cannot completely restrict trade to sanctioned countries. First, these sanctions being largely US–led and not UN-mandated, downgrades its global legitimacy and effective enforcement. Second, many countries that trade in Russian oil through transhipment have created alternatives, helping Russia circumvent the sanctions.
Also read: Trump's Ukraine U-turn puts Russia's trade partners at risk. India caught in the middle
Trump's reputational crisis
Former Russian President and Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev, taking to X, said, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.'
Why is Moscow pooh-poohing Trump's threats? Is Trump's dealmaker credentials facing a reputational crisis? And is he 'chickening out' too often, after issuing maximalist threats? Trump's position on the Russia-Ukraine war has swung like a pendulum. And the divide between Republicans who would like a more hawkish stance against Russia and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) base supportive of less involvement in the war is sending mixed signals about Washington's resolve to stay united on a particular path. MAGA stalwart Marjorie Taylor Greene, Georgia congresswoman and one of Trump's most staunch allies in Washington, said, 'MAGA voted for no more US involvement in foreign wars.'
Trump's negotiating style of employing a mix of maximalist demands for compromise from Ukraine while simultaneously going soft on Russia has clearly not yielded results. It has failed to affect any change in Putin's objectives through the war: de-Nazification, de-militarisation, preventing Ukraine's NATO membership, and occupying the critical territories of Ukraine such as Donetsk and Luhansk, which are rich in rare earth minerals.
Moreover, Putin's ambiguity and delays on Trump's peace deals, and European allies standing strongly with Ukraine — particularly after Trump's verbal spat with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — has pushed Washington's new curve. Even Trump cannot rock too many boats at the same time, it seems. During his more recent meeting with Zelenskyy, on the sidelines of Pope Francis's funeral, Trump said that he wondered whether Putin was sincerely interested in ending the war in Ukraine, as he continued a bombing campaign that included targeting civilian structures. While the recent NATO Summit in the Hague, where NATO members agreed to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP in the next decade, did do good optics for Trump and Western alliance's solidarity, Trump's Moscow policy seems all over the place — from placating Putin to berating him. The leaked audio released by CNN, where Trump could be heard telling a private meeting of fundraisers last year that he once threated to 'bomb the s**t out of Moscow' to prevent Russia from invading Ukraine during his first term, is merely a blip in the radar of Trump's theatrical oeuvre. And the clip seems to have hardly caused a stir in the Kremlin.
Moreover, Putin's grip over the war narrative in Russia is overwhelming. For Russia's domestic audience, the war is not an act of aggression against a weaker country, but an unrelenting test of Russian resilience to reclaim what it considers as its own territory. Russian people see it as standing up against the US-led West and reclaiming the country's lost glory of a great power in the category of the US.
In a quirky twist of global narratives, the US and the West — and not Russia — seem to be facing more heat for having failed to resolve the war. While there is no doubt that Russia invaded Ukraine, a retelling of contemporary history in context of NATO's eastward expansion and Trump's shenanigans has put the West on a weaker footing. Facing the wrath of Trump's tariffs and his hyper-transactional style of foreign engagements, the Global South is at tenterhooks and seems hardly interested in aligning with the West, or in taking sides in the Russia-Ukraine war. For the majority of the Global South, including India, the regional wars and the geopolitical tensions among great powers are reckless irritants making a dent on political bandwidth and the scarce resources that could better be used for meeting developmental challenges. Moreover, the recent attack by the US on Iranian nuclear sites under Operation Midnight Hammer gives more confidence to Moscow in calling out America's double standards on sovereignty and military interventions. The action by the US also allows Russia to leverage the narrative to carry out attacks on Ukraine with impunity, and negotiate from a position of strength.
Therefore, the impact of fresh sanctions on Russia remains doubtful. And the 50 days of reprieve rather could be music to Putin's ears, who would continue on the current path without much Western intervention for close to two months.
Moreover, is Trump's U-turn and increasingly hawkish stance on Russia bringing him closer to the very position of his predecessor whom he once vehemently criticised? Or is it merely a stunt to divert attention from the growing storm at home over the Jeffrey Epstein files? In both cases, he is locking horns with his MAGA base. So, the ramifications are still anyone's guess.
On the other hand, even with the Russian gambit, does Trump have any cards to show? Is he offering anything substantive to Kyiv that could, on the battlefield, completely turn the tide and really bring Putin to the negotiating table on the terms of the West? Is Trump really ready to play ball with Putin, given that he is rather prone to playing safe with the Russian president?
The Russia-Ukraine war exposes a complex paradox of power, wherein, the most powerful country in the world, with all its economic and military resources, is falling severely short in coercing a much more truncated Russia to kowtow to its demands. Putin's recurrent resort to the threat of using nuclear weapons does show a counter-coercion move of the weaker power to deter a strong power. But it seems to be working in the current circumstances.
In the final analysis, the US and the West are facing a dilemma. Allowing Russia to take Ukraine and recognising the territories occupied by it will downgrade the status of the US in the international order. It will also provide an opening for China to take over Taiwan and will embolden it and Russia toward more coercive actions in their spheres of influence. Therefore, the Russia-Ukraine war is a critical front, which will have an outsized influence on the near future of America's status and influence in the international system, and on the broader questions of power and its deployment to affect regional and global outcomes.
Indrani Talukdar @TalukdarIndrani is a Fellow and Monish Tourangbam is a Senior Research Consultant at the Chintan Research Foundation (CRF), New Delhi. Views are personal.
(Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza, Ukraine and beyond: Is Trump's bid to be a global peacemaker falling apart?
Gaza, Ukraine and beyond: Is Trump's bid to be a global peacemaker falling apart?

First Post

time5 minutes ago

  • First Post

Gaza, Ukraine and beyond: Is Trump's bid to be a global peacemaker falling apart?

The United States cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks this week plunges one of President Donald Trump's pushes to solve global conflicts into new uncertainty. read more The United States' decision to withdraw from Gaza ceasefire negotiations this week has cast fresh doubt over President Donald Trump's attempts to resolve some of the world's most intractable conflicts. The faltering of talks aimed at ending the 21-month war between Israel and Hamas marks another setback for Trump whose efforts to broker international peace agreements have stalled across multiple fronts. Though back in office for only six months, the Republican president has sought to position himself as a global peacemaker. Some of his aims, such as ending the Ukraine war before taking office, have yet to materialise. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Trump has cited humanitarian motives for his diplomatic pursuits, he has also been vocal about his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Several allies have nominated him for the honour. Ceasefire efforts in Gaza: No major progress Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, announced Thursday that the U.S. was recalling its negotiating team from Qatar. Talks there had failed to yield a breakthrough. Witkoff accused Hamas of not engaging in 'good faith', though he did not elaborate. Despite a visit to Washington earlier this month by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the negotiations have produced little progress. Witkoff said the U.S. would now 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home', but officials declined to provide further details. Asked about the issue on Friday, Trump told reporters that Hamas was uninterested in a deal and added, 'I think what's going to happen is they're going to be hunted down.' Ukraine war: Stalemate persists Trump previously vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within 24 hours of assuming office, but the war continues with no sign of resolution. Despite increasing criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump has not supported a bipartisan U.S. sanctions bill. Instead, he gave Russia 50 days to accept a peace plan, delaying punitive measures. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This delay has allowed Moscow to intensify its military offensive. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated his willingness to hold direct talks with Putin, but Russia has rejected the offer. Lower-level negotiations held in Istanbul on Wednesday ended without progress. Russia continues to demand that Ukraine withdraw from four regions it annexed in 2022 and abandon its NATO ambitions, terms Kyiv and its Western backers have rejected. Iran conflict: Ceasefire but no nuclear deal The US and Israel recently carried out joint strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure, leading to a fragile ceasefire. However, Washington has not yet reached any agreement with Tehran over its nuclear programme. An Iranian diplomat said this week that Tehran is open to talks with the US but only if steps are taken to rebuild trust. Meanwhile, Iran is also exploring a separate negotiation path with Britain, France and Germany—three parties to the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump withdrew from during his previous term. Foreign ministers from the four countries met Friday in Istanbul, warning that sanctions could be reinstated if there is no movement on a new deal by August. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Progress on some fronts Despite the setbacks, Trump has managed to broker certain regional agreements. In June, the US facilitated a peace accord between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, ending years of tension. The agreement includes commitments to cease hostilities, respect each other's sovereignty and grant US access to critical minerals. In May, the Trump administration claimed to de-escalate tensions between India and Pakistan following cross-border strikes. However, India denied any international interference. Earlier in July, US special envoy Tom Barrack announced a limited ceasefire between Israel and Syria following Israeli intervention in the latter's internal conflict. While the ceasefire was hailed as a success, the episode disrupted efforts to normalise relations between the two nations. With inputs from agencies

Gaza Ceasefire Talks Expected To Resume Next Week, Says Hamas
Gaza Ceasefire Talks Expected To Resume Next Week, Says Hamas

NDTV

time11 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Gaza Ceasefire Talks Expected To Resume Next Week, Says Hamas

CAIRO, Egypt: Ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel are expected to resume next week, a Hamas official said Friday, as Israeli strikes continue across Gaza and experts warn Palestinians are on the brink of famine. Hamas official Bassem Naim said on Friday that he was told an Israeli delegation would depart for consultations early next week. Previous talks had been held in Qatar. His comments come a day after the United States recalled its negotiating team from Qatar and after President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said Hamas' latest response to the negotiations showed a "lack of desire" to reach a truce. Witkoff said the U.S. will "now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza." He did not elaborate on what those options might be. Earlier on Thursday Israeli Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu's office also recalled his negotiating team in light of Hamas' response. In a brief statement, Netanyahu's office expressed appreciation for the efforts of Witkoff and the other mediators, Qatar and Egypt, but gave no further details. A breakthrough on a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas has eluded the Trump administration as humanitarian conditions worsen in Gaza. Israel has come under mounting pressure for the catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza and reports of people dying from causes related to malnutrition. In recent days more then two dozen Western-aligned countries and more than 100 charity and human rights groups have called for an end to the war, harshly criticizing Israel's blockade and a new aid delivery model it has rolled out. The charities and rights groups said even their own staff were struggling to get enough food. On Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognize Palestine as a state, saying, "The urgent thing today is that the war in Gaza stops and the civilian population is saved.″ Hamas said that Witkoff's remarks were meant to pressure the group for Netanyahu's benefit during the next round of talks and that in recent days negotiations had made progress. Naim said several gaps had been nearly solved, such as the agenda of the ceasefire, guarantees to continue negotiating to reach a permanent agreement and how humanitarian aid would be delivered. Israel's government didn't immediately respond to whether negotiations would resume next week. The sides have held weeks of talks in Qatar, reporting small signs of progress but no major breakthroughs. Officials have said a main sticking point is the redeployment of Israeli troops after any ceasefire takes place. The deal under discussion is expected to include an initial 60-day ceasefire in which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others in phases in exchange for Palestinians imprisoned by Israel. Aid supplies would be ramped up, and the two sides would hold negotiations on a lasting ceasefire. The talks have been bogged down over competing demands for ending the war. Hamas says it will only release all hostages in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal and end to the war. Israel says it will not agree to end the conflict until Hamas gives up power and disarms. The militant group says it is prepared to leave power but not surrender its weapons. Hamas is believed to be holding the hostages in different locations, including tunnels, and says it has ordered its guards to kill them if Israeli forces approach. Some 50 hostages remain in Gaza but fewer than half are believed to be alive. Their families say the start-stop talks are excruciating. "I thought that maybe something will come from the time that the negotiation, Israeli team were in Doha," said Yehuda Cohen, whose son Nimrod is being held hostage. "And when I heard that they're coming back, I ask myself: When will this nightmare end?" Meanwhile Israeli strikes continued across Gaza. At least 22 people were killed since Thursday night, according to hospital records at Nasser Hospital where the bodies arrived. Some were killed in strikes, others and others were killed while seeking aid, said the hospital.

What Macron says doesn't matter: Donald Trump
What Macron says doesn't matter: Donald Trump

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

What Macron says doesn't matter: Donald Trump

US President Trump on Friday dismissed French President Macron's plan to recognize a Palestinian state with 'what he says doesn't matter.' 'He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight... He's a team player, pretty much. But here's the good news: What he says doesn't matter. It's not going to change anything,' Trump said. Secretary of state Marco Rubio describing Macron's move as 'reckless.' (This is a Reuters' story)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store