&w=3840&q=100)
Boast and backlash: Counting Trump's ceasefire claims and India's unyielding denials
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor on Monday, firmly dismissed suggestions that New Delhi's military pause against Pakistan was influenced by foreign pressure, calling such claims 'completely incorrect and baseless.'
Without naming US President Donald Trump directly, Singh said military operations had ceased only after Indian forces had achieved their 'overall politico-military objectives.'
He added that the decision followed a request from Pakistan's Director-General of Military Operations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The objective of Operation Sindoor was to destroy the terror nurseries raised by Pakistan over the years,' Singh said, referencing the campaign launched after the Pahalgam terror attack.
Singh's remarks come in the wake of a flurry of claims by Trump, who — between May 10 and July 28 — publicly took credit at least 20 times for brokering a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
Every time Trump said he helped stop the conflict, India denied it.
After Rajnath Singh, Jaishankar, during a debate on Operation Sindoor on Monday, also vehemently asserted that Washington did not play any role in ending the India-Pakistan conflict in May and said there was no phone call between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump during those crucial weeks.
'I want to make two things very clear- one, at no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on,' he said.
'Secondly, there was no talk between the Prime Minister and President Trump from the April 22 (on the day of Pahalgam attack) when President (Donald) Trump called up to convey his sympathy, and on June 17, when he called up the prime minister in Canada to explain why he could not meet,' Jaishankar added.
On June 17, Prime Minister Narendra Modi clarified to President Trump in a phone call that the United States had no role in brokering the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and that there had been no talks about a US-India trade deal during the tensions.
PM Modi also turned down Trump's invitation to stop in Washington, D.C., on his return from the G7 Summit in Canada, citing a prior commitment to visit Croatia on June 18.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Shedding light on the 35-minute conversation, which came at Trump's request, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said, 'PM Modi clearly told President Trump that during the entire course of events, at no point, and at no level, was there any discussion about a US-India trade deal or about US mediation between India and Pakistan.'
This was the first conversation between the two leaders since India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, and came hours ahead of a meeting between Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and Trump.
'The Prime Minister said the talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries. It was done at Pakistan's request,' Misri further said.
Trump was the first to announce the India-Pakistan ceasefire on social media, claiming credit for brokering the deal. He continued to repeat this claim in the following weeks, even as India consistently denied that the US had played any role in the agreement.
Here's a list of statements by the US President on the India-Pakistan conflict so far:
10 May: 'After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE."
11 May: 'I am proud that the USA was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision. While not even discussed, I am going to increase trade substantially with both of these great nations. Additionally, I will work with you both to see if, after a 'thousand years,' a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir.'
12 May: 'We stopped a nuclear conflict. I think it could have been a bad nuclear war.'
13 May: '…My administration successfully brokered a historic ceasefire to stop the escalating violence between India and Pakistan. I used trade to a large extent… And they both have very powerful leaders, strong leaders.'
14 May: 'We convinced them… Let's go and make trade deals. If we can make trade deals, we like that much better than nuclear weapons.'
15 May: 'We talked to them about trade. Let's do trade instead of war. Pakistan was very happy with that and India was very happy with that… They've been fighting for about a 1000 years. I said I could settle that up.'
17 May: 'Those are major nuclear powers… It was getting deeper and more missiles. Everyone was stronger. Where the next one 's going to be, you know what? The N word. I think they were very close… I said we're going to talk about trade. We're going to do a lot of trade.'
22 May: 'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India — we settled that whole thing. I settled it through trade. We're doing a big deal with India. We're doing a big deal with Pakistan.'
30 May: 'We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. I believe that could have turned out into a nuclear disaster. We talk trade… We can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons.'
31 May: 'We were able to stop potentially a nuclear war through trade as opposed through bullets. You know, normally they do it through bullets. We do it through trade. We had a very nasty potential war going on between Pakistan and India.'
06 June: 'We solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and Pakistan. I talked about trade and said, we are not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other. They both stopped.'
18 June: 'Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war.'
21 June: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan.'
25 June: 'India and Pakistan…I ended that with a series of phone calls on trade. I said if you're going to go fighting each other, we're not doing any trade deal. They said: I want to do the trade deal. We stopped the nuclear war."
27 June: 'India and Pakistan. That was going to be maybe nuclear… I said to Scott and Howard: cancel all deals with India and Pakistan. They're not trading with us because they're in a war.'
08 July: 'Very, very big one was India and Pakistan. We stopped that over trade. We said that we are not going to be dealing with you at all if you are gonna fight. They were maybe at a nuclear stage.'
15 July: 'India and Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week. I said, we ' re not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled. And they did.'
19 July: 'Planes were being shot out of there. I think five jets were shot down, actually. These are two serious nuclear countries. India and Pakistan were going at it… and we got it solved through trade. We said: you guys want to make a trade deal. We're not making a trade deal if you're going to be throwing around weapons, and maybe nuclear weapons.'
26 July: 'It (Cambodia-Thailand conflict) very much reminds me of the conflict between Pakistan and India, which was brought to a successful halt.'
28 July: 'We do a lot of trade with Thailand and Cambodia. Yet I'm reading that they're killing each other… I say this should be an easy one for me because I settled India and Pakistan… If I can use trade to do that, then it's my honour."
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 minutes ago
- Mint
Wall Street week ahead: Focus on further fallout from weak jobs data, fresh Q2 earnings
After US stock indices fell sharply on Friday following weak jobs data and stiffer tariffs on several American trading partners, focus of Wall Street investors in the week ahead would be on any further fallout from the non-farm payroll numbers and fresh earnings reports. Following the jobs data, US President Donald Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer. Trump accused the BLS Commissioner of faking the jobs numbers without providing any evidence of data manipulation. Meanwhile, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS that Trump had "real concerns" about the data, while Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said the president "is right to call for new leadership." The economic calendar in the week ahead will be fairly light with data on services PMI and consumer credit slated to be released. On the earnings front, market participants will see finacial results from theme park and entertainment giant Walt Disney, pharma majors Pfizer and Eli Lilly. On August 4 (Monday), a report on Factory orders for June will be released. On August 5 (Tuesday), separate reports on US trade deficit for June, S&P final US services PMI for July, and ISM services for July will be released. On August 7 (Thursday), separate reports on initial jobless claims for the week ended August 2, US productivity for the second quarter (Q2), wholesale inventories for June, and consumer credit for June will be released. Following companies are due to report second quarter results in the week ahead — Palantir, ON Semiconductor, AMD, Caterpillar, Pfizer, Apollo Global Management, Yum! Brands, McDonald's, Walt Disney, Shopify, DoorDash, Eli Lilly, ConocoPhillips, Block, and Take-Two. US stocks slumped on Friday as new American tariffs on dozens of trading partners and a weak jobs data spurred selling pressure. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 542.40 points, or 1.23%, to 43,588.58, the S&P 500 lost 101.38 points, or 1.60%, to 6,238.01 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 472.32 points, or 2.24%, to 20,650.13. For the week, the S&P 500 fell 2.36%, the Nasdaq declined 2.17%, and the Dow fell 2.92%.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Rolls-Royce still vying to codevelop India's stealth jet engine: Alex Zino
Rolls-Royce says India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement will positively impact both its civil aviation and defence businesses in India Bhaswar Kumar New Delhi Listen to This Article Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the United Kingdom (UK) in July saw the signing of the India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Ceta), the adoption of Vision 2035 to steer bilateral strategic relations over the next decade, and the finalisation of a defence industrial road map. Against this backdrop, Alex Zino, executive vice-president (business development & future programmes for UK & international markets), and global head of government relations, Rolls-Royce, spoke to Bhaswar Kumar about how these developments would help the British aerospace and defence company scale up operations in India. Zino also confirmed the company still remains in
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US policymakers may start relying on Trump tariffs for federal revenue
Andrew Duehren US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that US policymakers may start to rely on. As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect on August 7. Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on imported goods has grown dramatically so far this year. Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated $152 billion through July, roughly double the $78 billion netted over the same time period last fiscal year, according to Treasury data. Indeed, Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the government at least $3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than $2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. 'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the US away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to larger tax increase for them compared to richer Americans. Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year. 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street.
