Can Musk's proposed ‘America Party' become a Republican party pooper?
Musk is so upset about the act, dubbed 'The One Big Beautiful Bill', that he has threatened to form a new political party to undermine the Republicans.
Ahead of Tuesday's Senate vote, Musk vowed to create his rival party, titled the "America Party", if the Republicans approved the bill.
'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day. Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uni-party so that the people actually have a VOICE,' Musk said on X on Monday evening.
'Vox populi, vox Dei'?
Musk's alternate party threat is not new. The billionaire businessman floated the idea in early June during the first round of the Musk-Trump bromance-to-breakup proceedings, which erupted on social media.
Shortly after formally stepping down from his role in the Trump administration as head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk launched a 'poll' on X to see if his social media followers were in favour of creating a new party.
Musk's hundreds of millions of X followers were informed that the new party would be in the 'middle' of the political spectrum, between the Democrats and the Republicans.
On Tuesday, Musk brought up his poll again on X, posting the 80% favouring a new party result with the phrase, 'Vox Populi, Vox Dei'.
Since the Latin phrase translates as "the voice of the people [is] the voice of God", the post suggested that Musk was now obliged to follow the majority opinion.
Except the 'vox populi' on X is not necessarily representative of the American people.
'I don't think it's particularly serious,' said Richard Johnson, senior lecturer in US politics and policy at Queen Mary University of London. Experts note that even Musk's considerable fortune would not be enough to create a new movement. 'It is possible to create a party, and money can help, but it's a fairly closed system,' confirmed Jérôme Viala-Gaudefroy, a US politics expert and author of the book ' Les mots de Trump ' (The Words of Trump).
In practical terms, it's 'very, very difficult to create a new party in the US system. There are all kinds of barriers, state by state, which require huge numbers of signatures to get to be put on the ballot', said Johnson. 'This isn't just a case of money. You actually need thousands and thousands of people in every state to give your party ballot access. So this kind of the undertaking would be enormous, and it would require a huge investment in time.'
Viala-Gaudefroy is sceptical about Musk's ability to generate enough popular enthusiasm to garner the requisite number of signatures. Musk is 'even lower in the polls than Donald Trump, he has angered the Democratic electorate and his positions are not very popular among independent voters either', he noted.
A 'wealthy tech bro' sours on 'woke ideology'
The political platform of a potential America Party would indeed struggle to appeal to a broad electorate.
Musk's brand of politics, which Johnson describes as 'basically Silicon Valley, but a little bit more socially conservative', is distasteful for many voters across the Republican-Democrat divide. 'His kind of anti-woke positions is offensive to Democrats,' noted Johnson.
But on the other hand, Musk also supports the kind of high-skilled immigrant labour that has powered the Silicon Valley startup industry. 'He basically has the positions of a wealthy tech bro who has soured a bit on what he views as woke ideology, but otherwise carries a lot of the policy positions of wealthy tech men in California,' explained Johnson.
In other words, Musk's economic positions – such as his support for greener energy sources, compatible with his Tesla electric cars, or his defence of high-skilled immigration – are unlikely to appeal to Trump's electoral base.
On the other side of the political spectrum, his controversial statements and gestures – such as his raised arm, which strongly resembles a Nazi salute – disqualify him in the eyes of more progressive voters.
A measure of the billionaire businessman's unpopularity was evident in Wednesday's market quarterly deliveries, which saw Tesla posting a 13.5% drop in sales over the past three months, reflecting a lingering anti-Musk sentiment.
A 'beautiful' bill splits conservative ranks
While the Tesla-SpaceX boss may be delusional about his actual popularity in the real world, experts say the new party threat could be Musk's way of sending the message that he is prepared to go to great lengths to hurt 'Trumpism'.
Viala-Gaudefroy believes the president's inner circle should be more concerned about Musk's promises to 'defeat Trumpist candidates' using his personal fortune if the tax-cut and spending bill is passed.
By becoming the Republican Party's biggest donor, Musk proved very useful to Trump during the presidential campaign. The US president probably does not want to see the world's richest man turn his billions of dollars against Trumpist candidates in the 2026 midterm elections, or even in the Republican primaries.
'This could have a significant impact, as the presidential majority in Congress is very slim. It could tip the balance if Elon Musk manages to sway the scales against pro-Trump candidates in just a few key constituencies,' explained Viala-Gaudefroy.
The political precariousness was on display on Tuesday, when Senate Republicans squeaked through their sweeping tax and spending bill by a 51-to-50 vote that required Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaker.
The close Senate vote reflected the considerable angst within the Republican Party over the bill, which even lost its grandiose 'One Big Beautiful Bill' name after Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer invoked Senate budget rules to delete the title of the bill on the floor Tuesday.
Trump himself appears to be cognisant of the threat Musk poses to his fiscal conservative base. Shortly before the bill was put to a Senate vote on Tuesday, the US president launched a high-octane castigation of his former billionaire friend.
Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he would 'take a look' at measures to consider deporting the South African-born Musk, who has held US citizenship since 2002.
Trump also signaled that he could take aim at the huge contracts and subsidies that Musk's Space X rocket and Starlink satellite internet businesses receive from the US government.
"We might have to put DOGE on Elon. You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," Trump said.
Money is important, but not everything
Democrats, for the moment, might be rubbing their hands with glee over the latest round of the Musk-Trump fallout. Some party figures have floated the possibility of Democrats making overtures to Musk, given his political largesse. But others warn that the financial support of someone as controversial as Musk could just as easily hurt a Democratic candidate.
As a result, experts interviewed by FRANCE 24 believe that the most effective tactic for the billionaire businessman would be to promise to support all Republican candidates who, in a right-wing primary, run against Trump's men.
While money is important in US politics, it's not everything, notes Johnson. 'When Barack Obama first ran for the Senate, he ran against one of the wealthiest men in Illinois,' explained Johnson, referring to Obama's 2004 Democratic primary win over multimillionaire Chicago trader Blair Hull, who spent 'spent millions and millions of dollars, outspending Obama massively. He got nowhere in the Democratic primary because basically, he wasn't offering anything that Democratic voters found particularly interesting'.
But while Musk's money could potentially be toxic for Democratic candidates, the disruption he has caused among Republican ranks is an asset for Democrats. 'We are witnessing a kind of civil war brewing within the Republican Party,' said Viala-Gaudefroy. The Democrats could hardly dream of a better scenario than one in which Trump does everything in his power to defeat Republican candidates who have opposed his spending bill while Musk does the opposite.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
'The ideological fusion between the American right and the media did not start with Trump, but he accelerated it'
The American radical right has always been ahead of its European counterparts when it comes to developing media ecosystems. What is happening today in the United States often signals, a little in advance, the major trends that will also emerge in Europe. It didn't all start with Donald Trump's arrival on the political scene, far from it. The right's conquest of the media can be traced back to radio: In the 1970s and 1980s, the AM band, which was then largely underused and faced few content restrictions, became the preferred platform for American conservatives. Rush Limbaugh embodied this trend with The Rush Limbaugh Show, which had an impressive run: Launched in 1984, the talk show continued until his death in 2021. Such programs were a success with the public and helped secure the victories of Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and later George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. At the same time, there was a boom in televangelists – preachers hosting religious television programs – who came to dominate many local radio and television stations. It was also during this period that Reagan, in 1985, granted American citizenship to media magnate Rupert Murdoch, originally from Australia – allowing him to enter the US media market with the goal of shifting it to the right. Murdoch replicated in the US the successful strategies he had already employed in Australia and the United Kingdom. In 1996, he launched Fox News, which would revolutionize the American right and its communication methods. Murdoch was not alone. Other right-wing magnates also set out to conquer the media market: John Dickey bought a small Atlanta radio station and, in 1997, turned it into Cumulus Media – a conglomerate that is now the second-largest owner and operator of AM and FM radio stations in the US (nearly 500). During the Bush era, another competitor, Sinclair Broadcast Group, owned the most television stations in America, and Steve Bannon launched the website Breitbart, which became the spearhead for the nationalist and populist far right.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Donald Trump says new tariffs of up to 70% will begin 1 August
US President Donald Trump is expected to begin formally notifying key US trading partners of a sweeping new tariff regime as early as Friday, according to media reports. The duties, set to take effect on 1 August, could see some countries face levies of up to 70% on exports to the United States. Speaking to reporters ahead of the Independence Day holiday, Trump said around "10 or 12" letters would be issued immediately, with more to follow over the coming days. "By the ninth they'll be fully covered," he stated, referring to a 9 July deadline he previously set for reaching deals that could avert the higher tariffs. Trump's approach, widely seen as part of his America First trade agenda, leaves little room for negotiation. "They'll range in value from maybe 60 or 70% tariffs to 10 and 20% tariffs," he added, making clear that the scale of the new charges would vary by country. The United States is currently in sensitive talks with several economies, including South Korea, Indonesia, Switzerland and the European Union. The discussions are understood to be at a critical stage, where delicate issues are being tackled. The White House first announced the higher "reciprocal" tariffs on 2 April, but delayed full implementation for 90 days to allow time for talks. During the interim, a 10% rate was applied. Should the full slate of tariffs be enacted next week, Bloomberg Economics estimates the average duty on US imports could rise to around 20%, up sharply from the pre-Trump average of roughly 3%. Such an increase would represent a significant escalation from the initial framework unveiled in April, where proposed tariffs ranged from 10 to 50%. The president has not yet detailed which countries or goods would fall under the highest rate brackets. Trump said the measures would begin generating revenue from next month. "Countries would start to pay on 1 August. The money will start coming into the United States on 1 August," he said. While tariffs are officially paid by importers or their intermediaries, the costs are often passed down to consumers or absorbed by businesses through reduced profit margins. According to local media, economists have cautioned that the delayed impact of tariffs could complicate efforts by the Federal Reserve to manage inflation. Some Fed officials are reportedly hesitant to cut interest rates while the full economic effects of the trade measures remain unclear. The new tariffs have rattled global markets, with shares in Asia and Europe declining and the dollar weakening. US markets remained closed on Thursday for the Fourth of July holiday.
Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
France's emission cuts tipped to slow again in 2025
The estimated reduction of less than one percent extends a slowdown seen in recent years, said Citepa, a non-profit organisation tasked by France's ecology ministry with tallying the country's greenhouse gas inventory. France, a major economy seen as a leader in transitioning to a low-carbon future, slashed its output of planet-heating emissions by 6.8 percent in 2023. But the rate of decline slowed sharply to 1.8 percent in 2024 and is tipped to slip even further in 2025 to just 0.8 percent, said Citepa's latest progress report for the ministry. "This slight decrease in greenhouse gas emissions would confirm the slowdown in momentum observed in recent years," it said. Advertisement France's current emissions reduction target for 2030 is at least 40 percent compared to 1990 levels, but a plan under development proposes raising this goal to 50 percent. To achieve this, France needs to cut emissions by around five percent each year between 2022 and 2030 - well above the current pace. France is far from alone in Europe, with Germany and Britain also struggling to sustain the momentum after posting impressive cuts in recent years. Major polluters elsewhere are also stalling. The United States only managed a 0.2 percent reduction in 2024, even before President Donald Trump took office promising to unwind climate protections and drill for more oil and gas. Cipeta said France's first quarter emissions for 2025 actually rose slightly, due in part to higher gas and electricity use for heating school and residential buildings. The sharp drops in energy emissions seen over the past two years were forecast to slow considerably in 2025, it added. "The use of nuclear power should stabilise in the second half of 2025, remaining at a historically high level," Cipeta said. "In addition, as the use of fossil fuels is already very low, it should stabilise without allowing the gains observed in the past." The slowdown comes as nations face pressure to commit new climate targets in line with international efforts to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels. On Wednesday, the 27-nation European Union unveiled its long-delayed goal of cutting emissions by 90 percent by 2040 compared to 1990 levels - but with contested new flexibilities built in. EU emissions fell by 8.3 percent in 2023 compared to 2022, and are now 37 percent below 1990 levels.
