Inflation winds whip up extra costs for Northern Star Resources
Higher royalty costs and tariff assumptions associated with its Pogo operations will contribute about $40/oz to the increase as Northern Star targets production of between 1.7 million ounces and 1.85moz for the financial year.
The 5 per cent jump is set to take the Stuart Tonkin-led company's all-in cost for FY26 to between $2300/oz and $2700/oz, with expectation of improving costs throughout the year.
Adding to the cost will be sustaining capital of about $750m across its production centres.
Reporting its latest quarterly results on Thursday, Northern Star said it delivered record annual group underlying free cash flow of $536 million for the 12 months to the end of June, with net mine cash flow of $1.19 billion.
The Yandal and Pogo operations both recorded quarterly and annual net mine cash flow.
Gold sold for the year came in within the group's revised guidance at 1.634moz at all-in costs of $2163/oz.
Average realised prices for the June quarter were $4483/oz, generating revenue of $1.99b
'The June quarter completes a constructive year of growth investments to position our largest asset, KCGM, for sustained future success,' Mr Tonkin said.
'We remain committed to unlocking the full potential of our production centres and are confident the investments made during FY25, including the acquisition of the Hemi deposit, will deliver significant value for shareholders.'
The $1.3b Hemi project in the Pilbara was picked up in Northern Star's massive $5b takeover of De Grey Mining at the end of 2024.
The price is believed to be a global record for a gold company without a mine in production, and comes during a period of consistent high prices for the metal.
Gold has climbed about a third this year, as uncertainty around US President Donald Trump's aggressive attempts to reshape global trade and conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East sparked flight to havens.
The precious metal has consolidated within a tight range over the past few months, though this week's gains of about 2.5 per cent have pushed prices to trade about $US80 short of April's record high above $US3500/oz.
It is currently trading at around $US3422/oz.
Earlier this month Northern Star secured approval for Hemi from the Environmental Protection Authority, subject to conditions regarding its water usage, flora and fauna disturbances, cultural heritage impacts and rehabilitation progress.
Once up and running — and coupled with increased output from an $1.5b expanded mill at its famed Super Pit in Kalgoorlie — Northern Star is poised to become a global top 10 producer by the end of the decade.
It ended the year with cash and bullion of $1.9b.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Kalamazoo claws back gold project with prices soaring
Kalamazoo Resources has taken back the reins of its 1.44-million-ounce resource Ashburton gold project in Western Australia, after an option held over it by mega-miner Northern Star Resources expired. Whilst Ashburton hosts potentially more than 770,000 ounces of mineable gold with a solid grade of 2.53 grams per tonne gold, Northern Star has a full book having just paid $5 billion for DeGrey Mining and has bigger fish to fry. Kalamazoo, however, is now looking to immediately turbo charge the project with the gold price continuing to test record highs. The company has kick started a new scoping study using fresh technical data and has undertaken a new $2 million placement to unlock what could potentially become a serious producer in the near term. Kalamazoo says the timing couldn't be sweeter, with Aussie gold now soaring to A$5100 an ounce—up more than A$2,000 since it struck the original $33 million option deal with De Grey just 18 months ago. That option, later handed to Northern Star in its takeover of De Grey, has now lapsed, but not before leaving Kalamazoo holding the keys to a far more valuable prize delivered from the exploration sweat of others. Notably, an earlier 10-hole drill blitz at Ashburton by De Grey's lit up the boards with intercepts such as 47m at 5.5g/t gold from 30m, 55.5m at 4.1g/t from 177.6m and 31.8m at 3.3g/t from 132.2m. Despite the dazzling numbers, Northern Star says it's taking a more measured approach to new developments outside its newly acquired 11-million-ounce Hemi juggernaut, DeGrey's principal asset. In addition to the colossal $5 billion price tag Northern Star is projected to throw another $1.3 billion capex at Hemi to bring it into production and has a pretty full dance card. Ashburton sits 35 kilometres southeast of Paraburdoo in Western Australia's Pilbara region and within the richly endowed Nanjilgardy fault zone, which includes such mines as Black Cat Syndicate's 350,000 ounce Paulson gold mine. Historical mining between 1998 and 2004 in the region produced 350,000 ounces with many, including, Kalamazoo believing that the best is yet to be discovered. The primary gold mineralisation centres around the company's Mt Olympus deposit and has been subject to extensive drilling, metallurgical test work and geological modelling by De Grey during the 18-month option period. As part of that work, recent pit optimisation studies, by combining the Mt Olympus and the West Olympus deposits into a single open pit and using updated gold price assumptions of A$4,500 per ounce, have marked out the 772,000 ounces of mineable gold going 2.53g/t gold. Kalamazoo says the updated resource number represents an impressive 17 per cent jump on the earlier 2023 estimate, which used a A$2600 gold price. Adding fuel to the fire, preliminary metallurgy has confirmed that a straightforward crush – grind - float circuit can produce saleable concentrates with gold recoveries of up to 94 per cent and concentrate grades averaging more than 30g/t gold. With a lot of heavy lifting already done by previous suitors, Kalamazoo has been handed the new data, allowing the company to fast-track its scoping study for completion within the next few months - all at minimal cost. Management has brought in BHM Process Consultants and Entech to help fast-track the study. Seasoned operator Simon Coyle, the former GM of Operations at the uber-successful Pilbara Minerals, has also been tapped to take the reins as project manager. By combining its 2023 resource estimate of 16.2Mt at 2.8g/t gold from Mt Olympus with the fresh high-grade data, Kalamazoo is confident it can carve out a low-cost, high-margin development pathway. The upcoming scoping study could also become the launchpad for a full-scale pre-feasibility study and set the stage for a serious gold play in the Pilbara. Backing its ambitions, the company has locked in the $2 million placement at 9 cents per share, with one free option for every two shares. Notably, directors are chipping in $450,000 of their own cash, reflecting a strong internal conviction. With gold prices at record highs, a simplified processing route, and a major scoping study underway, Kalamazoo looks well placed in the current environment that has seen listed companies in a fever pitch to pick up gold projects with scale and grade. The stars appear to have aligned for Kalamzoo. With Northern Star looking to fry bigger fish and its nose no doubt bleeding from the $5b price tag attached to DeGrey, Ashburton has dropped back on its lap at a time when an army of smaller listed players are out there jostling for projects just like this one. Is your ASX-listed company doing something interesting? Contact:
Sky News AU
4 days ago
- Sky News AU
The two-timing Chinese act that made a complete fool of Albo's charm offensive as the world again sits on the brink of all-out war
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's recent six-day visit to China has once again raised hard questions about Labor's stance on our relationship with Beijing, which runs in parallel to our allied commitments to the US, the UK and other core security partners. Trade was on top of the PM's China agenda, despite renewed fears of Beijing's plans to resolve the Taiwan dilemma by force. Australia finds itself in a far more complex region than was envisaged a decade ago, a fact the recent talks seem to largely neglect. From 'undefeated combat brotherhood' to loose security triangles The problem with understanding the current geopolitical setting - who is your friend, who is your ally, and who is your foe - is no longer straight and clear as it used to be. We have truly entered the phase of geopolitical fluidity when old norms and rules are no longer set in stone. A need for an adaptive approach is of growing relevance when it comes to assessing allied dynamics in the Indo-Pacific, particularly with respect to our geopolitical rivals. The Moscow-led allied relationship between Russia and North Korea continues to progress and mature, as was noted during the visit of Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to the country on July 12. During his meeting with the North Korean counterpart Choi Son-hui, Lavrov described the bilateral strategic treaty as "the basis of undefeated combative brotherhood". The alliance between the two nuclear-armed autocratic states will have to form a part of any future strategic calculus vis-a-vis power dynamics in northeast Asia and beyond. It is also worth reminding ourselves of China's close strategic relations with both Moscow and Pyongyang. Following his stopover in North Korea, Lavrov travelled to China to hold a series of strategic talks with his counterpart Wan Yi, even though he spoke to him just days before at the ASEAN summit in Malaysia. Although, it's too soon to look at this trio through the prism of a formed triangular security partnership, such as the 2023 Camp David agreement between the US, South Korea and Japan, the intensity of at least Russia-China high level contacts is telling and should not be dismissed as it happened to date. I doubt anyone imagined five years ago that Russia-North Korea rapprochement would reach current levels and that DPRK troops would see combat in the eastern European theatre of war. Being trapped in a set of self-comforting perceptions in such a dynamic and fluid geopolitical environment is a road with a dead end. What also requires closer attention is another emerging allied security triangle, China-Pakistan-Iran, in which Beijing is claiming a leadership role. It is a well-documented fact that China has close strategic ties with both countries, just like there is a close relationship between Islamabad and Tehran. Over the past two months, these deepened ties were put to the test during two major regional crisis, a near-war between India and Pakistan, and the 12-day war between Israel, the US and Iran. During the latest round of hostilities between New Delhi and Islamabad in May, Beijing was believed to be supplying Pakistani military not just with armaments and training but also with operational intelligence. According to the Depurty Chief of the Indian Army Lieutenant-General Rahul Singh, Islamabad received 'all possible support' from its de-facto ally, including 'live inputs' on India's defensive layout. Aside from political declarations, Beijing's military support for Iran during its latest open clash with Israel last month was more evasive. Yet, it had a limited footprint. During the intensive phase of the conflict, Chinese aircraft were believed to be delivering defence supplies into Iran, while an electronic warfare vessel was operating in the Gulf area, possibly tracking the trajectory of Israel's aerial and missile missions. In early July, the 47th Naval Escort Task Force of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), while operating in the Red Sea, was involved in a dangerous standoff with a German surveillance aircraft. This action could be perceived as a covert show of support for the Iran-backed Houthi militants, which stepped up their spectacular strikes against western shipping of the coast of Yemen. Pakistan was bolder in its support of the Iranian regime, by also escalating its political rhetoric with references to its nuclear capability and promises to offer its neighbour a de-facto extended deterrence. It is doubtful that the Chinese authorities were blissfully unaware of Pakistan's war of words over Israel. In the future, this triangular relationship may mature into a more substantive organisational structure. No appetite to 'discuss hypotheticals' This message from Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, was designed to be a bold response to equally bold messaging from Pentagon and the White House, which are seeking a clear commitment to a possible war contingency in the Taiwan Strait from Australia and Japan. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance…', Mr Conroy said. Clearly, Canberra was reluctant to engage in warmongering rhetoric prior to the PM's visit to China. This is all very well. But what is equally clear is that while Albanese prioritises trade with China, others like Minister Lavrov are busy discussing a whole range of strategic matters. 'The importance of strengthening close coordination between the two countries [China and Russia] in the international arena…. jointly respond to the challenges brought about by a turbulent and changing world," read extracts from the statement issued by the Chinese Foreign Ministry following Lavrov-Wan Yi talks. At the same time, Canberra finds it completely normal to engage in political fencing with our key security and defence ally, instead of securing a sit-down meeting between the PM and US President Donald Trump. Labor's ongoing balancing act may have worked in the past when the world's geopolitical dynamics were different. But not now, when geostrategic competition between great powers and respective allies gave way to power contests and conflict. Dr. Alexey Muraviev is Associate Professor of National Security and Strategic Studies at Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
The Age
5 days ago
- The Age
A China shock 2.0 is emerging to rock America
Yet instead of pursuing the policies needed to meet this threat head-on, the MAGA agenda is heavily focused on fighting the last war – on bringing manufacturing jobs lost to China and elsewhere back to the US. The challenge, Autor and Hanson argue, is not that of attempting to resuscitate the industrial might of a bygone age, but ensuring that the US is front and centre of the new technologies and able to convincingly harness them to its own ends. This endeavour is not obviously helped by Trump's scattergun approach to tariffs, punishing friend and foe alike, his propensity to alienate rather than co-operate with allies, the stupefying attacks on scientific research and the repudiation of foreign talent – once the very lifeblood of American advancement. Nor is it helped by the administration's casual disregard for the great asset of dollar hegemony which, bizarrely, Stephen Miran, Trump's chief economic adviser, seems to regard as in some way partly responsible for America's de-industrialisation. An administration seemingly hell-bent on fiscal ruin, and on weakening the dollar for the purposes of making US goods more competitive, doesn't exactly inspire international confidence in the dollar as a reserve currency asset. Loading China, by contrast, is investing heavily in the digital yuan as a way of internationalising its own currency, of offering an alternative to the fool's gold of cryptocurrency and of usurping the dollar for cross-border payments. Already, it is making steady progress. Why any longer should Brazil use the dollar for selling soybeans to China when Trump threatens the country with punitive tariffs for the sin of prosecuting his friend, Jair Bolsonaro, the former Brazilian president? Why indeed should it employ the dollar at all when the US regularly uses its power for extraterritorial purposes? In the developing world, Western influence is waning fast; China has been quick and single-minded at moving into its place. China has many problems and challenges, from the demographic to the still-deflating credit and property bubbles. But its catch-up and overtake approach to the technologies of the future is already paying big dividends. As, too, is the aggressive expansion of China's universities sector, originally begun under Jiang Zemin's presidency in the late 1990s, and heavily focused on Stem (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects. According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), the US-led China in 60 of 64 frontier technologies as recently as 2007, judged by share of the world's most-cited research, while China led the US in three. However, by 2023, these rankings were reversed, with China leading in 57 of 64 key technologies, and the US in seven. 'China has built the foundations to position itself as the world's leading science and technology superpower, by establishing a sometimes stunning lead in high-impact research across the majority of critical and emerging technology domains,' the ASPI says. All of the world's top 10 research institutions in some technologies are based in China, and are already collectively generating nine times more high-impact research papers than the second-ranked country (most often the US). The potential threat from Chinese AI is too great to ignore. Now, globally recognised companies at the forefront of their industries – such as Huawei in telecommunications, BYD in electric vehicles and Longi in solar wafers – have come from nowhere in less than 30 years to achieve world-leading positions. Industrial policy in China has, moreover, deliberately targeted key choke points in the supply chain, such that the US was this week forced to abandon its ban on the export of H20 Nvidia chips to China in return for China lifting similar export restrictions on the rare earth minerals vital to many hi-tech industries. The Nvidia ban was completely pointless in any case, serving only to turbocharge Chinese attempts to develop alternatives. Autor and Hanson suggest that the correct response to the China 2.0 shock is for the US to act in unison with commercial allies such as the EU, Japan, Canada, the UK, Australia and South Korea. Loading Counter-intuitively, Chinese companies should also be encouraged to set up production facilities in the US and elsewhere, rather similarly to the way that China once enticed Western companies to do the same in China as a way of speeding up technology transfer. Replicating Chinese industrial policy by aggressively promoting innovation in new fields, as happened in America and Europe during the Second World War, could also help narrow China's lead. It scarcely needs saying that Trump's America is at present doing the opposite of all these things. But just because Trump has got his head buried in the sand doesn't mean other nations should do the same. The potential threat from Chinese AI is too great to ignore. If China gets there first, it will reshape the world in its own image, and 'the end of history' will look very different from the one outlined by Francis Fukuyama back in 1992, when he declared the final triumph of liberal democracy.
