
What is buy now, pay later?
Unlike credit cards, BNPL plans typically don't charge interest. And providers don't run a hard credit check, so the loans are particularly attractive if you have bad credit or no credit history.
According to a 2025 Lending Tree survey, nearly half of Americans have used a BNPL service like Klarna or Affirm and close to a quarter (23%) have had three or more active BNPL loans at one time.
First introduced in 2019, the BNPL phenomenon has grown from standalone providers to retailers like Walmart and Apple, and even online giants like Amazon and DoorDash. An estimated 91.5 million Americans will use BNPL in 2025.
0% to 29.99%
No predefined spending limit
1 to 24 months
Late fees up to $35
Accepted at more than 450,000 merchants, including Amazon, Walmart and Target. Through the Klarna card, you can buy from retailers that aren't integrated with the company.
0% to 36%
One to 48 months
There are no late fees, but making late payments can affect your ability to get a loan in the future and possibly your credit score.
Customers are only refunded the principal amount, so if you don't have a 0% loan, you won't be refunded for the interest you paid before making the return.
Affirm has more than 245,000 merchants including Amazon, Peloton, adidas and Target. Through affirm.com or the Affirm app, consumers are also able to use the BNPL option at any retailer, either online or in-store, that aren't integrated with the company. Consumers will receive a single-use virtual card to pay for their purchases.
Up to $25,000 on a purchase.
BNPL is a form of short-term installment loan that allows you to complete the sales transaction and receive the goods or services while breaking down payment into several smaller increments. The first payment is due at checkout, followed by regular installments until the balance is paid off.
Most BNPL services offer "pay-in-four" installment plans, which set payments two to four weeks apart, matching many people's pay periods.
At checkout, you may see the option to pay in installments. If you select it, you'll be directed to fill out an application with personal details like your name, contact info, Social Security number and chosen payment method.
The BNPL provider conducts a soft credit check that won't hurt your credit score and, if you're approved, will present you with a payment plan.
If you use a pay-in-four BNPL plan to purchase an $800 iPhone, for example, you would pay $200 at checkout. You'd then make $200 payments every two weeks until the phone was paid for in six weeks.
The pay-in-four plan doesn't usually include interest, but BNPL plans with longer repayment terms can charge annual percentage rates as high as 36%.
You could also be hit with late or rescheduling fees, which can be $10 or more depending on your provider.
While traditional forms of financing, like credit cards and personal loans, appear on your credit reports and are factored into your credit score, the picture for BNPL is less clear.
FICO said it would begin including BNPL information in credit scores in fall 2025, but top providers like Klarna and Afterpay say they won't send data to the credit bureaus for consideration.
0%
Afterpay only offers 1 loan option: Customers can make 4 installment payments over 6 weeks. You have to make one down payment (typically 25% of the order), and then a payment once every two weeks.
Afterpay does charge late fees: $8 or 25% of the transaction, whichever is less.
In order to return items, you'll have to go through the merchant first. Since you don't pay interest on your Afterpay loan, you don't have to worry about not being refunded for interest. Afterpay also offers partial refunds on orders. However, you will still be on the hook for payments until the merchant has accepted and processed the return.
Approximately 100,000 merchants globally. Consumers can also use the Afterpay Card to pay for purchases in store. However, this is only available for some customers to use at select retailers such as Amazon, CVS, Target, Nordstrom and Macy's.
The amount of credit you can access depends on how long you've been an Afterpay customer and on whether you're making your payments on time and in full. A new user will be able to spend less than someone with a longer history. The more you use Afterpay, the more you can spend with it.
Affirm has been sending its loan data to Experian, Equifax and TransUnion and is working with FICO to develop credit score models that include its BNPL data. But it's not clear if banks and other lenders would use that model when assessing a customer's creditworthiness.
However it pans out, paying your BNPL installments on time and in full will protect your credit score. In addition, try to only take out one BNPL loan at a time.
BNPL can be a helpful way to break larger payments into more manageable increments without the risk of being hit with enormous interest rates. But that same convenience can make them a risky proposition if you're not confident you can make timely payments. BNPL loans can cloud your idea of your budget, or tempt you to take out multiple short-term loans at once.
Read on: The best buy now, pay later apps
Lending Tree found that 23% of BNPL users had three or more loans active at one time and 41% paid one of their BNPL bills late.
In addition, returning items bought via BNPL can be difficult, so make sure you're certain about your purchases.
There are advantages and drawbacks to consider before using BNPL.
Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) is a short-term loan that lets you break a bill into smaller installments instead of paying in full. It's typically split into four payments paid over six weeks, with the first payment due at checkout.
It may. FICO will start including include BNPL in credit scores in late 2025. But several BNPL companies say they won't be sending loan data to the major credit bureaus for consideration.
Yes, when you choose to take out a BNPL loan, your first payment will be due at checkout.
BNPL providers primarily make money off of fees from retailers. Stores and sites that accept BNPL must pay a fee for each transaction. In addition, some BNPL charge late fees and some longer-term loans may have interest charges.
Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox. Sign up here.
At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every personal finance article is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors. While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties, and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick threatens Harvard University's patent authority
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is threatening to take over hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of Harvard University patents and other inventions whose creation was funded by taxpayers, according to a Friday letter reviewed by The Post. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick fired off the missive to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding a full accounting of the federal money that went to the Ivy League school's patents by Sept. 5. Lutnick is threatening to reclaim hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Harvard patents for the taxpayers. AP Advertisement 'The Department is also initiating the 'march-in' process under the Bayh-Dole Act pursuant to which the U.S. government intends to to grant third-party licenses to Harvard's patents or take title where Harvard has failed timely to disclose or elect title to inventions,' the letter stated. The law forces inventors to disclose which federal grants resulted in patents and submit timely reports about how the patents are being used — with some provisions for 'products based on the inventions' to ensure the items are 'manufactured substantially within the US,' a senior administration official said, adding that the 1980 law also states that Americans should reap the benefits from such inventions. The law forces inventors to disclose which federal grants resulted in patents. AP Lutnick accused the Cambridge, Mass., university of having 'failed to live up to its obligations to the American taxpayer' with its patent authority. Advertisement A failure to comply with the Act's terms allows the federal government to take ownership of a university's patents and/or issue third-party licenses. The Post reached out to Harvard reps for comment.


Politico
4 minutes ago
- Politico
Inside the White House Energy Dominance Council
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben In the months since President DONALD TRUMP returned to office, a little-known but deeply influential body inside the White House has been quietly driving one of Trump's biggest policy ambitions: Making the United States 'energy dominant' by providing affordable, reliable energy to Americans while still generating enough electricity to power the boom in artificial intelligence. This Energy Dominance Council, first announced in November with Interior Secretary DOUG BURGUM as director and Energy Secretary CHRIS WRIGHT as deputy, is modeled after the national security and economic councils. It is tasked with coordinating the federal government — from the Department of Energy to the Department of Agriculture to the State Department — toward achieving those goals. The goal is to expedite projects, said RICHARD GOLDBERG, the senior counselor who helped conceive of and stood up the council. The council has been working with private enterprise to dramatically reduce the time it takes to get a project off the ground — from years, he said, to days. It's part of a larger administration drive to cut the red tape it believes stymies innovation. But environmental groups and renewable energy executives have taken the White House to task for refusing to include wind and solar power projects, two of the fastest and cheapest ways to increase energy production, in their energy dominance plans. That approach could haunt the administration, critics warn, as electricity prices rise, in part because of the high demand for power from the data centers used to fuel AI. Trump's focus on keeping oil prices down could also cause the White House to stumble on the president's promise to boost production — oil companies are laying off employees and the number of barrels the United States is producing is starting to fall after reaching a record high in March. West Wing Playbook sat down with Goldberg to discuss the council's mission, structure, and how it's navigating the challenge of meeting America's growing energy demand. He just wrapped up his service as a special government employee. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. Let's start with the big picture. What is the Energy Dominance Council, and how does it work inside the White House? It's the first time in history that we've created a dedicated energy dominance council that is tasked with carrying out the president's objectives to make America energy dominant. That means everything that is required to have enough energy to provide reliable and affordable energy for all Americans, have enough energy to win the AI arms race against China, have a US-led energy supply chain that hooks allies to the United States and unhooks people from our adversaries, and having enough energy to promote peace stability while managing threats and having maximum flexibility in times of conflict. How is the council structured? Who's actually doing the day-to-day work? The council is less than 10 very committed patriotic Americans working out of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. It's run by an executive director who's a deputy assistant to the president, and supported by two deputies who are special assistants to the president. They are managing projects on a daily basis. We have a dedicated policy lead just working oil and gas issues all day long. There's a policy lead working on power issues and all that power encompasses, and that includes nuclear power, coal power and electricity to power AI and what that means as far as maintaining and preserving, strengthening the grid today. A policy lead on mining and critical minerals was a very important addition that the president made to the council's mandate. How are you executing on that vision for the president? The message is the Energy Dominance Council is open for business. You just have to call and say, you have a project, you have something that we're working on that is a new build, a new mine, a new dig, a new connection, a new pipeline, a new export terminal, you name it, and that it will contribute to energy dominance in the following ways. It will make sure we are adding reliable baseload energy to our grid in the following ways. This is the focal point of the entire U.S. government to say, what do you need from the U.S. government to make your project happen in 14 or 28 days instead of five or 10 years or 30 years? Is it permitting assistance? Is it financing assistance? Is it other regulatory reviews that have become so burdensome over many years? What financing tools are available to companies seeking federal support? The Energy Department's loan program is well known, but there's also the Department of Defense's defense production authorities, the Export-Import Bank, the Development Finance Corporation and others. The council helps projects navigate this web. We've also ramped up investment in critical minerals, including taking the unprecedented step of having the U.S. government take equity in strategic mining projects like Mountain Pass [the only operating rare-earth mine in the United States]. What's the Council's emergency plan if we do see energy prices spike or grid failures this summer? We're working to prevent that from happening in the first place. There are only two major reasons why that might happen right now. One is you keep closing down coal plants that are keeping the grid stable in certain areas of high demand, you have states that just keep pushing forward on wind and solar with state support of some kind and connecting it to the grid and making their grid over reliant on it. Or you have one of these hyper scalers try to connect into an existing grid with just more power needs than you know could possibly happen. But the president is not going to allow that to happen, I'm very confident. If he sees any knuckleheads getting in the way that could cause it to happen, he's going to look at any possible authority that he has to break the log jam. In the event that energy prices do spike, do you think the administration would review its stance on wind and solar? I think it's important to understand that we have been put on a trajectory, on the grid and on prices by policy decisions made for many years embracing intermittent and unreliable sources of energy. And so when we start seeing stress in the grid today, this is a grid that the president inherited. I understand the political strategy from the wind and solar industry to look at an immediate moment of crisis or a rise in price or anything like that that could ever happen and say, 'Oh, it's because you're de-prioritizing wind and solar.' That's not why it's happening, and it's not the solution, we will absolutely see higher prices and grid failures if we reverse course. We need heavy baseload energy pumped into the grid to not just win the air arms race, but keep the lights on today. I've heard some buzz recently on geothermal. Where is the administration on this form of energy? It has potential. DOE is looking at this and working on this. It is absolutely part of the council's mandate and focus. You know, we just finished putting the finishing touches on having a challenge coin for the council and geothermal is represented on the coin. Europe promised to spend $750 billion over three years on purchases of U.S. energy. Does the U.S. have enough oil, gas and other energy commodities to meet that price tag? The answer is we have availability of supply today to increase sales abroad, increase exports across Europe and the Asia Pacific as well. And we have a supply curve that will continue to increase over the years ahead to both provide for the U.S. consumer and the increased demand that we're seeing across the globe for us. We need to continue to build out both the export infrastructure and help our potential customers abroad make sure that they're building out their infrastructure for import facilities and floating regasification units. We have American companies involved in all of that that can help. MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which former president was really weirded out by fish? (Answer at bottom.) Agenda Setting RUIN THE BRUINS: The White House is seeking a $1 billion settlement from the University of California, Los Angeles, our JUAN PEREZ JR. reports. The move comes after the administration last week froze nearly $600 million in funding to the school. University of California President JAMES B. MILLIKEN said in a statement the school was reviewing the proposal but that a settlement of that size would 'devastate' the university. SELL SELL SELL?: Trump is considering selling stock in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac later this year, our KATHERINE HAPGOOD reports. The details of a potential public offering would value the two companies at around $500 billion and involve selling 5 to 15 percent of their stock. It is unclear whether Fannie and Freddie will remain under government conservatorship. 'The president is weighing all his options,' a senior administration official said today. The Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Treasury Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. EDITED HISTORY: The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History today revealed an updated version of its impeachment exhibit that now includes context about Trump's impeachments, WaPo's JANAY KINGSBERRY and MAURA JUDKIS report. The change comes after a placard with Trump's name was removed from the exhibit following a Smithsonian review of the museum's content prompted by the White House. 'The updated display now reflects all presidential impeachments,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'Adhering to principles foundational to our role as the nation's museum, we take great care to ensure that what we present to the public reflects both intellectual integrity and thoughtful design.' WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT ANOTHER IRS SHAKEUP: Trump is replacing his Internal Revenue Service commissioner just two months into his tenure, Nicole and our BRIAN FALER report. BILLY LONG is expected to instead be named to an ambassadorship. It is unclear who will next lead the IRS, which has had six different leaders this year. Treasury Secretary SCOTT BESSENT will serve as the agency's acting commissioner, said the White House official, who was granted anonymity to discuss personnel moves. Knives Out EASIER SAID THAN DONE: The MAGA movement is escalating its calls to arrest Trump's opponents, from the Texas Democrats who bolted from the state to derail a redistricting vote to former President BARACK OBAMA. But those screaming the loudest appear likely to wind up disappointed, our KYLE CHENEY reports. It's a familiar refrain for Trump's second term: The far right lusts to see prominent Democrats or Trump adversaries hauled off in handcuffs, only to be let down when their revenge fantasies run into reality. 'They voted for that and now they realize they can't have retribution because it's not legally sound,' said GENE ROSSI, a white collar criminal defense lawyer who spent three decades at the Justice Department. SWISH SWISH, TISH: Speaking of political retribution, the U.S. attorney's office in Albany has issued at least two subpoenas to New York Attorney General LETITIA JAMES in recent days, our NICK REISMAN, JOSH GERSTEIN and ERICA ORDEN report. The subpoenas are an escalation of the Trump administration's scrutiny of James, who has positioned herself as a ferocious opponent of the president. One is focused on James' successful civil fraud case against Trump's businesses. The second stems from her high-profile fraud case against the National Rifle Association. In the Courts NOT SO FAST: A federal appeals court panel today threw out U.S. District Judge JAMES BOASBERG's bid to pursue criminal contempt for Trump administration officials he says defied his orders in March by sending 130 Venezuelan men to a prison in El Salvador, Kyle and Josh report. D.C. Circuit Judges GREGORY KATSAS and NEOMI RAO — both Trump appointees — overturned an order Boasberg issued in April initiating the potential contempt proceedings. The ruling can be appealed further. But if it remains in place, it appears to sharply diminish — but not completely rule out — the possibility that lawyers or other officials in the administration could face contempt charges over their conduct during the high-profile deportation showdown. What We're Reading Nobody Is Making Deals in Trump's Washington (Jim Secreto for POLITICO Magazine) I Helped Bury Stories About Trump. I Regret It. (Cameron Stracher for NYT Opinion) Veterans' Care at Risk Under Trump as Hundreds of Doctors and Nurses Reject Working at VA Hospitals (ProPublica's David Armstrong, Eric Umansky and Vernal Coleman) Could the U.S. Have Saved Navalny? (WSJ's Drew Hinshaw and Joe Parkinson) POTUS PUZZLER Former President GROVER CLEVELAND found fish more mysterious than humans, saying, 'No one has yet been wise enough to explain their ways or account for their conduct.' (Source: White House Historical Association)

Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why Instagram users think a new map feature is sharing their location, even though it isn't.
First things first: Does Meta's new Instagram Maps automatically share your location with everyone? No. It doesn't. The new maps feature, which rolled out this week, does not share your location by default. If you do want to share your location, it will only be visible to your Instagram friends, or a subset of them. Next: Is it reasonable for many Meta users to believe that Instagram Maps automatically shares their location with everyone? Yes. That makes quite a bit of sense. Which is why Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri seems to have spent much of the last two days trying to find every single person who's complaining about the new feature on Instagram and Threads, and explaining that they're wrong. There's a lot of this. And you can get a good sense of the anger the new map feature is generating by checking out this compilation of reactions, helpfully curated by Meta itself. Or, you can just check out Instagram's own Instagram account, which is currently devoted to explaining what it's doing, and not doing — turns out it's extra confusing, because some people who have tagged the location of a particular post are surprised that the post shows up on a map. But like I said: It shouldn't surprise Mosseri or anyone else at Meta when its users start posting about a new, seemingly super-invasive feature the company has rolled out — even if those users are totally mistaken. That's because: 1) Most people don't have any idea of how their phones and software work. 2) Many people dislike Meta, and many think Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is untrustworthy or worse. You can fact-check either of these assertions pretty easily. For example: Ask someone if they think their phone is listening to them, so it can serve them ads. You'll find that many people — even people who ostensibly know something about tech — believe that's true, even though it most definitely is not. And if you don't believe Meta, you can easily find people who are not Meta fans who can also explain why it's not true. And if you want evidence of Meta and Zuckerberg's startling unpopularity, it's just a click away. A staggering two-thirds of Americans have a negative view of Zuckerberg, per Pew Research. And while we're here, we may as well note that social media is really good at spreading false messages about things that seem true, or that people want to seem true. This isn't something we're supposed to spend time worrying about in our new political climate, but it's always been true and it remains true. And it's one of the reasons why, periodically, Meta's users rise up to pass along proclamations about Meta's plans to screw them over. Or to pass along proclamations they think will protect them from Meta screwing them over, even though they're all gibberish. So when Meta rolled out a new feature that lets users share their location with their friends, or a subset of them, it was easy to predict that users might fear the worst — that Meta was doxxing its users without their permission. Perhaps that's why Instagram soft-peddled the feature's launch this week, by quietly listing it alongside other " new features to help you connect with friends," instead of a big flashy rollout. (A Meta rep sent me a statement explaining that location sharing is opt-in only, but I've already explained that above; I've asked Mosseri for comment.) The map itself isn't even obvious on the app at first glance. To find it, look for the messages button on the top right of the screen. My own map tells me that almost no one I follow on Instagram is using this thing, at all. Which makes me wonder why Instagram is bothering with this. Yes, Snap has its own version, and Meta has copied Snap in the past, but Snap's one has been around for years. Why now?