logo
Pakistan boosts military spending amid India tensions – DW – 06/10/2025

Pakistan boosts military spending amid India tensions – DW – 06/10/2025

DWa day ago

Pakistan has boosted defense spending despite battling severe economic challenges. The military has seen a surge in popularity since recent clashes with India.
Pakistan has decided to substantially hike its military spending in the wake of recent clashes with its archrival and nuclear-armed neighbor, India.
Islamabad raised next year's defense budget to 2.55 trillion Pakistani rupees ($9 billion), compared to 2.12 trillion in the fiscal year ending this month, marking a jump of roughly 20% year over year.
The announcement came as Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's government unveiled its annual federal budget for the 2025-26 fiscal year on Tuesday.
The surge in military spending came despite Pakistan battling weak finances and tremendous economic challenges.
In fact, the overall spending planned in the budget is down 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion).
Kashmir: Students struggle with trauma from air attacks
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Pakistan army's popularity surge
Pakistan and India recently witnessed a major flare-up in violence, the worst since the rivals' last open conflict in 1999, which sparked fears that it could spiral into a full-blown war.
It began after a deadly attack on Hindu tourists in Pahalgam town — in India-administered Kashmir — on April 22, in which 26 people, mostly Hindu men, were killed.
New Delhi blamed Islamabad for backing the attack, an allegation Pakistan denies.
The crisis soon spiraled into a major military confrontation between the two nations.
After four days of fierce fighting, however, both sides agreed to a ceasefire.
Against this backdrop, the higher defense expenditures "aren't in the least surprising," said Michael Kugelman, a South Asia expert at the Washington-based Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
"There's the fundamental issue of needing to ensure sufficient resources in the aftermath of a serious conflict with India. Furthermore, the military, which surely sought these increased expenditures, is emboldened following the conflict and will look to push its agenda more rigorously," Kugelman told DW.
Pakistan's military, the country's most powerful institution, had been unpopular in recent years, as many people accused it of meddling in politics and keeping the country's most popular politician, Imran Khan, away from power.
But the military establishment has seen a surge in popularity after the recent fighting.
"Finally, with the nation fully behind Pakistan in its fight with India, the civilian and military leadership know that they have the political space to take these types of measures," remarked Kugelman.
Pakistan celebrates its military after standoff with India
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Struggling with economic crisis
Pakistan has been dealing with an economic crisis for years, marked by high inflation, a depreciating currency and International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailouts.
As recently as 2023, the country was staring at risk defaulting on its debts.
But a multibillion-dollar support package from the IMF has helped steady the economy and bring inflation under control.
In January, Pakistan agreed to an unprecedented 10-year plan with the World Bank which will see $20 billion (€19.4 billion) worth of loans for the cash-strapped economy.
Sharif's government now projects 4.2% economic expansion in 2025-26.
Growth this fiscal year is likely to be 2.7%, against an initial target of 3.6% set in the budget last year.
The reliance on the IMF means that Islamabad will have to fulfil the institution's requirements for budget management and economic reforms.
The IMF has urged Pakistan to widen the tax base through reforms which include taxing agriculture, retail, and real estate.
Analysts say Sharif's government plans to offset the increased defense budget with cuts to spending in other areas, including welfare.
"It's a big hike and will have to be funded from somewhere. Of course, it will have implications for expenditure on the social sectors and on development schemes," Safiya Aftab, an Islamabad-based economist, told DW.
"It's unfortunate that Pakistan is once again implementing the economic policy of a security state, but to be honest, the situation on the borders makes this inevitable," she added.
What role does China play in India-Pakistan tensions?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
False priorities?
Pakistan has faced criticism for years for its heavy military spending at the expense of health, education and social welfare.
Kugelman said raising military expenditure while slashing spending on welfare services could worsen the hardships faced by common people who are already struggling to cope with the effects of the economic crisis.
"But those in power would contend that recent weeks show the imperative, for national security reasons, of these moves," he underlined.
"And they would also point to some improvements in macroeconomic stability, including lower inflation, though surely that wouldn't be a winning argument for the many Pakistanis still dealing with economic stress."
Farhan Bokhari, an economic analyst, said that there's broad support in Pakistan for higher defense spending, "for the moment," pointing to the tensions with India.
"But for the long term, Pakistan's economy needs to grow faster to be able to support larger defense spending in the years to come," he noted.
Edited by: Srinivas Mazumdaru

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US: Donald Trump makes broad use of presidential powers – DW – 06/11/2025
US: Donald Trump makes broad use of presidential powers – DW – 06/11/2025

DW

time23 minutes ago

  • DW

US: Donald Trump makes broad use of presidential powers – DW – 06/11/2025

President Donald Trump has deployed the military against protesters in Los Angeles and ignored federal court orders — moves that have prompted concern about the condition of democratic institutions in the United States. Tensions remain high in Los Angeles, California, where thousands of people have been protesting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. A curfew imposed by the city's mayor on Tuesday night brought some calm, but there are no signs of de-escalation. After deploying the National Guard, US President Donald Trump has now ordered the deployment of some 700 Marines — active-duty troops known for their rapid response and elite combat capabilities. According to a spokeswoman for the United States Northern Command, US troops will help protect federal buildings and personnel, including ICE agents. Since Friday, demonstrators have occupied the streets in Los Angeles, protesting ICE raids targeting individuals lacking proper immigration documentation. In some cases, masked ICE agents reportedly arrested people on the street. The crackdown reflects the Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration — and now the military has been called in by the president to assist. Presidential powers and the Insurrection Act Normally, the president cannot unilaterally deploy the National Guard within a US state; governors must authorize such deployments. California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressly rejected the need for the National Guard and has sued the Trump administration. Downtown LA under curfew after days of protests To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, under the Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to deploy military forces without the governor's consent in cases of rebellion or civil unrest. Trump's decision to invoke that authority is considered highly unusual, given the importance placed on states' rights in the US federal system. Governor Newsom has accused Trump of abusing executive power and warned that his actions threaten democratic norms. "California may be first, but it clearly won't end here," Newsom said, "Other states are next. Democracy is next." Trump sidelining the judicial branch Trump has repeatedly clashed with the US judicial system during his first five months back in office. Early in his term, he authorized deportations that went forward despite federal court orders blocking them. Since March, more than 250 non-US citizens — whom Trump has labeled as terrorists — have been deported to El Salvador. Flights to El Salvador's infamous CECOT maximum-security prison reportedly continued even after a federal judge ordered them grounded. To justify the deportations, the Trump administration cited the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, arguing it allows for the removal of nationals from "hostile nations," without affording them a right to trial. The Trump administration claims those deported were affiliated with the transnational criminal group Tren de Argua. In the US system, the judiciary is one of three co-equal branches of government, alongside the executive and legislative branches. The balance among them is foundational to US democracy — critics say Trump is eroding that balance. Six of the nation's nine Supreme Court justices are conservatives, three were appointed by Trump. Will the 'principles of democracy' win out in the US? What about the legislative branch? Trump has largely bypassed Congress since returning to office in January, issuing 161 executive orders as of June 10 — more than any president in a similar time frame since World War II. His orders, which do not require House of Representatives or Senate approval, have had sweeping effects, from LGBTQ+ rights to trade policy. "Trump will definitely go down in history as the one who took executive power to its limits," wrote Patrick Malone, a professor of public administration and policy at American University in an email to DW. Malone questioned the legality of the president's mass firing of federal employees in the name of efficiency, for instance. "The question of legality of what this president has done are going to be in the courts for years to come," Malone said. He warned that the US democratic institutions are under serious pressure. One underlying issue, he said, is that many US laws were written for a nation vastly different from the one that exists today. But Malone is optimistic: "Institutions are generally quite difficult to topple. Hopefully, the principles of democracy will ultimately prevail." This article was published in German and translated by Jon Shelton.

Northern Ireland leaders urge end to anti-Romanian riots – DW – 06/11/2025
Northern Ireland leaders urge end to anti-Romanian riots – DW – 06/11/2025

DW

time3 hours ago

  • DW

Northern Ireland leaders urge end to anti-Romanian riots – DW – 06/11/2025

Police and political leaders have denounced "racist thuggery" after violent riots in Northern Ireland. Attacks on the Romanian community follow the arrest of two teenagers over the attempted rape of a young girl. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined Northern Ireland's political leaders on Wednesday in condemning violence and racially motivated unrest that left police injured and multiple homes and businesses damaged. Tensions have flared in Northern Ireland following the arrest and court appearance of two teenage boys charged in connection with a serious sexual assault on a teenage girl in Ballymena. What do we know about the Northern Ireland unrest? Police have not disclosed the ethnicity of the two teenage boys who remain in custody, but some of Monday's attacks targeted areas where Romanian migrants reside. During a court appearance on Monday, the pair of 14-year-olds charged requested a Romanian interpreter, sparking unrest in areas with large migrant populations. The violence was centered in the town of Ballymena, about 48 kilometers (30 miles) northwest of Belfast, and other locations. The protest was sparked over an alleged sexual assault on a young girl Image: Niall Carson/PA/AP/picture alliance Six people were arrested following a second consecutive night of rioting on Tuesday. The unrest, which left 15 police officers injured on Monday and 17 more the next night, involved rioters hurling petrol bombs, fireworks, and bricks at homes and businesses. Four houses were damaged by fire, and rioters also smashed windows and doors at homes and businesses. Leaders condemn 'racially motivated violence' and 'mob rule' Ministers from all parties in Northern Ireland's power-sharing executive condemned the violence in a joint statement on Wednesday. "We strongly condemn the racially motivated violence witnessed in recent days and make an urgent appeal for calm across society," the ministers said. "There can never be any justification for the violence that has taken place in recent days," said the leaders. Residents had been "terrorised," they said, as they urged people to reject the "divisive agenda being pushed by a destructive minority." Traditional foes such as the republican Sinn Fein and pro-UK Democratic Unionist Party joined in the statement. In Northern Ireland, Belfast's murals tell a new story To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Prime Minister Starmer echoed the message, denouncing the incidents. "I utterly condemn the violence that we have seen overnight in Ballymena and in other parts of Northern Ireland," Starmer told parliament. He added it was "absolutely vital" that police could investigate "rather than face mindless attacks as they seek to bring peace and order to keep people safe." Meanwhile, Northern Ireland's Chief Constable Jon Boutcher said: "Hate-fuelled acts and mob rule do nothing but tear at the fabric of our society — they resolve nothing and serve no one." The violence comes amid rising political tensions over immigration in the UK and neighboring Republic of Ireland. Edited by: Zac Crellin

US image takes a blow in many nations — study – DW – 06/11/2025
US image takes a blow in many nations — study – DW – 06/11/2025

DW

time5 hours ago

  • DW

US image takes a blow in many nations — study – DW – 06/11/2025

The US under President Donald Trump is losing popularity in a number of countries, a new study shows. But opinions on him and the country vary widely, in particular depending on ideological alignment. The United States is seeing a marked drop in popularity in many countries during the second term of President Donald Trump, according to a study by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center released on Wednesday. The survey, carried out in 24 countries, showed overall ratings of the US falling in 15 countries since last spring, with Mexico, Sweden, Poland and Canada displaying the biggest increase in negative views. Respondents were asked about overall views on the US and the state of its democracy as well as about their opinion of Trump, both with regard to his personal traits and his ability to handle major global issues. Most of the interviews were conducted after the notorious meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on February 28 and before Trump announced tariffs on countries around the world on April 2. Widespread decline in US image Mexico and Sweden were the two countries where the opinion of the US suffered most, with drops of 32 percentage points in positive ratings (from 61% to 29%) in the first and 28 percentage points (47% to 19%) in the second in comparison with 2024. US popularity among adults in Poland and Canada fell by more than 20 percentage points over the year in both countries. The fall in US popularity in Germany was also marked: from 49% to 33% (16 percentage points). Opinions about the US in the UK, Greece, Hungary, South Africa, Argentina and India showed little change. People in three countries — Israel, Nigeria and Turkey — became slightly more likely to give the US good marks. Israelis are US fans, Swedes are not Israel was the country with the highest percentage (83%) of people with a positive assessment of the US. Sweden had the most people who view the US unfavorably (79%). Despite the increase in popularity in Turkey, the country still has one of the most unfavorable opinions of the US, with just 25% of adults having a positive view of the country. In Germany, 66% had a negative view of the US. Europe swiftly responds to shifts in US foreign policy To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Generational, ideological divides Younger people (35 and below) in most countries surveyed had a more positive view of the US than those aged 50 and above. This was particularly noticeable in Brazil, with 73% of younger adults giving a positive assessment compared with 37% of older adults who have an unfavorable view. Political ideologies also played a large role in peoples' opinions. Among the 51% of people in Israel who say they are ideologically rightist, 97% had a favorable view of the US. South Africans angered by Trump's 'genocide' claims To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Australia also displayed a wide gap between those on the right, of whom 60% viewed the US positively, and those on the left, where the number dwindled to 12%. In Germany, supporters of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party were far more likely to have positive opinions of the US (63%) than those who do not back the party (25%). Trump a major factor The US president received mostly negative ratings in the survey, with more than half of adults in 19 of the countries saying they had little or no confidence in Trump's ability to lead world affairs. This is despite the fact that majorities in 18 countries viewed him as a "strong leader." The survey showed that a median of 34% of adults have a lot or some confidence in Trump's ability to give good leadership in world affairs, while 62%) have little or no confidence in him. His highest ratings came from Nigeria (79% confidence), Israel (69%), Kenya (64%), Hungary (53%) and India (52%). Adults in Mexico had the least confidence (8%), followed by Sweden (15%), Turkey (16%), Germany (18%) and Spain (19%). Low marks for Trump on climate change In 17 countries, men have more confidence in Trump than women, with this difference most marked in Sweden, Poland, and the UK. In Germany, the gender gap was 11 percentage points. Those on the right of the political spectrum also see him more positively. In all, 13 nations gave lower ratings for Trump than they did for his predecessor, Joe Biden, in 2024, but they are higher in six countries. The US is giving up on climate — others are cashing in To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Trump received his lowest marks on climate change policy, with a median of just 21% of people of the opinion that he can handle the challenges posed by global warming. Just 33% thought he could resolve the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and 29% the conflict between Israel and its neighbors. Edited by: Kieran Burke and Zac Crellin

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store