India should avoid rushing for trade pact with US, warn experts
The US has shot off letters to 24 countries and the European Union (EU) imposing tariffs that are as high as 50 per cent on Brazil. On its key trading partners like the EU and Mexico, 30 per cent duties have been proposed from August 1.
Economic think tank GTRI (Global Trade Research Initiative) said India must recognise that it is not alone in facing US pressure.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
The US is currently negotiating with over 20 countries and seeking concessions from more than 90.
"Yet most are resisting because they see these MASALA (Mutually Agreed Settlements Achieved through Leveraged Arm-twisting) deals for what they are politically driven, transactional demands offering no lasting trade certainty," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said.
Live Events
He added that both the EU and Mexico are major trade partners of the US, and Washington can impose tariffs on them to pressure them into quick deals, India cannot expect a balanced deal.
Another trade expert said India should tread cautiously while negotiating the trade pact with the US.
The expert added that Trump's trade threat is rapidly losing credibility as despite more than three months of pressure, only two countries -- the UK and Vietnam -- have agreed to the USA's one-sided terms.
From Japan and South Korea to the EU and Australia, countries are resisting Trump's trade deals that demand tariff cuts without reciprocal US concessions, mandate guaranteed purchases of American goods, and leave the door open for future tariffs even after a deal is signed, the GTRI said.
A team of Indian trade negotiators will soon visit Washington to further talks for the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA).
"India should stay the course and avoid trading away core sectors like agriculture. A hasty deal under pressure could have irreversible consequences, especially when such agreements may not survive the next shift in US politics," Srivastava said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran Claims Direct Hit On $15 MN U.S. Radar System In Qatar; Al Udeid Base ‘Damaged'
/ Jul 14, 2025, 09:32PM IST Iran has released what it claims is visual proof of a successful missile strike on a key U.S. military communications facility at Al Udeid Airbase in Qatar, the largest American base in the Middle East. A satellite image circulated by PressTV and Iran's embassy in India appears to show visible damage to a $15 million radar system, allegedly hit during Iran's June 23 retaliatory strike following the Iran-Israel conflict. Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Biden defends clemency orders, calls autopen use 'legal and justified'
Former US President Joe Biden has defended his end-of-term clemency decisions and dismissed criticism from incumbent President Donald Trump and his allies over the use of an autopen to sign official warrants. In a phone interview with The New York Times, Biden said he personally approved all commutations and pardons, despite not physically signing the documents himself. 'I made every single one of those. And — including the categories, when we set this up to begin with. And so — but I understand why Trump would think that, because obviously, I guess, he doesn't focus much. Anyway, so — yes, I made every decision.' Thousands received sentence reductions Biden's clemency actions covered three broad areas:- Around 1,500 individuals in pandemic-related home confinement were allowed to remain outside prison. Roughly 2,500 non-violent drug offenders had their sentences reduced to align with updated sentencing norms. 37 of the 40 federal death row inmates had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment without parole. Pardons were also granted to several individuals whose cases had drawn political attention, including members of the January 6 Capitol riot committee, Capitol Police officers who testified, Dr Anthony S Fauci, retired General Mark A Milley, and members of Biden's own family. Legal use of autopen defended Biden clarified the use of the autopen — an authorised mechanical signature tool — as a matter of practicality. 'Because there were a lot of them.' 'The autopen is, you know, legal. As you know, other presidents used it, including Trump. But the point is that, you know, we're talking about a whole lot of people.' Republicans have launched investigations, suggesting Biden's aides may have acted without authorisation. Mr Trump has labelled the clemency acts 'illegitimate'. But Biden rejected these claims outright. 'They're liars. They know it. They know, for certain. I mean, this is — look, what they, they've had a pretty good thing going here. They've done so badly. They've lied so consistently about almost everything they're doing. The best thing they can do is try to change the focus and focus on something else. And this is a — I think that's what this is about.' 'It's — you know — it's consistent with Trump's game plan all along. I mean, if I — I don't expect you to answer any questions — but if I told you three years ago, we'd have a president doing this, I think you'd look at me in the eye and say, 'What, are you, crazy?'' Pre-emptive pardons for family Acknowledging that he issued pardons to family members, Biden said it was a precautionary measure against politically motivated investigations. 'In terms of my family — he — goes after me through my family. I know how vindictive he is. I mean, everybody knows how vindictive he is. So we knew that they'd do what they're doing now. And my family didn't do anything wrong. My sister, my brother-in-law, my — my brother, etc... I just, I just know how he operates. And so I made — but I consciously made all those decisions, among others.' Strategy behind clemency Biden explained that he had categorised clemency cases and communicated his decisions clearly to aides, especially in high-profile matters like those involving General Milley and members of the Capitol riot committee. 'Well, first of all, there's categories. So, you know, they aren't reading names off for the commutations for those who had been home confinement for, during the pandemic. So the only things that really we read off names for were, for example, you know, was I, what was I going to do about, for example, Mark Milley?' 'Mark's a good guy. We know how vindictive Trump is and I've no doubt they would have gone after Mark for no good reason. The general, you know. So they may read off his name — what'd I want? I told them I wanted to make sure he had a pardon because I knew exactly what Trump would do — without any merit, I might add.' 'And you know, you know, members of the January 6 committee — it's just, there were no — I was deeply involved. I laid out a strategy how I want to go about these, dealing with pardons and commutations. I was — and I pulled the team in to say this is how I want to get it done generically and then specifically. And so, you know, that's just — this is how it worked.' Reversal on Don Siegelman Biden also spoke about reversing his decision to pardon former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman. 'Look, Siegelman was out of jail. He had served his time. And there was no — so he wasn't in jeopardy. And what I concluded was, there's — and these aren't easy decisions, but there are a lot of people who are considered for pardons. And I was proud I ran the process I ran.' 'These decisions took time. In this case, I viewed the facts, reflected on it a bit more, and deliberated more on it with my team and decided not to grant the pardon. And I didn't make this decision quickly. I made it thoroughly and after significant discussion.' Last-minute pardon backed by Clyburn Biden confirmed he had added a pardon for a former South Carolina official after lobbying from Representative Jim Clyburn. 'The case that Jim — and I have great faith in Jim — the case he made, the plea he made at the very end, was that — he made a compelling case that he was a person who had dedicated his life to public service, Cromartie. Since his release from prison, he became really involved in the community, helping underprivileged kids, staying active with his church. And he's someone who has been praised for his leadership and compassion for others.' 'So the very thing that he sort of got in trouble for, he was not only — served time, but he was making up for it. And I believed granting him a pardon was the right thing to do. There were decisions I made — this decision I made quickly and easily as Jim laid the case out.' 'What he was doing now, that was almost a continuation of his apology for what the hell happened when he committed the offence. So I agreed with Jim and I pardoned him. And he's still decent — this guy still is engaged, stays engaged in the community.' 3 death row cases left unchanged Explaining why three death-row inmates did not receive clemency, Biden said the crimes involved broader national trauma and terrorism. 'Those three, because they became — they were involved in what were major, major issues relating to terrorism and crimes that were — had national implications. One — for example, I was deeply involved in the one having to do with the church and I was down there.' 'It just seemed to me that it was going to be — it was just a bridge too far. And so that's why I didn't pardon those three, because they had a national implication that stood for things beyond the crime they committed. It was a reflection of what they did to the entire nation and the community.' 'And so, that's what I withheld from them. I spoke to the pope about this, by the way. I was — I had a discussion about — he called me to congratulate me on keeping my word about not supporting the death penalty.' 'But I told him I couldn't do the last three. And, that's, that, that's the reason because it's sort of like, you know, the guy who, — you know, I'm making this up — assassinates Abraham Lincoln. You don't, you know, you can't pardon him because there's such a gigantic implication for things that go well beyond that individual murder. That was my decision, anyway. Some thought I should have, but I decided not to do those three.'
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
India, US talks for proposed trade pact going on at a very fast pace: Piyush Goyal
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The negotiations between India and the US for a proposed trade agreement are going at a fast pace, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said on Indian team has reached Washington for the next round of talks on the first tranche of the bilateral trade agreement."Negotiations are going on at a very fast pace and in the spirit of mutual cooperation so that we can come out with a win-win trade complementing agreement with the United States," Goyal told reporters Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal at a separate event said that negotiations for proposed trade agreements with the European Union (EU) and the US are going said that the free trade agreements (FTAs) that India is doing are one of the key enablers to promote global capability centres (GCCs) in the country."So if you look at the free trade agreements today, which we are doing with the UK, which we have just announced, with European Union (EU), which is going on, with the US again discussions are on with several other countries in the world," Barthwal said here at CII GCC Business Summit and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). They are targeting to conclude the first phase of the pact by fall (September-October) of this India and the EU are also negotiating an June 2022, India and the 27-nation EU bloc resumed negotiations for a comprehensive free trade agreement, an investment protection agreement and a pact on geographical indications (GIs) after a gap of over eight talks stalled in 2013 due to differences over the level of opening up of the markets. India and the EU are targeting to conclude the free trade deal by the end of this the secretary said that today's agreements are different from the traditional FTAs, which were confined to traditional trade, tariffs and manufacturing. The new pacts are a more complex set of agreements which include services, a regulatory system in services, including the FDI (foreign direct investment)."Those are being looked at (in the new pacts)," he said, adding that now there is also an institutional mechanism in these pacts to look at issues like harmonising regulations and these are important facets of GCCs, he said, adding that modern FTAs will lead to the innovation corridor, which will facilitate GCCs in India "We are looking at the IPR (intellectual property rights) chapters. We are looking at what the coordination mechanism will be in case disputes arise. That is another area which we look at in FTAs," the secretary the new age pacts focus on principles of digital trade, which the partner countries have to adopt."If there is a data localisation or data privacy laws, then how will they be looked at. That is another angle, which we define in these FTAs," he new trade agreements, Barthwal said, are addressing a whole gamut of issues. "And therefore, it is taking a lot of time when we do these FTAs. There are detailed discussions, detailed deliberations, and detailed stakeholder consultation," he added that in the FTA with the UK, there is a chapter on innovation, which was not the case earlier. There is also a mechanism to set up innovation working groups under that deal, which was announced on May 6, but has not yet been signed."The ultimate point of these FTAs is that once these are (businesses) will get certainty about those regulations, because those regulations are not going to change unless and until you have agreed differently. And it gives certainty," Barthwal said.
