Taylor Swift Blackmailed? Blake Lively's Lawyer Decries 'Scandalous' Claims By Justin Baldoni's Team
The Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively battle over what went down on It Ends With Us and the alleged astroturfing that followed is starting to seem to look a lot like the Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Cassie Ventura case, at least in terms of tactics and texts.
In a shocking letter today to the federal judge overseeing the $400 million and more lawsuits between the IEWU stars, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times, various PR firms, and Baldoni's Wayfarer Studios, the Jane the Virgin alum's main lawyer accuses Lively of threatening to shame her 'Fortnight' pal unless Swift publicly offers strong support. A claim that Lively and Reynolds' lawyer Micheal Gottieb initially said was 'completely false.' Now another lawyer for the Another Simple Favor star is calling an attempt by Bryan Freedman 'to launder scandalous and defamatory allegations about Ms. Lively and opposing counsel into the press.'
More from Deadline
A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media
Cruel Subpoena Summer: Taylor Swift Dragged Directly Into Pal Blake Lively's Battle With Justin Baldoni
Cassie Ventura Got $20M From Sean Combs In 2023 Settlement, She Reveals In Trial Testimony - Update
In a blistering letter of their own just filed with the court and Judge Lewis J. Liman, Lively and Reynolds' Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Manatt, Phelps & Phillips attorney want the correspondence from the pugilistic Freedman struck from the docket — and that might not be the end of it.
'On behalf of our client, Blake Lively, we respectfully move to strike the letter signed by Mr. Bryan Freedman and filed earlier today,' Manatt's Esra Hudson exclaims. 'That letter, which was not filed with any evidentiary support of any kind, much less anything under oath, falsely accuses Ms. Lively, and her counsel, of engaging in 'witness tampering and evidence spoliation' based on an undisclosed anonymous source,' Hudson continues, after Freedman and his Baldoni crew have owned the media with Swift and Lively catfight stories for the past two hours.
'It should be unnecessary to respond to anonymously sourced, baseless, allegations recklessly leveled without any supporting evidence,' the sanctions-threatening letter adds. It is worth stating for the record, however, that each of the allegations in the Freedman Letter is unequivocally and demonstrably false.' While there has been silence from the previously subpoena-served Swift's side amidst all this Wednesday, Lively's lawyers remind Judge Liman of his stern February 3 warning to all sides in this high profile matter that there would be consequences if he saw the case 'litigated in the press.'
Heading towards the March 9, 2026 trial start of this matter, that has only just been replaced in the headlines by Sean 'Diddy' Combs' ongoing sex-trafficking trial taking place in lower Manhattan starting this week, only fools and horses would not say this matter hasn't been litigated in the press for ages — and I don't mean fellow defendant the Gray Lady.
Certainly, Freedman is a skilled practitioners of legal fireworks that light up the sky and capture everyone's attention – today more than ever as his communication with Judge Liman was picked up worldwide.
It's not hard to see why.
Freedman's letter in wanting the Swift subpoena enforced says: 'Specifically, the Wayfarer Parties' counsel are informed and believe, based on information from a source who is highly likely to have reliable information, that (i) Ms. Lively requested that Taylor Swift delete their text messages; (ii) Michael Gottlieb of Willkie Farr, counsel for the Lively Defendants, contacted a Venable attorney who represents Ms. Swift and demanded that Ms. Swift release a statement of support for Ms. Lively, intimating that, if Ms. Swift refused to do so, private text messages of a personal nature in Ms. Lively's possession would be released. The Wayfarer Parties' counsel are further informed and believe that a representative of Ms. Swift addressed these inappropriate and apparently extortionate threats in at least one written communication transmitted to Mr. Gottlieb. It is those communications that the Wayfarer Parties seek to obtain by way of subpoena, as they would evidence an attempt to intimidate and coerce a percipient witness in this litigation.'
While there is so far no actual evidence of Lively strong arming one of her supposed best and most famous friends in the very manner Diddy is accused of in his criminal case, the fact is IEWU soundtrack contributor Swift has been on the periphery of this multi-million dollar and reputation defining case almost from the jump. Not mentioned when Lively on December 20 filed a sexual harassment and retaliation complaint against Lively, his Wayfarer Studios, execs, and PR chiefs Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel with California's Civil Rights Department. Swift was all but named dropped by Lively as one of her 'Dragons,' along with hubby and Deadpool star Reynolds, in texts that were released by both sides in the IEWU dispute. In no small gesture at the top of fame and cultural real power last summer, Swift also provided her pal's edit of the Sony distributed and Baldoni directed domestic violence themed film with some superstar juice with her 'My Tears Ricochet' tune.
Managing to directly stay out the Lively-Baldoni fray (though not the tabloids' speculations of the state of Lively-Swift friendship) until recently, the controversy adverse Swift was quick to slap down the subpoena Baldoni's team served on her at the beginning of this month. 'Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case,' the Eras Tour performer's spokesperson told Deadline on May 9.
When this is all said and done, after the trial is finished, someone is going to be left with quite the reputation, and I don't mean Swift's 2017 album.
Best of Deadline
Where To Watch All The 'Mission: Impossible' Movies: Streamers With Multiple Films In The Franchise
Everything We Know About 'My Life With The Walter Boys' Season 2 So Far
'Bridgerton' Season 4: Everything We Know So Far
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times
Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times was dismissed by a judge on Monday, according to court documents obtained by HuffPost. The news marks the latest in the tumultuous back-and-forth legal battle that stems from the film 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni directed and starred in. Lively, who is married to Reynolds, starred in the film as well. Baldoni filed a $400 million countersuit against Lively, Reynolds and Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, in January, claiming that they attempted to extort and defame him with sexual harassment claims and that the two actors tried to take control of his film. He also claimed in a defamation suit that the Times had falsely reported that he had created a smear campaign against Lively. Baldoni's countersuit also lists the film producer Jamey Heath, Wayfarer partner Steve Sarowitz and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel as plaintiffs. However, Judge Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan argued that Lively had relied on 'legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions' rather than extortion. Liman also said that Lively's statements accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment are privileged because they were made in a California Civil Rights Department complaint and therefore not considered defamation. Additionally, Liman wrote that Baldoni's claim that Reynolds, Sloane and the Times defamed him does not hold up because the suit does not prove that any of the parties 'seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them.' In a 132-page opinion, the judge explicitly wrote that the Wayfarer Parties, which refer to Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and others in the company, 'have not adequately alleged that Lively's threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions. Additionally, the Wayfarer Parties have not shown that some of Lively's allegedly extortionate acts damaged them.' (Baldoni is a co-founder of Wayfarer Studios, an independent production studio involved in the film.) 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged,' the opinion also stated. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' 'The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively's version of events,' Liman added.'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.' While the judge dismissed the lawsuit, Baldoni is allowed to file an amended complaint by June 23. However, he may only include claims relevant to breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with a contract, which were also included in his complaint. Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb told HuffPost that the ruling is 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it,' the statement continued. The attorneys said they will be seeking attorneys' fees, and treble and punitive damages from Baldoni and other Wayfarer Studios parties. Sigrid McCawley, Sloane's attorney, told HuffPost in a statement on Monday that she was 'wrongfully dragged' into this lawsuit in an attempt to damage her reputation. 'Today's decision by the Court makes clear that Sloane did nothing wrong. Sloane stands fully vindicated, and justice has been served,' McCawley said. The New York Times celebrated the lawsuit's dismissal in a statement to HuffPost. 'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting,' a spokesperson for the Times said. 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.' Lively's lawsuit was filed in New York in December. 'For years prior to the release of the Film, Mr. Baldoni portrayed himself asa leader of the male feminist movement, writing books, hosting podcasts, and holding TED Talks on the topic. In reality, however, Mr. Baldoni's public persona is a stark contrast to his private behavior, which is replete with hypocrisy, misogyny, and retaliation,' Lively's attorneys wrote in her complaint. Baldoni's countersuit argued that Lively and Reynolds used their prestige 'to steal an entire film right out of the hands of its director and production studio.' It added that Baldoni and Wayfarer only took legal action because Lively had 'unequivocally left them with no choice, not only to set the record straight…But also to put the spotlight on the parts of Hollywood that they have dedicated their careers to being the antithesis of.' The trial is expected to start in March 2026. Representatives for Reynolds, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios did not immediately reply to HuffPost's request for comment. Blake Lively's Lawyer Accused Of Threatening To Leak Taylor Swift Texts Blake Lively Accuses Justin Baldoni Of Making Women On 'It Ends With Us' Set Uncomfortable Justin Baldoni Reportedly Admits He 'F***ed Up' In Voice Note Apology To Blake Lively
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scooter Braun Shares How ‘Deeply Unfair' Backlash to Taylor Swift Feud Turned Out to Be a ‘Gift'
Now that Taylor Swift has bought back the masters to her first six albums, Scooter Braun is reflecting on his part in the yearslong back-and-forth he ignited by purchasing the singer's catalog from Scott Borchetta back in 2019. While speaking about the feud during an episode of The Diary of a CEO posted Monday (June 9), the music mogul began by sharing how he'd originally had high hopes for his relationship with the 'Fortnight' singer after he bought Big Machine Label Group from Borchetta for a reported $300 million six years ago, gaining ownership of Swift's back catalog in the process. Shortly afterward, the pop star shared a Tumblr post calling the sale her 'worst case scenario,' accusing Braun of 'incessant, manipulative bullying' over the years and including a screenshot of a post from Justin Bieber featuring Braun and Kanye West with the caption, 'Taylor swift what's up.' More from Billboard Taylor Swift & Scooter Braun's Feud: A Timeline Kylie Minogue Joins Prestigious '21 Club' at London's O2 Arena Kevin Parker Previews New Tame Impala Music During Barcelona DJ Set Braun says that he was 'shocked' when he read Swift's post. 'When I bought Big Machine, I thought I was going to work with all the artists on Big Machine,' Braun recalled on the podcast. '[Taylor] and I had only met three or four times. One of the times, it was years earlier, it was really a great engagement. She invited me to her party. We respected each other.' 'In between that time since I'd seen her last, I started managing Kanye West,' he continued. 'I managed Justin Bieber. I knew she didn't get along with them. This is where my arrogance came in. I had a feeling she probably didn't like me because I managed them, but I thought once this announcement happened, she'd talk to me, see who I am, and we'd work together. Then this Tumblr comes out, and it says all of this stuff, and I was just shocked.' The involved parties would spend the next few weeks disputing details of how the deal went down — including whether or not Swift found out about the purchase only as it was publicly announced, which she claimed in her post — with Braun later writing in an open letter of his own that he was 'disappointed' in the 14-time Grammy winner for having 'remained silent' despite his family receiving 'numerous death threats' amid the debacle. Swift would later announce plans to re-record her old albums, while the retired manager eventually sold her catalog again to Shamrock Holdings. 'I couldn't fix the relationship that I didn't have, but then I was able to figure out, 'You know what? We'll sell it,'' Braun said of selling to Shamrock on The Diary of a CEO. 'In the world of streaming, the re-records will only help the old catalog as much as they help the new catalog. Both will get a bump. I showed how everyone can be a winner here, and I was able to sell the catalog and — I don't want to go into too much detail, but it's now come out very factually that I did offer it [to Taylor] … multiple times in that process. They said no, I sold to someone else, washed my hands of it and moved on.' Swift has also previously addressed Braun's alleged offers to sell her catalog back to her, though she recalls it much differently. According to the 'Karma' artist, his team had asked her to sign a non-disclosure agreement before she could even 'bid on [her] own work.' 'He would never even quote my team a price,' Swift wrote in a post on X at the time. 'These master recordings were not for sale to me.' Billboard has reached out to Swift's rep for comment. In any case, the musician walked away from negotiations and hammered away at her Taylor's Version re-recording project, releasing highly successful new versions of Fearless, Speak Now, Red and 1989 between 2021 and 2023. Everything came full circle at the end of May 2025, when Swift announced that she'd finally been able to acquire her old catalog from Shamrock, about which Braun told Billboard at the time, 'I am happy for her.' On the podcast, Braun reiterated that he only hopes for the best for Swift. 'I can't worry about everyone's niece being mad at me,' he quipped. 'What I gotta do is show up for my niece, and I gotta show up for my friends and my family. I wish everyone involved, across the board, whether I know them or not, good wishes.' Even so, the businessman confessed that the fallout was hard on his mental health and personal life, especially as he was going through a tough time with then-wife Yael Cohen that would eventually lead to a divorce. 'When something happens to you that feels deeply unfair, and you can't fix it, then you've really got to look at everything and realize the role you played in this or that, who you want to be,' Braun said of his disagreement with Swift. 'Everything in life is a gift,' he added. 'Having that experience allows me to have empathy for people I worked with. I never knew what it was like to be on the global stage like that. I never knew what criticism like that felt like.' Watch Braun's full interview on The Diary of a CEO above. Best of Billboard Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1 Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
N.Y. judge tosses Justin Baldoni's $400M lawsuit against Blake Lively
June 9 (UPI) -- A New York judge on Monday dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400M lawsuit against actress Blake Lively. Federal Judge Lewis Liman of New York's southern district accepted the motion to dismiss the multi-million-dollar counter lawsuit filed by Baldoni that alleged defamation and extortion. In addition, the judge, likewise, tossed out a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. "The [parties in the suit known as the] Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged," Liman wrote in his 132-page ruling. "The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail," the judge added. "Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety." However, Liman noted that Baldoni, 41, will still have the legal option to amend his claims for breach of implied covenant and contract interference with a June 23 deadline. The It Ends With Us director Baldoni was accused in December of sexual harassment by his co-star Lively, which Baldoni claimed was "categorically false." In January, Baldoni filed a $250 million libel lawsuit against the New York Times over an article that "falsely" detailed Lively's allegations during filming. Lively, 37, claimed in her California Civil Rights Department complaint filed Dec. 20 that the harassment damaged her business and caused her family, including husband actor Ryan Reynolds, "severe emotional distress" and after the suit alleged Reynolds called Baldoni a "sexual predator." On Monday, lawyers for Lively -- Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb -- called the court decision a "total victory and a complete vindication." "As we have said from day one, this $400 million lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," they said in the statement, adding they look forward to the "next round," which will be to seek attorney fees, treble and punitive damages. Discovery+ announced plans in March to air a docuseries in Britain this month called Baldoni vs. Lively: A Hollywood Feud. Meanwhile, the trial for Baldoni and Lively, which was scheduled for March 26, was expected to see both names testify.
