Women redefining philanthropy sector despite barriers
Over the next two decades, women are poised to come into greater economic power, inheriting up to $3.4 trillion of intergenerational wealth transfer.
Yet too many barriers are preventing women from entering philanthropy, with sexism and misogyny persisting in the sector.
Former prime minister Julia Gillard said female philanthropists often find it harder to be taken seriously when approaching organisations.
"When people look at families who have the resources to be substantial donors, there's still a tendency to assume that if there's a man in the family, he's the principal decision maker," she said in an interview with She Gives.
"There are still some stereotypes out there of women as do-gooders and meddlers, or that empowered and resourced women aren't very caring and can be too demanding.
"I understand why many women want to maintain a sense of privacy around their giving, because they don't do it for the public accolade ... but there are also many women who are prepared to speak publicly but are unsure if anybody really wants to hear what they've got to say."
Since leaving politics, Ms Gillard has founded the Global Institute for Women's Leadership, joined the board of Beyond Blue and served as patron of the Campaign for Female Education.
She is the current chair of Wellcome, a charity foundation which supports science to solve urgent health challenges.
While she wants to keep growing the number of people who are prepared to give, Ms Gillard says the cost of living and financial pressures requires an emphasis on other contributions.
"Some people still think that philanthropy is only for high-net-worth individuals like Bill Gates and therefore isn't for them," she said.
"This broader concept of giving time, talent and expertise is much more inclusive."
One year ago, She Gives was launched to highlight women's giving at any scale and shift the narrative on female-led philanthropy.
The organisation has partnered with the National Library to ensure female voices are part of Australia's permanent record on giving.
The past 12 months had shown there was an enormous hunger for stories that recognised the role of women in achieving positive change, campaign founder Melissa Smith said.
"We're proud to have shone a light on some of the incredible women who are driving giving forward in Australia, but there is still much more to be done," she said.
"Early data from our research suggests that greater visibility and awareness of giving, as well as supporting a cultural shift, are key to growing philanthropy."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
21-07-2025
- Perth Now
Women redefining philanthropy sector despite barriers
Female philanthropists are being encouraged to continue changing the face of the sector and counteract the perception of philanthropy as a world dominated by men. Over the next two decades, women are poised to come into greater economic power, inheriting up to $3.4 trillion of intergenerational wealth transfer. Yet too many barriers are preventing women from entering philanthropy, with sexism and misogyny persisting in the sector. Former prime minister Julia Gillard said female philanthropists often find it harder to be taken seriously when approaching organisations. "When people look at families who have the resources to be substantial donors, there's still a tendency to assume that if there's a man in the family, he's the principal decision maker," she said in an interview with She Gives. "There are still some stereotypes out there of women as do-gooders and meddlers, or that empowered and resourced women aren't very caring and can be too demanding. "I understand why many women want to maintain a sense of privacy around their giving, because they don't do it for the public accolade ... but there are also many women who are prepared to speak publicly but are unsure if anybody really wants to hear what they've got to say." Since leaving politics, Ms Gillard has founded the Global Institute for Women's Leadership, joined the board of Beyond Blue and served as patron of the Campaign for Female Education. She is the current chair of Wellcome, a charity foundation which supports science to solve urgent health challenges. While she wants to keep growing the number of people who are prepared to give, Ms Gillard says the cost of living and financial pressures requires an emphasis on other contributions. "Some people still think that philanthropy is only for high-net-worth individuals like Bill Gates and therefore isn't for them," she said. "This broader concept of giving time, talent and expertise is much more inclusive." One year ago, She Gives was launched to highlight women's giving at any scale and shift the narrative on female-led philanthropy. The organisation has partnered with the National Library to ensure female voices are part of Australia's permanent record on giving. The past 12 months had shown there was an enormous hunger for stories that recognised the role of women in achieving positive change, campaign founder Melissa Smith said. "We're proud to have shone a light on some of the incredible women who are driving giving forward in Australia, but there is still much more to be done," she said. "Early data from our research suggests that greater visibility and awareness of giving, as well as supporting a cultural shift, are key to growing philanthropy."
Sky News AU
15-07-2025
- Sky News AU
Mining giant Rio Tinto urges Albanese government to reimpose carbon tax and boost green energy subsidies to meet renewables targets
Mining giant Rio Tinto has used it's submission to the Productivity Commission ahead of the Albanese government's economic roundtable to lobby for the re-imposition of a carbon pricing scheme and bolstered green energy subsidies. Letters to the Productivity Commission's five pillars review, which will compile the agenda of the Albanese government's reform roundtable are beginning to flood in from a range of business groups and bodies. The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry used its submission to rail against the implementation of a 2035 emission reduction target larger than 65 per cent, stating the move would impede economic growth and stymie manufacturing. Meanwhile, the Australian Council of Trade Unions submission to the PC called on the government to consider imposing a Julia-Gillard style, economy wide carbon tax and said the policy was the best measure the government could take to ensure Australia was meeting its international climate obligations. The nation's second largest mining company joined the ACTU in advocating for the government to roll out a carbon tax, a policy which has been shelved for more than a decade since the fall of the Gillard government in 2013. Rio Tinto told the five pillars review that a new carbon pricing scheme was the only way the government could achieve its ambitious goal to have 82 per cent of Australia's electricity grid powered by renewables by 2030. 'Market-based price on carbon is the most effective way to incentivise the private sector to make low-carbon investments and drive down emissions,' Rio Tinto's submission read. The multinational company went a step further than the ACTU and outlined that a carbon tax alone was not enough to lower emissions in line with federal deadlines, arguing for the government to expand subsides to renewable energy producers. The consortium said greater federal funding packages were needed if the government wanted to bring down emissions in heavy industry while remaining 'commercially competitive in a global market.' Rio Tinto is one of the most significant inheritors of the Albanese governments Future Made in Australia fund that provides up to $1.5 billion in grant funding to support pre-commercial innovation, demonstration and deployment of renewable energy and low emission technologies. The company has several clean energy projects nationwide including large-scale solar and wind farms, battery storage facilities and renewable energy purchasing agreements. Rio Tinto, unlike the ACCI resoundingly backed in the government's goal of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy generation by 2030, and said the target 'provides certainty that Australia is committed to a decarbonisation pathway underpinned by the development of renewable energy at scale'. Australia's highest profile business leaders, including Rio Tinto CEO Kellie Parker and Fortescue founder Andrew Forrest joined Mr Albanese in Shanghai, on the second day of his six day long China visit and urged the PM to unleash greater collaboration on green steel and industrial decarbonisation efforts. 'We will create the future together of steel decarbonisation,' Ms Parker said. Fortescue, who's former CEO Andrew 'Twiggy' Forrest is an ardent renewables advocate used its submission to call on the government to boost taxpayer funded stimulus packages for renewable projects and lashed the ATO for not providing an adequate environment for clean energy investment. 'The Australian tax system does not currently provide sufficient incentives for major investment in new renewable or decarbonisation projects,' Fortescue's submission read.
The Advertiser
21-06-2025
- The Advertiser
Workers' retirement nest eggs set for super boost
Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products." Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products." Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products." Australian workers can look forward to a bigger nest egg, with an increase to the superannuation guarantee to add tens of thousands of dollars to the average super account. From July 1, employers' minimum required contribution to employees' superannuation accounts will rise from 11.5 per cent to 12 per cent. It's the latest and last in a series of incremental increases from nine per cent over more than a decade since they were legislated by the Rudd-Gillard Labor government in 2012. With the latest bump, a 30-year-old earning $60,000 would have an extra $20,000 in super by retirement, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds Australia. It will add about $300 each year to the superannuation of a worker on a $60,000 salary, or $500 for someone on a $100,000 salary. "The system foundations are cemented for young, working people to have a comfortable retirement," ASFA chief executive Mary Delahunty said. "It's a moment all Australians should be proud of." The association says the cost of a comfortable retirement increased 1.6 per cent in the past year, while the cost of a modest retirement rose 1.7 per cent. A "comfortable" retirement includes top-level health insurance, a reasonable car and leisure activities. The cost of either outcome was increasing slower than Australia's current 2.4 per cent headline inflation but retiree budgets remained under pressure from rising food, energy and health costs. Couples on average need $73,900 annually for a comfortable retirement, while most singles needed $52,300 per year, ASFA says. For a modest retirement covering the basics, couples needed $48,200 each year, singles $33,400, or for renting couples, $64,250, and $46,660 each year for singles who rent. The figures underlined the importance of increasing Australia's housing stock, Ms Delahunty said. "They also illustrate how super can be the difference between hardship and stability later in life, especially for renters." For some workers, the extra contribution will come from their existing pay package, according to CPA Australia's superannuation lead Richard Webb. "It's a good idea to check with your employer to see how they view the changes and what it means for you," he said. Workers on contracts with a total remuneration package could see a slight drop in their take-home pay, while those on award or enterprise agreements would likely receive the contribution on-top of their current pay. When compulsory superannuation was introduced in 1992 - in part to reduce government spending on the Age Pension - only one in 10 Australian retirees listed super as a source of income. Nine in 10 people between 30 and 50 now have super. Government spending on the Age Pension is projected to fall from 2.3 per cent of gross domestic product in 2020 to two per cent by 2062/63, despite a doubling of the over-65 population and a trebling of over-85s over the same period. However the super guarantee increase wouldn't help those who missed out on paid work for extended periods, Super Consumer Australia chief executive Xavier O'Halloran said. "(For) people who have caring responsibilities or who have been locked out of the unaffordable housing market ... increasing SG further won't address those inequalities," he told AAP. Mr O'Halloran said there was more that could be done to support people struggling in retirement, when a significant portion of their autumnal years' savings were made. "Right now, there are no minimum standards for retirement products like there are for MySuper," he said. "There is also no performance testing of retirement products, so super funds can still sell poor products."
