In a dissent not seen in three decades, two Fed governors wanted to cut interest rates and here is why
Bowman and Waller on Wednesday dissented from the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) 9-2 vote to hold the Fed's benchmark federal funds rate at a range of 4.25% to 4.5%, with both saying they would've supported a 25-basis-point cut to the key interest rate.
Dissents by FOMC members occur periodically, and the most recent dissent came from Bowman in September 2024, when she argued the Fed should have cut interest rates by just 25-basis-points instead of the 50-basis-point cut that policymakers voted to proceed with.
Bowman said in her latest dissent that the Fed should have cut rates and wrote, "Inflation has moved considerably closer to our target, after excluding temporary effects from tariffs, and the labor market remains near full employment."
Federal Reserve Holds Key Interest Rate Steady For Fifth Straight Meeting Despite Trump's Pressure
"With economic growth slowing this year and signs of a less dynamic labor market, I saw it as appropriate to begin gradually moving our moderately restrictive policy stance toward a neutral setting. In my view, this action would have proactively hedged against a further weakening in the economy and the risk of damage to the labor market," Bowman explained.
Read On The Fox Business App
She went on to say that she has gained "even greater confidence that tariffs will not present a persistent shock to inflation," which warrants more focus on risks to the employment side of the Fed's dual mandate.
Waller explained in his dissent that central banks should "look through" tariffs as "one-off increases in the price level" that "do not cause inflation beyond a temporary increase."
Trump Slams Powell As 'Moron' And Calls For Fed's Board To Take Control Of Policy Moves
He cited economic data including soft growth in the first half of 2025, with real gross domestic product (GDP) at 1.2%, as suggesting the monetary policy rate should be closer to neutral given the "temporary" effects of tariffs on inflation and the labor market near full employment. Waller said the median FOMC participant estimates the neutral rate to be about 3%, which would imply cuts of 125 to 150-basis-points from the current range.
"My final reason to favor a cut now is that while the labor market looks fine on the surface, once we account for expected data revisions, private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed, and other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased," he wrote.
Waller said that he respects the FOMC's majority view that a "wait and see" approach on the impact of tariffs on inflation was more appropriate, saying that different views are healthy for robust policy discussions. But he added that, "I believe that the wait and see approach is overly cautious, and, in my opinion, does not properly balance the risks to the outlook and could lead to policy falling behind the curve."
Trump Hits Powell As 'Total Loser' After Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged
Waller added that he doesn't think the FOMC should cut rates on a predetermined path and that if tariffs don't cause an inflationary shock, cuts can continue, and if they do cause surprises to inflation and employment, the Fed can pause those cuts.
During his press conference after the FOMC decision, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged the dissents and said he appreciated that they provided clear explanations of their thinking and that different views are healthy on committees such as the FOMC. He also said that while tariff-induced price hikes could be brief, one time occurrences, there remains the possibility that it drives more inflationary pressures.
Us Job Growth Cooled In July Amid Growing Economic Uncertainty
Following the FOMC announcement on Wednesday, the Commerce Department on Thursday released its personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index. The Fed's preferred inflation gauge showed that inflation accelerated in June, rising from 2.3% to 2.6% on an annual basis – further away from the Fed's 2% goal.
That was followed by Friday's weaker-than-expected jobs report, which showed the economy added just 74,000 jobs in July – well below the 110,000 estimate of LSEG economists – while job gains in May and June were revised downward by 258,000.
Rising inflation figures, and a disagreement among policymakers on how to approach them given the impact of tariffs, coupled with what appears to be a weakening labor market, could complicate the Fed's path forward.Original article source: In a dissent not seen in three decades, two Fed governors wanted to cut interest rates and here is why
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kentucky man wants a mortgage to wipe out $110K in student loans, credit card debt — The Ramsey Show says 'snowball' it
Jeremy from Lexington, Kentucky, called into The Ramsey Show with a complex financial puzzle: He and his wife owe roughly $110,000 in student loans and credit card debt — not including a Parent PLUS loan in his father's name that he's promised to repay. His proposed solution? Take out a new mortgage to purchase his dad's house — a property Jeremy already lives in and was set to inherit — and use the loan proceeds to pay off all the existing debt. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now The idea, he argued, would simplify payments and provide some tax benefits. However, hosts of The Ramsey Show weren't convinced. A tangled proposal Jeremy explained that he and his wife live in a double-wide mobile home on five acres of land — a property still under a $23,000 mortgage held in his father's name. They pay just $460 a month in rent, essentially covering the mortgage. Although his father originally intended to gift the property after passing, Jeremy plans to get a mortgage now to buy the house outright, then use the funds to pay off his and his wife's student loans, their $10,000 credit card balance and the Parent PLUS loan under his father's name. 'He makes six figures. So on the Parent PLUS loan, we've agreed that I'd pay that back. That was an agreement we made in high school,' Jeremy explained. '[My wife] makes $45,000 a year, I make $53,000. ' His logic? Consolidating everything into a single payment would ease their financial stress — and maybe even provide a mortgage interest tax deduction. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. Complicating financial factors George Kamel and co-host Ken Coleman quickly dismantled the plan. 'Making a hundred grand with as low rent as you guys have, you should be able to throw a few thousand dollars a month at this debt,' Coleman said. The hosts estimated that, if the couple tightened their budget and focused on debt reduction, they could knock out their $110,000 balance in two to three years. Using the debt snowball method, they'd tackle their smallest balances first, build momentum and gradually eliminate each debt without adding another mortgage. Beyond the complexity and tax rationale, the hosts took issue with the double-wide trailer, which is a depreciating asset. 'I would not take a mortgage out on something going down in value,' Kamel pointed out. Their bottom line: Buckle down, boost income, cut expenses and pay off the debts the old-fashioned way. Financial path forward Jeremy's story is a cautionary tale about the allure of debt consolidation — and how it can turn into a debt shuffle instead of a solution. While consolidating high-interest debt can sometimes be strategic, people shouldn't use it to avoid budgeting or complex decisions. The Ramsey team emphasized: Avoid taking on new debt to settle old debt: especially when it extends repayment timelines or risks assets. Use the debt snowball: Pay off the smallest balances first while making minimum payments on the rest. Maximize your income advantage: With $100,000 in combined income and minimal rent, Jeremy and his wife have the means — but not yet the mindset — to escape debt. Cut emotional ties to money deals: Don't feel obligated to pay a parent's debt if it leads to long-term financial strain. 'Just pay off your freaking debts. You signed the dotted line.' Kamel said, 'Get out of this debt in two years. And that's the only solution I would be pursuing at this point.' What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Have Trump's Tariffs Slowed the Stock Market?
President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 on April 2, a move that he called 'Liberation Day.' Why? Because that executive order, along with Trump using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), implemented a series of tariffs upon nearly all of America's trading partners, an act Trump defended as liberating the United States from what he called unfair trade deals of the past. Be Aware: Read Next: The signing of that executive order has created a summer of economic uncertainty both for America as well as its many trade partners. Trump instituted a baseline 10% on those trade partners, followed by a series of additional tariffs for some countries, while decreasing tariffs for others, or even pausing tariffs for certain countries to allow for further negotiation. In America, the looming threat of tariffs has created a fair amount of buyer concern — tariffs mean higher consumer prices here at home, and both shoppers and businesses alike have spent the summer waiting for the near-inevitable price-hikes. So it comes as no surprise that Trump's somewhat shocking Liberation Day announcement immediately caused global markets to crash in response to such a bold move. The markets eventually absorbed the news and righted themselves. That said, has the continued yo-yoing of tariff threats slowed the stock market? The Impact of Tariffs on the Stock Market The answer is yes. First, there was the initial market crashes in response to the news. Trump's announced tariffs were far more extreme than what experts and analysts predicted, and the April announcement was seen was a 'worse than the worst case scenario' by economists — the Dow Jones fell 3.98%, the Nasdaq Composite dropped 5.97% and the broad market index collapsed by 4.84%, the worst showing for each since the summer of 2020 when COVID ravaged the country and its economy. That isn't the only time Trump's tariffs have torpedoed the stock market, though. With almost every newly-announced increase in tariffs against a certain country, the markets tend to dive in response. Check Out: For example, August 2025 began with markets across the planet dropping in response to Trump's newest tariffs against America's partners, with S&P falling 1.6%, the Dow dropping by 1.23% and the Nasdaq Composite slipping by 2.24%, per CNN. This was Nasdaq's biggest single-day dip since April, and the S&P 500's biggest fall since May. All markets had been on a two-week rise prior to this most recent announcement. That April to August rollercoaster has been the pattern of the stock market for the summer — markets will be on the climb, Trump will announce a new flurry of tariffs, and stocks will drop in panic regarding the news, slowing whatever progress the market had accumulated. Trump's tariffs may ultimately lead to more equitable trade deals for America, but they've definitely come at a cost, frequently slowing the stock market with each new tariff. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Have Trump's Tariffs Slowed the Stock Market? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much Upper Class Retirees Get in Social Security at Age 75
Social Security is a vital source of income for many retired Americans. More than 57 million Americans over age 65 received benefits as of May 2025, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA). Many depend on the income, with 63% of recipients claiming it makes up at least half of their income, per a 2024 Pew Research Center survey. Check Out: Trending Now: Not all recipients must rely heavily on benefits, though. Each situation is different, so it's advantageous to get an idea of what's possible to aid in retirement planning. How Much the Average Upper Class Retiree Receives in Benefits at Age 75 The average monthly benefit for a 75-year-old was $2,064 as of December 2024, according to the SSA. Men received slightly more, receiving $2,277, and women less at $1,856. That is merely the average. For those in the 90th percentile, the amount increases to $3,105 across genders, according to the SSA. Upper class individuals can reasonably expect to be within that range. The maximum someone aged 70 and over can receive is $5,108 in 2025. For You: How Social Security Calculates Your Monthly Benefit Amount The SSA uses two key variables when calculating your monthly benefits: lifetime earnings and when you claim benefits. Basically, the longer you work, the more Social Security payroll taxes you pay. This directly influences the amount you can receive, as the SSA uses the best 35 earning years of your work history. When you claim impacts the amount, too. Full retirement age (FRA) is currently 67 years of age, although retirees can claim benefits beginning at 62. According to the SSA, delaying claiming benefits adds 8% to your annual benefits once you begin receiving benefits, or you reach 70 years old. Claiming benefits early can be costly, however, reducing payouts by up to 30%. Social Security Is Just One Part of Retirement While many retirees depend on Social Security, it's only one piece of retirement. Knowing the average amount an upper class individual receives can help Americans make a more informed decision with their retirement resources. Americans with investments and other savings can use Social Security to augment the lifestyle they want in retirement. Upper class retirees who are 75 can expect to receive roughly $3,100 in monthly benefits at the end of 2024. With cost-of-living adjustments, that amount will continue to increase year over year. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on Here's How Much Upper Class Retirees Get in Social Security at Age 75
