logo
Echo Chamber: Cut it, gut it or re-up it, pay equity is ready to overshadow the budget

Echo Chamber: Cut it, gut it or re-up it, pay equity is ready to overshadow the budget

The Spinoff14-05-2025

Last week's biggest story is still the government's biggest headache.
Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus.
The current parliamentary sitting block has been under way for only a week, but already, signs of weariness are beginning to show on the faces of our MPs. With a slew of announcements in the last seven days – a member's bill to ban social media for under-16s (then some real government work), redress for abuse in state care survivors, a Waitangi Tribunal review, just to name a few things – and parliament sitting under urgency, patience is short, wrinkles are deep, and frowns are plentiful.
The pressure seemed to weigh deeply on the prime minister, who trotted past the opposition benches before Tuesday's question time kicked off, stopped himself in front of Labour leader Chris Hipkins, and gave his opposition counterpart a seemingly sharp jab in the knee to get his attention. Hipkins, slumped in his seat, just shrugged and grimaced as Christopher Luxon leaned over him.
They might have been trying to figure out who the bigger liar was in the pay equity debacle, and couldn't quite crack the case before the speaker's entrance started proceedings. As the saying goes, there are always three sides to a story: yours, mine and the truth – or in this case, one political party, another political party, and the women of tomorrow.
Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick was first up on oral questions, in a back-and-forth with Luxon over the cutting of 33 pay equity claims in favour of a regime that will make it harder for women workers to launch new claims. Luxon, having already spent the morning fielding anti-government/pro-union propaganda, responded that, well, this new legislation simply fixed an 'unaffordable' system which let librarians think that reading books all day is the same kind of boring as waiting to catch pāua poachers all day.
'And who are you compared to?' Swarbrick called across the barracking benches, before Brownlee swung his fingers and shut the orchestra up.
Then it was the 'Right Honourable Christopher Hipkins'. Thank you, Mr Speaker, the Labour leader grinned, but Chris is usually fine. If it was meant to be funny, Brownlee wasn't having it: 'I wasn't inquiring as to your health. Just ask your question.'
Another back-and-forth over pay equity with the prime minister saw Luxon keep to the 'well, as I've said to you, we're simply fixing your broken system' line. But Chippy remained cheerful as questions moved to finance minister Nicola Willis, who was able to laud the budget's forecast that the government will be able to make a withdrawal from the Super Fund for the first time in 2028.
'Thanks to Labour!' Hipkins called. His squeaky little voice kept popping up, like a mouse scurrying along the floorboards: 'Thank you, Labour!' And again, a little chirp – 'just say thank you!'
'The leader of the opposition says, 'thank you, Labour,'' Willis responded. 'I say, 'thank you, taxpayers'.'
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer came in with questions about the barring of unions from the budget lockup for the first time. She pressed on despite Luxon hiding behind the finance minister, and a groan sounding from the government benches – it was Act's David Seymour, wearing a boyish grin on his face.
'Ka pai, David? Can I carry on?' Ngarewa-Packer asked. Not leaving the attack dog politics to the minor party leader giggling in his seat, National's number one defence, transport minister Chris Bishop, got into position. Again, the prime minister is not responsible for who attends the budget lockup, Bishop said, before piping up a few minutes later – had the prime minister perhaps seen reports of a certain political party failing to even show up to budget debates?
That set Brownlee off again, reminding the House that it was 'inappropriate' to discuss the absence of another member within the House, and asking the prime minister to do so would be a breach of the standing orders. So of course, Winston Peters butted in.
Let me correct what has been said by the speaker, the NZ First leader offered. When someone talks about non-participation, they don't mean absence – just non-participation. And then, the icing on the cake: 'Words matter.'
'I'm a very, very foolish man,' Brownlee replied. 'I should've understood that right at the start. None the less, my ruling stands.' He kept the same energy when Labour's Kieran McAnulty rose for a point of order as soon as Luxon looked like he was ready to throw the former Labour government under the bus again: 'Some people would say you're fast, others would have a different view.'
He's a man of great wit and little patience, that speaker. Does anyone spare a thought for Gerry Brownlee at the end of the day? It can't be easy to deal with all these cun-… Oh wait, you can't print that!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals
The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

The House: Parliamentary Week Achieves Two Out Of Three Goals

, Editor: The House While Parliament's week was dominated by its final event - Thursday's debate on the report from the Privileges Committee into a haka performed in the chamber - the rest of the week focussed on other business that, while more mundane, was still worthy of note. The Government appeared to have three objectives for this week in the house. Crucial to the administration's continuance, the first goal was to successfully complete the initial debate on the budget. The long initial budget debate could no longer dribble on over weeks, so the house spent six hours of the week completing the second reading debate, which is the first debate a budget gets. The reading was accomplished and so the Government continues. This may sound silly, but a Government cannot survive, if the house votes against its budget. Agreeing to vote for budget and taxation bills are the 'supply' portion of the 'confidence and supply' agreement that is the foundation of any coalition agreement. The budget focus now turns to select committees and what is called 'Scrutiny Week', when ministers appear before various subject committees to defend their budget plans. Scrutiny Week begins on 16 June. Slow seconds A second objective was possibly not in earlier plans for this week - to finally polish off the bills originally slated for completion two weeks ago during budget week urgency. Then, the Leader of the House had asked the house to accord urgency for 12 bills the Government hoped to progress through 30 stages of parliamentary debate. The plan was ambitious and it did not succeed. Despite day-long sittings until midnight Saturday (when urgency must end), only two bills were completed, others were untouched, and 13 stages were unfinished or unstarted. This week's plan for the house had MPs returning to the well for more of the same. Just like last time, progress was at a snail's pace. After quite a few hours, the Government had slugged its way through just a few more stages. The plan was slowed to a crawl by bills' committee stages (formally known as the Committee of the Whole House). Committee stages are a crucial way for MPs to publicly interrogate the minister in charge of a bill. With patience, they can tease out a lot about both a government's development of legislation and its intended real-world impacts. Because the committee stage has no set duration, it is also a way for the opposition to make the Government really work for progress. The Government did achieve progress on the bills left incomplete from budget week, but again, it was probably not what was hoped for. They will need to come back yet again in three weeks to have a third crack. The Opposition is showing itself to be quite effective at the filibuster. The Government's third objective was to have the debate on the recent Privileges Committee Report on three Te Pāti Māori MPs done by the week's end. As Leader of the House Chris Bishop said in re-initiating the debate: "My encouragement would be for everybody to finish this debate today. "Have a robust debate, but let's end this issue once and for all, and deal with the issue and get back to the major issues facing this country." That wish was fulfilled with apparent agreement from across the house. As 6pm neared, the MP who eventually moved that a vote be taken was Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. The frankly fascinating debate on the report will be reported separately. - RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ.

Suspended Te Pāti Māori MPs To Embark On National Tour
Suspended Te Pāti Māori MPs To Embark On National Tour

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Suspended Te Pāti Māori MPs To Embark On National Tour

Te Pāti Māori says it will continue to stand its ground as three MPs begin their record suspensions. On Thursday night, Parliament dealt its harshest ever punishment by suspending co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer for 21 days, and Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven. The trio were sanctioned for their actions during the first reading of the Treaty Principles Bill in November. Parliament's privileges committee deemed the haka the MPs performed could have "intimidated" others. Government parties supported the recommended suspension. Labour agreed they should face some sanction, but disagreed with the length of time the committee had landed on. Speaking to media after their suspension was handed down, the MPs said they planned to use their time away from the House to organise. "We're going to go home and show that we stood our ground," Ngarewa-Packer said. The party now has the Regulatory Standards Bill in its sights, and will use its time away to encourage supporters to make submissions against it. Party president John Tamihere told Midday Report the party was feeling "very chipper" and the co-leaders would embark on a national tour. "What we've got to do is just get out on our streets, in all our pā up and down the country, activate, organise and that's where we're going now." Accusing Parliament of being a "very unhealthy place" for Māori, Tamihere said the MPs would apologise once it was made clear what they would be apologising for. "If you're saying we should apologise for bringing the tikanga that displays our reo, which is the haka, into the House... see, we're not here to just appear for tourists. We're not here to start a rugby game, you know? "We are here to display and practice who we are and what we are. We do that 24/7, and we don't do it because somebody says, 'No, when you walk in that Parliament you've got to stop being a Māori,' for goodness sake." Waititi said there were "many tools in the tikanga basket" when it came to opposing further legislation. "It will be deemed, and probably sanctioned, by tipuna who guide us in our wairua, in our ngākau, and the people who guide us outside. They sent us in to be the unapologetic Māori voice. Māori voice means that everything that we have in our kete kōrero will be used." He said Thursday's debate got "pretty ugly and sad", referencing Winston Peters' "scribble" jab at his mataora. "I would be ashamed," Waititi said. "If I was his mokopuna, to look over those clips and to hear him denigrate not only something that was handed down by his ancestors, but also him as a future ancestor the legacy he will leave for his tamariki-mokopuna. I'm saddened by that, but also I feel ashamed that his family have to wear that legacy." Peters agreed the debate was sad, though for different reasons - telling Morning Report Te Pāti Māori's behaviour was unprecedented and unforgivable. Disappointed by inevitable - former leader Te Ururoa Flavell, Te Pāti Māori co-leader from 2013 to 2018, said he was disappointed at the outcome, but it was inevitable. "Māori and haka, that is part of who we are and what we do, as an expression of a message. No different to giving a speech in the House and pointing the finger at people. You sort of think, where's the consistency here?" he asked. "Our people understand the protocols that go with various places. Our marae are run by tikanga and protocols about what you can and can't do. And we also know that there are consequences of actions, both for better or for worse. "That's never an issue - the issue here is when you line it all up, you'd say that the three MPs were dealt with very, very harshly and unfairly." Flavell said Parliament had come a long way from the days where MPs could not speak te reo in the House, but even that was hard fought for. He said Parliament allowed waiata and even Christmas carols, despite not being in the rules, but with an acceptance they were in the spirit of the occasion. "Really, can we get to a point in time to accept that Māori are tangata whenua of this land? Can we not get to a time and have a conversation about actually accepting that kaupapa Māori is okay in this land and in the halls of Parliament, for goodness sake, and to allow it to happen on appropriate occasions?" Flavell said a debate about tikanga in the House was long overdue, but said any debate must run alongside education. "I hope that we learn from the history and allow the debate to happen, but let's do it fairly, not in the sense of allowing every party to have their vehicle. That will move nothing, it will not move the dial, and we saw that yesterday, but allow actually, a debate to inform. "Hopefully, the committee that's digging into the whole issue of the Treaty of Waitangi will raise some of those issues. But let's have the debate. Let's allow a discussion on kaupapa Māori within the halls of Parliament, and that, I believe, will go a long way to settle some of these grievances that will not only have come up in the past, but are likely to come up in the future."

Manawatū Gorge Replacement Opens Toll-Free
Manawatū Gorge Replacement Opens Toll-Free

Scoop

time4 hours ago

  • Scoop

Manawatū Gorge Replacement Opens Toll-Free

Press Release – New Zealand Labour Party We had to campaign hard against a National Government that wanted to slap a toll on locals who had already waited a long time for this road to open,' says Labour transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere. Thanks to a successful community-led campaign backed by Labour, Lower North Island locals are today celebrating the toll-free opening of Te Ahu a Turanga – Manawatū Tararua Highway. Local Labour MPs Tangi Utikere and Kieran McAnulty wore their Toll-Free Tararua t-shirts to celebrate the opening of the new road without the National Government's proposed toll. 'It is such a relief for locals to have the Manawatū Tararua Highway open today, after years of work went in to replace the old Manawatū Gorge,' Labour transport spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. 'We had to campaign hard against a National Government that wanted to slap a toll on locals who had already waited a long time for this road to open. 'That was greedy and uncalled for, given the road had already been funded by Labour. 'It took a huge effort by locals, and strong support from people in surrounding areas who stood against National's toll. 'It's a beautiful new road, and I look forward to using it regularly to drive between the mighty electorates of Palmerston North and Wairarapa,' Tangi Utikere said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store