Ex-DNC chair complains Democrats expected him to 'just rubber-stamp' plans during 2024 campaign
Former Democratic National Committee (DNC) chair Jaime Harrison lamented that he was "taken for granted" as a party leader and was seen as a "rubber-stamp" throughout the 2024 campaign, as Democrats continue to determine a way forward after their loss to President Donald Trump in November.
"I feel like, as chair, my voice was not always heard, that I was taken for granted. I was seen as somebody to just rubber-stamp and not to actually have a seat at the table to influence certain things," Harrison told the Washington Post at South Carolina's Democratic convention on Saturday. "And that has to change."
"We can't just be nice ornaments," Harrison said, telling the Post that he was angry over the election and over Black voters' voting for Trump or choosing to stay home. "We actually have to have a substantive and real role in terms of directing this party and moving this party forward."
Harrison stood by former President Joe Biden as he faced attacks on his age prior to exiting the 2024 race.
The former DNC chair said in January that the party should have stuck with Biden rather than forcing him off the ticket.
After former Vice President Kamala Harris lost to Trump in November, Sen. Bernie Sanders accused the Democratic Party of abandoning the working class.
Harrison strongly disagreed with the suggestion and responded to Sanders on social media, calling it "straight up BS."
"Biden was the most-pro worker President of my lifetime - saved union pensions, created millions of good paying jobs and even marched in a picket line and some of MVP's plans would have fundamentally transformed the quality of life and closed the racial wealth gap for working people across this country," Harrison wrote in November, after the election."From the child tax credits, to 25k for a down payment for a house, to Medicare covering the cost of senior health care in their homes. There are a lot of post-election takes and this one ain't a good one," he concluded.
Other prominent Black Democrats, including Catherine Fleming Bruce, who is running for Senate in South Carolina, expressed frustration to the Washington Post that there wasn't an open process to replace Biden on the ticket.
She told the Post that Democrats should be "making sure that we have Democratic processes at all times."
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore told the outlet that the party had a problem with only focusing on Black voters in election years.
"It's tiring," he said.
South Carolina Democratic Party chair Christale Spain told the Post that the party didn't prioritize Black voters, a key voting bloc for the party, in 2024.
"We can't lose our most dependable base because we're chasing rainbows," she told the outlet. "You've gotta know where your bread is buttered. Invest there."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now
Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," he said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Such ingratitude," Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans, wrote on X. President Donald Trump is finally responding to Elon Musk's criticism of his "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said in the Oval Office on Thursday. "I don't know if we will anymore." Trump told reporters that Musk's criticism of the bill likely stemmed primarily from the phase-out of the electric vehicle tax credit, which would likely impact his company, Tesla. "You know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate… which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said. "And they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles." "Elon knew this from the beginning," Trump added. Musk fired back minutes later, saying that while he thought the EV phase-out was unfair, he was more concerned about the "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." He later wrote on X that without him, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would have gained control of the House, and Republicans would've had a smaller majority in the Senate. "Such ingratitude," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans last year. In the Oval Office, Trump also said that Musk was lashing out because he "missed" being in the White House. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," Trump said. "I'll tell you, he's not the first. People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it." The tech titan first unleashed on the "Big Beautiful Bill," which is set to serve as the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, on Tuesday. He's kept up his criticism ever since. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Musk main criticism has been of the bill's projected impact on the federal deficit. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that in its current form, the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years, while the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said that number would be $2.5 trillion. Musk previously said that the bill undermined the work of DOGE, which has sought to cut billions of dollars in federal spending. Republicans on Capitol Hill have largely brushed off Musk's criticism. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that Musk is "flat wrong" about the bill, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that the tech titan is "entitled to that opinion," but "we're going to proceed full speed ahead." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's Controversial Pardons Make Some Republicans Squirm
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump's pardons of white-collar criminals whosupport his presidency and donate to his campaigns stoked plenty of outrage from Democrats and former law enforcement officials last week. Now, even some Republicans are signaling their discomfort with his decisions to grant clemency ― and the way he's going about it. 'I think that when the president pardons someone, they need to carefully explain why injustice was done,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, told HuffPost. 'And I think pardons should be rare, and President Trump likes pardons much more than I do.'In recent weeks, Trump has pardoned a former Virginia sheriff who was convicted of trying to sell deputy badges, a Las Vegas politician who stole money intended for a memorial dedicated to a fallen police officer, a tax cheat whose mother raised millions of dollars for Republican political campaigns, and a pair of reality television stars who were convicted of bank fraud and tax evasion. The pardons appear to have been politically motivated, a reward for MAGA die-hards who stood with Trump and his movement. 'No MAGA left behind,' Ed Martin, the president's controversial new pardon attorney, wrote in a social media post last month. Trump also shocked many Republicans when he pardoned hundreds of Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol rioters who were convicted of assaulting or interfering with police officers, roughly 1,000 nonviolent offenders and around 200 people accused of assaulting police. A number of those pardoned have since been rearrested for other alleged crimes. 'On its face, you got to be pretty careful,' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), another Senate Judiciary Committee member, said of Trump's latest pardons. 'I haven't looked at the current ones, but I think I'm pretty well staked out on about two or three hundred of Jan. 6 people who never should have been pardoned.' Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said the 'best approach' for issuing pardons is to follow a process and make decisions on clemency requests after a recommendation from a parole board or the Department of Justice. The president's pardon power under the U.S. Constitution is broad and completely unchecked. Presidents aren't bound to go through a certain process ― though some follow DOJ guidelines more than others ― and they're free to pardon whomever, no matter the crime. Some of President Joe Biden's pardons also drew outrage ― including for his son Hunter Biden. 'The only way you're going to fix it or change it would be, I think, through a constitutional amendment, and that would take a long time to do,' Rounds said. 'I think just the American people being aware of it is an important part of this discussion. I don't know that you're going to fix it as much as bring attention to it.' Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed a question about Trump's pardons by pointing to controversial pardons issued by President Bill Clinton in the 1990s. 'There's no sense of making any comments about the president's pardons because it's totally his own decision ― any president in the United States,' Grassley said. 'And nobody asked me about the 2,500 pardons that [Bill] Clinton gave, and so I'm not going to make any comments on pardons that Trump makes.' Trump, meanwhile, seems far more interested in probing his predecessor's pardons. On Wednesday, the president directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, accusing his aides of concealing his 'cognitive decline' and casting doubts on the legitimacy of his use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. The order followed weeks of inquiries by Republican lawmakers into Biden's mental and physical health as president following the release of a new book chronicling the former president's 'decline, its cover-up and his disastrous choice to run again.' Biden, however, denied the accusations from Trump in a statement Wednesday: 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.'
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump 'very disappointed' by Musk as row explodes into public
US President Donald Trump says he was "very surprised" and "disappointed" with former ally Elon Musk's criticisms of his centrepiece budget bill. "Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump told reporters in the White House on Thursday. It was the president's most direct criticism yet of Musk's lobbying efforts against the proposals to cut taxes and slash government spending - a plan that has drawn criticism from Musk and some Republicans. In response, Musk doubled down on X and accused the president of "Such ingratitude", adding: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election". Musk left his post at the Department of Government Efficiency last week after 129 days on the job, and Trump presented him with a with a golden key during a congratulatory news conference on 30 May. But in the days since, he has repeatedly criticised Trump's budget bill currently working its way through Congress, calling it a "disgusting abomination" and posting "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." The bill passed the House with the backing of most Republicans, with a handful of representatives from Trump's party and all Democrats opposed. Speaking to reporters during a news conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, Trump said: "We are doing things in that bill that are unbelievable. "I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here," he said. "All of a sudden he had a problem." "He hasn't said bad about my personally, but I'm sure that will be next." Put in charge of radically slashing government spending, Musk initiated mass sackings and wholesale elimination of departments such as the US Agency for International Development (USAID). Doge claims to have saved $180bn, although that number has been disputed, and is well short of Musk's initial aim to cut spending by up to $2 trillion.
