How to Create Better Content With AI — Plus 11 Tools to Get You There
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
AI-generated videos are already here, and this machine is unstoppable. According to a Wistia report, 41% of videos will be created with AI in 2025 — double the share from last year. AI now plays a role in everything from pre-production planning to post-production tasks, such as dubbing, captions and visual generation.
In such a fast-moving industry, manual resources alone aren't enough. That's why at HOLYWATER, which specializes in storytelling and distribution, we focus on balancing creative minds with AI automation to scale and reach new markets more efficiently. Whether you're creating marketing videos, educational content or entertainment series, my tips on how to effectively combine AI automation with human creativity will help you stay ahead of the competition and create engaging storytelling.
Related: Why 2025 Will Be the Year AI Redefines Content Creation and Search Strategies
Integrate multiple AI tools for maximum impact
If you work with AI to create content, don't just rely on one particular tool. Instead, consider testing different technologies and choose the ones that really work for you. Here are some of our top AI tool combinations.
For video creation, we turn to Runway and Marey. The first one removes backgrounds, customizes frames, adds effects and creates videos based on text prompts with support for different formats for different styles. Marey creates cinematic camera moves using just a single image. It transforms any 2D scene into a 3D environment so you can direct the camera as if you're on set.
Working with audio and voice, we use ElevenLabs. It generates high-quality AI voices that bring characters to life for a more engaging narrative. For visuals, Flux is a must-have. We use it to create visual assets for AI-series and promotional materials.
If you work with fiction texts a lot, try Sudowrite and its wide range of features, from outline creation to automatic writing and self-editing. This software can create a character outline, world, synopsis, plot and even write the first chapters based on user input. Meanwhile, GPT agents can help build personalized AI assistants that analyze context, learn style and deliver relevant results for tasks from analytics to content structuring.
A mix of these tools delivers exponentially better results. In our experience, "using multiple AI tools ends up in better content." But the key is the human who works with these tools and creates the stories.
Create interactive experiences, not just viewing
When creating viral content, aim not just to make hits, but to build a long-term story. Think about how you can further develop your product and retain your audience.
For example, we pioneered AI Companion, allowing viewers to directly interact with AI characters from their favorite shows. Users can text with characters, creating deeper emotional connections that extend beyond the viewing experience.
This interactive approach is not limited to content creation. Fashion brands can develop AI-powered virtual stylists, and educational apps can integrate AI tutors that adapt to a student's pace and learning style, like Duolingo. The key is moving beyond one-way communication to create experiences where your audience becomes an active participant in your story.
Optimize distribution and marketing with AI
At my company, we also use AI in our marketing. Our AI-driven marketing machine generates over 200,000 creative concepts monthly across 12-15 languages. All of this is made possible with a team of marketers leveraging AI tools and robust user analytics to power their ideas.
The foundation of this scale is our data-driven solution, which identifies viral elements from series, extracts them, combines strategically, and adds titles to produce finished marketing concepts at scale. In addition to our in-house tools, our marketing team uses a powerful stack of AI solutions:
Stable Diffusion and Midjourney for helping create high-quality, eye-catching visuals and artwork.
RunwayML for video editing, manipulation and creative video effects.
Leonardo AI for adding artistic or cinematic flourishes to content.
LAMA and Concepter for rapid ideation, concept development and content adaptation across different markets and formats.
That's how we can quickly create tailored promotional content for different audience segments, A/B test creative approaches and optimize marketing based on real-time performance data.
Related: How to Leverage AI for Content Creation While Avoiding Potential Risks and Penalties
Engage a team to use AI
The most successful AI implementations happen when every team member finds their own way to work smarter with these tools.
We encourage our team to use AI, not as a shortcut, but as a skill. Everyone finds their own way to work smarter with it. Our content ops manager uses it for brainstorming and training models on specific tones. The brand designer refines visuals with focused prompts. Our developers code with pair programming tools like Cursor. The brand lead analyzes user interviews to spot patterns and spark stronger ideas.
The approach is complex yet scalable: Let AI handle the repetitive stuff, so your team can focus on the work only humans can do — strategy, creativity and original thinking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
NVDA Vs. NVDY: The Better Nvidia Stock Buy For Your Investing Style
Nvidia is the crown jewel of the AI boom. But how you choose to invest in it, either directly through NVDA stock or indirectly via the NVDY covered call income ETF, reflects your risk appetite, time horizon and definition of returns. This article explores which option (NVDA stock vs. NVDY) is a better fit for your portfolio and what your choice reveals about your investor persona. What Is YieldMax's NVDY? The YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) is an actively managed fund that does not invest directly in Nvidia shares, but delivers a far higher income yield vs. NVDA. The fund's staggering trailing twelve-month (TTM) distribution yield of nearly 80% stems from a unique strategy that generates monthly income through options without actually owning NVDA stock. To achieve this, NVDY implements a 'synthetic covered call' strategy by which it To generate monthly income by selling short-term covered calls, NVDY first needs a long exposure to NVDA stock. Rather than buying NVDA shares outright, NVDY creates a cheaper, synthetic long position by This combo allows NVDY to simulate NVDA stock's price moves, without actually buying the stock. These call and put options typically have durations of one to six months and strike prices near NVDA's current price at the time these option contracts are executed. The synthetic long position provides NVDY with exposure that is nearly identical to owning NVDA stock. If NVDA rises, the call gains in value and if NVDA falls, the put incurs a loss. If NVDA stays flat, typically both options may expire worthless, and the fund may lose the cost of the call, but this will be offset by the premium received from the short put. Suppose NVDA stock is currently trading at $200/share. NVDY buys a call option with a strike price of $200 (at-the-money) by paying a premium of $15. (Premiums vary depending on volatility and expiration, and the $15 figures here are for illustrative purposes.) This gives NVDY the right to buy NVDA at $200. If NVDA rises to $250, the call option's value would increase to $50. Subtracting the $15 premium paid, the net profit on the call is $35. As part of the synthetic strategy, NVDY also sells a put option with a $200 strike price, receiving a $15 premium. This gives it the obligation to buy NVDA at $200 if the price falls below that level. If NVDA drops to $150, NVDY is forced to buy at $200, incurring a $50 loss on the put. After subtracting the $15 premium received, the net loss is $35. These call and put options together form a synthetic long position, mimicking the payoff of directly owning the stock. Although synthetic ownership is more complex than buying shares directly, it is significantly more capital-efficient. For example, buying 100 shares of NVDA at $200 each would require $20,000 upfront. A synthetic long position created by buying a call and selling a put at the same $200 strike can replicate this exposure. If the premiums for both options are around $15 each, the net upfront premium may be close to zero. Since each options contract typically represents 100 shares, this setup simulates $20,000 of stock exposure with little or no net premium paid. However, this does not mean the position is free. The short put side of the trade introduces significant downside risk and typically requires substantial margin or collateral. While the strategy uses less capital than directly purchasing the stock, margin requirements and potential losses can be huge. This is an oversimplified example meant to illustrate the concept of capital efficiency. In practice, actual capital requirements and risk exposure will vary depending on market conditions and brokerage policies. Investors don't need to worry about this nitty-gritty, NVDY fund managers will handle the complexities. NVDY then sells calls against this synthetic long position to generate income from premiums. These call options are typically short-term (expiring within one month or less) and are written at strike prices 0–15% above NVDA's current price at the time. If NVDA's price goes up, NVDY makes gains up to the strike price, but anything above that is capped, because the fund sold away that upside in exchange for income. If NVDA stays flat or dips slightly, NVDY retains the premium from selling the call options. This is its main source of monthly income. NVDY also holds short-term U.S. Treasuries that not only serve as collateral for the options in connection with its synthetic covered call strategy, but also earn some interest. NVDY also employs a 'Covered Call Spread' strategy—a more nuanced variation of the traditional covered call—used when it anticipates a sharp short-term rise in NVDA's price or when market conditions make spreads more advantageous than outright calls. In this strategy, NVDY sells a call option while simultaneously buying a call option with a higher strike price but the same expiration date. This approach still generates income and, if NVDA's price surges, allows NVDY to participate in more upside than a regular covered call would. How Does NVDY Differ From NVDA Stock? NVDA stock and NVDY are both Nvidia-focused investments but serve different goals: NVDA stock is regarded as a growth superstar, while NVDY is designed as a tactical income generator. For NVDA investors, gains and losses move in lockstep with the stock price. But, NVDY's returns, shaped by its synthetic long structure, follow a more complicated path. So, we notice that drawdowns are more or less similar for NVDA and NVDY, but gains are capped for NVDY. So, why invest in NVDY at all? Because of the outsized income yield from NVDY that far surpasses NVDA's. NVDY pays varying monthly distributions, while NVDA pays a penny in quarterly dividends. On a TTM basis, NVDY has paid distributions totaling $14.04/share, equating to 78.7% distribution yield based on NVDY's last closing price of $17.85. This far surpasses NVDA's 0.02% forward yield or annual payout of 4 cents/share on a forward basis. Price performance and Total Returns (including dividends/distributions): Even with NVDY's hefty monthly distributions, NVDA has delivered stronger total returns. NVDY's monthly payouts are a mix of return of capital (ROC) and ordinary income (such as option premiums and interest from Treasuries) For example: Why this breakdown matters: Return of capital isn't taxed when received. Instead, it reduces your cost basis in the ETF, which can increase taxable capital gains when you sell. Illustration: Once your cost basis is reduced to zero, any further ROC distributions are treated entirely as capital gains for tax purposes. The income portion of the payout, however, is taxable in the year received. For July, this would mean the remaining 63% of the distribution was taxable income. Expense Ratio: YieldMax lists NVDY's gross expense ratio as 0.99%, while many third-party sites like Yahoo Finance report the net expense ratio as 1.27%. That means an investor pays $127 annually for every $10,000 invested in NVDY. Let's say an investor bought 1,000 shares of NVDY a year ago at around $24/share: Even after accounting for the $304.80 annual fee (1.27% of $24,000), the net income is still exceptionally high. In other words, the expense ratio barely dents NVDY's income advantage. Since its inception on May 10, 2023, when it was trading around $20, NVDY has paid out $32.71 in distributions. Investors who purchased one share at launch would have recovered their full initial investment and realized an additional $12.71 in income. It is important to note that NVDY shareholders do not receive any dividends paid by Nvidia (NVDA) directly. But with these juicy payouts from NVDY, no investor would have missed much. When it comes to NVDA, the math is simple. You'll need about 10× the cost of an NVDY share to buy one share of NVDA. Sell NVDA in a taxable account, and you'll owe capital gains taxes on your profits. Sell it in a tax-advantaged account like a 401(k), and those taxes can be pushed to another day. NVDY Vs. NVDA: Advantages And Risks Lower Entry Cost: NVDY trades at roughly one-tenth the price of NVDA stock, making it more accessible for smaller investors. Capital Efficiency: Through its synthetic long position strategy, NVDY can mimic exposure to thousands of dollars' worth of NVDA stock with a minimal capital outlay. Attractive Yields - NVDY's covered call strategy generates eye-catching yields, appealing to income-focused investors. NVDA on the other hand is coveted for its growth potential rather than dividends. Faster Capital Recovery: NVDY's hefty and frequent payouts can help investors achieve 'house money' status quickly, recovering their initial investment through distributions. This can substantially de-risk the investment. NVDA requires selling shares to realize profits. Occasional Upside Participation: when NVDA stock is expected to rally in the short-term (because of a sell-off or some positive development) NVDY employs the 'Covered Call Spread' strategy, allowing more upside capture versus a standard covered call if NVDA's price surges. Asymmetric Downside: NVDY's synthetic long structure caps upside but leaves investors fully exposed to NVDA's downside. High monthly income may not be able to offset losses from a sharp NVDA correction. Investor Exodus: Significant price drops in NVDY can trigger investor outflows, lowering Assets Under Management (AUM) and making it harder to generate option income efficiently, thereby creating a negative feedback loop. Distribution volatility: While NVDA offers paltry dividends, NVDY's monthly payouts can fluctuate sharply — largely because they rely on option premium income and include return of capital. When NVDA's implied volatility drops or NVDY's Net Asset Value (NAV) erodes from repeated ROC payouts, the ETF's distributions could shrink. Opportunity Cost: Historically NVDA's returns have outpaced NVDY's significantly. Simply holding NVDA stock may generate greater total returns than NVDY, especially during strong bull runs in tech. NVDA Or NVDY — Which Investor Are You? If you are betting on Nvidia as a core pillar of an AI-driven future, and seek full participation in Nvidia's growth story — you're a Growth Chaser — you pick NVDA stock. If you are comfortable with capped upside and prioritize monthly income, you're an Income Alchemist — you choose NVDY to tactically monetize volatility and generate consistent yield. If you are looking to blend growth and income — gaining exposure to Nvidia's long-term upside while securing a steady income stream, you hold both: NVDA for capital appreciation and NVDY for monthly payouts. That makes you the Hedged Optimist. Bottom Line In my view, NVDA stock remains the superior play with its compelling long-term returns despite the meager dividend. The NVDA stock has clearly demonstrated resilience by rebounding and reaching new heights after every sharp correction, highlighting its structural strength. On the other hand, NVDY's low capital requirements, exceptional yield and the potential to recover capital in a reasonable time frame are alluring. However, the risks of asymmetric downside and NAV erosion — potentially shrinking the very dividends investors seek — make NVDY better suited as a tactical, smaller allocation in a portfolio. By contrast, NVDA stock deserves to be a core holding and investors may consider accumulating on any weakness, although past performance is no guarantee for future results.
New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Elon Musk Threatens to Sue Apple Over Claims It Favors OpenAI
Elon Musk claimed late Monday that Apple gave preferential treatment to OpenAI, a prominent competitor of his artificial intelligence company, and he threatened to sue the consumer tech giant for 'an unequivocal antitrust violation.' Mr. Musk's A.I. company, xAI, released a new version of its chatbot, Grok, last month. Mr. Musk has recently posted on his social media platform X about how well his chatbot was doing with rankings in Apple's App Store. But on Monday, Mr. Musk started posting that Apple was intentionally favoring OpenAI instead. Apple has a partnership with OpenAI to integrate its chatbot, ChatGPT, into Apple products. 'App Store, why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps?' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Are you playing politics?' Hours later, Mr. Musk posted that 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store.' 'xAI will take immediate legal action,' he added. Mr. Musk frequently turns to legal threats against competitors and critics over perceived injustice, sometimes resulting in lawsuits and other times fizzling out after a few social media posts. As of Tuesday afternoon, xAI did not appear to have filed a lawsuit in federal court. Representatives for xAI and Apple did not respond to requests for comment. A fact-checking feature run by X users, called Community Notes, added a note to Mr. Musk's post that said chatbot apps made by companies other than OpenAI have reached the number one spot on the App Store. Mr. Musk has feuded with OpenAI and Apple before. Mr. Musk previously criticized Apple in 2022, when he said the company had threatened to remove his social media app from its App Store altogether after he relaxed content moderation rules. Apple's policies prohibit apps that include hateful speech or content. Mr. Musk later met with Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and clarified it was a 'misunderstanding.' Mr. Musk co-founded OpenAI, but left the company in 2018, citing disagreements with the other co-founders over the company's direction. He sued OpenAI last year, claiming that the company and two of its founders, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, had breached its founding contract by putting commercial interests ahead of the public good. (The New York Times has also sued OpenAI for copyright infringement. The company has denied wrongdoing.) Mr. Altman, who remains the chief executive of OpenAI, has denied the allegations.
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Sara Kehaulani Goo named President of the Creator Network
As a company focused on storytelling and a mission to reach all of America, we recognize that creators are increasingly important alongside our deeply reported News and Opinion. The newest iteration of our third newsroom will focus on building a creator network and responsibly embracing AI. This new unit will focus on building personality-driven content and franchises in topic areas that are of interest to our target audiences. As referenced in a previous note, this unit will operate independently from the Newsroom and will report into me to create new commercial opportunities. To lead this new chapter, I am very excited to announce that Sara Kehaulani Goo will be returning to The Post to serve as President, Creator Network. As President, Sara will be building a new business with creators through an innovative commercial model, embracing AI to make and distribute content, and building the tools, services, and infrastructure needed to help creators succeed. In addition to her tenure as an editor and reporter at the Washington Post, Sara most recently came to us from Axios where she served as Editor-in-Chief building the newsroom there and pioneering new ways for news to be consumed and delivered. Sara has steered major news organizations through digital transformations, and we are so fortunate to have her returning to the Post to lead this critical part of our business. Please join me in welcoming Sara, who will start on August 25 and report to me.
