Why Iran closing this 103-mile stretch of ocean could be catastrophic
As fighting between Israel and Iran is boiling over with the US now involved, the most strategic oil chokepoint in the world – the Strait of Hormuz – is in the spotlight.
Concerns have been raised about just how disruptive the war could be for the steady flow of Gulf oil shipments to Europe, the US and Asia.
All eyes are on the Strait of Hormuz after Iran's parliament voted to approve the closure today. The decision still needs to be rubber-stamped by the country's Supreme National Security Council.
Adam Lakhani, security director at International SOS, warned that shutting it could cause a bigger market turmoil than the Russian invasion of Ukraine and Covid-19.
He told Metro that the price of oil could jump from the current $71.77 to as much as $120 per barrel in a 'worst-case scenario'.
'Iran has a very well-established naval base in the city of Bandar Abbas and it has a strong naval capability,' Lakhani explained.
'So whether they decide to pull that lever… is something we are concerned about and are watching very closely.'
About a fifth of the world's oil is transited through the shipping lane, which splits Iran on one side and Oman and the UAE on the other, and links the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea in the Indian Ocean.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Tankers collecting from various ports on the Persian Gulf must go through Hormuz.
The strait – between 35 to 60 miles wide – has been at the heart of regional tensions for decades, but the threat from Iran to shut it has only escalated the fears.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard commander Sardar Esmail Kowsari told local media that closing Hormuz 'is under consideration, and Iran will make the best decision with determination.'
He said: 'Our hands are wide open when it comes to punishing the enemy, and the military response was only part of our overall response.'
As a major chokepoint, the operation of Hormuz is critical to global energy security.
The inability of any oil to transit – even temporarily – can create substantial supply delays and raise shipping costs, increasing world energy prices.
Although most chokepoints can be bypassed by using other routes, which often add significantly to transit time, some have no alternatives.
Lakhani stressed that Kowsari's threat 'should be taken seriously', judging by the US repositioning of the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier along with several support tankers to bolster the military in the region.
Iran's threat to shut Homruz comes as a vessel crashed into two ships sailing nearby, 22 nautical miles east of Khor Fakkan in the UAE.
The Emirati national guard said it evacuated 24 people from an oil tanker after the collision.
The crude oil tanker, ADALYNN, was bound for Egypt's Suez Canal when the crash in the Gulf of Oman happened. More Trending
British maritime security firm Ambrey has said the cause of the incident is 'not security-related'.
Naval sources cited by Reuters warned that electronic interference with commercial ship navigation systems has surged in recent days around the strait and the wider Gulf, which is having an impact on vessels.
Maritime ship experts say shipowners are increasingly wary of using the waterway, with some ships having tightened security and others canceling routes there.
The Strait of Hormuz vote today comes after the US administration announced that is warplanes had dropped 'bunker buster' bombs on three key nuclear sites.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Is Donald Trump gambling his popularity and presidency with strikes on Iran?
MORE: London to Dubai BA flight turns back 90 minutes from landing after Iran strikes
MORE: UK prepares flights to help British nationals escape Israel after US bombs Iran
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Full list of Santander bank branches closing this week
More bank branches are shutting across the UK after Santander confirmed a list of closures. The UK high streets have been obliterated in recent years, even before the coronavirus pandemic as people have turned to online shopping. Changing customer habits are also reshaping banking, with many big names exiting towns and cities. And it isn't just banks bidding farewell. Poundland – a staple on every high street – announced a closure of almost 70 stores last week after a rescue deal. Here are the Santander branches closing this week. Aberdare – June 24 Blackwood – June 23 Brecon – June 25 Cleveleys – June 23 Dungannon – June 23 Eltham – June 23 Glasgow LDHQ – June 24 Glasgow MX – June 23 Greenford – June 24 Magherafelt – June 24 To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Santander told Metro previously that customer behaviour is changing and it needs to ensure that the business remains 'fit for future.' More Trending A Santander spokesperson said: 'Our new combination of full-service branches, alongside Work Cafés, counter-free branches and reduced hours branches, aims to provide the right balance between digital banking and face-to-face money management and guidance. 'As a business, we must move with customers and balance our investment across all the places where we interact with customers, to deliver the very best for them now and in the future.' The bank said that closing a branch is 'always a very difficult decision.' View More » It comes after the closure of ten Santander and eight NatWest branches last week. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Martin Lewis' MSE shares major update on £100,000,000 Mastercard compensation payouts MORE: Major UK high street bank could be put up for sale MORE: Full list of 55 NatWest branches that will close in another blow to high street Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Woman had to pay £20k to access her own bank account as husband was dying
Nicky Wake was left in 'limbo' as she was unable to access their joint bank account A young widow who had to pay out £20,000 to access her own bank account has issued a warning to people to be prepared when the worst happens. Nicky Wake's husband Andy died in April 2020 from Covid while he was in care. His death came a few years after he suffered multiple heart attacks that led to a catastrophic brain injury. Unable to walk, talk, or care for himself, Andy required round-the-clock specialist care in a nursing home. During that time, Nicky, 54, said she was left in 'limbo' as she was unable to access their joint bank account despite them being co-directors in their events and management company. This meant Nicky couldn't manage the business or pay herself dividends. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Andy had not appointed a legal or digital executor, prepared a will, or set up a power of attorney before his illness and death. Nicky, from Manchester, told The Mirror: 'It was an unholy mess. Andy kept all of the savings in his ISA. He joked that it was for a rainy day, and that day happened in 2017. 'It was pouring down and I couldn't access our savings when I needed it the most. I was solo parenting our son Finn, now 17, struggling with child care, while my husband was critically ill in hospital with no prognosis of a happy ending. His consultant said to me, 'your story does not have a happy end', and at the same time, I was worried about the financial implications.' While Nicky had her own current account, she relied on the savings account and was left financially stranded at the worst possible time. 'We used that account to buy our son school shoes and his birthday presents every year', she said. To regain control of their finances and the business, Nicky had to fork out over £20,000 in legal fees. Even after regaining control, she was obliged to account for every expenditure to the Court of Protection. Nicky said: 'Even though the money was jointly mine, I had to detail every penny of that in a heartbreaking report. So when I was fighting the biggest battle of my life, trying to stay alive, I was bashing needlessly. 'It was the most trying and horrid of times. I understand why the Court of Protection is in place, but it drove me to despair and the worst of all scenarios. 'I did CPR for 40 minutes to keep him alive, and at times the Court of Protection made me wish I hadn't, and that is a terrible and awful burden to carry.' She added: 'It is my fault, we should have had those grown-up conversations and we should have got a power of attorney in place, but we didn't.' Nicky didn't gain full access to their business until Andy died. In addition, Nicky was unable to access his social media accounts - a place where he had long connected with friends. She struggled to guess passwords and wished she could inform his friends about his condition and share regular updates. Contacting customer service representatives on social media platforms was 'impossible'. Nicky added: 'Every other day, a Facebook memory pops up with Andy, it's a beautiful yet heartbreaking reminder. 'I would have loved to have created a post for the love of Andy and put that on his account, but I never got the chance to do that.' She also lost messages from her husband. She said: 'I lost every WhatsApp conversation I had with him, and you don't understand how heartbreaking and painful that is. Not being able to go back and look at those memories. 'You need to back those up, save your WhatsApp conversations. It was something I had to experience.' Nicky is now urging everyone to keep an updated will, establish a power of attorney, designate legacy contacts for all digital and social accounts, back up crucial chats like WhatsApp to the cloud, and keep a secure, accessible record of account passwords. 'There are a lot of important assets we need to keep and treasure. 'We need to be having those difficult conversations, but we don't talk about it enough. You don't think it's going to happen to you, but then it does.' Reflecting back, she added: 'It was heartbreaking, horrible, kind of limbo. I felt like I was fighting battles on every front. To have to deal with admin, lack of access, financial worries, on top of a life-changing tragedy, was beyond belief. I used to wake up and couldn't believe what had happened to our beautiful family, I still don't.' Following this time, Nicky was inspired to launch a platform designed to help others like her - widows and widowers - in finding companionship, love, and hope following profound loss. Research Manager at SunLife, Jordan Flynn, said: 'If you're thinking about leaving instructions for your funeral or writing a will, it's a good time to leave clear instructions for your digital estate. Not doing so can mean loved ones are locked out of important accounts or left unsure about whether to memorialise, delete, or manage your social media accounts. 'Some people may like the idea of their profiles and photos remaining online for loved ones to remember them by. But others are uncomfortable with these accounts being visible when they're no longer around to manage them.' Jordan shared her top five tips on how to take control of your digital legacy. Digital executor: 'Appoint someone you trust to manage your online accounts and digital assets when you die. This can be the executor of your will or a separate person with digital know-how.' List online accounts: 'Make a comprehensive list of all your online accounts, and make sure you include everything from social media and email to online banking, cloud storage, and entertainment services. If you have appointed a digital executor you won't need to list all your passwords, just the username or email address associated with each account.' Legacy contact: 'Most major platforms have a specific feature where you can appoint someone as your digital executor within your account profile. For example, Apple has a 'Legacy Contact', Facebook also has a Legacy Contact, and Google has Inactive Account Manager – it is something you have to opt into, so make sure you have taken the necessary steps.' Document digital wishes clearly: 'You need to make sure there is evidence of what you want to happen to your digital legacy – there can be no grey areas. Clearly state whether you want accounts deleted, memorialised, or passed on, and who should receive sentimental content like photos or videos.' Store instructions securely: 'You need to make sure your wishes are securely stored – ideally, include your digital instructions in your will to ensure they're legally binding. Alternatively, you can store them with your solicitor or in a secure place known to your executor.' Jordan added: 'Preparing for your digital legacy is no longer optional in the internet age. It's a simple step that can save your loved one's unnecessary distress - and ensures your online identity reflects your wishes, even after you're gone. 'SunLife's Digital Wishes Pack ( includes everything you need to know about listing online accounts, deciding what should happen to each one, and leaving clear instructions for loved ones – download it for free today.'
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
US warns it WILL strike again and world ‘should listen to Trump' as Iran leaders jet to meet Putin after nuke bomb blitz
'WE WILL DEFEND' US warns it WILL strike again and world 'should listen to Trump' as Iran leaders jet to meet Putin after nuke bomb blitz THE US has warned it will strike again and that the world "should listen to Trump" after unleashing an unprecedented blitz on three nuclear facilities. It comes imminently after the Iranian foreign minister revealed he is to meet with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin and warned the West of "unprecedented danger". 5 Iranian worshippers burn the flags of the US and Israel on Friday 5 United States President Donald J Trump addresses the nation Credit: AP 5 Russia's President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi during a meeting at the Kremlin in April Credit: AFP 5 B-2 Spirit drops a GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bomb (stock image) 5 US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Operation Midnight Hammer was 'an incredible and overwhelming success' that took months and weeks of planning. He added Trump has been clear that "any retaliation by Iran" against the US would be "met with force far greater" than what was seen on Saturday night. Hegseth said: 'Iran would be smart to heed those words. He's said it before, and he means it.' The Defence Secretary went on to praise the US leader, calling it "bold and brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back". He urged: "When this President speaks, the world should listen." Iran's foreign minister Abbas Arghchi has said he is going to Russia today to meet mad leader Putin. He revealed: 'I'm going to Moscow this afternoon, and I have a meeting with President Putin tomorrow morning.' Arghchi called Moscow a 'friend of Iran,' adding 'we always consult with each other'. Fears loom that the conflict could spiral into a world war, with Putin puppet Dmitry Medvedev making a veiled threat to supply Iran with nuclear weapons. He said: "A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their nuclear weapons." After declaring the US strikes as being a success, Trump warned that further action could be taken if Tehran doesn't agree to an adequate peace deal. He said in a nationally televised speech at the White House: "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." 'Remember there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. 'But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. 'Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight." And shortly after speaking on-camera, he posted to Truth Social: "This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. "Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. "But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill." Meanwhile Iran's foreign minister Abbas Arghchi dubbed the strikes "outrageous and will have everlasting consequences". He also called the military action "a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations". Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...
