Justice Malala to unpack South Africa's economic and political future
Justice Malala
At the heart of this discussion is Operation Vulindlela, the joint initiative between government and business designed to fast-track structural reforms in energy, transport, and crime prevention – all critical areas for industries represented at AATF.
As the country's top CEOs set a 3% GDP growth target, the success of these reforms will determine whether the country's automation, manufacturing, and industrial technology sectors can accelerate digital transformation, attract investment, and drive economic growth. Malala will explore the real impact of these reforms on businesses, unpack whether implementation is on track, and discuss how private and public sectors can align to create a competitive industrial economy.
Beyond domestic policy, South Africa's global positioning and trade relationships remain vital to its industrial future. Malala will examine how the country's G20 membership and foreign policy stance – particularly on the Middle East and BRICS relations – could impact trade, investment, and economic partnerships. The return of Donald Trump to the global political stage could also present new challenges and opportunities for South African industries, shaping the future of business diplomacy.
With the 2026 municipal elections approaching, the country's political landscape is shifting. Malala will provide exclusive insights into the stability of the Government of National Unity (GNU), the challenges of coalition politics, and the potential impact of new political realignments on business confidence, investment, and economic policy direction.
A globally respected political thinker, Malala writes for Bloomberg, Financial Mail, and TimesLive and has been published in the Financial Times, Washington Post, The Guardian, and The Economist, which described him as 'perhaps the country's most astute political commentator'. He is the author of four books, including The Plot To Save South Africa, which reached number one on the SA bestseller list and was hailed as 'masterful, compelling, and fast-moving' by international critics.
This exclusive AATF event will bring together business leaders, policymakers, industrial decision-makers, and the media for a high-level discussion on South Africa's economic direction, its automation-driven future, and the policies that will shape industrial success in 2025 and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
Pressure mounts on South Africa to sever ties with Israel, expel diplomats
South African authorities are facing mounting pressure to sever ties with Israel and expel Israeli diplomats, amid growing outrage over its genocide by starvation campaign in the besieged Gaza Strip. Several activists told Middle East Eye that they had intensified their campaign to end what they called South Africa's complicity in Israel's war on Gaza, where more than 200,000 Palestinians have been killed or wounded and the entire population is facing famine. Zukiswa Wanner, a writer and activist, said that many South Africans had thought Pretoria's decision to take Israel to the International Court of Justice in late 2023 would result in a swift end to the 22-month conflict, but Israel, with full Western backing, continued its war on Gaza. "Almost two years later, Israel has not relented and we continue seeing the horror visited on the Palestinians," Wanner told MEE. "As individuals, we are all quite powerless on pushing the stop of the genocide - but as citizens - we can demand of our government that they finalise this small thing: South Africa can't be having normal relations with an abnormal, genocidal government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Since Israel went to war on Gaza, only Bolivia and Belize have severed diplomatic relations with Israel. At various points, the Muslim majority countries of Bahrain, Chad, Jordan and Turkey have withdrawn their ambassadors, but all still maintain diplomatic ties with Israel. For its part, South Africa hasn't had an ambassador in Israel since 2018. But activists say the country needs to take stronger action against Israel. 'South Africa can't be having normal relations with an abnormal, genocidal government' - Zukiswa Wanner Many South Africans told MEE that they were extremely disappointed with Cyril Ramaphosa's government's decision to ignore parliament's decision to sever ties with Israel in November 2023. "Other countries have disengaged with Israel without the fanfare we brought to the table," Wanner added. This week, a petition created by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), urging the government to shutter the Israeli embassy had secured several thousand signatures. "You have rightly brought a case of genocide against Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), so you have determined Israel is committing genocide. How then can we continue to have diplomatic and economic relations with that genocidal state?" the petition said. 'Block the Boat' Across South Africa, frustration over Israel's war on Gaza and brutal occupation of the West Bank have triggered several small scale protest actions at traffic lights, and outside embassies and ports. This week, activists in the port city of Durban mobilised over reports that a ship travelling via South Africa to Israel was carrying cargo that may be used in the war on Gaza. Local activists were alerted by the South African BDS coalition that the vessel, originating from Chennai, India, was carrying "dangerous goods". With India having previously sent combat drones, as well as batches of explosives and components to Israel, the activists said they were compelled to act to prevent Durban from becoming a conduit for murdering Palestinians. Hundreds of South Africans mobilised online, reached out to local and national representatives and the police, calling for the ship to be inspected and for Pretoria to uphold its obligations in international law. Israel's war on Gaza has exposed 'deep divide' within Brics, experts say Read More » As a founding member of The Hague Group, South Africa has pledged its intention to prevent the supply of arms to Israel. It has also committed to preventing the docking of vessels which may be used to transport fuel and arms to Israel. On Thursday, activists reported that following an inspection by police, the vessel was found to have not been in possession of any material that may be used to violate human rights, but lauded both the community and authorities for complying with their requests to have the vessel checked. "We will continue to carry through with this 'Block the Boat - Durban' campaign, because we know that our port could be used for transporting of goods destined for Israel," Lubna Nadvi with the KwaZulu-Natal Palestine Solidarity Forum (PSF), told MEE. Nadvi said the group was also monitoring the tranporstation of coal from Richards Bay Port - the other major port in KwaZulu-Natal - and would be picketing outside the port terminal in the coming days. "There are multiple campaigns that we are undertaking. The fact that this tip-off came through means that there is a very vigilant international network keeping an eye out. And the fact that nothing was found is good, and we need to be vigilant that no such items will be traveling through any one of our ports," Nadvi added. The South African Police Services did not immediately respond to MEE's request for comment.
Dubai Eye
2 days ago
- Dubai Eye
India PM Modi faces opposition fury after Trump's 25% tariff threat
Indian opposition parties criticised the government on Thursday, describing US President Donald Trump's threat of a 25 per cent tariff as a diplomatic failure for New Delhi, while the rupee currency tumbled and equity indexes slid in response to the news. The 25 per cent rate would single out India more harshly than other major trading partners, and threatens to unravel months of talks, undermining one of Washington's strategic partners in the region, viewed as a counterbalance to China. Trump said the tariff on goods imports from India would start from Friday, in addition to an unspecified penalty for Russian dealings and involvement in the BRICS grouping of nations, but added later that trade talks continued. In response, the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi said it was studying the implications of Trump's remarks and was dedicated to securing a fair trade deal. "This development reflects a broader collapse of foreign policy under the Modi government," a lawmaker of the main opposition Congress said in a notice asking for a discussion of the matter in the lower house. The debate would focus on the "government's economic and diplomatic failure in preventing the imposition of 25 per cent US tariffs plus penalties on Indian exports," it added. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal is expected to brief the lower house later on Thursday, television news channels said. Economists warned the steep tariff could hurt India's manufacturing ambitions and trim up to 40 basis points from economic growth in the financial year to March 2026. India's benchmark equity indices, the Nifty 50 and BSE Sensex, fell about 0.6 per cent each, while the rupee declined to 87.74, its lowest in more than five months, before paring losses. India has received a "raw deal", said Priyanka Kishore, an economist at Asia Decoded. "While further trade talks may bring the tariff rate down, it appears unlikely that India will secure a significantly better outcome than its eastern neighbours," she added. That would raise questions about India's relative appeal as a China plus one destination, she said, referring to a strategy of diversifying supply chains through manufacturing outside China to reduce geopolitical and operational risks. Trade talks continued, Trump said on social media, however, as nations face a Friday deadline to strike deals on reciprocal tariffs or have a US tariff slapped on their exports. The US levy on India exceeds those achieved by some other nations in deals with the Trump administration. For example, the tariff on Vietnam is set at 20 per cent and on Indonesia at 19 per cent, with levies of 15 per cent on Japanese and European Union exports. On Wednesday, Trump said Washington had reached a trade deal with India's arch-rival Pakistan that Islamabad said would lead to lower tariffs on its exports, but neither side have yet revealed the agreed rate. Since India's short but deadly conflict with Pakistan in May, New Delhi has been unhappy about Trump's closeness with Islamabad and has protested, casting a shadow over trade talks. Despite former public displays of bonhomie between Trump and Modi, India has taken a slightly harder stance against the United States in recent weeks. Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the India-Pakistan ceasefire he announced on social media on May 10, but India disputes his claim that it resulted from his intervention and trade threats. "The country is now bearing the cost of Narendra Modi's friendship," Congress said. The United States, the world's largest economy, now has a trade deficit of $45.7 billion with India, the fifth largest.
Arabian Post
2 days ago
- Arabian Post
RIC Dialogue Revival Gains Traction Amid US Tariff Pressures
Russia has renewed efforts to revive the dormant Russia–India–China trilateral dialogue, prompting cautious signals from India and prompt endorsement from China. Moscow's deputy foreign minister, Andrei Rudenko, has confirmed active negotiations with Beijing and New Delhi around restarting consultations among the trio, all founding members of BRICS, to address global strategic concerns. China's foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian framed the initiative as beneficial not only to the countries individually but to peace and stability in the region and beyond. The push for RIC's reactivation is widely seen as a geopolitical response to mounting pressure from the US. President Trump has announced a sweeping 25% tariff on goods imported from India, effective from 1 August 2025, tied to concerns over India's continued trade with Russia in oil and arms. Additional penalties may include hefty secondary tariffs targeting countries purchasing Russian energy. Analysts suggest these measures aim to curb support for Moscow amid escalating tensions over the war in Ukraine. India's government has responded with guarded openness, describing RIC as a consultative mechanism and confirming that any resumption would occur 'in a mutually convenient manner.' There is, however, no set schedule yet for a trilateral meeting. Delhi continues to emphasise its policy of strategic autonomy, favouring existing multilateral platforms like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation over reinventing older groupings. ADVERTISEMENT Diplomatic analysts highlight a delicate balance. While India may value the leverage offered by engaging with both Russia and China, unresolved security issues remain substantial hurdles. Ongoing infrastructure expansion by China along the Line of Actual Control, assertion of territorial claims, and its close support to Pakistan compound mistrust. India's top army chief has affirmed that troop deployment along the Himalayan boundary will remain unchanged unless de‑escalation yields concrete stability. Moscow and Beijing insist that cooler diplomatic winds have set the stage for RIC's revival. China's endorsement lends important legitimacy to Russia's proposition, given its substantial trading partnership and growing influence within Eurasian multilateral institutions. For Moscow, reactivating RIC represents a strategic way to counteract economic isolation and foster alternatives to Western-dominated forums. India's interest in RIC appears to stem not from ideological alignment but a pragmatic reassessment of global alliances amid unpredictability from Washington. The sudden shift in US policy during the Trump presidency—from strategic ally‑ship to threatening tariffs and secondary sanctions—has prompted Delhi to seek diversified ties as a hedge. Yet India remains impatient with the prospect of formalising a framework that it neither initiated nor fully trusts. Its preference is clear: preserve diplomatic flexibility, maintain strong bilateral ties with the US, and leverage broader coalitions like BRICS and SCO to engage Russia and China when strategically beneficial. The trajectory of RIC revival will hinge on whether India perceives tangible value in a trilateral platform beyond existing multilateral frameworks. If border tensions ease and mutual interests in global governance strengthen, corridors for rebooting RIC may open. Otherwise, the format may serve more as diplomatic signalling than substantive partnership. Geopolitics at this level remains fluid, and small shifts in external pressure or strategic calculation could tip India's stance in one direction or the other.
