Salmonella outbreak in the US: Eggs recalled after illnesses reported across 7 States
states, sending 21 to the hospital—and triggering a massive recall of 1.7 million dozen eggs by California's August Egg Company.
On June 6, 2025, the CDC issued a public health warning: dozens of Salmonella cases, all linked to the same egg strain. These folks got sick between February and May, but the alert just dropped—perfect timing to wreck your June brunch plans.
The CDC report revealed that 79 people across Arizona, California, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, Washington, and Wyoming fell ill.
That's a big spread, all connected by the same egg brand.
"Recalled brown cage free eggs and brown certified organic eggs, with sell by dates from March 4, 2025, to June 4, 2025, were distributed in California and Nevada to retail locations including Save Mart, FoodMaxx, Lucky, Smart & Final, Safeway, Raleys, Food 4 Less and Ralphs," the US CDC says. "The eggs were also distributed to Walmart locations in California, Washington, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming, New Mexico, Nebraska, Indiana and Illinois with sell by dates from March 4, 2025, to June 19, 2025," it adds.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
August Egg Company voluntarily recalled 1.7 million dozen brown cage-free and organic eggs produced in Hilmar, CA. The culprit? Plant codes P-6562 or CA5330,, spanning early March to early June sell-by dates. If you stocked up on ova lately, better check your fridge.
Data from the CDC and FDA shows that surveyed patients confirmed eating eggs or egg dishes before getting sick. . Symptoms like diarrhea, fever, vomiting, and cramps usually started 12–72 hours post-meal.
Worst-hit groups include young kids, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems—who are more likely to need hospitalization or IV fluids .
Safety rules
Use only pasteurized eggs for recipes like raw cookie dough or homemade mayonnaise .
Always refrigerate eggs, cook them until yolks are hard, wash hands and utensils after handling
Clean and sanitize surfaces after any raw egg contact
Check UPC codes and plant numbers before cooking anything egg-based recently.
Check your carton for plant codes P‑6562 or CA5330. Dispose of or return any matching eggs, cooked or raw. Thoroughly clean surfaces that touched the eggs with hot, soapy water. Monitor symptoms if you ate them: look out for diarrhea lasting over 3 days, high fever, blood in stool, vomiting, dehydration.
Eggs have been in short supply due to avian flu and soaring prices. This outbreak stings extra because consumers were already scrambling. Plus, it reminds us that 'natural,' 'organic,' or 'cage-free' labels don't mean immune to bugs. Packaging strategy doesn't kill pathogens—it just risks spreading them further.
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Do feminine washes really work? The shocking truth about vaginal care trends and why they can be risky
The female hygiene market is booming, but some products, like intimate washes, are unnecessary and potentially harmful. Studies reveal the presence of PFAS in reusable menstrual products and toxic heavy metals like lead and arsenic in tampons. These chemicals pose serious health risks, including cancer, infertility, and organ damage, raising concerns about product safety and the need for further research. The female hygiene product market has seen a boom in recent years, thanks to the increased awareness around personal care and intimate hygiene. While products such as menstrual cups and period panties have been a boon, the same cannot be said about all. From products that claim to keep to 'clean' down there, and leave you smelling like a bouquet of roses, to intimate area whitening creams, certain products feed on the insecurities of many women. But do these products really live up to their claims? And should you use it? Let's take a look at what science and health experts say. The case of intimate washes If you are a woman (or not), you must have come across at least one advertisement for 'feminine wash' or 'intimate wash'. Often claimed as natural, moisturizing, and safe, these washes advertise that if you have a vulva and a vagina, you need to use them to keep the area 'clean'. So, should you be using these washes to keep everything down there clean? Well, the manufacturers can put fancy labels and make big claims, but health experts do not really approve of these feminine washes. Why? Because you don't really need them! Dr Tanya Narendra, aka Dr. Cuterus, an Oxford University-trained embryologist and medical doctor, explains why you don't need these intimate washes. 'The vagina is a self-cleaning organ. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo It means that you don't need a special soap to wash the vagina. Just like you don't clean the inside of your nose but the outside, you don't have to clean the inside of your vagina,' she said in a video. PFAS in menstrual products Well, feminine washes and intimate sprays are not the only culprits. Some studies have found the presence of dangerous chemicals and PFAs in female hygiene products. A recent study led by researchers at the Indiana University Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs and the University of Notre Dame found the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals (PFAS), also known as 'forever chemicals', in reusable feminine hygiene products such as period underwear, reusable pads, menstrual cups, and reusable incontinence underwear and pads. 'Feminine hygiene products stay in contact with the skin for extended periods, and the risks from the dermal absorption of PFAS, especially neutral PFAS, are not well understood,' the study author said. PFAS are linked to serious health risks. 'One of the most abundant PFAS detected in products from the North American market is 8:2 FTOH, a chemical that was voluntarily phased out in food packaging by manufacturers in accordance with the FDA due to persistence in the body after dietary exposure. Notably, 8:2 FTOH can be transformed into more toxic PFOA once inside the body,' they added. Heavy metals in tampons A 2024 study led by a UC Berkeley researcher found that tampons of several brands have toxic metals like lead, arsenic, and cadmium. The potential exposure to these chemicals, including the toxic metals, is high, as the skin of the vagina has a higher potential for chemical absorption than skin elsewhere on the body. 'Despite this large potential for public health concern, very little research has been done to measure chemicals in tampons. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to measure metals in tampons. Concerningly, we found concentrations of all metals we tested for, including toxic metals like arsenic and lead,' lead author Jenni A. Shearston, a postdoctoral scholar at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health and UC Berkeley's Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, said. Barbara Palvin Opens Up About Her Hidden Health Battle & Transformative Surgery Recovery These metals are linked to a higher risk of dementia, infertility, diabetes, and cancer. They can also damage the liver, kidneys, and brain. 'Although toxic metals are ubiquitous and we are exposed to low levels at any given time, our study clearly shows that metals are also present in menstrual products, and that women might be at higher risk for exposure using these products,' the researchers said. The researchers found heavy metals in all types of tampons they tested. Lead concentrations were higher in non-organic tampons, but arsenic was higher in organic tampons.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Advanced therapy helps city woman win eight-year-long fight against breast cancer
Ranchi: A 38-year-old Alpana Pathak has triumphed over stage 4 metastatic breast cancer after an eight-year-long battle. She was diagnosed with breast carcinoma in 2017. Over the years, she endured multiple rounds of chemotherapy, breast surgery, radiation, targeted therapies, brain radiation (SBRT), and lung surgeries. Despite her relentless fight, the disease kept returning, spreading to her brain and other organs. By late 2024, her condition deteriorated. She was placed on ventilator support as she struggled with severe lung infection, urinary tract infection, blood infection among others. Under the supervision of Dr Satish Sharma, consultant–medical oncology at city-based Bhagwan Mahavir Manipal Hospital, she then underwent an advanced targeted therapy imported from Germany. This intervention proved transformative after years of extensive treatment. Blood next generation sequencing was then conducted, and based on the results, Sharma and his team made the decision to initiate an advanced international therapy. "The results were remarkable over the course of months. Alpana was gradually weaned off oxygen, regained her ability to walk independently, and resumed her daily activities," Sharma said on Monday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Compare Spreads: Bitcoin vs Ethereum CFDs IC Markets Learn More Undo He added, "When the patient came to us, her condition was extremely critical; she was on a ventilator, battling multiple organ infections. We explored every possible option and opted for an advanced international therapy tailored to her needs. She gradually came off the ventilator, regained her strength, and returned to her normal life." Narrating her ordeal, Pathak said, "These past eight years have been the toughest battle of my life. I have been through surgeries, chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapies, and even slipped into a coma. There were days when I could not walk, when every breath felt like a struggle. Today, I can once again lead a normal life." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
LASIK isn't as safe as you think: Columbia doctor warns it can cause long-term vision loss
LASIK, one of the most popular vision-correction procedures, has long been marketed as a quick, safe way to achieve 20/20 vision. However, Dr. Cynthia MacKay, an ophthalmologist at Columbia University, has raised serious concerns about its long-term safety. She describes LASIK as 'taking a healthy eye and making it sick,' warning that it can permanently alter the cornea and leave patients with worse vision than before. Complications may appear decades later, including loss of distance vision, reduced contrast sensitivity, chronic dry eyes, and corneal bulging. Her critique emphasizes the need for full patient awareness and careful screening before undergoing the procedure. What happens during LASIK surgery LASIK (Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis) is a popular procedure designed to correct refractive errors such as nearsightedness, farsightedness, and astigmatism. During the surgery, an ophthalmologist uses an excimer laser to reshape the cornea, the clear front layer of the eye, in order to improve how light is focused on the retina. The procedure begins with creating a thin corneal flap, which is carefully lifted to allow the laser to reshape the underlying tissue. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo Once the reshaping is complete, the flap is repositioned, naturally adhering without stitches. While many patients experience rapid improvement in vision and reduced dependence on glasses or contact lenses, Dr. MacKay warns that LASIK permanently alters the corneal structure. These structural changes can lead to long-term complications such as corneal thinning, ectasia (bulging of the cornea), dry eyes, and loss of contrast sensitivity. Patients may also experience visual disturbances like glare, halos, or difficulties seeing at night. Because of these potential risks, it is critical for anyone considering LASIK to have a thorough preoperative evaluation, understand the limitations of the procedure, and discuss possible short- and long-term complications with their ophthalmologist before undergoing surgery. Documented risks and complications of LASIK surgery Several studies and reports outline the possible LASIK side effects: Dry eye syndrome : Up to 95% experience dry eyes immediately post-surgery, with 20% having persistent issues. Visual disturbances: Glare, halos, and difficulty seeing at night affect roughly 20% of patients. Loss of contrast sensitivity: Many patients notice reduced ability to perceive subtle shades. Flap-related complications: Improper healing or trauma can cause long-term issues. Long-term complications: Corneal ectasia, scarring, and other late-onset problems may appear years after surgery. Disagreement and scientific perspective While Dr. MacKay emphasizes the long-term risks of LASIK, many ophthalmologists maintain that the procedure is generally safe for the majority of patients when thorough preoperative screening and proper surgical protocols are followed. The success of LASIK often depends on factors such as corneal thickness, overall eye anatomy, pre-existing eye conditions, and the patient's healing capacity. Some doctors argue that most complications are mild and temporary, like dry eyes or night vision issues, and that serious long-term effects are relatively rare. Experts agree, however, that patient education, informed consent, and realistic expectations are essential to minimize risks and ensure satisfaction. Individual variability makes it clear that LASIK is not a one-size-fits-all solution, and ongoing monitoring post-surgery is recommended to catch potential issues early. Ethical concerns and FDA scrutiny LASIK marketing campaigns often promise outcomes like '20/20 vision or your money back,' which can give patients unrealistic expectations while downplaying potential risks. Dr. MacKay has criticized the FDA for not issuing stronger public warnings or requiring more transparent reporting of complications. Ethical discussions in ophthalmology focus on ensuring patients are fully informed about both short- and long-term risks, including chronic dry eyes, visual disturbances, and structural changes to the cornea. The underreporting of adverse effects and the aggressive promotion of LASIK raise questions about industry accountability. With millions of procedures performed worldwide, it's increasingly important that prospective patients receive balanced information, including the potential for late-onset complications and the necessity of ongoing eye health monitoring. Lessons for prospective patients LASIK can dramatically improve vision for many people, offering freedom from glasses or contact lenses. However, it is not without risk, and patients must approach the procedure with a thorough understanding of possible outcomes. Comprehensive preoperative screening, including corneal thickness measurements and an evaluation of eye health, is crucial. Patients should also discuss long-term risks with their ophthalmologist, including chronic dry eyes, loss of contrast sensitivity, night vision issues, and the rare possibility of corneal bulging or scarring. By understanding both the benefits and potential complications, individuals can make informed decisions, set realistic expectations, and plan for proper post-operative care to ensure their vision remains healthy over time.
