UK crime agency freezes assets of disgraced Sheikh Hasina ally
The UK's National Crime Agency (NCA) has frozen properties in the United Kingdom owned by Saifuzzaman Chowdhury, Bangladesh's former Minister of Land, Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit (I-Unit) can reveal.
The move follows legal requests from Bangladesh authorities to take action against assets owned by Chowdhury, a political ally of deposed Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina of the now-banned Awami League party. Chowdhury is under investigation by Bangladesh authorities for money laundering.
Last night, in a statement to the I-Unit, an NCA spokesperson confirmed the freezing order: 'We can confirm that the NCA has secured freezing orders against a number of properties as part of an on-going civil investigation.'
The property freeze means, in effect, that the assets cannot be sold by Chowdhury.
The action by the police agency, often dubbed 'Britain's FBI', coincided with this week's visit to London by Bangladesh's interim leader, Professor Muhammad Yunus.
Last year, Al Jazeera revealed Chowdhury, 56, owns more than 350 properties in the UK. While the full extent of the NCA's action is not yet understood, the I-Unit can disclose that Chowdhury's luxury home in St John's Wood, London, is part of the asset freeze.
The home, bought for 11 million pounds ($14.8m), was the scene of secret filming by undercover reporters from Al Jazeera's I-Unit. Reporters met Chowdhury during a long-running investigation into wealth that he had accumulated while he was still a government minister.
During the meeting, Chowdhury talked expansively to reporters about his global property portfolio and revealed his taste for expensive suits and designer 'baby croc' leather shoes. He described his close ties to the now deposed Sheikh Hasina, telling Al Jazeera's journalists, 'I am like her son, actually.'
'She knows I have a business here,' he also told them.
The I-Unit revealed that Chowdhury, from a powerful family in the port city of Chittagong, amassed a property empire despite a $12,000 annual limit as part of the nation's currency laws on the amount a citizen can take out of Bangladesh. The investigation uncovered that Chowdhury spent more than $500m on real estate in London, Dubai, and New York but did not declare his overseas assets on his Bangladesh tax returns.
The undercover meeting was part of the Al Jazeera documentary The Minister's Millions, broadcast last October.
Chowdhury had been a close ally of deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who fled Bangladesh in August 2024 after hundreds were killed as security forces cracked down on student protests.
After Hasina's departure, Bangladesh authorities launched an investigation into allegations of widespread corruption in her government.
Following the uprising and street violence in Bangladesh, the I-Unit tracked down Chowdhury to his London home, where he could be observed taking leisurely walks around his exclusive neighbourhood, which includes Lord's Cricket Ground.
In earlier statements to Al Jazeera, Chowdhury said the funds used to buy his overseas properties came from legitimate businesses outside Bangladesh, which he had owned for years. The former minister claimed he was the subject of a politically motivated 'witch-hunt' against him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Australia confident AUKUS security pact will proceed despite US review
Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said he is 'very confident' that the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom will continue to move forward despite news that the Pentagon is reviewing the 2021 deal between the three nations. News of the review was first reported on Thursday as US defence officials said re-assessing the pact was necessary to ensure that the military deal, agreed to with much fanfare under former US President Joe Biden, was in line with US President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The pact includes a deal worth hundreds of billions of dollars to provide Australia with closely-guarded nuclear propulsion technology. Only five other countries besides the US can build nuclear submarines: the UK, China, Russia, France and India. 'The meetings that we've had with the United States have been very positive in respect of AUKUS,' Defence Minister Marles told the ABC network. A review of the deal is 'something that it's perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do … It's exactly what we did', Marles said. 'There is a plan here. We are sticking to it, and we're going to deliver it,' he said. Under the terms of the AUKUS deal, Australia and the UK will work with the US to design nuclear-class submarines ready for delivery to Australia in the 2040s, according to the US Naval Institute. The three countries are already close military allies and share intelligence, but AUKUS focuses on key strategic areas, such as countering the rise of China and its expansion into the Pacific. Due to the long lead time in building the submarines under the AUKUS deal, Australia also agreed to buy up to three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines during the 2030s. The US and UK also plan to start the rotational deployment of their submarines out of Australia in 2027. But some Trump administration officials, such as Pentagon policy adviser Elbridge Colby, say the submarine deal puts foreign governments ahead of US national security. 'My concern is why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it?' Colby said last year. Other officials, including US Representative Joe Courtney from Connecticut – a US state which has an industry focused on building submarines for the US Navy – say the deal is in the 'best interest of all three AUKUS nations, as well as the Indo-Pacific region as a whole'. 'To abandon AUKUS – which is already well under way – would cause lasting harm to our nation's standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing,' Courtney said. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to discuss the deal when he meets Trump next week during a meeting of the G7 leaders in Canada. Earlier this year, Australia made a $500m payment towards AUKUS and plans to spend $2bn this year to speed up the production process in the US of the Virginia-class submarines. The UK, like Australia, has downplayed concerns that the Trump administration could renege on the pact. A UK official told the Reuters news agency that the deal is 'one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades' that will also produce 'jobs and economic growth in communities across all three nations'. 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year,' the official said.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
What do we know about the US-China trade deal?
The White House has said a trade deal with China is done and is awaiting the signatures of United States President Donald Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. The White House said on Wednesday that the president is currently reviewing the details. Trump announced the deal after days of trade talks between US and Chinese delegations in London, which followed an earlier round of negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters during the announcement. The deal includes a provision in which China will supply the US with rare earth elements vital to major US companies, particularly in the auto, semiconductor, and smartphone manufacturing sectors. Trump said that minerals would be supplied upfront, but it is unclear what that entails. China has disproportionate control over the rare earth market. It produces 60 percent of the world's rare earth minerals and processes nearly 90 percent of them. That has been a longstanding concern of the US, including during the administration of former President Joe Biden. In February 2024, then US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said the US was 'very concerned' about the nation's reliance on China for its supply of critical minerals in an interview with CNBC. Those concerns have been amplified in Trump's second term, especially after he imposed sweeping tariffs – including a 145 percent tariff on China – and added on export control measures for China's chip industry. In April, China's Ministry of Commerce retaliated by imposing export restrictions on these minerals. Under the latest agreement, the US will impose 55 percent tariffs across the board on Chinese goods, down from 145 percent. In return, Beijing will impose a 10 percent tariff on goods it imports from the US, down from 125 percent. The 55 percent US tariff includes a 10 percent baseline tariff – which is currently in legal limbo after a trade court ruled it illegal, a decision that a higher court has temporarily blocked – as well as 25 percent from tariffs dating to Trump's first term and 20 percent related to alleged fentanyl trafficking. The White House has framed the deal as a win, and the tariffs remain higher than when Trump first took office. Experts continue to argue that tariffs act as a tax on US businesses and consumers will ultimately bear the cost, not China. Retailers, including Walmart, have already said they will need to raise prices because of the tariffs. In an earnings call last month, CEO Doug McMillon said, 'Given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins.' Walmart sources about 60 percent of its merchandise from China. It's not clear if it will change any of its sourcing plans in the light of the latest deal. The new deal hasn't assuaged the concerns among the small business community. 'For many small businesses that mostly source their parts or products from China, this is a death sentence and will destroy their American dream,' the Main Street Alliance, an advocacy group representing small business interests, said in a publicly released statement in response to the trade deal. Small business owners have also had to implement hiring freezes and pause development due to tariffs on China. Wild Rye, an outdoor apparel brand that previously spoke with Al Jazeera, said this hasn't changed anything. 'It is devastating, 55 percent tariffs are still insane,' Cassie Abel, founder of Wild Rye, told Al Jazeera. She added that because of the previously announced tariffs, anticipatory spending and orders to cater to, it was very challenging for small businesses like hers to find shipping containers to get her existing orders to the US. 'It's really hard to find a container. The chances of getting our product out of China within the 90-day window is basically zero,' Abel said. The deal for a 90 day pause on most tariffs was announced in April and expires July 8. Because the specifics of the trade deal have yet to be made public, it is not clear when the new tariffs will kick in for China. The White House did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for clarification. The deal also includes a concession allowing Chinese students to continue attending US universities, a matter that had not been contested until Trump raised it a few weeks ago. The sudden shift in the US stance on that had left thousands of Chinese students – and the universities they were set to attend or are currently enrolled in – in limbo. Lutnick said that US tariffs on China will not change again and will go into effect as soon as next week, although analysts believe that may be a negotiating tactic. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, believes that despite Lutnick's claims, this will not be the end of tariff negotiations with China. He expects further industry-specific exemptions in the months ahead, similar to the exception for semiconductor chips. 'The tariffs are high, but I believe this is … a starting point. The framework's established, and I'd expect more deals going forward,' Ives said. Adam S Hersch, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, agrees it will lead to more negotiations. 'It seems like the two sides have agreed to postpone facing their deeper disagreements,' Hersch said. Global markets generally responded positively to the news. In London, the FTSE closed up 0.1 percent. The Nikkei in Tokyo closed up 0.6 percent, the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index rose 0.8 percent, and Shanghai markets ended the day up 0.5 percent. In the US, markets remained largely flat, balancing optimism from the trade news with the release of new inflation data. Consumer prices increased by just 0.1 percent, which was lower than expected. Analysts say the figure reflects both subdued inflation and consumers scaling back spending, partly due to the uncertainty surrounding trade policy. The S&P 500 fell 0.3 percent for its first loss in four days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was virtually unchanged after falling by 1 point yesterday. The tech heavy Nasdaq fell by 0.5 percent.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
UK sanctions Israeli ministers for 'inciting violence'
British Foreign Secretary David Lammy says the UK has sanctioned far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich for inciting violence against Palestinians.
