Putin's World Shrinks: As Ukraine Becomes Russia's Afghanistan, Allies Walk Away
For Vladimir Putin, this is more than a battlefield loss. This is a diplomatic collapse. A mirror to America's fall in Afghanistan – only colder and more isolating. Where once flags of loyalty waved high, now silence, distance and new partnerships fill the air.
Syria
Syria used to be a victory badge on Putin's coat. Back in 2015, Russia's entry into the Syrian civil war turned the tide for Bashar al-Assad. Moscow's airstrikes, coupled with Iranian boots on the ground, gave Assad his second life. In return, Russia gained access to naval and air bases in the Mediterranean.
But that alliance cracked in 2024. Russia, too busy in Ukraine, could not shield Assad when the rebels surged back. The HTS and Turkish-backed fighters regrouped. Damascus wobbled. Assad fled. The same Putin who once stood firm behind Syria, watched it collapse, unable to stretch his power beyond his war-weary borders.
Armenia
For years, Armenia counted on Russia. Against Azerbaijan and Turkey, Moscow was the shield. But in 2023, that shield vanished. Nagorno-Karabakh fell. Over 100,000 ethnic Armenians fled. Russian peacekeepers stood idle. Anger swelled in Yerevan.
By 2024, Armenia began pulling away. Military deals were paused. Old promises were questioned. Then came the final blow – Armenia walked out of the CSTO, the very security pact that tied it to Moscow. A treaty signed in 1997, meant to be ironclad, now lies in the dust.
Finland, Sweden
The war in Ukraine was meant to stop NATO. Instead, it pulled in the ones who stayed away the longest. Finland joined the NATO in 2023. Sweden followed in 2024. Neutrality turned to fear. And fear turned to strategy. Both nations moved fast, sensing that Russian aggression was no longer just a possibility. It was a pattern.
With their entry, NATO touched more of Russia's border. What Putin tried to avoid became reality. What began as a push against NATO's eastward creep ended in a sprint westward by those who feared Moscow most.
Central Asia
Kazakhstan. Uzbekistan. Kyrgyzstan. These lands once echoed with Soviet ties. Moscow had sway here, in trade, culture and influence. But now? Europe, China and Turkey are moving in.
Brussels is building new roads, new trade routes and new promises. Turkey is sending troops, teachers and trade envoys. China's Belt and Road is laying steel and cement across the steppes.
Moscow, weighed down by war, is missing this quiet shift.
Iran's Loneliness
Iran gave Russia its deadliest drones. Shahed loitering munitions buzzed over Ukrainian skies. Tehran stood by Moscow when others hesitated. But loyalty went unanswered.
In June 2025, when Israeli jets bombed Iran followed by American bombers, Russia offered only words. A few lines of diplomatic concern. No defense. No action. Tehran took notice.
Even as Tehran burns under sirens and smoke, Moscow stays silent. The alliance feels one-sided now. Iran bleeds. Russia watches.
From Damascus to Yerevan and from Helsinki to Tehran, the pattern repeats. Russia once led an axis of defiance. Now, it stands alone in many rooms. This is not only a war. It is a quiet falling away. A global friend list losing names.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
44 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Ukrainian drone attack kills one in Russia's Lipetsk, regional governor says
The Russian defence ministry said that it destroyed 10 Ukrainian drones overnight over the Lipetsk region and 69 in total over Russian territory and the Crimean Peninsula. The ministry reports only how many drones its forces destroy, not how many Ukraine launches.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Is Iran planning something dangerous? Nuclear experts have a warning after US strikes
Iran could become more dangerous after the 12-day war with Israel and the US strikes on its key nuclear facilities last month, nuclear arms experts have warned. Iran has stopped its cooperation with IAEA and might be getting ready to pull out of the NPT.(REUTERS/ File) The US struck three key Iranian nuclear facilities last month using bunker buster bombs. These were Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. While US President Donald Trump said the strikes obliterated the country's nuclear program, experts have given a big warning regarding Tehran's nuclear future. Nuclear proliferation experts, quoted in an ABC News report, believe the strikes could lead to a "fork-in-the-road" moment that results in Tehran taking a more dangerous and secretive path to obtaining nuclear arms if it chooses to do so. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a bill approved last week by the parliament to halt cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. The country is also mulling a withdrawal from the 57-year-old Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (NPT). "The last country to pull out of the NPT was North Korea," Howard Stoffer, a professor of international affairs at the University of New Haven and former deputy executive director of the UN Security Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee, told ABC News. The NPT, signed by 191 countries in 1968, said countries, other than those certified as nuclear powers, cannot develop nuclear weapons. However, it allows countries to pursue peaceful civilian nuclear programs, like those for energy use. "They can go right up to the brink, and basically do everything except assemble the weapons in their final form and still be technically in compliance with the treaty. That frightens a lot of countries that are Iran's neighbours, Israel in particular," John Erath, senior policy director for the Centre for Arms and Non-Proliferation, told ABC News. Iran has made it clear that it would 'act according to its own interest' regarding the NPT. The treaty also requires inspection by the IAEA, so it remains to be seen how Tehran fulfils that obligation in light of the new law if it decides to join it. The Iran-US nuclear deal Iran signed a nuclear deal with several world powers led by the United States in 2015, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), under the Barack Obama administration. The agreement limited Iran's civilian nuclear program to peaceful purposes in exchange for lifting economic sanctions imposed on the country. President Donald Trump withdrew from the accord during his first term in 2018, calling it "defective to its core" and reimposed US sanctions on Iran. Since then, multiple attempts have been made to negotiate a new deal with Tehran, including by Trump himself, but it hasn't borne fruit yet.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Jaishankar says India will ‘cross that bridge' on Senator Lindsey Graham's 500% tariff bill
External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar reacted to the US proposal to impose 500% tariffs on Russian oil imports and said that any development in the U.S. Congress is of interest to India if it affects or has the potential to affect the country's interests. While addressing a press conference, Jaishankar stated that India's concerns and interests on energy, security have been conveyed to Senator Lindsey Graham. Jaishankar said, 'Regarding Senator Lindsey Graham's bill, any development which is happening in the US Congress is of interest to us if it impacts our interest or could impact our interest. So, we have been in touch with Senator Graham. The embassy and, ambassador have been in touch. Our concerns and our interests in energy, security have been made conversant to him. So, we'll then have to cross that bridge when we come to it, if we come to it.' Graham's sanctions bill on Russia would impose a 500 per cent tariff on imports from any nation that purchases Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products, The Hill reported. The bill has over 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof. Following the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, the U.S. and other Western nations imposed sanctions on Moscow, but India has maintained its imports of Russian oil. In May, Senator Lindsey Graham stated that he is in discussions with U.S. President Donald Trump about the proposed legislation. While some Republican lawmakers have expressed concern about advancing the bill, they are reportedly awaiting Trump's approval before pushing it forward in Congress. When asked whether Trump is giving instructions on when the bill will come to the floor, Graham stated, 'We are separate entities coordinating with each other,' The Hill reported. We have been in touch with Senator Graham. Our concerns and our interests in energy, security have been made conversant to him. Graham is proposing a carveout for his Russian sanctions bill to exclude nations that help Ukraine's defence, protecting them from a 500 per cent tariff for trading with Russia. Key Takeaways The proposed tariff bill could significantly impact global energy markets, especially for countries like India. India's proactive engagement with U.S. lawmakers indicates its intent to protect national interests amidst geopolitical challenges. The dynamics of U.S.-India relations will evolve based on responses to sanctions and energy security concerns.
