'No Call Between Modi & Trump...': India Officially Rejects U.S. Involvement In Ceasefire With Pak
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh made a fiery intervention in Lok Sabha during the debate on Operation Sindoor, India's powerful military response after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Singh dismissed Donald Trump's claim of pressuring India to pause its strikes, asserting that the mission ended only after achieving strategic objectives. 'This wasn't a war to seize land, but to destroy Pakistan's terror network,' he clarified. Taking a swipe at the Opposition, Singh questioned why no one in Parliament asked how many Pakistani jets were downed. His assertive speech reignited the national security vs political narrative debate and set the tone for a landmark moment in Indian defence politics.#operationsindoor #rajnathsingh #rajnathsinghspeech #loksabha #loksabhalive #donaldtrump #indiandefence #pokstrikes #pahalgamattack #counterterrorism #narendramodi #loksabhadebate #indianpolitics #modidoctrine #bjpvscongress #indiapakistan #trumpclaim #indianairforce #terrorresponse #surgicalstrikes #nationalsecurity #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews
8.9K views | 1 hour ago

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
'I will not speak in English': BJP's Nishikant Dubey on Tamil Nadu MPs request in LS amid glitch in translating system
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, on Tuesday, refused to speak in English, rejecting Tamil Nadu MPs request in Lok Sabha amid a glitch in translating system. He further claimed that the MPs 'only had a problem with Hindi.' The BJP MP made the comments in the Lok Sabha after after Tamil Nadu MPs requested Nishikant Dubey to speak in English following a a technical glitch in the translator (system) in the Lok Sabha. Responding to them, Dubey said "...It would have been better if you had asked me to speak in Tamil or Bengali. English is a foreign language, and your insistence on it reflects your mindset. Someone spoke in Bengali for half an hour, yet Tamil Nadu MPs didn't object. You only have a problem with Hindi. Congress and its allies don't like North Indians or Hindi. If you keep promoting English, we'll end up becoming England. 'Hum phir se gulaam ho jayenge' (We will become slaves again)..." During the Monsoon Session of the Parliament on Tuesday, several leaders launched scathing attacks on the government about India's Operation Sindoor in the aftermath of the brutal Pahalgam terror attack in April that killed 26 people. Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav said the launch of Operation Sindoor after the Pahalgam attack was a "symbol of the government's intelligence failure". Uttar Pradesh's former chief minister also said that India's foreign policy has 'completely collapsed,' while labelling China as a 'monster' that will "gobble up our (India's) land and market". "Who will take responsibility for the intelligence lapse in the Pahalgam attack?' Akhilesh Yadav said about the tragedy. Rahul Gandhi also took a swipe at the government, daring PM Modi to call 'Trump a liar,' referring to the POTUS's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. While India has consistently denied these assertions, the US President continues to highlight his alleged role in de-escalating tensions between the two nations following the Pahalgam terror attack. Following Rahul Gandhi's claims, PM Modi while addressing the Lok Sabha, refuted claims made by US President Donald Trump regarding his role in halting India's military action against Pakistan. He said said no world leader asked India to stop its military action against Pakistan during 'Operation Sindoor' after four days of conflict in May in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.


The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tharoor raises delinking of BrahMos Thiruvananthapuram unit from parent firm in Parliament
Shashi Tharoor, MP, has drawn the Union government's urgent attention to the reported move to delink the Thiruvananthapuram unit of BrahMos from the parent BrahMos Aerospace Pvt. Ltd. (BAPL). Raising the matter under Rule 377 in the Lok Sabha, Mr. Tharoor called for the intervention of the Ministry of Defence and the Union government to protect BrahMos Aerospace Thiruvananthapuram Ltd. (BATL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAPL, considering its strategic importance. Mr. Tharoor urged the Union government to ensure that either the BATL, located in his parliamentary constituency, remained under the Indo-Russian missile joint venture the BAPL or was reconstituted as a direct production centre under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). He said the resolution to delink the BATL was passed without consultation with the State government, stakeholders, or the employee unions, causing anxiety among the staff. The BATL, he pointed out, manufactured precision components, engines, other critical systems for the BrahMos missile programmes. Its workforce had played a significant role in boosting India's strategic defence capabilities, he said, highlighting the need to address the matter without delay. Though members are allowed to raise matters of urgent public importance under Rule 377 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha, Mr. Tharoor in a post on X said his submission on the challenges faced by the BrahMos plant in Thiruvananthapuram was tabled on account of the debate on Operation Sindoor in the Lok Sabha, which was ironic in view of the successful deployment of BrahMos during Sindoor.


Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bihar voter roll revision is assault on foundations of democracy, say 93 ex-bureaucrats
A group of 93 retired civil servants and diplomats, on Tuesday, called the ongoing special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar an 'assault on the very foundations of our democracy', referring to the right to vote. 'The assault is an insidious one where the purported attempt to clean up and sanitise the electoral rolls is likely to end up disenfranchising a very large segment of the voting population, particularly the poor and the marginalised,' the Constitutional Conduct Group said. The group of former bureaucrats highlighted that a vast majority of the economically weaker sections of the population have held their right to vote as the 'most fundamental stake in Indian democracy' because a liberal approach was followed to prepare electoral rolls, with the understanding that several Indians lack documentation to prove their citizenship. 'This process has now been reversed to ensure that those with poor access to documents will be deprived of their rights as voters,' the group contended. The former bureaucrats argued that the exercise by the Election Commission allows it to effectively become a deciding authority on citizenship rights' without possessing the constitutional mandate to do so. The exercise, under the guise of cleaning up voter lists, attempts to 'introduce the contested idea of the NRC [National Register of Citizens] through the backdoor', the group further alleged. The group also raised alarm at the 'breakneck speed' at which the process of revising the electoral roll has been implemented. It highlighted that booth-level officers have been tasked with completing the process with 'grossly inadequate infrastructure' and under 'impossible timelines'. The group also cited journalist Ajit Anjum's reportage as evidence that there has been a massive scale of 'fraud and forgery' during the entire process. In a video posted on his YouTube channel on July 12, Anjum had claimed that he had found irregularities in the revision of the electoral rolls in the state, with several enumeration forms at the booth not having photos of the applicants and others that had been partially filled or did not have signatures. Anjum was, however, booked by the police for allegedly interfering in the Bihar voter roll revision process and for allegedly provoking communal discord. Several press bodies questioned the filing of a case against him, saying that the authorities should not 'criminalise journalism'. The signatories to the statement by the Constitutional Conduct Group include Punjab's former director general of police Julio Ribeiro, Delhi's former Lieutenant Governor Najeeb Jung and former Indian Administrative Service officer Harsh Mander. The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. A draft roll will be published on August 1 and the final roll will be out on September 30. On July 2, eleven INDIA bloc parties told the Election Commission that the special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls risked disenfranchising more than 2.5 crore voters, as they may not be able to produce the necessary documents. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on July 6 defended the exercise, claiming that the exercise had to be carried out as no one was satisfied with the current voter rolls.