logo
Consumers are saving more and spending less as Trump's tariffs loom

Consumers are saving more and spending less as Trump's tariffs loom

CNN30-03-2025

Tariffs are looming, inflation is still sticky and US consumers are bracing themselves for the impact.
That's according to data released Friday from the Commerce Department: Americans socked away money into savings, pulled back on discretionary purchases, and, when accounting for inflation, increased their spending ever so slightly after taking a breather in a frigid and post-holiday January.
At the same time, inflation data showed minimal progress on the easing of price hikes.
But the most comprehensive economic data to date on how prices are changing and how consumers are earning, spending and saving doesn't fully account for the elephant in the room: President Donald Trump's aggressive trade policy.
Recently imposed tariffs on auto imports and a slew of other levies waiting in the wings stand to weigh on consumer spending — America's economic engine — and drive prices higher, economists warn.
'There is no other conclusion possible other than the Trump 2.0 economic policies are frightening consumers as much as they do corporations,' Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FwdBonds wrote in a note on Friday. 'The economy is going to stall out if not something worse if Washington policymakers are not careful.'
The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index rose 2.5% in February from the year before, holding steady with what was seen in January, according to Commerce Department data released Friday. On a monthly basis, prices rose 0.3%, unchanged from January.
Economists expected that falling energy prices and stabilizing food prices would help keep the disinflationary trend at hand, and that was indeed the case: Energy prices fell 1.1% for the month while food prices eased just slightly to 1.5% from 1.6%.
Forecasts called for the PCE price index to be unchanged from January's preliminary 2.5% rate.
However, one critical barometer — the core PCE index, which serves as a gauge of underlying inflation — came in slightly hotter than economists expected.
Excluding food and energy prices, which tend to be more volatile, the closely watched core PCE price index rose 0.4% for the month and 2.8% from a year before, accelerating from 2.7% in January.
'[The core PCE price index] has been trading in a band of 2.6% to 2.8% for 10 months — it's just plain moving sideways,' Dan North, senior economist for Allianz Trade North America, said in an interview. 'We're going nowhere. Inflation is really very sticky, not having moved for 10 months, and that puts the [Federal Reserve] in an increasingly awkward spot.'
The Fed last week kept interest rates unchanged, and Chair Jerome Powell indicated that central bankers are waiting for more evidence that inflation is headed toward their 2% target — or that the economy is weakening — before they return to cutting rates.
Powell acknowledged that 'it remains seen' how uncertainty swelling around Trump's aggressive economic agenda affects future spending and investment.
Excluding the effects of inflation, consumer spending rebounded in February, rising 0.4% for the month. In January, spending was weaker than initially reported and fell by 0.3%.
Where consumers put those dollars was especially telling: They shelled out more for goods — likely reflecting the 'pull forward' of buying products before tariffs hit, economists say — while pulling back sharply on services spending, such as eating out and traveling.
'Heightened uncertainty around the economic outlook, fears of accelerating inflation, and the declines in the equity market are depressing consumer confidence and now we see signs that the 'soft' survey data are starting to weigh on the 'hard' economic data,' Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist of Nationwide, wrote Friday. 'It was particularly telling that consumers pulled back on discretionary service expenditures, recording the first decline since January 2022.'
However, when adjusting for inflation, spending in February was up a mere 0.1%.
Friday's report, however, did provide a silver lining for household finances: Incomes climbed by 0.8% for the month and and disposable income (after taxes) was up 0.9% and 0.5% after adjusting for inflation. Consumers opted to put a good chunk in their piggy banks: The personal saving rate increased to 4.6% from a revised 4.3% rate in January.
'Obviously, consumers remain jittery given spending remains subdued and savings high, but as long as incomes keep growing there's money to spend, which will support the economy and help Americans deal with persistent inflation,' Robert Frick, corporate economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, wrote Friday.
'While inflation ticked up, we have yet to know and feel the full effect of tariffs, especially on autos, and how much they will raise prices,' he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules

CNBC

time20 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court rules

A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules
Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

CNN

time21 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

President Donald Trump's heftiest tariffs cleared a court hurdle for now, after a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that they could take effect while legal challenges play out. The decision came after the Trump administration appealed the Court of International Trade's ruling finding the president exceeded his authority to impose country-wide tariffs claiming a national emergency. 'Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits. Having considered the traditional stay factors… the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances,' according to the ruling. The stay is pending the course of the appeal, the court wrote, adding that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court. 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said. The appeals court ruling, however, has no bearing on the sector-wide tariffs Trump previously enacted, including those on aluminum, steel, cars and car parts. That's because he imposed those levies under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act – a different law than the one Trump cited for his broader trade actions. Section 232 gives a president significant power to levy tariffs on specific sectors if they believe there is a national security threat risk. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules
Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump's most sweeping tariffs can remain in place for now, appeals court rules

President Donald Trump's heftiest tariffs cleared a court hurdle for now, after a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that they could take effect while legal challenges play out. The decision came after the Trump administration appealed the Court of International Trade's ruling finding the president exceeded his authority to impose country-wide tariffs claiming a national emergency. 'Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits. Having considered the traditional stay factors… the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances,' according to the ruling. The stay is pending the course of the appeal, the court wrote, adding that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court. 'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said. The appeals court ruling, however, has no bearing on the sector-wide tariffs Trump previously enacted, including those on aluminum, steel, cars and car parts. That's because he imposed those levies under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act – a different law than the one Trump cited for his broader trade actions. Section 232 gives a president significant power to levy tariffs on specific sectors if they believe there is a national security threat risk. This is a developing story and will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store