Rahul Gandhi Assures Justice For Odisha Student's Family After Self-Immolation Over Sexual Harassment
The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha described the circumstances that led to the young woman's desperate act as inflicting a deep wound on society as a whole. Gandhi emphasized that both he and the Congress party would stand firmly beside the family throughout their pursuit of justice.
Taking to social media platform X, Gandhi shared his emotional response to the conversation with the victim's father. He expressed how the father's voice conveyed the profound pain, unfulfilled dreams, and struggles of his daughter. Gandhi characterized the incident as not only inhumane and shameful but also as a collective societal wound that demands attention and action.
The tragic incident has sparked widespread protests across Balasore, with the Biju Janata Dal organizing a complete shutdown of the city in response to what they perceive as government negligence. BJD workers demonstrated their anger by burning tires on the streets, voicing their frustration over the administration's failure to prevent this devastating outcome.
The protests included demands for the resignation of Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi and Education Minister Suryabanshi Suraj. BJD activists called for the Balasore Bandh, which was scheduled to run from 6 am to 2 pm, with substantial public participation in the demonstration.
The 20-year-old student, who was enrolled at Fakir Mohan Autonomous College, took the extreme step after experiencing persistent sexual harassment from her college's Head of Department. Despite filing a formal complaint and seeking intervention from the principal, her desperate pleas for help were ignored, ultimately driving her to this tragic decision.
Former Chief Minister and BJD leader Naveen Patnaik delivered sharp criticism of the current state administration, branding it a "failed system" and holding it responsible for the student's death. Patnaik emphasized that this was not an accidental death but rather the direct consequence of a system that chose silence over support when the victim needed help most.
In his statement, Patnaik highlighted the disturbing reality of how systemic failures can cost lives, noting that the young woman's death resulted from a system that remained silent instead of providing the assistance she desperately needed. He described how the victim struggled for justice until she ultimately gave up hope.
The student's death was officially confirmed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar on Monday. The medical facility's Department of Burn Centre released a statement indicating that the patient had been brought to their casualty department on July 12, having been referred from Balasore District Headquarters Hospital.
The incident has reignited discussions about the safety of women in educational institutions and the effectiveness of complaint mechanisms designed to protect students from harassment. The case highlights the urgent need for educational institutions to take sexual harassment complaints seriously and implement robust systems to ensure student safety.
The tragedy has also brought attention to the broader issue of how institutions respond to reports of sexual harassment and the devastating consequences that can result from institutional apathy. The victim's decision to take her own life after being ignored by those in positions of authority serves as a stark reminder of the importance of creating safe environments for students to report misconduct without fear of being dismissed or ignored.
As the family seeks justice and the community demands accountability, this incident underscores the critical need for systemic changes in how educational institutions handle harassment complaints and protect vulnerable students from abuse by those in positions of power.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
PM Modi to host NDA parliamentary meet on Tuesday
Prime Minister Narendra Modi will address the BJP-led NDA parliamentary party meeting on Tuesday, a get-together of the ruling alliance's MPs which is being held after a considerable gap. The prime minister is also likely to be felicitated by the parliamentary party over his government's military response to the terror strike.(ANI) The NDA meeting comes a couple of days before the filing of nomination for vice president's election begins from August 7. The NDA will have to announce its candidate, whose election will be a certainty due to the alliance's majority in the electoral college, by August 21, the last date of nomination-filing and the Monsoon Session of Parliament. The meeting comes in the middle of a session which has been all but a washout so far, except for a two-day discussion on the Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor, due to a united Opposition's ceaseless protest against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar by the Election Commission. PM Modi is expected to speak on a host of current issues as the Opposition has been raising the heat over the poll body's alleged partisan conduct favouring the government, and the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The prime minister is also likely to be felicitated by the parliamentary party over his government's military response to the terror strike. The electoral college for the vice president poll includes MPs of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, and its current strength is 782. If the Opposition also names a candidate, a distinct possibility, then the poll is scheduled to be held on September 9. Since the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, when the BJP lost its majority but comfortably crossed the halfway mark with allies, the sessional meeting of the party's MPs was expanded to include its allies. PM Modi had addressed the first such meeting on July 2. However, no meeting has been held in the last few sessions. Before the last national elections, he used to address the weekly meetings of BJP parliamentary party, now expanded to include party's allies such as the TDP, JD(U), and LJP (Ram Vilas). The meeting is attended by MPs of the ruling alliance, and PM Modi often covers a sweep of political and governance issues, and at times touches on the government's agenda in Parliament. He often offers to the MPs talking points to be raised in public, especially their constituencies.
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In major reshuffle for TMC, Abhishek Banerjee given charge as Lok Sabha leader, Kakali replaces Kalyan as new Chief Whip
In a significant reshuffle of the Trinamool Congress party, Chairperson Mamata Banerjee on Sunday announced that Abhishek Banerjee will take over as the party's Lok Sabha leader until veteran MP Sudip Bandyopadhyay, who currently holds the role, 'becomes fully fit'. Kakali Ghosh Dastidar will replace Kalyan Banerjee as Chief Whip. The announcement came during a virtual meeting of TMC MPs, who gathered at the party's new office on Rajendra Prasad Road in New Delhi. According to sources, Mamata Banerjee expressed her unhappiness over the party's recent coordination in Parliament and performance in the Lok Sabha. 'She said Abhishek Banerjee will lead the party in the Lok Sabha until Sudip Bandyopadhyay becomes fully fit. Kakali Ghosh Dastidar will oversee daily coordination,' said a senior MP present at the meeting. Bandyopadhyay, who is 76, had not been attending Parliament regularly in recent times. Mamata also referred to recent controversies involving Mahua Moitra, Kalyan Banerjee, and Kirti Azad. She indicated that in the absence of senior leaders Sudip Bandyopadhyay and Sougata Roy, Kalyan Banerjee had been entrusted with coordinating parliamentary affairs — a responsibility she believes he failed to discharge effectively. After the meeting, Kalyan Banerjee denied being removed, telling his close circle that he had resigned. A senior TMC MP said, 'Abhishek Banerjee had talked to Kalyan Banerjee and requested him to hold off on the decision.' Kalyan Banerjee told mediapersons, 'Abhishek Banerjee talked to me 10 minutes earlier.' He added, 'What will I do if the majority of MPs are regularly absent in Parliament? Does Mamata Banerjee know how the daily work of Parliament is going? If the party would not have taken steps, what would I do? I did maximum work but I am not a scholar from Oxford, Cambridge. I do not wear expensive sarees. Those who criticise Mamata Banerjee, they get rewarded.' At the meeting, Mamata Banerjee also instructed MPs to raise their voice against alleged harassment of Bengalis in BJP-ruled states and to oppose the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. She also advised MPs to actively participate in INDIA bloc meetings.
Scroll.in
12 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: SC raps Rahul Gandhi for China incursion remark, Jharkhand ex-CM Shibu Soren dead & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. The Supreme Court told Congress leader Rahul Gandhi that a 'true Indian' would not make remarks such as the ones he made in 2022 about alleged Chinese incursions into Indian territory. However, the court stayed the defamation proceedings against him for three weeks. The case pertains to comments made by Gandhi in December 16 about a clash between the Indian and Chinese armies along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang. In response to the court's remark, Gandhi's counsel Abhishek Singhvi said that it was also possible for a 'true Indian' to express concern about the deaths of soldiers during clashes between India and China in eastern Ladakh's Galwan Valley in June 2020. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih, however, asked the Opposition leader how he had verified claims that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory had been occupied by China. Datta asked why the Congress leader had made the allegations on social media instead of raising questions in Parliament. Read more. Jharkhand's former Chief Minister Shibu Soren died on Monday. He was 81. Soren was admitted to a hospital in New Delhi for more than a month and was undergoing treatment for kidney-related ailments. Soren was the founder of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha and the party's chief for 38 years. He served as the chief minister for 10 days in March 2005, for five months between August 2008 and January 2009, and between December 2009 and May 2010. Read more. The Supreme Court questioned the 'tearing hurry' of the Uttar Pradesh government in passing an ordinance that allows it to take over the management of the Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi expressed disapproval of the 'clandestine manner' in which the government had secured permission to use temple funds for a Rs 500-crore corridor project. The permission was secured through a May 15 judgement of the Supreme Court, which allowed the state to acquire five acres of land with temple funds. The bench verbally proposed recalling the May 15 verdict and forming a committee, headed by a retired High Court judge, to oversee the temple's management while the validity of the ordinance was being decided. The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court challenging a Madras High Court order restraining it from naming welfare schemes after living politicians and using the photographs of former chief ministers, ideological leaders and political party symbols in advertisements of the schemes. On Thursday, the High Court passed the order on a plea filed by an All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MP, who had sought directions to stop the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government from using Chief Minister MK Stalin's name in public outreach programmes such as Ungaludan Stalin. The petitioner had argued that the practice violated the Supreme Court's earlier directions and the 2014 Government Advertisement Content Regulation Guidelines. The High Court had referred to a Supreme Court ruling that allowed the use of the current chief minister's photo in government advertisements, but ruled that including former leaders or party icons could be seen as political misuse of public funds.
