Postponed Columbia County Unity Fundraiser to happen Saturday at new location
AUGUSTA, Ga. (WJBF) – Postponed from its original date due to the threat of severe weather, the Columbia County Unity Fundraiser to benefit the families of Columbia County Sheriff's Office Deputy Brandon Sikes and Deputy Gavin White will be held this Saturday.
The event will be held at the Augusta Elks Lodge located at 205 Elkdom Court a few blocks from Westside High School.
Admission is free, but donations are welcome.
Food trucks and vendors will be present, as well as other activities, including a bounce house with a 60-foot obstacle course, a foam party, a visit from a favorite Disney princess, and tons of unique and antique vehicles, with a vehicle contest.
Entry into the car show is $10 per vehicle entry.
There will also be a silent auction with a RecTeq Grill, spa packages, a 12-foot utility trailer, Dewalt tool set, Guitar Pull tickets, gift cards, gift baskets and more.
All proceeds go to benefit the families of the deputies involved in the deadly shooting that claimed the life of one Columbia County deputy on Saturday, April 26th, and severely wounded another.
Columbia County Sheriff's Office Deputy Brandon Sikes was killed in the line of duty Saturday, April 26th, and another, Columbia County Sheriff's Office Deputy Gavin White, was critically wounded when a suspect opened fire on the two deputies along I-20 near Exit 194 at Belair Road.
It happened while three Columbia County Sheriff's Deputies, which included Deputies Sikes and White, were serving a Temporary Protective Order to Montgomery during a traffic stop. The suspect, James Blake Montgomery, allegedly opened fire on the three deputies with a 9mm AR Pistol after they turned to walk to their vehicles.
The other on-scene deputy has not received much attention, but he is credited with saving Deputy White's life.
Columbia County Sheriff`s Office Deputy Gavin White was critically wounded when the suspect opened fire on him and the other on-scene deputies. Deputy Andrew Brown, when he noticed that White had been shot and was not dead, dragged him past several law enforcement vehicles while still under fire from the suspect and got Deputy White into one of the county vehicles where Deputy Brown drove him through the gunfire in an effort to get him to a hospital.
According to Columbia County Sheriff's Office, Deputy White was released from the hospital Thursday, May 1st, and was returned home where he continued his recovery.
Deputy Sikes was laid to rest Monday, May 6th, following a public ceremony that saw Georgia Governor Brian Kemp attend.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BREAKING: Supreme Court sides with straight woman in so-called 'reverse discrimination' case
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously sided with an Ohio woman on Thursday who claimed she was discriminated against for being straight. She said her gay boss didn't promote her. The ruling in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services will now allow similar suits to be brought in the U.S., making it easier for members of majority groups to claim job discrimination over their identity. Marlean Ames brought the case. Ames, a straight former Ohio Department of Youth Services (the state's juvenile justice department) employee Ames alleged that she was denied a promotion and later removed from her position while less qualified queer employees were given the roles she sought. At issue was whether so-called majority-group plaintiffs — such as heterosexual employees alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation or white employees claiming they were discriminated against because of their race — must meet a higher evidentiary standard than other plaintiffs in discrimination cases. Related: That standard has been used in about half of the federal court circuits in the U.S., according to the New York Times. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion for the court. Jackson wrote that the court's case law "makes clear that the standard for proving disparate treatment under Title VII does not vary based on whether or not the plaintiff is a member of a majority group. ... The 'background circumstances' rule flouts that basic principle." 'Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson also wrote in the opinion. In a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas — joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch — wrote that the higher standard was "judge-made." "Courts with this rule have enshrined into Title VII's anti-discrimination law an explicitly race-based preference: White plaintiffs must prove the existence of background circumstances, while nonwhite plaintiffs need not do so," he wrote. He added that the court's decision Thursday, "obviates the need for courts to engage in the 'sordid business'" of dividing people by their race or other identity. The Human Rights Campaign in a statement emphasized the need for civil rights laws. 'Our civil rights laws must protect all people from unlawful discrimination—whether based on race, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or other protected characteristics,' said Cathryn Oakley, the organization's senior director of legal policy. 'Today's unanimous decision, written by Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson, emphasizes the ongoing importance of federal civil rights laws. It also comes as we're witnessing an alarming wave of political attacks targeting LGBTQ+ people across the country, the weaponization of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and unprecedented hostility within parts of the federal government toward our community. LGBTQ+ people, in particular, face heightened and increasingly dangerous forms of discrimination — and too often, fewer paths to remedy it. This ruling must be understood in the context of that rising tide. Fighting discrimination is not just about one case or one person — it's about defending the broader promise of equality and justice for all.' Allen Morris, policy dreictor at the National LGBTQ Task Force, said the decision "underscores the need for congressional action, and the prioritization of federal non-discrimination protections." Morris also noted that the primary target of employment discrimination is still people "with intersecting needs." "This moment must also be met with clarity and urgency: underserved communities continue to face a systemically challenged and unleveled playing field in workspaces, schools and public life," Morris said. "Nearly 1 in 2 transgender people report experiencing mistreatment in the workforce. We must not excuse or dismiss the lived realities of communities who are fighting to be treated with dignity and fairness. Congress must act to pass comprehensive, explicit federal non-discrimination protections, including the long-overdue Equality Act."
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Disney, Rogers target Woodbridge family for allegedly making millions via illegal streaming
Some of the heaviest hitters in entertainment — including Disney, Paramount and Warner Brothers — have joined Bell and Rogers in a lawsuit against a father and son. The companies allege the pair pirated their TV shows and movies illegally to subscribers, in return for millions. But almost three years in, the main case has yet to actually begin, with father Antonio and son Marshall Macciacchera only recently agreeing to submit their passports in the lead up to the contempt of court decisions against them. The federal court allegation suggests Antonio and Marshall brought in revenues of around $1.5 million annually by pirating content from Canada and around the world to thousands of their users via their platform called SmoothStreams (SSTV). The plaintiffs estimate in 2021, there were about 2.5 million visits to SSTV, which was hosted by companies in Panama and Hong Kong. According to court documents, the investigation began in 2018 before progressing through the federal courts, at which point civil search warrants were executed in Barrie and Woodbridge. However, both men refused to give access to a commercial location and two homes, which resulted in contempt findings against them and included a financial penalty of $375,000 for Marshall and $95,000 for Antonio. 'They submit … the search robbed Marshall Macciacchera of his dignity and was 'out of bounds,'' court documents read. Meanwhile, Bell and Rogers allege father and son are stonewalling. During the search warrants, the judge said investigators uncovered evidence of a sophisticated operation running out of Marshall's residence and commercial premises and seized television receivers, encoders and servers. '(These devices were used in) capturing and (illegally) redistributing television content on a massive scale through the SSTV,' court documents allege. Bell and Rogers are seeking a term of imprisonment of up to six months for the contempt and have suggested it should continue until the Macciaccheras provide the information, documentation and passwords they've been ordered to provide. Antonio has suggested a 30-day term of imprisonment to be served on weekends or 30 days of house arrest and Marshall is suggesting one week per clear failure to comply. The case continues when the pair are to face penalty hearings later this month. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Revives Straight Woman's Job-Discrimination Suit
The US Supreme Court revived a job-bias lawsuit by a woman who says she suffered discrimination because she's straight, in a ruling that makes it easier in some parts of the country for members of so-called majority groups to get cases to a jury. The justices unanimously said a federal appeals court was wrong to require majority workers, including White people and men, to meet a more difficult test than members of groups that have historically faced discrimination.
