The one thing about Mamdani's win that should worry Republicans
You shouldn't read too much into one mayoral election in New York City — let alone a Democratic primary — when it comes to gauging the broader political winds. But if there's one warning sign for Republicans, it's that national polling is starting to show discontent among two key groups that swung hard right for Donald Trump in 2024 and that helped power Zohran Mamdani's upset win: young people and Latinos.
Trump romped to victory in 2024 by promising to improve the cost of living after a spike in inflation and to reset immigration policy after a rapid influx of migrants. But recent polling shows that young and Latino voters have moved sharply against the president in both of these areas and are judging his performance harshly overall.
Based on five June polls measuring Trump's approval rating, the president's numbers among these groups have fallen far from his 2024 high-water mark. These negative ratings also stand out compared with movement among more 'traditionally' Republican groups: White voters and voters over 65. For each of these groups, there was less of a shift in voting behavior last election. Trump's June approval with voters over 65 is only net negative by 6.5 points, while he is above water with Whites by three points.
The issues bothering these groups notably connect to ones that Mamdani — who began his campaign by interviewing Trump voters in November — ran on. He promised to both make the city more affordable and protect migrants from Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns.
On the issue of the economy, young people have a more unfavorable than favorable view of Trump's performance by a 25-point margin. With Latinos, it's 26 points. By contrast, the disapproval margin for voters over 65 is 7.5 points, and it's less than one point for White voters.
There's some overlap between these trends: Latino voters tend to skew younger in the electorate, as the demographic has grown quickly in size and electoral importance. A large number of voters cited economic pressure during the Biden presidency as their reason for switching parties — crediting the prior Trump presidency with a stronger economic climate.
Approval ratings and voting behavior are not the same thing, of course, but these persistent negative ratings among the groups that swung the largest toward the president suggest that these voters are not feeling the economic relief they believed they would be getting.
On the issue of immigration, this divergence also persists. Young voters are more likely to have an unfavorable view of Trump on immigration than a favorable one by a margin of 18 points, and Latinos by 24 points, as the administration pursues a wide range of policies that have affected undocumented immigrants as well as foreign students, certain green-card holders, and people who have been temporarily allowed to live and work in the United States.
Democrats should nonetheless temper their expectations. Even with strong disapproval ratings among these groups, it is unlikely that they will swing back to being as Democratic as they were previously. Trump's approval is still higher with them than it was at a comparable point in his first term.
It's not a perfect apples-to-apples comparison, but it does suggest that the Republican brand, though tarnished since last year's election, remains stronger among these key groups than it did eight years ago.
But Democrats also don't need to recover all their losses to have a strong performance in the midterms. Even a 1 percent better showing in House races overall would have secured them the speaker's gavel last year. The Republican Party will be making a mistake if it thinks it can take its newest voters for granted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters will decide redistricting in November, escalating battle with Trump and Texas
Ratcheting up the pressure in the escalating national fight over control of Congress, the California Legislature on Thursday approved November special election to ask voters in November to redraw the state's electoral lines to favor Democrats and thwart President Trump's far-right policy agenda. The ballot measure, pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state and national Democratic leaders, is the latest volley in a national political brawl over electoral maps that could alter the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. If voters approve the redrawn lines on Nov. 4, Democrats in the Golden State would see the odds tilted further in their favor, while the number of California Republicans in the House could be halved. Newsom initially said that new electoral districts in California would only take effect if another state redrew its lines before 2031. But after Texas moved toward approving its own maps this week that could give the GOP five more House seats, Democrats stripped the so-called "trigger" language from the amendment — meaning that if voters approve the measure, the new lines would take effect no matter what. The ballot measure language, which asks California voters to override the power of the independent redistricting commission, was approved by most Democrats in the Assembly and the Senate, where they hold supermajorities. California lawmakers have the power to place constitutional amendments on the statewide ballot without the approval of the governor. Newsom, however, is expected later Thursday to sign two separate bills that fund the special election and spell out the lines for the new congressional districts. Democrats' rush to the ballot marks a sudden departure from California's 15-year commitment to independent redistricting, often held up as the country's gold standard. The state's voters stripped lawmakers of the power to draw lines during the Great Recession and handed that partisan power to a panel of independent citizens whose names are drawn in a lottery. The change, Democrats said, was forced by an extraordinary change in circumstances: After decades of the United States redrawing congressional lines once a decade, President Trump and his political team have leaned on Republican-led states to redraw their district lines before the 2026 midterm elections to help Republicans retain control of the House. 'His playbook is a simple one: Bully, threaten, fight, then rig the rules to hang onto power," said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. "We are here today because California will not be a bystander to that power grab. We are not intimidated, and we are acting openly, lawfully, with purpose and resolve, to defend our state and to defend our democracy.' Republicans in the state Assembly and the state Senate criticized Newsom's argument that Democrats must "fight fire with fire," saying retaliation is a slippery slope that would erode the independent redistricting process California voters have chosen twice at the ballot box. "You move forward fighting fire with fire, and what happens? You burn it all down," said Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher (R-Yuba City). He said Trump was "wrong" to push Gov. Greg Abbott to redraw Texas' lines to benefit Republicans, and so was California's push to pursue the same strategy. State Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), who co-authored the bill drawing the proposed congressional districts, said Democrats had no choice but to stand up, given the harm the Trump administration has inflicted on healthcare, education, tariffs and other policies that affect Californians. 'What do we do? Just sit back and do nothing?" Gonzalez said. "Or do we fight back and provide some chance for our Californians to see themselves in this democracy?" Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee) said the effort is "a corrupt redistricting scheme to rig California's elections" that violates the "letter and the spirit of the California constitution." "Democrats are rushing this through under the guise of urgency," Jones said. "There is no emergency that justifies this abuse of process.' Three Assembly Democrats did not vote in favor of the constitutional amendment. Jasmeet Bains (D-Delano), who is running for Congress against Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) in the San Joaquin Valley, voted no. Progressive Caucus chair Alex Lee (D-San Jose), and Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay), did not vote. Democrats will face an unusual messaging challenge with the November ballot measure, said Matt Lesenyie, an assistant professor of political science at Cal State Long Beach. The opponents of mid-decade redistricting are stressing that the measure would "disadvantage voters," he said, which is "wording that Democrats have primed Democrats on, for now two administrations, that democracy is being killed with a thousand cuts." "It's a weird, sort of up-is-down moment," Lesenyie said. How did we get here? Trump's political team began pressuring Abbott and Texas Republicans in early June to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts in the middle of the decade — which is very uncommon — to give Republicans a better shot at keeping the House in 2026. "We are entitled to five more seats," Trump later told CNBC. Some Texas Republicans feared that mid-decade redistricting could imperil their own chances of reelection. But within a month of the White House floating the idea, Abbott added the new congressional lines, which would stack the deck against as many as five Texas Democrats in Congress, to the Legislature's special session in July. By mid-July, Newsom was talking about California punching back. In an interview with the progressive news site the TN Holler, Newsom said: "These guys, they're not f—ing around. They're playing by a totally different set of rules." Democrats in Texas fled the state for nearly two weeks, including some to California, to deny Republicans the quorum they needed to pass the new lines. Abbott signed civil arrest warrants and levied fines on the 52 absent Democrats while they held news conferences in California and Illinois to bring attention to the fight. While the Texas drama unfolded, consultants for the campaign arm of House Democrats in California quietly drew up maps that would further chop down the number of Golden State Republicans in Congress. The proposed changes would eliminate the district of Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Corona) and dilute the number of GOP voters in four districts represented by Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Darrell Issa. The Democrats agreed to return to Texas last week and pointed to California's tit-for-tat effort as one measure of success, saying the Golden State could neutralize any Republican gains in Texas. Since then, other Republican-led states have begun to contemplate redistricting too, including Indiana, Florida and Missouri. Trump's political allies are publicly threatening to mount primary challenges against any Indiana Republican who opposes redrawing the lines. In California, the opposition is shaping up as quickly as the ballot measure. California voters received the first campaign mailer opposing the ballot measure a day before the Legislature voted to approve it. A four-page glossy flier, funded by conservative donor and redistricting champion Charlie Munger Jr., warned voters that mid-decade redistricting is "weakening our Democratic process" and "a threat to California's landmark election reform." Republicans have also gone to court to try and stop the measure, alleging in an emergency petition with the state Supreme Court that Democrats violated the state Constitution by ramming the bills through without following proper legislative procedure. The high court Wednesday rejected the petition. A wave of legal challenges are expected, not only in California but in any state that reconfigures congressional districts in the expanding partisan brawl. Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) said Thursday morning that a lawsuit challenging the California ballot measure would be filed in state court by Friday evening. He said Republicans also plan to litigate the title of the ballot measure and any voter guide materials that accompany it. And, he said, if voters approve the new lines, "I believe we will have ample opportunity to set the maps aside in federal court." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Workday's forecast for quarterly subscription revenue disappoints
(Reuters) -Workday raised its annual subscription revenue forecast on Thursday, but an in-line outlook for the current quarter sent the human resources software provider's shares down nearly 4% in extended trading. Workday's customers rely on the company's single cloud-based platform, which provide applications to manage services including recruitment, payroll, accounting and audit. In an uncertain economy, customers are tightening their spending on platforms like Workday as they reassess budgets and timing. Workday's AI-driven tools help organizations automate tasks such as screening job applications, scheduling interviews, and streamlining workforce planning. The company on Thursday also announced it will buy Paradox, giving Workday an AI-powered talent acquisition suite to help customers more efficiently find, hire, and onboard employees. It did not provide financial details of the deal. Workday competes with Oracle, SAP and payroll providers such as Automatic Data Processing and Dayforce. Its customers include United Airlines, Visa and FedEx. For the third quarter, Workday expects subscription revenue of $2.24 billion, in line with analysts' average estimate, according to data compiled by LSEG. It raised its fiscal 2026 subscription revenue forecast to $8.82 billion, compared to its prior forecast of $8.80 billion. Workday's total revenue for the second quarter ended July 31 stood at $2.35 billion, compared with an estimate of $2.34 billion. Subscription revenue rose 14% to $2.17 billion.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Powell would have to move goal posts for a Sept. Fed rate cut
Investors are watching for any signs that the Federal Reserve will cut rates during Fed Chair Jerome Powell's Friday speech at the Kansas City Federal Reserve's annual Economic Symposium. BNP Paribas head of Americas' macro strategy and US economics, Calvin Tse, joins Market Domination with Josh Lipton and Barron's senior market analysis writer Paul La Monica to discuss his expectations for Powell's comments and for the Fed. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Well, pressure coming down on the Fed for policy changes. Expectations point towards a Fed rate cut in September, while President Trump continues to call for a big cut to rates. However, while markets look for a glimpse of a dovish tone from Fed Chair Powell, our next guest believes the Fed should remain on hold for the remainder of the year. Calvin C, BNP Paribas head of America's macro strategy and US economics, joins us now to discuss. Calvin, it's good to see you. Let's start, Calvin, with what we expect tomorrow. We're very wound up, Calvin, about tomorrow. I don't know if you've noticed, all eyes on J. Powell, Jackson Hole. What kind of J. Powell are we going to see? Wait, is it is it neutral J? Is it dovish J? Do we get a hawkish J? What do you think? Well, that's a million dollar question. We have been amongst the most hawkish banks on the street, calling for the Fed to remain on hold ever since December of 2024. That's been a challenging call to hold, especially as we've just mentioned, the markets have been really sticky on pricing in September at an extraordinarily high probability for a cut. Go ahead, come on. J. Powell has told us, however, that he has a very clear reaction function, and the two things that he looks at is the year-over-year rate of PC inflation and the unemployment rate. Based on that reaction function, the Fed should not be cutting rates in September. Therefore, what I think is the most important thing to be watching out for tomorrow morning is whether or not J. Powell shifts that reaction function. If he stands pat, which is our base case, continuing to highlight that the labor market still remains tight, given the unemployment rate, we think that a lot of that cut pricing can come out of the curve and push interest rates higher. If he stands pat, Calvin, your base case, how does the market respond? We think it will respond in a couple of ways. The first is we're probably going to see that September probabilities come down from those about 75% chance right now to maybe somewhere closer to 50/50. And what we think was also going to happen is that the yield curve is probably going to flatten quite significantly as well, as the front end rises relative to the back end. All right, Calvin. Uh, Paul, Calvin says stand pat, base case. What do you think? Yeah, I mean, it's obviously going to be data dependent to use that sort of trite saying, and we have, you know, some jobs numbers, some more inflation data that will be coming. The thing that I'm really struck by is that we talk a lot about hawks and doves. To use another bird analogy, Jerome Powell, as we all know, is a lame duck. He's not going to be the Fed chair for a third time. President Trump is going to nominate someone else, potentially sooner rather than later. So I think the big question is, if Powell is trying to cement his legacy, how cognizant is he going to remain of last year's arguable mistake in cutting rates aggressively because they were worried about some of the data? And then it turned out that inflation, kind of like, you know, the the, uh, guy in Monty Python who's saying, "I'm not dead, I'm not dead." Uh, it still is something that they have to worry about. So I do think that there's a chance Powell sounds a little bit more hawkish, and we can't cement that September rate cut just yet. It's going to be about the data, I think, more importantly, than anything Powell has to say tomorrow. Related Videos Rotation trade, US manufacturing, Fed speech: Market takeaways Walmart earnings: Markets 'missed the big picture,' analyst says Wall Street is bullish on Nvidia pre-earnings: Analyst explains Strategy & bitcoin volatility, HPE upgrade, Instacart downgrade Sign in to access your portfolio
