Detroit City Council mulls over increasing fines for parents whose children break curfew
"It's empowering parents to be able to have all the tools available to them, to be able to look out and watch out for their children," said Coleman A. Young II, city councilmember.
Currently, if a parent violates the law, the fines are a minimum of $75 for the first offense and $100 for a second.
If approved by the Detroit City Council, it would be raised to a minimum of $250 for a first offense and $500 for a second offense, which is the maximum amount allowed under state law.
"I need the fines to be increased so that I can have leverage when it comes to parents," said Detroit Police Chief Todd Bettison.
Data from Detroit police shows the city issued 122 curfew violations between July 8 and July 20, writing 68 parental responsibility tickets.
Graham Anderson with the city's law department says the amendment is decades overdue.
"We are not trying to criminalize overworked parents who the kid sneaks out of the house; that's not the purpose here," said Anderson.
Community members spoke out passionately on both sides of the argument, pushing for council accountability and more solutions.
"Some folks have mentioned that rights are being violated, but don't we have a right to a safe environment?" said one concerned resident.
"I believe this is just like ICE. They're going to target the kids at the schools with the curfew; they're going to come after the parents," added another resident at Monday's council meeting.
"Detroit has a real problem with youth-to-youth crime, and they need to find a way," said a resident. "This isn't going to end the issue, but it's going to at least help."
After more than an hour of discussion, the amendment was moved to Tuesday's meeting as new business, with Bettison also requesting a waiver that would allow for an immediate full council vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Mounts New Attack Against Wind Projects on Federal Land
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration is considering halting all wind development on federal lands and in federal waters as the president expands his campaign against the renewable energy source he's long criticized. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus Boston's Dumpsters Overflow as Trash-Strike Summer Drags On Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Tuesday ordered a comprehensive review of the agency's approval process for wind projects, including right-of-way authorizations, environmental analysis and wildlife permits. The order, which Burgum said aims to end preferential treatment for wind and solar, is sure to further spook renewables investors and developers already reeling from the administration's attack on clean energy. President Donald Trump, who was in Scotland Tuesday to open a second golf course at his sprawling estate in the eastern part of the country, criticized the UK's support for wind power and decried turbines as overly expensive eyesores. 'Windmills are a disgrace,' he said earlier in the day. 'They hurt everything they touch. They're ugly. They're very inefficient. It's the most expensive form of energy there is.' Trump, who fought against a wind project within view of his first golf course in Aberdeen, Scotland, indefinitely halted the sale of new offshore wind leases on his first day in office and paused permitting of all wind projects on federal lands and waters. More recently, the Interior Department ordered that all solar and wind projects on federal lands required Burgum's sign-off, a move that threatens to mire their approval process in red tape. In April, Burgum halted work on Equinor ASA's $5 billion Empire Wind farm off the coast of New York, but then reversed the decision a month later after the administration reached a deal with New York Governor Kathy Hochul to open the way for new gas pipelines to be built in the state. Torgrim Reitan, Equinor's chief financial officer, said in an interview last month that further investments in US offshore wind are likely off the table. Wind power backers criticized the latest move by the Interior Department, with the American Clean Power Association saying it amounts to 'a confusing mix of unprecedented requirements on wind projects.' 'On its current course, the Interior department will block electricity from the grid resulting in higher prices, lost jobs, and decreased system reliability,' Jason Grumet, the trade group's chief executive officer, said in a statement. 'The proposed federal interference with private economic activity is unprecedented and creates a troubling challenge for critical infrastructure investment of any kind.' --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Skylar Woodhouse. (Adds comment from trade group in last two paragraphs.) It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Administration Halts NIH From Issuing Any New Research Grants
The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), led by Director Russell Vought (C) seen here ... More with U.S. President Donald Trump (L), is reportedly blocking the National Institutes of Health from issuing any new funding to grantees and contractors. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) Things just got even tougher for science and scientists around the country and the countless patients and other people that their research could eventually benefit. For the past several months, many researchers in the U.S. have already had to deal with kind of a 'cancel culture' with their grants from the National Institutes of Health being abruptly held, cut or terminated if certain words, phrases or concepts appeared in them that didn't correspond with what the Trump Administration wanted. And now the Trump Administration is putting an immediate 'pause' on the NIH's ability to issue any new research grants, contracts or training awards to anyone outside the NIH. The OMB Blocks The NIH From Providing New Funding Yep, Angus Chen, Megan Molteni, and Anil Oza just reported for STAT how this directive came out of the White House Office of Management and Budget and was delivered as a four-sentence email to the directors of NIH institutes and centers on Tuesday afternoon. The email referred to a 'footnote' from the OMB regarding funding for the NIH and indicated that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 'has interpreted this footnote' to mean that new funding from the NIH would be prohibited for now but the NIH is 'working to make this limitation short-term and temporary.' That footnote could end up being quite a kick to the rears of grantees, awardees and contractors in universities, medical centers and other research organizations around the country. It looks like any researcher expecting to receive funds from the NIH through either new awards or renewals of current awards may have to wait for it, wait for it, wait until who knows what needs to happen. Neither the OMB nor the NIH have clarified what will happen and what needs to happen to make funding available again. (I am reaching out to contacts at HHS and NIH for further comment.) This situation basically further handcuffs the NIH's ability to use money that Congress already allocated to the NIH to use this fiscal year. It's kind of like of your parents giving you an allowance and then someone else saying, 'Oh you can't use that.' NIH Employees Prohibited From Spending Money On Purchases Or Travel The OMB footnote will do some further kicking to those working within the NIH as well. That is those still working within the NIH. Since U.S. President Donald Trump took office, there have been multiple waves of different Rs at the NIH. And these Rs haven't exactly been rest and relaxation. They've been rounds of resignations, retirements and RIFs—meaning reductions in force. The remaining NIH employees will reportedly not be able to spend any more money on purchases or travel until the end of the current government fiscal year, which will be September 30. Unspent NIH Funds Would Return To The U.S. Treasury After September 30 Speaking of the government fiscal year. Being only two months away from its end raises an even bigger concern. If this situation isn't 'short-term' and 'temporary' enough, it could soon become quite permanent. Once September 30 passes, money unspent by the NIH would automatically go back to the U.S. Treasury. So, in two months, researchers might have to sing 'bye-bye-bye' to the funding they thought they would receive. That certanly wouldn't be in sync with any of their staffing and scientific plans. This so-called 'temporary' situation could be a way of cutting NIH funding in a manner that bypasses Congress. This office of Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) has estimated that the funds currently hanging in the balance may total around $15 billion. NIH Funding Halt May Cause Even More Job Loss I've written previously in Forbes about how the cutting and canceling of research grants will cause job loss. Unless we've entered some other world in the multi-verse, that still hold. Many scientists depend on NIH funding to pay their own salaries and fringe benefits as well those of their research staffs. When it's not clear when and if expected funding will arrive, there's only so long researchers can hold on, in the words of Wilson Phillips, before they have to lay off people or even lose their own positions. And once a researcher or research staff member is lost, it can be tough to replace them. It's not as if you are simply looking for something to post something dumb on social media or be featured in the reality TV show 'Cheaters.' The U.S. doesn't have an unlimited supply of those with appropriate scientific talent, skills and drive. It can take a lot of time to find someone with the right stuff to fill a position. You can't simply tell the coaches or managers of the Los Angeles Dodgers, Philadelphia Eagles or Oklahoma City Thunder, 'Yeah, we know that you have been sort of successful. But we won't allow you to pay your players, so you are going to have to cut them. Oh, but don't worry, some day when you do have money, we aren't saying when and how, you can always find new players.' NIH Funding Halt Will Have Widespread Ramifcations On Health And The Economy If you don't do any scientific research and think this NIH funding halt won't affect you, think again. It's not as if the NIH funded researchers out there are spending their days posting random rants on social media. They are working hard, often day and night, on ways to prevent and treat different disease such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, cancer and a whole range of different infectious diseases, including those that may cause the 'p' word some day. Who knows how many lives will end being affected by these interruptions, disruptions and stoppages of such work? And no matter how healthy you think you are right now, no matter how much kombucha, eyes of newt or whatever you are consuming right now, you will run into health problems some day. You, your family members and your friends will. Trying to keep as many Americans as healthy as possible shouldn't be a political thing. More Americans being healthy longer would mean more Americans to work and produce for society longer. That should be a win-win situation. Or a win-win-win situation. More legit biomedical and health research as opposed to more let's-just-say-it-happens-woo-woo should help the economy as well. More science-backed stuff would mean more stable and sustainable health products and interventions that can form the basis of more sustainable businesses. Yet, this 'pause' in NIH funding is yet another blow to science, scientific research and all of the above. It should give everyone pause to think about what's really important for this country and whether things are headed in the right direction in U.S. After all, this latest 'temporary' situation with NIH may not end up being temporary at all.
Fox News
5 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump announces major Russia policy shift, threatens sanctions within days
Fox News senior strategic analyst Gen. Jack Keane (ret.) joins 'Fox & Friends' to break down President Donald Trump's new strategy on Russia as he seeks to end the war in Ukraine.
