
Wild history of jailed Kazakh ex-Premier's $3 mn mansion makes it a tough sell in a soft market
Kazakhstan
's state asset management company are facing a task that's as unusual as it's near impossible: selling a villa of the highest luxury.
The 2,878-square-meter (30,980-square-foot) house in the swankiest corner of the capital,
Astana
, flaunts over-the-top features that have become a hallmark of luxury properties around the world: A pool with a unique water feature, a dance club and a theater in addition to 30 rooms that include sleeping quarters with a rare four-person bed. And it was once owned by
Karim Massimov
, the nation's longest-serving prime minister who is now doing jail time for an attempted coup.
But even at $3 million, a 40% discount from its one-time valuation, the weight of recent Kazakh history is making it a very difficult sell. An auction was cancelled in May — the third attempt at a sale just this year — and the state asset company is now contemplating how to finally remove the property from its balance sheet.
Attracting luxury buyers to a city that, despite Kazakhstan's vast resources wealth, hasn't yet developed a reputation as a playground for billionaires, was always going to be a challenge. The highest echelon of the wealth pyramid is small in the country of 20 million and the richest Kazakhs are reluctant to invest in a market that's stalled.
The villa's lineage may be thinning the potential market even further.
Live Events
'It will be very difficult to sell the house openly as everyone would know who bought it,' said Eldar Shamsutdinov, head of the Almaty-based think tank Kommentariy. It is also 'irrational to freeze so much money in property. The Astana residential property market is overheated, the investment attractiveness has dropped, the pace of prices growth has slowed. Demand for multimillion properties is almost fully satisfied.'
Shining City on the Steppe
How the mansion's story is affecting the sales process is a reflection of Astana's evolution as the capital of a newly independent nation, erected to flaunt its energy wealth and as an ode to its ruler. The second-largest former Soviet republic after Russia quickly raced ahead of its neighbors to build central Asia's richest economy, thanks to its energy exports.
Nursultan Nazarbayev, who ruled the nation for almost 30 years after independence, envisioned a glimmering city rising dramatically from the Great Dala — the Kazakh steppe — in the middle of the country. In almost every way, it would serve as a contrast to the old capital, Almaty, nestled in the southern mountains near the borders with China and Kyrgyzstan. The location was chosen strategically to expand the central government's footprint in the country's north, where many of the Russian minority live and ties with Moscow are the strongest.
Nazarbayev was intricately involved in the planning and in the early stages of development was known to sketch his dream skyline on napkins. The city is peppered with buildings designed by international architects, following the leader's concepts. Around the wide, wind-swept boulevards, the eclectic highlights include an entertainment complex shaped like a tent (credited to Norman Foster), a circus that looks like flying saucer and high rises that seek to bring in folklore aesthetic. The city was renamed Nur-Sultan to honor the former leader by Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who followed Nazarbayev as president in 2019. That tribute soured after the coup attempt and the city returned to its previous name.
'Astana is the realization of Nazarbayev's personal ambition,' said Dosym Satpayev, the head of the consultancy Risk Assessment Group in Almaty. 'He wanted a larger place in history and considered it to be his brainchild.'
A construction boom followed the 1997 move as a metropolis of more than 1.5 million people sprang up in place of what was once a town of about 300,000. By 2008, when the villa was built, the bubble had burst as the global financial crisis clobbered local banks and brought lending growth to an abrupt halt. Kazakhstan eventually needed to restructure billions of dollars worth of debt and spent at least $18 billion to bail out its financial industry.
The country's prime minister during that turbulent time was Massimov, who was born in the future capital, then called Tselinograd. With an education that encompassed studies in Chinese, Arabic and economics, he taught at both Wuhan University and Columbia University in New York before a business career that included stints in Beijing and Hong Kong eventually took him to the highest levels of Kazakh banking.
As prime minister, Massimov cut a larger-than-life figure. He was known as one of the first in Kazakhstan's political elite to embrace social media and cultivated a network of friendly bloggers. Like some other post-Soviet politicians, Massimov also liked to flaunt his athletic prowess, sometimes spotted swimming or riding a bike in town. And he was also a well-known fixture of the Astana nightlife: A 2008 diplomatic cable released by Wikileaks describes him entertaining a group and dancing on a stage at the upscale club Chocolat, after drinks at the Radisson Hotel's cigar bar.
'Bloody January'
After two stints as prime minister, Massimov became the head of Kazakhstan's powerful national security apparatus. It was in that role that he got caught up in the 2022 unrest that became known as 'Bloody January.' The turmoil was the biggest threat to the country's stability since independence and was characterized as a coup attempt by the government. Massimov was arrested as an alleged instigator. In 2023, he was found guilty of high treason and sentenced to 18 years in prison and the confiscation of property.
In the aftermath, the state seized Massimov's assets, including the mansion in Astana. According to official filings, ownership of the house was transferred in 2009. The national security committee described the property as a 'gift' from 'a business structure.' When authorities took control, they found $17.2 million in cash, 'elite watches, gold bullions, antiques and much more,' according to a National Security Committee statement at the time.
To potential buyers, all that signaled not just a wealthy owner, but someone well connected with powerful allies across different strata of Kazakh society. And as political fortunes ebb and flow, it might be difficult to puzzle out just how a multimillion-dollar wager on such a high-profile property might play out now or in the future.
'People with big money are quite cautious,' said Satpayev at Risk Assessment Group. Without a clear succession plan for the current leadership, they may be 'fearing that there might be revanchism.'
Property Roller Coaster
For sure, it would be difficult to stay inconspicuous, even though the villa in the posh Karaotkel district remains hidden behind a wall more than two meters (6.6 feet) tall. The area, with its large park, swanky hotel and an upscale tennis center that once hosted Rafael Nadal, is also a symbol of Kazakhstan's growing wealth gap where bureaucrats and business people mingle with the new city's elite.
In the end, the state might decide to keep the property and convert it to a different use, like an administrative building or a kindergarten, according to Shamsutdinov at Kommentariy.
Through all the political upheaval, Astana's property market bounced back from the lows of the financial crisis, thanks to a series of government measures from mortgage subsidies to a program that redirected retirement savings to real estate.
By 2021, the market was showing signs of force as country-wide purchases jumped 97%, according to Halyk Finance research. Geopolitics intervened again as the ripple effects of the Russia sanctions over the invasion of Ukraine sparked a steep decline, only to be followed by a sharp bounce in rental prices as Russians fleeing mobilization swelled the city's population.
As of now, used-home prices are heading the other way again, dropping 1.9% this year through May, with nearly 12% inflation and a 16.5% benchmark interest rate cooling demand.
Housing has become a particularly sore spot for many Kazakhs. After all the shocks of the past decade, wages are stagnant and unemployment remains stubborn, sapping the property market from much-needed impetus. That dynamic makes selling a lavish and notorious villa an even more daunting proposition.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As Trump's fresh threats loom, India still has a slight tariff edge over China but loses advantage with Vietnam
Despite fresh tariff escalation threats and the prospect of higher duties under the new regime announced by US President Donald Trump that could take effect from August 7, India continues to have a relative advantage on a key metric being tracked by policymakers in New Delhi – the tariff differential with China. As on August 1, China had the highest effective tariff rate (ETR) of the US's major trading partners, with India with a comparative advantage of around 20 percentage points. While tariffs on China remain at 34 per cent, the total ETR inclusive of the tariff rate at the end of 2024 came to around 42 per cent, according to Fitch Ratings' updated ETR Monitor that reflects the July 27 and July 31 announcements of new reciprocal tariff rates for most trading partners of the US. While India is slightly over 21 per cent, according to the latest data, the overall effective tariff rate for the US across all its trading partners is now 17 per cent — about 8 percentage points lower than Fitch's ETR Monitor of April 3, 2025, when higher reciprocal tariffs were originally announced, but around 3 percentage points higher than the estimate at the end of June 2025. The ETR represents total duties as a percentage of total imports and changes, with shifts in import share by country of origin and product mix. With Vietnam, though, India now has lost a slight advantage in ETR terms after additional tariffs kicked in, as against an advantage up to end-2024. This is despite Trump's rhetoric against transhipped goods and his administration's efforts to neutralise China's supply bases in ASEAN. And going forward, given Trump's frustration with India on not agreeing to his terms for a deal, this disadvantage is likely to fester. That is likely to be the case till Delhi gets a deal of some kind with Washington DC, but the situation could, however, change for the worse going forward, with Trump warning Monday that he would raise the tariff on India 'substantially' for buying Russian oil. Amid all the upheaval thrown up by America's tariff action, the assumptions that the Indian policymaker had implicitly factored in include that Washington DC will maintain a differential of 10-20 per cent in tariffs between China and countries such as India; and that a trade deal with the US needs to be clinched precisely for ensuring the gap in tariffs between India and China is maintained, even with a limited early-harvest type of deal. New Delhi did back out at the last minute from signing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (a trade deal among Asia-Pacific countries including China) given the sensitivities of agri livelihoods. A higher-than-anticipated US tariff rate, especially on a comparative basis, could dent India's growth prospects, economists said. Though Trump did not specify the rate of penalty for India on account of Russian oil and defence imports, earlier statements made by Trump indicate that it could be to the tune of 100 per cent. This way, India stands to potentially lose the US tariff advantage vis-a-vis China at least till the time a deal is struck, even if Beijing, too, faces the same penalty for importing from Russia. China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India (just under 2 million a day) and Turkey. China had agreed to cut tariffs on US goods to 10 per cent from 125 per cent in May, while the US had agreed to lower tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent from 145 per cent. But with respect to Russian oil, Trump has been singling out India, while being largely silent on China. Given how talks between Indian and US negotiators have proceeded so far, an interim deal still seems distant and is unlikely to be clinched before September, with October a possible outer deadline. Indications are a sixth round of talks between the two negotiating teams will take discussions forward on August 25. India's government has asked it various ministries to come up with potential giveaways to sweeten the deal for the upcoming negotiations. Once the official level discussions wrap up, there is a sense that a final call on the deal could come down to a conversation between the two leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump. For India, the best-case scenario would be to get a deal of some sort now, and then build on that in the future negotiations that could run into 2026, experts said. The effective duty on Chinese products on a landed basis across US ports in commodity categories where Indian producers are reasonably competitive is being tracked constantly. The net tariff differential with India, and how that curve continues to move, is of particular interest here, given the belief that Washington DC would ensure a reasonable tariff differential between China and India. Officials said a 10-20 per cent differential is expected to tide over some of India's structural downsides — infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, high interest cost, the cost of doing business, corruption, etc. US and Chinese officials wrapped up two days of discussions in Stockholm last week, with no breakthrough announced. After the talks, China's top trade negotiator Li Chenggang declared that the two sides agreed to push for an extension of a 90-day tariff truce struck in mid-May, without specifying when and for how long this extension kicks in. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Unable to accept erosion of its dominance': After India, Russia hits back at US on inflated tariffs over oil trade
Days after Trump unveiled a new set of steep tariffs, Russia on Monday responded to the US administration for increasing tariffs and imposing sanctions on the country, accusing the government of using 'neocolonial' policy against specific countries to maintain Washington's hegemony. Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, in a statement, said no tariff wars or sanctions 'can halt the natural course of history'. Calling sanctions and restrictions a 'regrettable reality' of today's historical stage that affects the entire world, she said that the US is unable to come to terms with the 'loss of hegemony in the emerging world order.' 'Sanctions and restrictions have unfortunately become a defining feature of the current historical period, impacting countries across the globe. Unable to accept the erosion of its dominance in an emerging multipolar international order, Washington continues to pursue a neocolonial agenda, employing politically motivated economic pressure against those who choose an independent course on the international stage,' she said. Russia asserted in its statement that 'no tariff wars or sanctions can halt the natural course of history.' Zakharova further said that Russia will deepen in cooperation with countries of the Global South, and resist the 'unlawful unilateral sanctions.' The response issued by Russian Foreign Ministry came hours after India issued a strongly worded statement over US imposing inflated tariffs on New Delhi for indulging in trade with Moscow in the middle of the Russia-Ukraine war. (With inputs from PTI)


The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Figma sheds $11 billion in market value days after blockbuster IPO
Shares of Figma slumped 23% on profit taking on Monday, as euphoria over the design software firm waned days after its blockbuster initial public offering. San Francisco, California-based Figma shares had scored a massive 250% gain during their market debut on Thursday when they were priced at $33 but finished at $115.50, giving the company a market capitalisation of about $56.3 billion. Figma's market value closed at $59.5 billion on Friday after its shares rose 5.6% to $122. The shares traded as low as $92.75 on Monday, down 23%, reducing its market value to about $45.2 billion. "The excitement for Figma's business is not over, but the euphoria that's gone into its heady stock pricing seems to be deflating as those that wanted an early piece of the action bought in during market hours while some IPO recipients are probably taking sweet profits," said Michael Ashley Schulman, chief investment officer at Running Point Capital in Los Angeles. Founded in 2012 and led by CEO Dylan Field, Figma provides cloud-based collaborative design tools, with a roster of marquee clients including Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix and Uber. Field owns about 54.2 million Figma shares worth about $5 billion after selling 2.35 million shares in the IPO. As is common in many Silicon Valley startups, Field retains 74.1% voting power over Figma given his holdings of Class B shares. Adobe had abandoned a $20 billion deal to acquire Figma in 2023 following antitrust pushback from regulators in Europe and the UK. "With Figma at a $46 billion market capitalisation, Adobe's failed buyout offer must now seem like a distant memory," Schulman added.